Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Men are Monogamous, Women aren't

Overdosed

Overdosed

"Grass" said she has a BF
★★
Joined
May 25, 2021
Posts
598
If you been following my threads about women and monogamy, you may've noticed that I hardly mention oxytocin. This supposed neglect to explore the hormone may come across as exposing a bias to this series, but that's further from the truth. The topic deserves a thread of its own.

Oxytocin is the hormone that been shown to encourage bonding in mothers. It's likely the primary motive why monogamous females want to cohabitant with their male partners. And the hormones peaks during copulation and orgasm.
Plasma OT levels increased during sexual arousal in both women and men and were significantly higher during orgasm/ejaculation than during prior baseline testing. We suggest that the temporal pattern of secretion could be related to smooth muscle contractions of the reproductive system during orgasm.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3782434/

It's found in monogamous voles, gibbons, diks-diks, wolves, etc. even in humans
In the Prairie voles, oxytocin released into the brain of the female during sexual activity is important for forming a monogamous pair bond with her sexual partner.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183515/
Oxytocin has been best known for its roles in female reproduction. It is released in large amounts during labor, and after stimulation of the nipples. It is a facilitator for childbirth and breastfeeding.

recent studies have begun to investigate oxytocin's role in various behaviors, including orgasm, social recognition, bonding, and maternal behaviors.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22029018/

However it's been demonstrated despite having this pair-bonding hormone, virtually all females that are classified as monogamous engage in extra-pair copulations and many of them labor extra-pair young.
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._Its_incidence_in_human_and_animal_population
Although, gibbons can still be characterized as monogamous, the observations in this study suggest a more flexible reproductive strategy for gibbons than expected from earlier descriptions of an obligate monogamy, where sexual intercourse occurs exclusively between pair-mates.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00319.x

The egalitarian objection to this is to say both sexes have practiced infidelity, therefore men are just as genetically non-monogamous as women. On a psychological and biological level, it's not equivalent.

We know that oxytocin facilitates bonding with mothers' and their child, in fact, this is true for every child they birthed. From a neurological standpoint, women's brains are well suited to have deep multiple bonds to those who give them strong pulses of oxytocin.
Men on the other hand, oxytocin increases monogamous tenancies for primarily his partner, even it comes from another source.
the participants [who were given sprays of exogenous oxytocin] gave their partners significantly higher attractiveness and arousal ratings than other either unfamiliar or familiar women.

For men in a relationship, increased endogenous OXT signaling in the brain following experience of proximity, social support, intimate contact, or sex with their romantic partner might make these behaviors even more rewarding via an engagement of related neurocircuitry.
https://www.pnas.org/content/110/50/20308

In light of this, you could make the argument if a man cheats on his wife and orgasms, the oxytocin will trigger his brain to want to return to his partner, while if a woman cheats and orgasms, the oxytocin will make her form a bound with whoever she cheated with. Men are more likely to feel guilty about it as well. Additionally, it's the long-term, male mates who pay the price if the women is fertilized by the short-term mates, evolutionarly, socially, and financially.

And it has been well established that women have desire for extra-pair mates, and for more likely to orgasm with them. Those who think that increasing the chances of women orgasming would result them with more monogamous leanings from the oxytocin is ludicrous in the face of the data. When you also read personal testimonies why wives/gfs cheat, often they summarize as 'I had orgasms [with their SOs] and I love him, but...' etc. etc. etc.

Vasopressin, another hormone associated with monogamy, makes men more loyal (in general), but it's released in largest amounts during sexual activity, particularly during erection (this is why men also tend to cheat when they drink alcohol, and why too much causes whiskey dick).

Vasopressin, secreted during the arousal phase, is linked to male drive for sexual expression males release vasopressin during copulation, which is crucial for inter-male aggression and mate-guarding. Vasopressin is also associated with male persistency for sexual behavior.
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...c/Gender-differences-in-sexual-motivation.pdf
In males there is clear evidence that the peptide arginine vasopressin (AVP) plays a significant role in the formation of the pair bond of the male for its mate. AVP is structurally related to OT, differing from OT in only two amino acids.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK97287/

How vasopressin reacts with women is the polar opposite. It causes them to be less sexually incline to their long-term partner in favour being promiscuous and commit infidelity with short-term partners.

All these observations are reflective as we see in self-reports
If men aren't sexually satisfied (for instance, if their spouse declines sex often), they take that rejection to heart, and it can easily translate to feeling "unloved."
https://www.verywellmind.com/why-married-people-cheat-2300656
For women, infidelity is thought to be driven more by emotional needs and is most likely when they are not satisfied in their marital relationship, especially when it is not a partnership of equals.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201207/promise-promiscuity
Remember what kind of men women have extra-pair copulation with for "emotional needs". They're not typically emotionally supportive, loyal or even socially stable.

