"misandry doesn't exist. women are not raping and killing men." THATS NOT MISANDRY YOU DUMBFUCKS

[blackpillednigga]

MISANDRY IS NOT REVERSE "MISOGYNY." MISANDRY IS INTENTIONAL SEXUAL DEPPREVATION, PASSIVE AGGRESSIVENESS FOR BEING A MAN, CONSTANTLY BEING FEARED AS A "CREEP", WOMEN CONVINCING SIMPS TO BEAT YOU UP FOR BEING UGLY. ATLEAST WITH MISOGYNY WHEN WOMEN ARE RAPED IT'S OUT OF LOVE BY THE OPPOSITE SEX. MEANWHILE WOMEN WOULD NEVER RAPE MEN BECAUSE MOST MEN ARE UNDESIRABLE TO THEM.

MISANDRY = WOMEN SEXUALLY DEPRIVING US AND WANTING US TO DIE ALONE

MISOGYNY = MEN EXPRESSING INTENSE AND DANGEROUS LOVE TO WOMEN OUT OF MENTAL ILLNESS RATHER THAN HATE

 

[DarkSneezer]

They won't get it bro, foids only care for themselves. Foids, as retarded as they are in many ways, are masterful manipulators. They've made everyone hate me my whole life. That's misandry

 

[Grodd]

Misandry is everywhere yet it is socially acceptable fucking clown world

 

[SwiftQuill]

*girl in videogame with big boobs*

"OMG this is so sexist and misogynist and it promotes rape and objectifies women"

"Hey you know us men also struggle and we have our own problems in life. We don't need this misandry.

"HOW DARE you say misandry? Have you ever been raped or are afraid of being raped like we women are?? SHUT UP"

Their definition of misogyny is so generous that it includes bullshit stuff like gender pay gap, female beauty standards, and female characters in videogames, bullshit innocent abstract stuff. Everything is misogyny.

But their definition of misandry is so hypocritical, so narrow, that you can literally say out loud "I hate men" and falsely send men to prison for rape, and to them that's still not misandry. Literally hating men isn't misandry.

Heads I win tails you lose is feminist logic.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

The way feminists endlessly repeat that as a "gotcha" argument makes me feel like I should promote this more.

In addition, differences in adversarial sexual beliefs across sites significantly predicted both forced and verbal sexual coercion for both genders, such that greater levels of hostility towards women at a site predicted higher levels of forced and verbal coercion against women and greater levels of hostility towards men at a site predicted higher levels of forced and verbal coercion against men.

Predictors of Sexual Coercion Against Women and Men: A Multilevel, Multinational Study of University Students

38 sites across 20 nations showing a clear trend of negative attitudes toward both men and women leading to more sexual coercion against them from the opposite sex, even more than their relative status, heavily implying that you could have massive numbers of women raping men even in highly "male-dominated" societies, if misandry there were strong enough.

 

[Balding Subhuman]

Women are physically weaker than men so they couldn't even kill men. Most often women parade around this fact that they aren't killing men as some sort of a moral highground, when they are actually just weaklings who couldn't even do it.

It would be kind of like arguing that children are more moral than adults because children don't kill their parents at the same rate as parents kill their children. Well duh.

Its honestly the same thing with rape, women tout it like its a badge of honor on their chest, meanwhile they don't even find 99% of men attractive and they wouldn't even have the physical prowess to even rape a man.

38 sites across 20 nations showing a clear trend of negative attitudes toward both men and women leading to more sexual coercion against them from the opposite sex, even more than their relative status, heavily implying that you could have massive numbers of women raping men even in highly "male-dominated" societies, if misandry there were strong enough.

Not to mention most of cases of men being raped by women will never find the light of day, since most men would never go to the police and tell such thing had happened. Would he even be believed? Would people ridicule him? Its the same thing with domestic violence. Vast majority of these cases of violence against men go unnoticed, thus they don't end up in data. Therefore women and feminists get to parade around this falsehood of being morally superior to men.

 

[Leonardo Part V]

Women are physically weaker than men so they couldn't even kill men. Most often women parade around this fact that they aren't killing men as some sort of a moral highground, when they are actually just weaklings who couldn't even do it.

It would be kind of like arguing that children are more moral than adults because children don't kill their parents at the same rate as parents kill their children. Well duh.

