Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Marxism-Rodgerism. Opinions?

mlcurrycel

mlcurrycel

Marxist-Rodgerist
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
6,537
It may seem difficult to understand the realities of the blackpill. It may be hard to come to terms with how - and why - the world functions as it does. And even when you do, it is even harder to understand where to go next.

But there is one set of techniques which shines a clear light on the world we live in. A scientific and logical analysis of systems of limited resources - Marxism. When we undertake a Marxist analysis of the sexual economy, we immediately find its nuances explained and its realities presented for all to see.

The fundamental element of inequality is exploitation. In economic Marxism, exploitation occurs when a capitalist takes most of the value a worker's labor creates, leaving them barely enough to survive. In other words, the worker's surplus value is stolen from them. This is how capitalists make profits. Sometimes, the capitalists let some segments of workers keep more of their value, in order to bribe and pacify them.

In the sexual economy, there are two distinct classes of men - Chads...and everyone else. There is a group which keeps most women for itself - the Chad-Bourgeois - and a much larger group which, despite being responsible for maintaining global civilization with their labor so that Chad is free to take all he wants, is denied most women. These are the sexual proletariat.

The sexuality of women should be evenly spread among society, but it is not. Instead, it is commodified by sexual capitalism and given to Chad. The Chad-Bourgeoisie allow the sexual proletariat to have just as much pussy as they need to keep the human race alive through reproduction. But even here is it not fair; the proletariat get Chad's leftovers - only when the Chad-Bourgeois no longer want a woman does she go to settle down, marry, and reproduce with a non-Chad.

Now, I mentioned before that the economic bourgeois sometimes bribe workers by giving them more than they would otherwise. In the modern era, the Chad-Bourgeois are facing a world where the proletariat is no longer consigned to the feudal life of arranged marriages without any questions asked, and can see the reality of sexual inequality via media and their own insights. The Chad-Bourgeois responds by bribing the sexual proletariat - they, too, are now allowed to have sex before marriage, and perhaps fuck many women. These women are, of course, still the ones Chad doesn't want, but it bribes most of the world. Remember, this happened when the sexual free market, where women can now choose their partners without having to marry a non-Chad in the end, replaced the Feudal system of arranged marriage. This is sexual capitalism.

The people so bribed are normies. This is the main reason why normies are blind to the sexual capitalist system and lack revolutionary potential.

But the system is imperfect. Due to the female's nature, not all members of the proletariat can be bribed just by the Chad-Bourgeois allowing (pseudo) free sex for everyone. A group at the bottom is inevitability left out - incels.

As sexual feudalism shifted to sexual capitalism, a contradiction was exposed - the Contradiction of Sexual Capitalism is the existence of incels, and the conclusion of the capitalist stage of history must be the resolving of this contradiction. Due to how females are hardwired to be only attracted to Chads, incels always lose in a sexual free market. Many females would rather be single than marry an incel, and a result the incels become a class which doesn't even get marriage, much less any additional bribes. Due to their extreme condition, the incels become "blackpilled" and see the system as it is. The incels thus attain class consciousness.

The basic structure of the sexual world is that the Chad-Bourgeois take all the pussy they can, especially the desirable kind, while eventually passing their leftovers to the sexual proletariat as bribes and allowances. Among the latter group, those are who successfully bribed are normies, and those who become class conscious are incels.

So how do the Chad-Bourgeois manage to keep society under their control, even with incels attain class consciousness? In Marxism, the answer is the Base and superstructure. In a sexual capitalist society, all we know is shaped by the system of sexual economy we live in. Our culture, beliefs, and so on are bent to conform to and reinforce the Chad-Bourgeois narrative. In order to prevent the sexual proletariat from attaining class consciousness, the Chad-Bourgouse use culture to create a false consciousness for them to live in instead.

The key to understanding this is to understand that truth is relative to one's class. Comrade Lenin explained this with his concept of partiinost, party truth. What is "true" depends on your class, truth for one class may be falsehood for another. Thus, what class's "truth" you're listening to is very important.

