If you been following my threads about women and monogamy, you may've noticed that I hardly mention oxytocin. This supposed neglect to explore the hormone may come across as exposing a bias to this series, but that's further from the truth. The topic deserves a thread of its own.
Oxytocin is the hormone that been shown to encourage bonding in mothers. It's likely the primary motive why monogamous females want to cohabitant with their male partners. And the hormones peaks during copulation and orgasm.
It's found in monogamous voles, gibbons, diks-diks, wolves, etc. even in humans
However it's been demonstrated despite having this pair-bonding hormone, virtually all females that are classified as monogamous engage in extra-pair copulations and many of them labor extra-pair young.
incels.is
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._Its_incidence_in_human_and_animal_population
The egalitarian objection to this is to say both sexes have practiced infidelity, therefore men are just as genetically non-monogamous as women. On a psychological and biological level, it's not equivalent.
We know that oxytocin facilitates bonding with mothers' and their child, in fact, this is true for every child they birthed. From a neurological standpoint, women's brains are well suited to have deep multiple bonds to those who give them strong pulses of oxytocin.
Men on the other hand, oxytocin increases monogamous tenancies for primarily his partner, even it comes from another source.
In light of this, you could make the argument if a man cheats on his wife and orgasms, the oxytocin will trigger his brain to want to return to his partner, while if a woman cheats and orgasms, the oxytocin will make her form a bound with whoever she cheated with. Men are more likely to feel guilty about it as well. Additionally, it's the long-term, male mates who pay the price if the women is fertilized by the short-term mates, evolutionarly, socially, and financially.
And it has been well established that women have desire for extra-pair mates, and for more likely to orgasm with them. Those who think that increasing the chances of women orgasming would result them with more monogamous leanings from the oxytocin is ludicrous in the face of the data. When you also read personal testimonies why wives/gfs cheat, often they summarize as 'I had orgasms [with their SOs] and I love him, but...' etc. etc. etc.
incels.is
Vasopressin, another hormone associated with monogamy, makes men more loyal (in general), but it's released in largest amounts during sexual activity, particularly during erection (this is why men also tend to cheat when they drink alcohol, and why too much causes whiskey dick).
How vasopressin reacts with women is the polar opposite. It causes them to be less sexually incline to their long-term partner in favour being promiscuous and commit infidelity with short-term partners.
incels.is
All these observations are reflective as we see in self-reports
Remember what kind of men women have extra-pair copulation with for "emotional needs". They're not typically emotionally supportive, loyal or even socially stable.
Whenever heterosexual couples deprive the men of regular sexual activities, they subconsciously feel less attached to their female partners as their AVP and OXT levels start to decline. (The female partners become more similar to the men's mothers than lovers at that point.)
As we all know, men are usually available for sexual engagement, and it's the women within modern couples who determines if such activities are permitted. In other words, whether women or men partakes in infidelity, it's often the outcome from the women of the relationships' desires & decisions, even when it wasn't their intention.
So, cucks/simps, beating yourself when your whore SO 'surprisingly' cheats on you will never solve anything and they always will blame the affair on you, but after knowing it'll eventually happen, then yes, it's on you.
After reading the evidence, females and oxytocin are irrelevant in terms of actual monogamy -not “““““““social monogamy””””” which is form of parasitism. When a man and woman cheats, it's not the equivalent (still don't think either should partake in it, but that never mattered), so this genetically don't support anyone's egalitarian philosophy.
Women are attached to whoever induces a flood of oxytocin in their brains (regardless if it's caused by their LTR partners or not), while OXT increases men's attraction specifically to their partners. Vasopressin is the main motivator for monogamy in males. Meanwhile, AVP in females incites aggression and infidelity towards their long-term mates as a small part of their dual mating strategy, which they're programmed to adhere.
It doesn't matter if you're a chad or not, if you're in or plan to be in a relationship with a woman, as a male you're a simp & a cuck. And if you still wish to pursue one after evaluating all this evidence, once your gf betrays you, you genuinely deserve the pain. It's like holding a wild scorpion and trusting it to not sting you.
Our patriarchal forefathers likely knew about all of this and purposely gated women's nature for the prosperity of civilization, but the west has taken their common sense as acts of hatred. Now everyone will suffer in the long term.
This concludes the end of my relationship/monogamy/parasitepill (whatever you want to call it) series. I encourage the mods to add a similar conclusion of them in their blackpill science wiki, if they're so inclined to.
I appreciate all of you for taking your time reading these.
Oxytocin is the hormone that been shown to encourage bonding in mothers. It's likely the primary motive why monogamous females want to cohabitant with their male partners. And the hormones peaks during copulation and orgasm.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3782434/
It's found in monogamous voles, gibbons, diks-diks, wolves, etc. even in humans
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183515/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22029018/
However it's been demonstrated despite having this pair-bonding hormone, virtually all females that are classified as monogamous engage in extra-pair copulations and many of them labor extra-pair young.
