My comment on a semi anti-GG cuck video on youtube

[Cybersex is our hope]

GG was the final nail in the coffin that turned me from SJW hardcore leftist to anti-feminist and more and more right leaning by years (i'm with the social right now). It's just amazes me to no end how the feminist arguments seemed to perfect and linear yet they didn't matched up with my real experience (and that of many other guys). Than i discovered Karen Straughan and so on and it opened my mind and gave words to my inner feelings whose i weren't able to express. GG was great and it was basically a revolt of low status males against females who excluded them (us) in school, university, workplace, society and so on and that were attempting to ruin the world we fled into ( i was even bullied by girls when i was younger and stalked) through their obsession with "creating a better videogame world" lol, you just wanna make it "female oriented" bitch, don't try to fool me again. Also, as stated, you don't have to criticize a fucking hobby for its "patriarchic messages". It uses those messages since they appeal to our biological archetype/unconscious and make the game fun af (this is why we don't like to "question" them). You want your videogame? Go make one without having to pay reporters to say it's good when it's not. And no, by "making one" i'm not suggesing you ruin a franchise or a series or even historical memory and facts (battlefield V much?) only to bitch when we say it sucks asses and make it go broke. Really, you are more and more a minority and should start behaving as one. Your ideology failed. Your ideology never made peace with human nature and inner desires (and i mean marxism: be it revolutionary marxism or progressive/reformist/soc-dem marxism. The goal is the same and so is the attitude.) In the 20th century you failed economically now you are failing culturally. At least accept your failure, keep voicing your opinions if you want, you have the right to do so, but sto being smug, censorous, arrogant and know-it-all patronizing others. It only make people hate you more since you are not in the position to do so in regards to the functionality of your ideology


You can find it in the video "Anita sarkeesian and the people who hate her" From youtuber "Big joel"

Tell me what you think about it

 

[Lubricure]

Your comment is based, for example those cucks should address the indoctrination of children with sexualized messages and their wifey having le sexy times with chad, not worrying about video games, which are mostly copes available for purchase. Moreover, playing a videogame doesn´t necessarily bring a supposedly bad behaviour in real life, they are merchandise that allows to release pent up stress.

Stupid femcucks point the finger to the splinter in someone's eye, but they conveniently forget about the baobab stuck in their asses.
I have never seen a "good" feminist game, but I have always seen games and franchises scarred by feministing their content to appease SJWs and roasties.

 

[AnimalofPrey]

gg==

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Your comment is based, for example those cucks should address the indoctrination of children with sexualized messages and their wifey having le sexy times with chad, not worrying about video games, which are mostly copes available for purchase. Moreover, playing a videogame doesn´t necessarily bring a supposedly bad behaviour in real life, they are merchandise that allows to release pent up stress.

Stupid femcucks point the finger to the splinter in someone's eye, but they conveniently forget about the baobab stuck in their asses.
I have never seen a "good" feminist game, but I have always seen games and franchises scarred by feministing their content to appease SJWs and roasties.

They can't come to terms with the basic fact that even children do prefer traditional gender roles and that if let free they develop more conservative than their parents

gg==

I didn't become redpilled only with gg but it was a gradual path. High iq comment however

 

[jerrycan dan]

I am amazed that people getting mad over gaming contributed to them actively thinking modern liberal leftism is bullshit, as opposed to looking around at the world outside their doorstep (which they are sheltering themselves from for a reason) and thinking about how bad everything is.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

I am amazed that people getting mad over gaming contributed to them actively thinking modern liberal leftism is bullshit, as opposed to looking around at the world outside their doorstep (which they are sheltering themselves from for a reason) and thinking about how bad everything is.

I was in my late teens/ early 20's. This was my way to interact with the world

 

[BlkPillPres]

I am amazed that people getting mad over gaming contributed to them actively thinking modern liberal leftism is bullshit, as opposed to looking around at the world outside their doorstep (which they are sheltering themselves from for a reason) and thinking about how bad everything is.