Its honestly the same thing with rape, women tout it like its a badge of honor on their chest, meanwhile they don't even find 99% of men attractive and they wouldn't even have the physical prowess to even rape a man.


Not to mention most of cases of men being raped by women will never find the light of day, since most men would never go to the police and tell such thing had happened. Would he even be believed? Would people ridicule him? Its the same thing with domestic violence. Vast majority of these cases of violence against men go unnoticed, thus they don't end up in data. Therefore women and feminists get to parade around this falsehood of being morally superior to men.

Most men would enjoy being "raped" by the average woman. Being rejected and ostracized by the opposite sex is what really stings in a male. We are reverse-raped every single day.

 

[blackpillednigga]

Most men would enjoy being "raped" by the average woman. Being rejected and ostracized by the opposite sex is what really stings in a male. We are reverse-raped every single day.

yeah. the gendered-reversed moral equivalent of rape to a woman by a man would be if women denied sex with men

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Women are physically weaker than men so they couldn't even kill men. Most often women parade around this fact that they aren't killing men as some sort of a moral highground, when they are actually just weaklings who couldn't even do it.

It would be kind of like arguing that children are more moral than adults because children don't kill their parents at the same rate as parents kill their children. Well duh.

The murders thing is pretty funny when you look at the actual numbers instead of percentages. The differences are nowhere near as drastic when you look at the right contexts.

Women and feminists in general love to tout how evil men are by pointing out that most women are killed by their partners, while less than 10% of men are, but that's because so many murders are male-on-male and happening in male-only contexts (all-male friend groups, gang warfare, and so on). Look solely at partner killings, and the gap gets much smaller than it is in general.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1jpn8up/misandry_annoys_misogyny_kills_debunked/



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1iz4qs0/in_the_70s_rates_of_domestic_violence_homicide/


Even if we handwave all of this away as just women killing their abusers in self-defense, as feminists do, there's also the fact that there's a similar trend in opposite-sex siblicide (killing of a sibling) which no one really talks about, but it's apparently true. Most siblicides are brothers killing brothers, but in the opposite-sex ones, there seems to be a 2:1 ratio with brothers only twice as likely to kill sisters as the reverse, despite men commiting 90%+ of murders pretty much everywhere on Earth.

A surprisingly small gap in the numbers of brothers killing sisters and sisters killing brothers in at least some studies

I've been going through this article about siblicide (killing of one's sibling) today and found some interesting numbers in the section talking about gender as a factor. Siblicide: The psychology of sibling homicide. Walsh and Krienert (2014) found the following pattern regarding siblicide...

incels.is

Men are supposedly unstoppable murder machines just cutting down women all around them, yet the data consistently shows that in relation to the women closest to them (wives/girlfriends and sisters) they are less likely to kill them than they should be given general homicide rates, and in fact the differences between boyfriends/brothers killing girlfriends/sisters and vice versa are often lower than differences between various ethnicities's chances of killing each other, for example.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

Men are also not raping and killing women. Misogyny, as they describe it, simply doesn't exist. There are more false than real accusations, ffs.

 

[rapetorturekill]

They won't get it bro, foids only care for themselves. Foids, as retarded as they are in many ways, are masterful manipulators. They've made everyone hate me my whole life. That's misandry

 

[OmegaRicecel]

Just a reminder that chad is the one that perpetrates most of these crimes, not incels, who as our namesake describes, don’t even have a chance to commit these crimes because fouds don’t even as much as talk to us

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

MISANDRY IS NOT REVERSE "MISOGYNY." MISANDRY IS INTENTIONAL SEXUAL DEPPREVATION, PASSIVE AGGRESSIVENESS FOR BEING A MAN, CONSTANTLY BEING FEARED AS A "CREEP", WOMEN CONVINCING SIMPS TO BEAT YOU UP FOR BEING UGLY. ATLEAST WITH MISOGYNY WHEN WOMEN ARE RAPED IT'S OUT OF LOVE BY THE OPPOSITE SEX. MEANWHILE WOMEN WOULD NEVER RAPE MEN BECAUSE MOST MEN ARE UNDESIRABLE TO THEM.