For example, let's take the Chad-Bourgeois idea of "confidence." Confidence is an intentionally vague idea to explain Chad's sexual success as anything besides winning the genetic lottery. It is said that someone - anyone - with "confidence" can also live like Chad does. For the Chad-Bourgoise, this is true. All a Chad has to do is be willing step outside or set up an online dating profile and they will get all the pussy they want. However, for the rest of the world, this is not the case. By enforcing the idea of confidence instead of genetic luck, Chad yet again bribes the sexual proletariat - bribes them with hope. The idea of confidence explains structural inequality as personal failure - in the same way the capitalist tells the exploited worker that he, too, would be rich if he only worked harder, so does the Chad tell the sexual proletariat that they could have sex if they were only just a little more confident. In this way, the sexual proletariat are blamed for their own oppression - their celibacy is a result of their own moral failings, because they were not "confident" enough. The Chad-Bourgeois present themselves as having earned the pussy they inherent, while the rest of the world deserves to live without. Confidence is just one example of how sexual capitalism distorts culture and creates false narratives to keep people blind.

Normies love false narratives because they are bribed. A normie, who may have even had sex, believes that his success in the past means the confidence narrative and so on is true - he can truly be a Chad, if he works hard enough! Thus the normies convince themselves Chad's world is not only fair but desirable, because they too might have a chance of being chad.

Normies are deceived to varying degrees.

A regular normie has had their bribe a few times and doesn't bother to think about the realities of exploitation and the sexual economy. These normies can be blackpilled with evidence, but most of them just double down on the false consciousness due to their hope that they can be a Chad.

A beta is a normie who is faced with the reality of sexual inequality. He may be an orbiter, hanging around women in the hope he'll get sex. He may be a nice guy, who is nice to women for the same reason. He may be cucked, whereby he shares a single woman with other men so that he can at least get laid. Though he may deny it, he is painfully aware of these material and sexual realities.

A white knight has come against a blackpill before, and it scared them. They swing the other way - they actively try and spread Chad's narrative and enforce it, because they are trying convince themselves. There is great overlap between white knights and Betas, as the latter often exhibit white knight behavior. Many Betas turn into white knights when confronted with the black pill.

All normies have one thing in common - they do not want to accept the reality of the blackpill because they want to continue to believe they can be Chad. Another element is that they enjoy Chad's narrative when it suits them - regarding incels. They don't like to remember that Chad is sexually more successful then them because he is just better....but that's not so bad if it means that they are better than incels in turn, since they at least "earned" some sex and incels could not! In economic capitalism, the reality of economic status defined by class is ignored in favor of an individualist, democratic narrative, and sexual capitalism works the same way. The realities of incels and the Chad-Bourgeois are overlooked in favor of the lie that it's all about individual action, that any individual can work his way to the top of the sexual marketplace through hard work and imaginary concepts like "confidence."

By the methods described above, the Chad-Bourgeois extract all of the surplus value - in this context, surplus pussy - from the workers/sexual proletariat for themselves, and maintain the system through bribing normies and creating false consciousness. But here's where it gets really interesting - the immortal science of historical materialism explains even more than this.

Everyone knows that even among Chads there is a hierarchy - a racial hierarchy, with white Chad at the top. In the 1960s, Comrade Mao Zedong developed Marxist-Leninist-Maoism to explain the differences between the first world and the third world. Maoism reveals the first world exploits the third world through imperialism, and sets up a global class hierarchy of sorts. This economic hierarchy in turn ties into a sexual hierarchy - one where the imperialist white Chads are above the colonized Chads. A critique of imperialism explains the racial Chad hierarchy - which, of course, filters down into the sexual proletariat as well.

Following this trend, we can see the close interconnection between looks (Chad privilege) and economic success. Females like money and power...and it seems Chad ends up with those as well.