Whenever heterosexual couples deprive the men of regular sexual activities, they subconsciously feel less attached to their female partners as their AVP and OXT levels start to decline. (The female partners become more similar to the men's mothers than lovers at that point.)
As we all know, men are usually available for sexual engagement, and it's the women within modern couples who determines if such activities are permitted. In other words, whether women or men partakes in infidelity, it's often the outcome from the women of the relationships' desires & decisions, even when it wasn't their intention.
So, cucks/simps, beating yourself when your whore SO 'surprisingly' cheats on you will never solve anything and they always will blame the affair on you, but after knowing it'll eventually happen, then yes, it's on you.


After reading the evidence, females and oxytocin are irrelevant in terms of actual monogamy -not “““““““social monogamy””””” which is form of parasitism. When a man and woman cheats, it's not the equivalent (still don't think either should partake in it, but that never mattered), so this genetically don't support anyone's egalitarian philosophy.

Women are attached to whoever induces a flood of oxytocin in their brains (regardless if it's caused by their LTR partners or not), while OXT increases men's attraction specifically to their partners. Vasopressin is the main motivator for monogamy in males. Meanwhile, AVP in females incites aggression and infidelity towards their long-term mates as a small part of their dual mating strategy, which they're programmed to adhere.

It doesn't matter if you're a chad or not, if you're in or plan to be in a relationship with a woman, as a male you're a simp & a cuck. And if you still wish to pursue one after evaluating all this evidence, once your gf betrays you, you genuinely deserve the pain. It's like holding a wild scorpion and trusting it to not sting you. :feelsUgh:

Our patriarchal forefathers likely knew about all of this and purposely gated women's nature for the prosperity of civilization, but the west has taken their common sense as acts of hatred.:society: Now everyone will suffer in the long term.

This concludes the end of my relationship/monogamy/parasitepill (whatever you want to call it) series. I encourage the mods to add a similar conclusion of them in their blackpill science wiki, if they're so inclined to.
I appreciate all of you for taking your time reading these. :feelsYall:
 
Last edited:
brutal blackpill @epillepsy thot(
 
brutal blackpill @epillepsy thot(
something we all knew but good to see studies on the chemical process of whoredom.
on an individual level, woman cheat far more often than men.
but they all fuck one or two chads, so the numbers even out.
 

That may be the case, but as my series demonstrated, women won't be even loyal to one Chad.

@TheProphetMuscle
@youthislife
@Sadandangrycel
@Oldcelloner38
@Mecoja
@Loner94
@Draestyn
Thoughts on the topic? Looks like monogamy only exists really in men.
 
No they are not, men with options will fuck and cheat as much as they can. Both men and women are sluts.
 
No they are not, men with options will fuck and cheat as much as they can. Both men and women are sluts.

this. no matter how many far-fetched conclusions are done off countless studies the truth is that a chad/high smv males will cheat and get as many partner as he can, what can happens is a slow-down as he approximates towards experiencing effects of aging.
 
Last edited:
Fascinating studies. Thanks for posting.
this. no matter how many far-fetched conclusions are done off countless studies the truth is that a chad/high smv males will cheat and get as many partner as he can, what can happens is a slow-down as he approximates towards experiencing effects of aging.
That's probably because chad is experiencing low oxytocin release. The amount of oxytocin men release during sex varies from man to man. It is not the same across each man. Men who are naturally monogamous experience large oxytocin releases whereas men wired towards promiscuity probably don't experience an oxytocin release.
 
If you been following my threads about women and monogamy, you may've noticed that I hardly mention oxytocin. This supposed neglect to explore the hormone may come across as exposing a bias to this series, but that's further from the truth. The topic deserves a thread of its own.

Oxytocin is the hormone that been shown to encourage bonding in mothers. It's likely the primary motive why monogamous females want to cohabitant with their male partners. And the hormones peaks during copulation and orgasm.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3782434/

It's found in monogamous voles, gibbons, diks-diks, wolves, etc. even in humans

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183515/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22029018/

However it's been demonstrated despite having this pair-bonding hormone, virtually all females that are classified as monogamous engage in extra-pair copulations and many of them labor extra-pair young.
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._Its_incidence_in_human_and_animal_population

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00319.x

The egalitarian objection to this is to say both sexes have practiced infidelity, therefore men are just as genetically non-monogamous as women. On a psychological and biological level, it's not equivalent.

We know that oxytocin facilitates bonding with mothers' and their child, in fact, this is true for every child they birthed. From a neurological standpoint, women's brains are well suited to have deep multiple bonds to those who give them strong pulses of oxytocin.
Men on the other hand, oxytocin increases monogamous tenancies for primarily his partner, even it comes from another source.

https://www.pnas.org/content/110/50/20308

In light of this, you could make the argument if a man cheats on his wife and orgasms, the oxytocin will trigger his brain to want to return to his partner, while if a woman cheats and orgasms, the oxytocin will make her form a bound with whoever she cheated with. Men are more likely to feel guilty about it as well. Additionally, it's the long-term, male mates who pay the price if the women is fertilized by the short-term mates, evolutionarly, socially, and financially.

