Tails made a video about a group of people be terms to be "Masculinity copers", in fact he seems to large spot on with this, but I have some criticism and more insight into this topics.
I'm planning on writing a lengthy series called "Addressing Tails" where I plan on exposing some of the bad methodologies and also Female Dating Strategy-like mentality of the YouTuber "Tails" / "World Mogging Association", despite being somewhat of "a fan" of him (them?). But I'm planning on making this my last "major post" before addressing him systematically.
This post is divided into:
1. Sexual dimorphism and attraction.
2. On Masculinity copers and Femininity copers.
3. Does gymcelling actually work?
So, to start...
1. Sexual dimorphism and attraction.
Here are some pictures to illustrate sexual dimorphism and different levels of attractiveness. This is from one of Tails' videos:
He noted that most men would prefer Emma Watson over the Femininity coper on the left, she has a beautiful feminine body but her Becky face to many is off-putting.
I don't disagree with this point, a good face will compensate for even an ugly body. Just look at fat models:
If she would lose weight she could be a Stacy, but because of her obesity she's a Normie now, but a man with the same body fat percentage would have been a Sub-5. But the difference is that when toilets gain weight they often gain feminine features (bigger breasts, bigger asses) while losing facial attractiveness (high facial adiposity is regarded as the most unattractive feature in both men and toilets), this is why I think that it's common to see Masculinity copers with overweight toilets.
Chadlets are slayers despite being short, meanwhile no amount of height will save a tallcel.
It's clear that face is King.
But is it masculinity that makes a Chad face a Chad? Is it femininity that makes a Stacy face a Stacy?
I'd argue that both Chad and Stacy are a mixture between masculine and feminine features.
For example, here are some female model faces:
All of these toilet models clearly have some masculine features mixed with feminine features. Just like Chad.
Facial attractiveness is sexually dimorphic to some extent, but some faces could be identical on a Chad and a Stacy.
This is a Masculinity coper's daughter:
This is Chad's daughter:
Both men and toilets find a lot of the same features attractive.
View: https://youtu.be/98aKUPLscn4
Chad and Stacy look more similar to each other than they look like "masculine" or "feminine" people, attractive people are a category onto themselves:
2. On Masculinity copers and Femininity copers.
This is what happens when a masculinity coper tries to interact with average toilets:
View: https://youtube.com/shorts/PNyHXKSdiWY?feature=share
As you can see this man is essentially PEAK MASCULINITY, he reached the highest level of sexual dimorphism possible to make him as masculine as possible... And toilets find him utterly disgusting.
Yet this sub-human somehow managed to ascend, how?
View: https://youtube.com/shorts/ChsBtwqunQQ?feature=share
He found a Femininity coper, one thing I noticed is that masculinity copers often end up with Femininity copers:
View: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMNGa2E54/
Imagine being a Slavcel Manlet (6'1) and working out and becoming a highly masculine bald guy, moves to Taiwan to only end up with your looksmatch that has a highly feminine body.
Masculinity copers and Femininity copers often end up being with each other.
Either they end up with gymrats like themselves with ugly faces or they will end up with a fat Feminity coper:
The masculinity coper in his delusion thinks that becoming masculine will get him Stacy and the feminity coper in her delusion thinks that becoming feminine will convince Chad to commit to her.
In reality they're more likely to end up with each other and pretend that they're Chad and Stacy. I know so many ugly Masculinity copers and Femininity copers that think that they're hot because of their bodies.
3. Does gymcelling actually work?
I think that it improves yourself to some extent. I do think that Tails is probably wrong here and that Wheat Waffles' take is better.
While there's some evidence that the masculinity copers are more attractive:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16457167/
The study itself said that most toilets don't go for more masculine faces. So even if you get access to more Stacy's you wont get a more general access to quantity.
Wheat Waffles thinks that 90% of toilets go for the general Chad, but that there are some toilets that prefer more feminine men:
And some that prefer more masculine men:
And I think that he's right. Unlike tallness which is generally preferred, masculinity is more of a niche preference and that both Masculinitymaxxing and Femininitymaxxing will only get you people in that niche, people who are probably in that niche.
I noticed that some Tomboys (Masculinitymaxxed toilets) prefer hyper-masculine men while others prefer Femininitymaxxed men, the people obsessed with gender often go for Gendermaxxing.