We all know that studies have proven Chads are much more likely to succeed in economic sphere. They are given quality jobs and often end up in very social, very prestigious positions like executive officers. But this shows us that wealth comes second. Poor Chads still dominate the sexual proletariat, and their poverty, on average, never lasts long. In other words, sexual inequality comes before economic inequality, and due to how intertwined they are, it means that economic inequality is a consequence of sexual inequality due to society's constant preference for Chad. Sexual inequality predates economic capitalism, feudalism, even primitive tribalism - sexual inequality is the original and eternal form of hierarchy, it is harbinger of all other inequalities in other areas.

Thus, the Revolutionary and Immortal Science of Marxist-Rodgerism is born. We see that the fundamental conflict is between the well endowed Chad-Bourgeoisie and the sexual proletariat, and that all other conflicts ultimately derive from this great inequality. We see that the Chad-Bourgeois manipulates culture and society to further its narratives and worldview to maintain this power structure. Finally, we must conclude that the only way forward for humanity is to dismantle the system of sexual capitalism so that sex can be distributed fairly to all members of society.

Incels of the world, rise up! You have nothing to lose but your chains!


u/Communecel
 
Marxist-Rodgerism? Holy shit that's funny.
 
JFL @ this low-IQ nonsense
 
Blank 063c1df39aae3940245cb46c29df9a13
 
jfl at thinking this ideology has enough popular support for a succuesful beta uprising
 
im way to ADD to sit through and read this entire thing
Chad exploits normies by fucking the women they work to feed. If women are like a job, incels are like the jobless and homeless. Just like marxists want everybody to have their fair share in exchange for contributingto society, MR want all men and women to have their looksmatch.
 
First marxism seeks to destroy the family unit, now you're telling me marxism is going to reinstate it? When will this stupid meme die already.
 
jfl at thinking this ideology has enough popular support for a succuesful beta uprising
That's why we must Agitate, Educate, Organise. People thought socialism was impossible, then Vladmir Lenin did it by working hard all throughout his life.
 
First marxism seeks to destroy the family unit, now you're telling me marxism is going to reinstate it? When will this stupid meme die already.
Marxism is Historical and Dialetical Materialism. If a scientist funded by tobacco companies says smoking is good for you, historical materialism tells us he's bullshitting.

Let's look at Marxist Feminism. Marx was a bluepilled guy and didn't really talk about it. He even expelled rich foid feminists from his organisations.

MF comes from Engels. He was a rich kid who used to fuck prostitutes and fell in love with an Irish whore. Said whores are better partners then traditional women. He pushed the line about destroying the family while most working class men wanted to feed theirs.
 
Marxist-Rodgerism? Holy shit that's funny.

Indeed, funniest shit I've read all day.

In a way ER has transcended death, while all these Chads and Stacy's he despised will die and be forgotten to time, ER will be remembered and talked about forever, so he sorta won in the end.
 
+1

oh, yeah ive never liked capitalism
Some incels support it because they think it's different from social-democratic capitalism and they don't want taxes going to slut voids, but in reality social-democracy is just an attempt by the rich to tamp down on agitation by promising bread and circuses while the real exploitation happens overseas. Feminism and Title 9 is just a tool by the rich.
Indeed, funniest shit I've read all day.

In a way ER has transcended death, while all these Chads and Stacy's he despised will die and be forgotten to time, ER will be remembered and talked about forever, so he sorta won in the end.
 
That's why we must Agitate, Educate, Organise. People thought socialism was impossible, then Vladmir Lenin did it by working hard all throughout his life.
What does incel organizing even look like? Do I cold approach a bunch of Indian guys and hand them pamphlets with ER's face plastered on them while I explain the benefits of Marx-Rodgerism to them?
 
