my ideal job

[barcacel]

I was thinking in what would be my ideal job, well i think i got a good idea, a job where i would work in a factory of non-sentient female android robots, creating non-sentient female android robots in mass. I don't have a PhD (or won't have it by the time, we get the non-sentient androids), so i can't work as an engineer, creating the first models.
I got the idea from here:

Automation / Robotics Technician - Overnight - Job at Eppendorf Inc.

Would you like to work for a company who has made it its mission to make a contribution to improving human living conditions? With around 4,500 employee...

www.jobsinminneapolis.com

I might search for an overnight job:

Why you should sleep in the day if you have autism level 1, we people with autism level 1 are nocturnal animals and not diurnal animals

i post this here because, everyone on the Incelosphere is non-nt i always sleep with the lights on because my eyes open by themselves in the dark when i try to close them, i can see that my eyes are closed when i sleep with the lights on, i also get the feeling that something is watching i me...

incels.is

We will have non-sentient female android robots in 2032:

why we will have non-sentient female android robots in 2032 and reverse aging in 2052. Thread version 2.0

the most famous futurist called Ray Kurzweil made 300+ technology predictions in 1999 for 2009, 2010s, 2019, 2020s, 2029, 2030s, 2040s and 2045, as of today he got them all late but not wrong, i discovered why all his predictions are 1.52x late but right, he made an error, in 1999 he...

incels.is

 

[asdfghjqbbbb]

you have a job as an incel captain

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

I doubt we will have female robots by 2032

 

[Twinkcel]

Fuck my parents for not being rich.

 

[barcacel]

I doubt we will have female robots by 2032

you need to read my 2032 thread again, you also need to read the law of accelerating returns

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

you need to read my 2032 thread again, you also need to read the law of accelerating returns

I’m a skeptic

 

[barcacel]

I’m a skeptic

research the science of the law of accelerating returns and the sixth paradigm of computing then

 

[Gutless]

Your job is to make amusing posts for me to read.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

research the science of the law of accelerating returns and the sixth paradigm of computing then

I believe that, but I think the goal is further away than people think.

 

[barcacel]

I believe that, but I think the goal is further away than people think.

Ray Kurzweil has many PhDs, all of his predictions have becomed true if you take into account the death of the 5th paradigm slowing and the 1.52x method.

 

[LDARbeforeROPE]

Fuck my parents for not being rich.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Ray Kurzweil has many PhDs, all of his predictions have becomed true if you take into account the death of the 5th paradigm slowing and the 1.52x method.

 

[RandomGuy]

 

[barcacel]

View attachment 749340

sixth paradigm of computing:

3D stacked computer chips could make computers 1,000 times faster

A 3D computer architecture demonstrated by a team at Stanford University crams both CPU and memory into the same chip.

www.zmescience.com

 

[barcacel]

sixth paradigm of computing:

3D stacked computer chips could make computers 1,000 times faster

A 3D computer architecture demonstrated by a team at Stanford University crams both CPU and memory into the same chip.

www.zmescience.com

@Copexodius Maximus

Why Stacking Chips Like Pancakes Could Mean Faster, Cheaper Laptops

By packaging "chiplets" into a single, larger uberprocessor, Intel hopes to bring to the masses the kind of premium speeds found in Apple's M1 Ultra.

www.cnet.com

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

@Copexodius Maximus

View attachment 749366

Why Stacking Chips Like Pancakes Could Mean Faster, Cheaper Laptops

By packaging "chiplets" into a single, larger uberprocessor, Intel hopes to bring to the masses the kind of premium speeds found in Apple's M1 Ultra.

www.cnet.com

Interesting. Don’t have much to say about the future of chip shape, but even if we assume Moore’s Law I think female robots that will act like real humans and fuck us are too far away.

 

[ADHD_cel]

Fuck my parents for not being rich.

 

[barcacel]

Interesting. Don’t have much to say about the future of chip shape, but even if we assume Moore’s Law I think female robots that will act like real humans and fuck us are too far away.

that's because we are 10-15 years behind of where we are supposed to be technologically, because the change of paradigm, but we will go back to where we are supposed to be technologically when we get back to the trendline (sixth paradigm)

 

[barcacel]

Interesting. Don’t have much to say about the future of chip shape, but even if we assume Moore’s Law I think female robots that will act like real humans and fuck us are too far away.

you think that technology will keep increasing at the same rate as it did during 2013-2023, but you need to understand that technology is exponential and the slowing of the fifth death is not to be used to predict the future. Read about the law of accelerating returns. We will jump forward 10-15 years (or more) technologically when we get back to the trendline (sixth paradigm).

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

you think that technology will keep increasing at the same rate as it did during 2013-2023, but you need to understand that technology is exponential and the slowing of the fifth death is not to be used to predict the future. Read about the law of accelerating returns. We will jump forward 10-15 years (or more) technologically when we get back to the trendline (sixth paradigm).

View attachment 749372

Moore’s Law is exponential, so I still assumed that.

 

[barcacel]

Moore’s Law is exponential, so I still assumed that.

It stopped being exponential since 2012 (i explain why, on my 2032 thread), so you think that it's exponentially was very slow (the sixth paradigm will even create the exponentially that we didn't have, during the death of the fifth paradigm slowing)

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

It stopped being exponential since 2012 (i explain why, on my 2032 thread), so you think that it's exponentially was very slow (the sixth paradigm will even create the exponentially that we didn't have, during the death of the fifth paradigm slowing)

I didn’t know Moor’s Law hit a limit, I just assumed it kept doubling. The reason I assume what I do isn’t because I think there’s something wrong with the technological advancement, but rather there is an underestimation of how complex the brain actually is.

 

[barcacel]

I didn’t know Moor’s Law hit a limit, I just assumed it kept doubling. The reason I assume what I do isn’t because I think there’s something wrong with the technological advancement, but rather there is an underestimation of how complex the brain actually is.

there are already chatbots that act like humans, we don't need to emulate the brain, we just need to program the behavior of females in the non-sentient androids. Moore's law used to double every 18 months, but after 2012, it started to take longer and longer over time for moore's law to double:

View: https://youtu.be/19lZfObdAXs

the law has been basically dead since 2012 because, the law states that it doubles every 18 months, now we are just squeezing the last drops of juice that it has.

 

[barcacel]

i changed my mind, i would prefer a job where i would repair non-sentient female android robots instead because, i don't wanna end up in a factory job where i create other types of things that are not androids.