I was in my late teens/ early 20's. This was my way to interact with the world

JFL at the Karen Straughan part in your post (le female antifeminst, le "standing with us"). Like I keep saying, all women are feminists, all these so called anti-feminist women conveniently still use and enjoy all the perks that feminism has created for them, while publicly professing - "were not like those evil feminist meanies, yes we still choose mates hypergamously, yes we can still divorce you and take 50% of your wealth, yes we can and some of us have had abortions, but hey, at least were against these things publicly"

You've fallen for the BS, I don't care about words, I care about actions, and its very ironic for women to be at the forefront of a men's rights movements where LITERALLY what caused the problems creating the movement were women having too much power and/or say over how society operates, its so ironic and ridiculous, they are attempting to solve the problem of female empowerment, by empowering women to argue against female empowerment, bravo MRA's, makes perfect sense.

The MRA is one of the most blue pilled BS groups in existence, they have yet to accept the black pill, accepting the enemy into your camp and expecting significant progress in your goals is ridiculous, but they don't even have the right goals to begin with, nothing they are advocating for is going to:

1. Lower female SMV
2. Reduced the influence of the female power structure

Those are the things we need to do, and advocating for "fathers rights" doesn't do shit about those ROOT PROBLEMS that are causing the other outlying problems that affect men's lives and leads to fathers having diminished rights, they are attacking sideline points rather than the core issues because they are so cucked and blue pilled they are afraid to admit that WOMEN ARE OUR ENEMIES.

Our mating strategies are diametrically opposed, we are by nature against eachother, a society that favors the male mating strategy (patriacrhy) will primarily benefit men, and actually the human collective as a whole, a society that favors the female mating strategy (modern secular society) will primarily benefit women, and WOMEN ONLY, because men will begin to opt out of society, and male productivity will begin to fall dramatically, and men are the work force of the species.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

JFL at the Karen Straughan part in your post (le female antifeminst, le "standing with us"). Like I keep saying, all women are feminists, all these so called anti-feminist women conveniently still use and enjoy all the perks that feminism has created for them, while publicly professing - "were not like those evil feminist meanies, yes we still choose mates hypergamously, yes we can still divorce you and take 50% of your wealth, yes we can and some of us have had abortions, but hey, at least were against these things publicly"

You've fallen for the BS, I don't care about words, I care about actions, and its very ironic for women to be at the forefront of a men's rights movements where LITERALLY what caused the problems creating the movement were women having too much power and/or say over how society operates, its so ironic and ridiculous, they are attempting to solve the problem of female empowerment, by empowering women to argue against female empowerment, bravo MRA's, makes perfect sense.

The MRA is one of the most blue pilled BS groups in existence, they have yet to accept the black pill, accepting the enemy into your camp and expecting significant progress in your goals is ridiculous, but they don't even have the right goals to begin with, nothing they are advocating for is going to:

1. Lower female SMV
2. Reduced the influence of the female power structure

Those are the things we need to do, and advocating for "fathers rights" doesn't do shit about those ROOT PROBLEMS that are causing the other outlying problems that affect men's lives and leads to fathers having diminished rights, they are attacking sideline points rather than the core issues because they are so cucked and blue pilled they are afraid to admit that WOMEN ARE OUR ENEMIES.

Our mating strategies are diametrically opposed, we are by nature against eachother, a society that favors the male mating strategy (patriacrhy) will primarily benefit men, and actually the human collective as a whole, a society that favors the female mating strategy (modern secular society) will primarily benefit women, and WOMEN ONLY, because men will begin to opt out of society, and male productivity will begin to fall dramatically, and men are the work force of the species.

In the same comment you managed to be so high iq but also so low iq.
High iq in regards to analyzing how trad cons and mra address side problems (that won't even be problems any longer since from millennial generation and on marriage will decrease due to hypergamy more and more) and how they play the same feminist cards by accusing you of being mysogynistic to make them notice their bluepillery
Low iq in not understanding i came from a SJW mindset and my redpilling (and sometimes blackpilling) was a gradual path. GG was a good hit but i still had some bluepill in me that i rejected gradually after my first pseudo-experience hanging out with a pseudo gf and who said very nasty things about male dicks and threatened me online.
It was gradual and led me where i am now: thinking the vast majority of women shouldn't have the right to vote or be economically independent for the good of EVERYONE.

PS: I don't see women as literal enemies, quite much like metaphorical ones; they are cold selectors and prefer seeing us die than help us just to select the best genes. We have to upset them, control them and even make them very angry and repressed in order to get them to respect us in the long run deep down. It's a perpetual natural selection they act on us