What does incel organizing even look like? Do I cold approach a bunch of Indian guys and hand them pamphlets with ER's face plastered on them while I explain the benefits of Marx-Rodgerism to them?
It'll be more successful for us than cold-approaching women :feelskek: .
We need to use the internet to slowly turn disgruntled men from the bluepill to red then black.
We need to create Autonomous Zones in the rural Third World where we start practising what we preach on the micro scale and arm ourselves in case of a sub8 cleansing and prepare for climate change.
We need to create a group of awakened men large enough to take power when centres of power are destabilised due to the internal contradictions of Chad society.
All of us right now are halfway up the mountain - we must clear the path to the summiy for the rest of humanity.
 
:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:


JFL @ low IQ commenters here.

Let me get you a TLDR version of your post:

There is a close analogy with our situation with the classical definition of "ploretariats".

1. Imagine, the "looks" is the currency in the sexual market.
2. Chads are those who possess the "looks", they are the "bourgeoisie" and hence we are the "ploretariats", the "have nots".
3. ER is the reactionary response to this "looks" base class struggle.
4. He is one of the first "Bolsheviks" who took weapon to rebel against this "status quo".

All the ugly ass mongrels of the world, unite!!

images
 
Last edited:
:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:


JFL @ low IQ commenters here.

Let me get you a TLDR version of your post:

There is a close analogy with our situation with the classical definition of "ploretariats".

1. Imagine, the "looks" is the currency in the sexual market.
2. Chads are those who possess the "looks", they are the "bourgeoisie" and hence we are the "ploretariats", the "have nots".
3. ER is the reactionary response to this "looks" base class struggle.
4. He is one of the first "Bolsheviks" who took weapon to rebel against this "status quo".

All the ugly ass mongrels of the world, unite!!

images
+1

Remember, the ruling class is not rich bevause they work hard, they are rich because they own the companies and the profits accrued by said companies. They can sit on their ass and wait for the money to roll in while some CEO does the organising.

Chad doesn't have to looksmax to get pussy, and saying that capitalists deserve money for sometimes working as a CEO or for keeping a close eye on their CEOs is like saying some chads deserve pussy because some of them looksmaxxed or paid someone to looksmaxx for them.
 
Remember, the ruling class is not rich bevause they work hard, they are rich because they own the companies and the profits accrued by said companies.

Nope, ruling class is rich because they are born that way. Also they inherit that "sexual capital" (a.k.a. looks) from their parents.

A typical classic feudal monarchy.

All the ugly ass mongrels of the world, unite!!!
 
ER didn't do nearly enough legwork to have his name credited to the extension of Marxist theory to the sex economy. Houellebecq might come the closest, but the ideas still haven't developed anything close to completely.

"ploretariats".

cco6n5ii89h11.png
 
ER didn't do nearly enough legwork to have his name credited to the extension of Marxist theory to the sex economy. Houellebecq might come the closest, but the ideas still haven't developed anything close to completely.



cco6n5ii89h11.png

Fucking noodlewhore's profession is "princess", her bio says. Somebody burn that bitch with fire.

Yea, during the ER's era the concept of inceldom was still nascent. I think we need to work more on the theoretical framework, for example, how do you explain blackpill with dialectic materialism?

@Flabcel Repulsive @Legionarivs @Gyros_Pretcel GTFIH
 
Last edited:
ER didn't do nearly enough legwork to have his name credited to the extension of Marxist theory to the sex economy. Houellebecq might come the closest, but the ideas still haven't developed anything close to completely.



cco6n5ii89h11.png

Entitled bitch trying to hide her asian nose behind a fucking filter, jfl.
Marxism Rodgerism is as good of a monicker for our beliefs as Social-Democracy was for Marxism-Leninism. We'll make a new one while the cake bakes.
 
OK, I'm going to go against my better judgment and give this just one honest look.

At first glance there are two major problems:

The first is this.
The fundamental element of inequality is exploitation.
The entire backbone of this political ideology rests on the premise of genetic inequality being the primary equality that precedes even economic inequality, as you state later.