MISANDRY = WOMEN SEXUALLY DEPRIVING US AND WANTING US TO DIE ALONE

MISOGYNY = MEN EXPRESSING INTENSE AND DANGEROUS LOVE TO WOMEN OUT OF MENTAL ILLNESS RATHER THAN HATE

Actually women are raping and killing and they get away with that

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Just a reminder that chad is the one that perpetrates most of these crimes, not incels, who as our namesake describes, don’t even have a chance to commit these crimes because fouds don’t even as much as talk to us

Foids do crimes also and they get away with that

 

[SmhChan]

1. If Misandry doesn't exist, why do foids make false sexual assault allegations?
2. If Misandry doesn't exist, why do foids commit paternity frauds?
3. If Misandry doesn't exist, why do foids support alimony (practically stealing)?
4. If Misandry doesn't exist, why do foids threaten men's livelihood when mean things are said about them by men?
5. If Misandry doesn't exist, why do foids get away with murder?

I didn't list anything that has anything to do with immorality. The above ones are literally heinous crimes that have been legalized over the years. Of course, misandry doesn't exist when misandry is legalized.

 

[SmhChan]

The way feminists endlessly repeat that as a "gotcha" argument makes me feel like I should promote this more.



Predictors of Sexual Coercion Against Women and Men: A Multilevel, Multinational Study of University Students

38 sites across 20 nations showing a clear trend of negative attitudes toward both men and women leading to more sexual coercion against them from the opposite sex, even more than their relative status, heavily implying that you could have massive numbers of women raping men even in highly "male-dominated" societies, if misandry there were strong enough.

Sadly, people don't care about theories and moral implications. They care about the bottom line (men collectively killing more foids), which in all honesty cannot be debated.

 

[Mixedcel59]

Most Men kill other Men, not Women, as for rape, most of the Men who commit rape have previous partners and the stats are exaggerated beyond belief by Women who think that 99% of the population of Women have been raped.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Sadly, people don't care about theories and moral implications. They care about the bottom line (men collectively killing more foids), which in all honesty cannot be debated.

I'd say it's more so just them looking for an excuse to hate on men and make women seem saintly, since that's how people already feel about the genders, the statistics are just an excuse. You have lots of groups of people who kill each other at more unequal rates for example, but nobody cares about those differences, since it's only men vs. women where you have one groups universally liked by society (and not even really seen as being capable of being evil) and another universally disliked.

 

[SmhChan]

I'd say it's more so just them looking for an excuse to hate on men and make women seem saintly, since that's how people already feel about the genders, the statistics are just an excuse.

Oh! I know, obviously. According to CDC, average homicide rate per 100k in US is 6.9, and if it's only male-on-female homicides, the number goes down significantly. It's such a tiny percent of the male population that commits crimes that it's laughable. "They" just don't care about other factors. They just narrow it down to only a few things that serve their hatred of men.

I also think they bank on the pre-conceived notion that men would commit violence against foids if not under the laws because of all the war-crime rapes men have committed. In which case, I'd say it's not very different from all the crimes foids have legalized like, killing babies or aborting with half-assed excuses, alimony, fascist family-court laws, false SA allegations without any consequences, banning paternity check, and many more.

You have lots of groups of people who kill each other at more unequal rates for example, but nobody cares about those differences, since it's only men vs. women where you have one groups universally liked by society (and not even really seen as being capable of being evil) and another universally disliked.

Yeah. There was this MRA roastie who was giving the excuse that this foid-favoring shit is just 'le evil and powerful men' pushing it from behind the scenes just to "garner votes", completely absolving foids. JFL.

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

Just a reminder that chad is the one that perpetrates most of these crimes, not incels, who as our namesake describes, don’t even have a chance to commit these crimes because fouds don’t even as much as talk to us

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

I also think they bank on the pre-conceived notion that men would commit violence against foids if not under the laws because of all the war-crime rapes men have committed. In which case, I'd say it's not very different from all the crimes foids have legalized like, killing babies or aborting with half-assed excuses, alimony, fascist family-court laws, false SA allegations without any consequences, banning paternity check, and many more.

True, and even in that former case, let's not forget this.

(New Study) Percentage of female frontline combatants has no or insignificant effect on the amount of sexual violence a militant group commits

You guys know about the article about how, in DR Congo, 40% of women and 10% of men who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by armed fighters said that the person who assaulted them was a woman? https://world.time.com/2013/12/03/congos-forgotten-curse-epidemic-of-female-on-female-rape/...

incels.is

 

[anglocelticcel]

Misandry is everywhere yet it is socially acceptable fucking clown world

Get leftists to fight for WEF globalists