M
Med Amine
Visionary
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2022
- Posts
- 24,771
medicine is a part of scienceThat's medicine, not STEM
medicine is a part of scienceThat's medicine, not STEM
So are geography and sociology, they are social sciences.medicine is a part of science
Overagepill-teenlovepill=
Is that a Holocaust reference or am I way too far gone?If an oven can bake one cake every hour,
how many cakes can 40 ovens bake in 3 years?
If you forget the cake in the oven for too long it will surely become holocausted down to ash.Is that a Holocaust reference or am I way too far gone?
Because it's the HIGHEST IQ thread on the sitewhy is this still pinned?
Duhwhen multiplied by 0 the answer is 0
TldrChad and Pepe are playing with a pile of black, red and green stones.
When the game starts, there are many black pieces on the game board
could be any positive integer.
Players take turns. Chad took the first move. There are 2 options for a move:
(1) Place a red or green stone (from an infinite supply) on top of an existing stone pile. At the end of the round, there may not be two tiles of the same color in the stack.
A stack can contain up to three stones.
or
(2) Take out 2 stacks, but the top colors of the two stacks must be the same. Stack height doesn't matter.
If you can't take any action, you lose.
Determine whether either player can use a strategy to guarantee victory, and if so, explain how.
k=6
Just remembered this one is brazilian, might be hard to understand the question, maybe a Strang or Stewart might be betterFinally, some good fucken high IQ level thread, get them one of the Guidorizzi's books so they can whack their brains in OP
When your realize that your qt foid STEM class coleague chooses to be declared volcel but in reality fucks a chad a day just like everyone else but you you might end up in here tooLol like an inverse relationship, if you are good at math chances are you are a professional or are studying in STEM and you are basically a betabuxxx bitch which makes you a volcel for not trying hard enough in your academic/professional area and rotting here instead
Consider the function f(n), such that f(0) = 0 and f(⌊n/10⌋) + n - 10⌊n/10⌋, how many algorisms does the smallest positive integer m has, such that f(m) = 2015?When your realize that your qt foid STEM class coleague chooses to be declared volcel but in reality fucks a chad a day just like everyone else but you you might end up in here too
Is the function f(n) defined by f(n) = f(⌊n/10⌋) + n - 10⌊n/10⌋? You didn't make that clearConsider the function f(n), such that f(0) = 0 and f(⌊n/10⌋) + n - 10⌊n/10⌋, how many algorisms does the smallest positive integer m has, such that f(m) = 2015?
YesIs the function f(n) defined by f(n) = f(⌊n/10⌋) + n - 10⌊n/10⌋? You didn't make that clear
def f(n):
What is that? Why do you write like a computer?def f(n):
if n == 0:
return 0
else:
return f(n // 10) + n - 10 * (n // 10)
m = 1
power = 10
algarism_counter = 1
while True:
if f(m) == 2015:
break
m += 1
if m == power:
power *= 10
algarism_counter += 1
print("m has:", algarism_counter)
Could only count to 9, gave up
It's code in python for calculating functions with recursive method, but it took so much heap for a long time that I could only see m reaching 9 algarisms, by the way what is the actual answer I'm curiousWhat is that? Why do you write like a computer?
It's higher than 200 bhai.It's code in python for calculating functions with recursive method, but it took so much heap for a long time that I could only see m reaching 9 algarisms, by the way what is the actual answer I'm curious
I don't think it's anywhere near 9. The highest possible value for n - 10(⌊n/10⌋) is 9, so there's at least 223 algorithms. Idk how you can do this question without brute force, which is already impossible.def f(n):
if n == 0:
return 0
else:
return f(n // 10) + n - 10 * (n // 10)
m = 1
power = 10
algarism_counter = 1
while True:
if f(m) == 2015:
break
m += 1
if m == power:
power *= 10
algarism_counter += 1
print("m has:", algarism_counter)
Could only count to 9, gave up
Didn't know that, sorrie. Also, I reckon floor functions are not differentiable, so I assume you can't use derivatives on this one for m to reach 2015, how do you solve it?It's higher than 200 bhai.
Also, why do you use that? YOU CAN'T USE PYTHON AT OLYMPIAD
It's from a high school olympiad, you can solve it without calculus.Didn't know that, sorrie. Also, I reckon floor functions are not differentiable, so I assume you can't use derivatives on this one for m to reach 2015, how do you solve it?
Ye, no heap anywhere near as capable of reaching this resultI don't think it's anywhere near 9. The highest possible value for n - 10(⌊n/10⌋) is 9, so there's at least 223 algorithms. Idk how you can do this question without brute force, which is already impossible.
If 0 is an eigenvalue, then there exists a non-zero vector in the kernel, which means it's nontrivial so dim(L(V)) < n. Therefore, L is not subjective.Let V be a vector space with dim(V) = n < ∞. Suppose that L: V -> V is a linear map and that 0 is an eigenvalue of L.
Prove that L cannot be surjective.
hey good job. i know it wasnt the most challenging problem, but i just wanted to throw in a cute little algebra problemIf 0 is an eigenvalue, then there exists a non-zero vector in the kernel, which means it's nontrivial so dim(L(V)) < n. Therefore, L is not subjective.
I think Chad can always force a win. First, Chad takes away 2 stacks. After that, he keeps mirroring Pepe's move. I didn't check super thoroughly, but I think this works.Chad and Pepe are playing with a pile of black, red and green stones.
When the game starts, there are k many black pieces (stone piles) on the game board
k could be any positive integer.
Players take turns. Chad took the first move. There are 2 options for a move:
(1) Place a red or green stone (from an infinite supply) on top of an existing stone pile. At the end of the round, there may not be two tiles of the same color in the stack.
A stack can contain up to three stones.
or
(2) Take out 2 stacks, but the top colors of the two stacks must be the same. Stack height doesn't matter.
If you can't take any action, you lose.
Determine whether either player can use a strategy to guarantee victory, and if so, explain how.
k=6
I'll just find the smallest m s.t. f(m) = 2015. Given that the algorithm is already specified, I don't really understand the "how many algorithms" part of the question.Consider the function f(n), such that f(0) = 0 and f(n) = f(⌊n/10⌋) + n - 10⌊n/10⌋, how many algorisms does the smallest positive integer m has, such that f(m) = 2015?
CorrectI'll just find the smallest m s.t. f(m) = 2015. Given that the algorithm is already specified, I don't really understand the "how many algorithms" part of the question.
For n < 10, f(n) = n
For 9 < n < 100, f(n) = ⌊n/10⌋ + n - 10⌊n/10⌋ = n - 9⌊n/10⌋
For 99 < n < 1000, f(n) = ⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊⌊n/10⌋/10⌋ + n - 10⌊n/10⌋ = n - 9⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊n/100⌋
For 999 < n < 10,000, f(n) = ⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊⌊n/10⌋/10⌋ - 9⌊⌊n/10⌋/100⌋ + n - 10⌊n/10⌋ = n - 9⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊n/100⌋ - 9⌊n/1000⌋
The pattern should be clear by now. If n has digits abcd with a > 0, then f(n) = abcd - 9(abc + ab + a) = a + b + c + d. At this stage, it should be easy to convince yourself that f is just the digit sum function.
The smallest number with digit sum 2015 is an 8 followed by 223 9s since 2015 = 223*9 + 8.
@Grim_Reaper @incelpardo99
Suppose a_ij != 0. Let B = PD where P is a permutation matrix which will swap columns i & j of A and D is a diagonal matrix with d_ii = 1 and d_kk = 0 for k != i. Then AB will be nil save for column i, whose diagonal element will be a_ij. However, a_ij = tr(AB) = 0 is now a contradiction.Let A be an n x n matrix with complex entries. If trace(AB)=0 for every n x n matrix B, show that A=0.
good job ! an elegant solution too. that problem is an old favorite of mineSuppose a_ij != 0. Let B = PD where P is a permutation matrix which will swap columns i & j of A and D is a diagonal matrix with d_ii = 1 and d_kk = 0 for k != i. Then AB will be nil save for column i, whose diagonal element will be a_ij. However, a_ij = tr(AB) = 0 is now a contradiction.
I'll just find the smallest m s.t. f(m) = 2015. Given that the algorithm is already specified, I don't really understand the "how many algorithms" part of the question.
For n < 10, f(n) = n
For 9 < n < 100, f(n) = ⌊n/10⌋ + n - 10⌊n/10⌋ = n - 9⌊n/10⌋
For 99 < n < 1000, f(n) = ⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊⌊n/10⌋/10⌋ + n - 10⌊n/10⌋ = n - 9⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊n/100⌋
For 999 < n < 10,000, f(n) = ⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊⌊n/10⌋/10⌋ - 9⌊⌊n/10⌋/100⌋ + n - 10⌊n/10⌋ = n - 9⌊n/10⌋ - 9⌊n/100⌋ - 9⌊n/1000⌋
The pattern should be clear by now. If n has digits abcd with a > 0, then f(n) = abcd - 9(abc + ab + a) = a + b + c + d. At this stage, it should be easy to convince yourself that f is just the digit sum function.
The smallest number with digit sum 2015 is an 8 followed by 223 9s since 2015 = 223*9 + 8.
@Grim_Reaper @incelpardo99
How many algorithms are there though?Correct
How many algorithms are there though?
Given that the algorithm is already specified, I don't really understand the "how many algorithms" part of the question.
It's a nice problem. I'll be assisting with linear algebra this quarter. Maybe I'll try to sneak in this problem.good job ! an elegant solution too. that problem is an old favorite of mine
damn youre living my dreamIt's a nice problem. I'll be assisting with linear algebra this quarter. Maybe I'll try to sneak in this problem.
I hope you'll get there then. I also hope it'll bring you more joy than it does me. I'm currently getting a PhD but I don't see myself continuing in academia.damn youre living my dream
yea for now as a 3rd year undergrad academia seems like the move. but i imagine that may change once i actually see how brutal it is. i'll still try it out tho. i got nothing to loseI hope you'll get there then. I also hope it'll bring you more joy than it does me. I'm currently getting a PhD but I don't see myself continuing in academia.
224How many algorithms are there though?
Amazing
My thoughts exactly at the timeyea for now as a 3rd year undergrad academia seems like the move. but i imagine that may change once i actually see how brutal it is. i'll still try it out tho. i got nothing to lose
I'm too busy doing math to have sexI hate IQ moggers.
If you answered a correct question in this thread, you must be a sexhaver.
@Ahnfeltia probably has foid students asking him to give them better grades, and in-exchange they have sex with him.I hate IQ moggers.
If you answered a correct question in this thread, you must be a sexhaver.
@Ahnfeltia probably has foid students asking him to give them better grades, and in-exchange they have sex with them.
only happened thrice thus far@Ahnfeltia probably has foid students asking him to give them better grades, and in-exchange they have sex with him.
@IronsideCelonly happened thrice thus far