Which is it, genetics or exploitation? It can't be both, because simply being born with better genetics doesn't mean you're exploiting others with worse genetics. That inequality is built-in and not the result of any action. Exploitation, on the other hand, is malice, which is volitional and categorically different than the inequality of genes i.e., the result of action.

The second problem is that the object (through which inequality is expressed) is intrinsically different. With class and economic inequality the object is money (which buys material goods such as arable land). With sexual inequality the object is women (which doesn't buy anything, unless you're talking slave trading). Money can't choose to go to the bourgeois, because it's an inanimate fucking object, but women can (and do) choose to go the chad-bourgeois. Removing the woman's choice at an institutional level doesn't fundamentally change this difference. You still have objects that have conscious agency, who are stripped of that agency. Again, categorical difference.
 
Marxism Rodgerism = Incels create a government that takes on the responsibility of abolishing lonliness and inceldom and cheating and paternity fraud by any means necessary, including state assigned wives.


Also, government makes sure every man has the opportunity to earn enough to feed his family. Not like Afghanistan where 10 year old boys prostitute themselves to feed their mother or America where men sell their plasma or sell drugs or have their girlfriend on Onlyfans
 
OK, I'm going to go against my better judgment and give this just one honest look.

At first glance there are two major problems:

The first is this.

The entire backbone of this political ideology rests on the premise of genetic inequality being the primary equality that precedes even economic inequality, as you state later.

Which is it, genetics or exploitation? It can't be both, because simply being born with better genetics doesn't mean you're exploiting others with worse genetics. That inequality is built-in and not the result of any action. Exploitation, on the other hand, is malice, which is volitional and categorically different than the inequality of genes i.e., the result of action.

The second problem is that the object (through which inequality is expressed) is intrinsically different. With class and economic inequality the object is money (which buys material goods such as arable land). With sexual inequality the object is women (which doesn't buy anything, unless you're talking slave trading). Money can't choose to go to the bourgeois, because it's an inanimate fucking object, but women can (and do) choose to go the chad-bourgeois. Removing the woman's choice at an institutional level doesn't fundamentally change this difference. You still have objects that have conscious agency, who are stripped of that agency. Again, categorical difference.
@Communcel 's hypothesis was that incels and normies are exploited because they pay for women to stay alive while Chad fucks them for free
 
meme ideology tbh
So you're against the government forcing women to be monogamous? You're against mandatory paternity testing? You're against government assigned wives?
 
OK, I'm going to go against my better judgment and give this just one honest look.

At first glance there are two major problems:

The first is this.

The entire backbone of this political ideology rests on the premise of genetic inequality being the primary equality that precedes even economic inequality, as you state later.

Which is it, genetics or exploitation? It can't be both, because simply being born with better genetics doesn't mean you're exploiting others with worse genetics. That inequality is built-in and not the result of any action. Exploitation, on the other hand, is malice, which is volitional and categorically different than the inequality of genes i.e., the result of action.

The second problem is that the object (through which inequality is expressed) is intrinsically different. With class and economic inequality the object is money (which buys material goods such as arable land). With sexual inequality the object is women (which doesn't buy anything, unless you're talking slave trading). Money can't choose to go to the bourgeois, because it's an inanimate fucking object, but women can (and do) choose to go the chad-bourgeois. Removing the woman's choice at an institutional level doesn't fundamentally change this difference. You still have objects that have conscious agency, who are stripped of that agency. Again, categorical difference.
  1. Class exploitation is about control of means of production / capital / factories, basically metal wombs where raw materials go in and finished products come out
  2. Women don't have conscious agency. The proof is they don't have the self will to not fuck Chad.
 
OK, I'm going to go against my better judgment and give this just one honest look.

At first glance there are two major problems:

The first is this.

The entire backbone of this political ideology rests on the premise of genetic inequality being the primary equality that precedes even economic inequality, as you state later.

Which is it, genetics or exploitation? It can't be both, because simply being born with better genetics doesn't mean you're exploiting others with worse genetics. That inequality is built-in and not the result of any action. Exploitation, on the other hand, is malice, which is volitional and categorically different than the inequality of genes i.e., the result of action.

The second problem is that the object (through which inequality is expressed) is intrinsically different. With class and economic inequality the object is money (which buys material goods such as arable land). With sexual inequality the object is women (which doesn't buy anything, unless you're talking slave trading). Money can't choose to go to the bourgeois, because it's an inanimate fucking object, but women can (and do) choose to go the chad-bourgeois. Removing the woman's choice at an institutional level doesn't fundamentally change this difference. You still have objects that have conscious agency, who are stripped of that agency. Again, categorical difference.
Genetic inequality is built into the system and concentrated among the chads, a chad oppresses the vast majority of men by mere his existence, as chad lives life on tutorial mode, chads get all the female attention and monopolise sex, genetic inequality is inseparable from humanity that's why a marxist rodgerist state must put all the HTN and chads in concentration camps, their existence oppresses the sexual proletariat. Economic inequality is closely related to genetic inequality, its always the high iq,tall men who are the CEO's and founders. The likes of Jeremy meeks confirm this, jeremy meeks was a poor ghetto nigger until his mugshot went viral,he ended up marrying and fucking a billionaire gigastacy.
(Fortune 500 CEO height is on average 6 ft 0 in (1.83 m) tall )
 

Attachments

  • images (2) (1).jpeg
    images (2) (1).jpeg
    32.8 KB · Views: 72
Last edited:
Genetic inequality is built into the system and concentrated among the chads, a chad oppresses the vast majority of men by mere his existence, as chad lives life on tutorial mode, chads get all the female attention and monopolise sex, genetic inequality is inseparable from humanity that's why a marxist rodgerist state must put all the HTN and chads in concentration camps.
Under monogamy and even polygyny, Chads had to feed his own foids, although many of them did that by enslaving incels and normies.

Chad cuckolding another man's wife under surface level monogamous society is like proto sexual capitalism

Chad fucking all the women while incels and normies pay taxes, only fans, alimony, child support, etc, is like late stage sexual capitalism
 
I've never thought of factory machinery as metal wombs before today, but it actually makes a lot of sense
 
Incels should buy land in Russia, recruit orphaned girls and desperate women, and breed daughters to offer new incels immigrating in.
 
It's not sex trafficking because the women aren't going anywhere. It's not prositution because they're not employees exchanging sex for money from Johns
 

View: https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1640584158924660736

Although daughters and their parents rated ambition and intelligence as the most important qualities of a husband for daughters, in the concrete case, both parties chose the more attractive man.

Even fathers will choose Chad for their daughters. That's why we need government assignment.
 
That was a solid read. Couldn't agree more. This is a high IQ take imo. Good read and paragraphed and articulated well. Everything has a hierarchy, but if you work really really hard you might get to sniff the fart of a prolapsed asshole from some thrashed out whore lmao. Ahhh, fuck em. Fuck em all.
 
That was a solid read. Couldn't agree more. This is a high IQ take imo. Good read and paragraphed and articulated well. Everything has a hierarchy, but if you work really really hard you might get to sniff the fart of a prolapsed asshole from some thrashed out whore lmao. Ahhh, fuck em. Fuck em all.
Thank you comrade, credit goes to @Communcel from r/incels. I refuse to subsidise a society where Chad gets free pussy and I get none. I will be as much of a leech as I can until I can form my own society with government assigned wives and government enforced monogamy.

Please vote for Marxism Rodgerism in the poll.
 
you have to be joking if you think state mandated gfs are anything but a cope
The Prophet Mohammed helped his followers get married. Religions and cults all around the world help get followers married. The Moonies in South Korea are famous for getting their followers arrange marriaged even if the couple never met before the wedding. Mormons? Same thing.

Most men who join criminal gangs do it to get women by darktriadmaxxing and drugmaxxing

Even today, militias in South Sudan and terrorist groups around the Islamic world offer marriages to new recruits

What's unrealistic here?
 
I'm talking about government assigned wives, not arranged marriages
That's just an arranged marriage where the government gets involved to ensure monogamy.

How about, if a woman doesn't get married by her parents before 21, the government chooses a man for her. Does that sound good?
 
the government cannot and will never be able to legally mandate arranged marriages in cultures where it no longer exists both for political, constitutional, and practical reasons
That's why we must make our own nation. Look at the Prophet Mohammed as an example. Read my other threads. Land is cheap in Russia. More women than men thanks to war. Plenty of guns. Rising inceldom. As long as we don't threaten Putin, we can grow for a long time. Indistinguishable from a cult at the start. Nationhood comes much later.
 
also LMAO how do you plan on bringing women into a country full of incels?
There's legal ways. I won't say anything about illegal ways.

Legal ways include :
  • Adopting children, once they're mature they can marry someone other than their step-father
  • Letting economically vulnerable women exchange monogamy for financial security
  • Using religion to draw in women
  • Getting JBWmaxxers like It'sOver to bring his harem to Incelistan. We can marry his daughters.
And that's just the legal ways.
 
jfl do you really think the world is the same as it was in 700 bce? stop coping and accept there is no hope for incels
Russia is being accused of taking Ukrainian children and giving them to Russian parents right now. Nothing has changed since 700 BCE.
 
"Letting economically vulnerable women exchange monogamy for financial security"
"Using religion to draw in women"
"Getting JBWmaxxers"

You can literally attempt all of this stuff right now, you don't need to try and buy up land in Russia to do it...
Yes, but you have to consider feminist media, feminist government, feminist businesses, hypergamy, domestic violence laws, sexual misconduct laws, and divorce laws. Child support laws too.

None of that in Incelistan.
 
"Letting economically vulnerable women exchange monogamy for financial security"
"Using religion to draw in women"
"Getting JBWmaxxers"

You can literally attempt all of this stuff right now, you don't need to try and buy up land in Russia to do it...
Put me in power and I can get you a white blonde Russian woman.
 
"Letting economically vulnerable women exchange monogamy for financial security"
"Using religion to draw in women"
"Getting JBWmaxxers"

You can literally attempt all of this stuff right now, you don't need to try and buy up land in Russia to do it...
The point of land in Russia is creating a space where women can't cheat or divorce rape us
 
You don't need to be in power to get a vulnerable woman to marry you for financial reasons, aka glorified betabuxxing / mail order bride. If you can convince so much as a single woman into doing that then I'll listen to you jfl
I could afford a mail order bride and I consider myself poor. The problem with greencardmaxxing is that when the vulnerable woman comes to a feminist country, she suddenly has all the power. We will turn that around.

Single mother? Dude, I'll get you a virgin.
 
sexhaver problems
The more desperate women are, the uglier the men they're willing to date. The less choice they have, the harder for them to wait forever or become sluts for Chad only.
 
You don't need to be in power to get a vulnerable woman to marry you for financial reasons, aka glorified betabuxxing / mail order bride. If you can convince so much as a single woman into doing that then I'll listen to you jfl
Betabuxxing a virgin woman who will be prevented from cheating on you is the best that the 95% of men who aren't Chad can hope for. In time, we will even develop brain implants that make women love their husbands. We can cure inceldom.
 
As i said before, Just name it Mark Rodgers and be done with it, Whatever the fuck this religion is but may i state a fact that is true that is of that Cho got more kills than ER so your hailing a fake saint.
 

Similar threads

Antorian
Replies
5
Views
198
BlueCore
BlueCore
Efiliste
Replies
28
Views
3K
shitholeamerica
S
turbosperg
Replies
2
Views
372
IronsideCel
IronsideCel
Logic55
Replies
2
Views
256
Vilsonicvs
Vilsonicvs
NorthernWind
Replies
7
Views
292
Regenerator
Regenerator

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top