And it has been well established that women have desire for extra-pair mates, and for more likely to orgasm with them. Those who think that increasing the chances of women orgasming would result them with more monogamous leanings from the oxytocin is ludicrous in the face of the data. When you also read personal testimonies why wives/gfs cheat, often they summarize as 'I had orgasms [with their SOs] and I love him, but...' etc. etc. etc.

Vasopressin, another hormone associated with monogamy, makes men more loyal (in general), but it's released in largest amounts during sexual activity, particularly during erection (this is why men also tend to cheat when they drink alcohol, and why too much causes whiskey dick).


https://www.researchgate.net/profil...c/Gender-differences-in-sexual-motivation.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK97287/

How vasopressin reacts with women is the polar opposite. It causes them to be less sexually incline to their long-term partner in favour being promiscuous and commit infidelity with short-term partners.

All these observations are reflective as we see in self-reports

https://www.verywellmind.com/why-married-people-cheat-2300656

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201207/promise-promiscuity
Remember what kind of men women have extra-pair copulation with for "emotional needs". They're not typically emotionally supportive, loyal or even socially stable.

Whenever heterosexual couples deprive the men of regular sexual activities, they subconsciously feel less attached to their female partners as their AVP and OXT levels start to decline. (The female partners become more similar to the men's mothers than lovers at that point.)
As we all know, men are usually available for sexual engagement, and it's the women within modern couples who determines if such activities are permitted. In other words, whether women or men partakes in infidelity, it's often the outcome from the women of the relationships' desires & decisions, even when it wasn't their intention.
So, cucks/simps, beating yourself when your whore SO 'surprisingly' cheats on you will never solve anything and they always will blame the affair on you, but after knowing it'll eventually happen, then yes, it's on you.


After reading the evidence, females and oxytocin are irrelevant in terms of actual monogamy -not “““““““social monogamy””””” which is form of parasitism. When a man and woman cheats, it's not the equivalent (still don't think either should partake in it, but that never mattered), so this genetically don't support anyone's egalitarian philosophy.

Women are attached to whoever induces a flood of oxytocin in their brains (regardless if it's caused by their LTR partners or not), while OXT increases men's attraction specifically to their partners. Vasopressin is the main motivator for monogamy in males. Meanwhile, AVP in females incites aggression and infidelity towards their long-term mates as a small part of their dual mating strategy, which they're programmed to adhere.

It doesn't matter if you're a chad or not, if you're in or plan to be in a relationship with a woman, as a male you're a simp & a cuck. And if you still wish to pursue one after evaluating all this evidence, once your gf betrays you, you genuinely deserve the pain. It's like holding a wild scorpion and trusting it to not sting you. :feelsUgh:

Our patriarchal forefathers likely knew about all of this and purposely gated women's nature for the prosperity of civilization, but the west has taken their common sense as acts of hatred.:society: Now everyone will suffer in the long term.

This concludes the end of my relationship/monogamy/parasitepill (whatever you want to call it) series. I encourage the mods to add a similar conclusion of them in their blackpill science wiki, if they're so inclined to.
I appreciate all of you for taking your time reading these. :feelsYall:
@mods please sticky this masterpiece:feelsohh:
 
women's brains are well suited to have deep multiple bonds to those who give them strong pulses of oxytocin.
Brutal hormonepill
Normie's Gfs fucking the drug dealers out there
 
This needs to be pinned ngl.
 
Ah yes, Chad and Tyrone are so monogamous, that is why they only have 1 girl for life and never fuck hundreds of women...
We are hitting cope levels that shouldn't even be possible.
 
Ah yes, Chad and Tyrone are so monogamous, that is why they only have 1 girl for life and never fuck hundreds of women...
We are hitting cope levels that shouldn't even be possible.
Chad is like 0,0001 % of men
 
This is why, in medieval times, they would execute women who betrayed their husbands. Even the guarantee of a death penalty will not stop women from cheating, but at least it's something. As it is right now there's no incentive for women to be faithful.
 
@Cybersex is our hope

I understand that Chad is a small percentage of the top males.
But males are not monogamous.

Actually it is the opposite, men are made to have lots of females.

And females are made to have 1 partner. That is why her pregnancy/gestation is 9 months long.
Society allows them the privilege of having everything provided for them by millions of ugly men.

And society is the one that forces ugly men into being monogamous. When naturally each incel should have at least 14 young fertile foids.
Men can overcome their drive and be monogamous. I would prefer to be monogamous with a nawalt and many men do
 
So a biological fact is a cope, got it.
you know this is a good example of why the blackpill will never be mainstream, you can show someone all the data and studies you want but if they don't want to accept it you're doomed from the start.
 
Blackpill is getting more and more brutal
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
6
Views
259
lifeisbullshit95
lifeisbullshit95
AloneCel2
Replies
26
Views
782
sociology blackpill
sociology blackpill
Lapasetjakahvi01
Replies
14
Views
397
Namtriz912
Namtriz912

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top