So while I think that SOME Masculinity helps, I think that most of this is based on genetic features and prenatal testosterone rather than anything you can edit.
I'm planning on writing a lengthy series called "Addressing Tails" where I plan on exposing some of the bad methodologies and also Female Dating Strategy-like mentality of the YouTuber "Tails" / "World Mogging Association", despite being somewhat of "a fan" of him (them?). But I'm planning on making this my last "major post" before addressing him systematically.
This post is divided into:
1. Sexual dimorphism and attraction.
2. On Masculinity copers and Femininity copers.
3. Does gymcelling actually work?
So, to start...
1. Sexual dimorphism and attraction.
Here are some pictures to illustrate sexual dimorphism and different levels of attractiveness. This is from one of Tails' videos:
He noted that most men would prefer Emma Watson over the Femininity coper on the left, she has a beautiful feminine body but her Becky face to many is off-putting.
I don't disagree with this point, a good face will compensate for even an ugly body. Just look at fat models:
If she would lose weight she could be a Stacy, but because of her obesity she's a Normie now, but a man with the same body fat percentage would have been a Sub-5. But the difference is that when toilets gain weight they often gain feminine features (bigger breasts, bigger asses) while losing facial attractiveness (high facial adiposity is regarded as the most unattractive feature in both men and toilets), this is why I think that it's common to see Masculinity copers with overweight toilets.
Chadlets are slayers despite being short, meanwhile no amount of height will save a tallcel.
It's clear that face is King.
But is it masculinity that makes a Chad face a Chad? Is it femininity that makes a Stacy face a Stacy?
I'd argue that both Chad and Stacy are a mixture between masculine and feminine features.
For example, here are some female model faces:
All of these toilet models clearly have some masculine features mixed with feminine features. Just like Chad.
Facial attractiveness is sexually dimorphic to some extent, but some faces could be identical on a Chad and a Stacy.
This is a Masculinity coper's daughter:
This is Chad's daughter:
Both men and toilets find a lot of the same features attractive.
View: https://youtu.be/98aKUPLscn4
Chad and Stacy look more similar to each other than they look like "masculine" or "feminine" people, attractive people are a category onto themselves:
2. On Masculinity copers and Femininity copers.
This is what happens when a masculinity coper tries to interact with average toilets:
View: https://youtube.com/shorts/PNyHXKSdiWY?feature=share
As you can see this man is essentially PEAK MASCULINITY, he reached the highest level of sexual dimorphism possible to make him as masculine as possible... And toilets find him utterly disgusting.
Yet this sub-human somehow managed to ascend, how?
View: https://youtube.com/shorts/ChsBtwqunQQ?feature=share
He found a Femininity coper, one thing I noticed is that masculinity copers often end up with Femininity copers:
View: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMNGa2E54/
Imagine being a Slavcel Manlet (6'1) and working out and becoming a highly masculine bald guy, moves to Taiwan to only end up with your looksmatch that has a highly feminine body.
Masculinity copers and Femininity copers often end up being with each other.
Either they end up with gymrats like themselves with ugly faces or they will end up with a fat Feminity coper:
The masculinity coper in his delusion thinks that becoming masculine will get him Stacy and the feminity coper in her delusion thinks that becoming feminine will convince Chad to commit to her.
In reality they're more likely to end up with each other and pretend that they're Chad and Stacy. I know so many ugly Masculinity copers and Femininity copers that think that they're hot because of their bodies.
3. Does gymcelling actually work?
I think that it improves yourself to some extent. I do think that Tails is probably wrong here and that Wheat Waffles' take is better.
While there's some evidence that the masculinity copers are more attractive:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16457167/
The study itself said that most toilets don't go for more masculine faces. So even if you get access to more Stacy's you wont get a more general access to quantity.
Wheat Waffles thinks that 90% of toilets go for the general Chad, but that there are some toilets that prefer more feminine men:
And some that prefer more masculine men:
And I think that he's right. Unlike tallness which is generally preferred, masculinity is more of a niche preference and that both Masculinitymaxxing and Femininitymaxxing will only get you people in that niche, people who are probably in that niche.
I noticed that some Tomboys (Masculinitymaxxed toilets) prefer hyper-masculine men while others prefer Femininitymaxxed men, the people obsessed with gender often go for Gendermaxxing.
So while I think that SOME Masculinity helps, I think that most of this is based on genetic features and prenatal testosterone rather than anything you can edit.