There are no monogamous females
Less than hundred years ago intellectuals and the laymen alike would define "monogamy" as a type of sexual pairing between two sexes of a species until death, now, scientists realize this type of pairing is so rare, they had to redefine "monogamy" to "social monogamy", which is basically...
incels.is
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00319.x
The egalitarian objection to this is to say both sexes have practiced infidelity, therefore men are just as genetically non-monogamous as women. On a psychological and biological level, it's not equivalent.
We know that oxytocin facilitates bonding with mothers' and their child, in fact, this is true for every child they birthed. From a neurological standpoint, women's brains are well suited to have deep multiple bonds to those who give them strong pulses of oxytocin.
Men on the other hand, oxytocin increases monogamous tenancies for primarily his partner, even it comes from another source.
https://www.pnas.org/content/110/50/20308
In light of this, you could make the argument if a man cheats on his wife and orgasms, the oxytocin will trigger his brain to want to return to his partner, while if a woman cheats and orgasms, the oxytocin will make her form a bound with whoever she cheated with. Men are more likely to feel guilty about it as well. Additionally, it's the long-term, male mates who pay the price if the women is fertilized by the short-term mates, evolutionarly, socially, and financially.
And it has been well established that women have desire for extra-pair mates, and for more likely to orgasm with them. Those who think that increasing the chances of women orgasming would result them with more monogamous leanings from the oxytocin is ludicrous in the face of the data. When you also read personal testimonies why wives/gfs cheat, often they summarize as 'I had orgasms [with their SOs] and I love him, but...' etc. etc. etc.
Are Women Programmed to Cheat?
Is extra-pair copulation (EPC or infidelity) by women currently adaptive? Or, does women's EPC currently advance women's reproductive success (RS)? An evolved adaptation may be currently nonadaptive and even maladaptive because the current ecological setting in which it occurs differs from the...
incels.is
Vasopressin, another hormone associated with monogamy, makes men more loyal (in general), but it's released in largest amounts during sexual activity, particularly during erection (this is why men also tend to cheat when they drink alcohol, and why too much causes whiskey dick).
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...c/Gender-differences-in-sexual-motivation.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK97287/
How vasopressin reacts with women is the polar opposite. It causes them to be less sexually incline to their long-term partner in favour being promiscuous and commit infidelity with short-term partners.
Why Women Can't Form Faithful Relationships
“Alpha fucks, beta bucks (or cucks)” a catch phrase known to many generations, but why is this case and what's the science behind it? This phenomenon is called “women's dual mating strategy”. This strategy entails females in relationships will try to maximize their children's genetic quality...
incels.is
All these observations are reflective as we see in self-reports
https://www.verywellmind.com/why-married-people-cheat-2300656
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201207/promise-promiscuity
Remember what kind of men women have extra-pair copulation with for "emotional needs". They're not typically emotionally supportive, loyal or even socially stable.
Whenever heterosexual couples deprive the men of regular sexual activities, they subconsciously feel less attached to their female partners as their AVP and OXT levels start to decline. (The female partners become more similar to the men's mothers than lovers at that point.)
As we all know, men are usually available for sexual engagement, and it's the women within modern couples who determines if such activities are permitted. In other words, whether women or men partakes in infidelity, it's often the outcome from the women of the relationships' desires & decisions, even when it wasn't their intention.
So, cucks/simps, beating yourself when your whore SO 'surprisingly' cheats on you will never solve anything and they always will blame the affair on you, but after knowing it'll eventually happen, then yes, it's on you.
After reading the evidence, females and oxytocin are irrelevant in terms of actual monogamy -not “““““““social monogamy””””” which is form of parasitism. When a man and woman cheats, it's not the equivalent (still don't think either should partake in it, but that never mattered), so this genetically don't support anyone's egalitarian philosophy.
Women are attached to whoever induces a flood of oxytocin in their brains (regardless if it's caused by their LTR partners or not), while OXT increases men's attraction specifically to their partners. Vasopressin is the main motivator for monogamy in males. Meanwhile, AVP in females incites aggression and infidelity towards their long-term mates as a small part of their dual mating strategy, which they're programmed to adhere.
It doesn't matter if you're a chad or not, if you're in or plan to be in a relationship with a woman, as a male you're a simp & a cuck. And if you still wish to pursue one after evaluating all this evidence, once your gf betrays you, you genuinely deserve the pain. It's like holding a wild scorpion and trusting it to not sting you.
Our patriarchal forefathers likely knew about all of this and purposely gated women's nature for the prosperity of civilization, but the west has taken their common sense as acts of hatred.
Now everyone will suffer in the long term.This concludes the end of my relationship/monogamy/parasitepill (whatever you want to call it) series. I encourage the mods to add a similar conclusion of them in their blackpill science wiki, if they're so inclined to.
I appreciate all of you for taking your time reading these.
Last edited:
