Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Marxism-Rodgerism. Opinions?

The traditional solution where you could marry at most one person at a time solved everything at once. it paired people off to similar smv rank. this meant while unattractive males would get unattractive females which is a slight loss, but they would get to reproduce which is 99% of the value anyway.
Tbh I don't believe in fairness or equality at all. If anything i rather have an incel takeover where the rankings are shifted. Ultimately normies are inherently immoral and instead of pretending to have some moral value to shift power from them, might as well just be a villain from the get go and focus on ripping away all their power.
i don't think that thinking of normies as humans is a good idea. the crimes they have committed has gone way past mere declarations of war.
 
Last edited:
Marxism and communism can go fuck itself, Only the 4th reich of Lonelyus shall stand!
i would say that marxism and communism would be good for weight-loss but all communists are overweight
 
i would say that marxism and communism would be good for weight-loss but all communists are overweight
FUCK OFF COMMIE, AND GET THAT FUCKING AVI OFF YOUR PAGE IF YOUR A COMMIE!
 
The traditional solution where you could marry at most one person at a time solved everything at once. it paired people off to similar smv rank. this meant while unattractive males would get unattractive females which is a slight loss, but they would get to reproduce which is 99% of the value anyway.
Tbh I don't believe in fairness or equality at all. If anything i rather have an incel takeover where the rankings are shifted. Ultimately normies are inherently immoral and instead of pretending to have some moral value to shift power from them, might as well just be a villain from the get go and focus on ripping away all their power.
i don't think that thinking of normies as humans is a good idea. the crimes they have committed has gone way past mere declarations of war.
Men act like emotional retards in order to peacock for women. Patriarchy will make men behave better.
 
Christianity essentially is sexual socialism already. But let's not forget, love and attraction can't be forced!
Incels, even in a system like that, will never be genuinely loved and lusted after by foids.
If you want to be loved, YOU must have a loveable bone structure and loveable genetics, no way around that.
I will never forgive a whore and marry a "born-again virgin". Christianity is for roman slaves. Christian pastors tell incels to pray to God for comfort, FUCK that. I used to be a Christian.

MR guarantees virgin pussy to all men. MR guarantees mandatory paternity testing. MR guarantees making adultery illegal.
 
One more thing:
-Chad harems are a staple of human history
-Controling sex-ratio allows to adjust the dial so that there are more women than chads can take for themselfs, it's analogue to how capitalism created a more value instead of a fairer distribution of value.
-This could be turned up to such extremes that there are enough women for every man to have a harem, though, since some will not want that and more importantly, because men will still need to create enough financial value to carry all these women along, that's probably going too far.
-But with a more modest change you might still create a large enough surplus of women for everyone to end up with one.

-You might argue that a truly BPed person would see how no amount of women can change how unattractive incels are to females, but I wouldn't feel certain in that. Nowadays many women still choose to settle down, a majority even. A lot of women can't stand being alone and with way more women than men around their negotiating position will be as weak as it can be, however weak that is.
Some British women after WW1 chose to remain single and/or be whores rather than settle down.

More women = bigger drain on economy
More women = harder to fight off invasions
More women = men have less incentive to invest and work hard to feed their children

It will lead to a South Sudan kind of situation
 
Read the rest, I get more enthusiastic as I go on.
Ultimately though, I don't care how it feels or if it is consistent in it's philisophy. Does it have any chance to become reality? A consistent but impractical solution is no solution at all.

Since you want to force equality, your methods of controlling the behavior of the population must be very effective. Not only does this make every Western power your enemy, it makes for piss easy color revolutions if you lose control just a bit. You need North Korea style influence over the lifes of your people.

Not to be rude, but I would bet against anyone here being able to put that together from scratch, while being under hostile siege from all sides, while lacking nukes.
North Korea is the only country where JBW doesn't work. Just saying ...
 
Leftism, especially Marxism, is an ideology for losers, arbitrarily changing the rules of the game so losers get more stuff. At least Rodgerism owns this to its logical conclusion through true universal equality. You love equality? Cool, fuck an incel or shut up, fascist.
Hippie communes used to require female hippies to mandatorily fuck all the hippie men, even the ugly ones. You can guess why the hippie movement failed.
 
The reason why this is great despite me thinking very little of Marxism in general, is that it's using popular leftist ideas and rhetoric to make it's case. In many instance, progressives won't be able to refute what is being said without contradicting what they already publicly stated before.

Honestly, Marxism might work better for the sexual market than the financial one:
In the financial world, Marx grew up witnessing exploitation and poverty around him and predicted the misery capitalism would foster among it's citizens would inevitably give birth to a desire to revolt amongst the downtrodden.

Instead, the workers became wealthier than ever, stopped working themselfs to the death side by side with their children and suddenly had enough money, they didn't want the whole system to be overthrown anymore. They themselfs would loose too much. Only the poorest, not yet industrialised countries had further revolutions and they all ended in slaughter.

But the sexual market does not allow for growing the pie in the way the financial market does. You can't just create more and more sex to spread around, there are pretty hard limits, the primary factors being the male to female ratio and the grade of control excercised on human behavior by the state.
So we do see things play out roughly as a Marxist analysis would predict.

I still am not optimistic Marxism has a solution to the problem it describes. Can't help but remember how the Russians abolished the banking monopoly and tried to get rid of money itself as currency, only a few months before they had to revert everythign because their country was collapsing.

Either way, this was honestly fun to read, the title made me think it was going to be retarded drivel but I will probably end up copy pasting some lines from here for future use in arguments.

A spontaneous idea that came to my mind:

-Marxism failed to predict reality, in part because how the money/value was divided became less important than how much was created because their was so much room for growth left, by the end of it everyone was better off, especially the poor, for whom having more money was the most important.

-On the sexual market, you can't easily create more and more value as you please. But there is something you can do that will have the same effect:

-Control the gender-ratio by controlling how many men and women are born. This allows for a higher number of women per man, which effectively means more value per consumer, which is in a sense value creation.

-Affecting this ratio is also not all that unrealistic. I mean, I don't see a good way and we have negative infinite political capital, but in theory it's doable.
You should read Vladmir Lenin's "Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism"
 
What does incel organizing even look like? Do I cold approach a bunch of Indian guys and hand them pamphlets with ER's face plastered on them while I explain the benefits of Marx-Rodgerism to them?
That would work. There are still millions of men like us who haven't been exposed to the blackpill. Most men don't even know what the blackpill is.
 
To be honest, the only way for this to happen is if Trump wins in 2024 and then he starts a coup to stay in power. Far-right incels should be appointed by Trump to run the country at all levels which are local, state, and federal. However, Trump is too much of a pussy to do this.
 
Some British women after WW1 chose to remain single and/or be whores rather than settle down.
More women = bigger drain on economy
It will lead to a South Sudan kind of situation
South sudan has an impressive average IQ of 58.61.

Obviously that will be more influenced in 3rd world countries by enviormetnal factors, though those enviormental factors are in some way just an indirect expression of the low innate IQ. From what I have read


it seems like these countries will still be more than a SD below whites even if they ever catch up in terms of eliminating malnourishment and diseases. Western countries already manage impressive amounts of people who are nothing but a drain on the economy. The burden women inflict on the economy could be lowered simply by reducing some of the female only welfare expenses. Though that might not even be necessary, just the higher productivity through higher IQ might be enough.

Some women will always choose to remain single. If polygamy is prohibited and the number of women who strongly prefer to not end up without a partner is as high as the number of men available it will still equalize the power dynamics between the sexes. If there are more women looking than men available, it might even flip it on its head.

More women = harder to fight off invasions
With nukes available large scale invasions are off the table. Even if your economy crashes, your nuclear defenses will be the last thing you cut down on (below a certain minimum necessary for nuclear deterance).

More women = men have less incentive to invest and work hard to feed their children
Not sure how true that holds. We are no longer in the wilderness and basic evolutionary logic does no longer apply the same way it did before. Right now the most reproductively successful people are low IQ underclass people who just pump out kids since their early years and rely on state support to afford their high number of offspring.

While the hardest working members of the middle class are too busy working hard to even have any children. Right now, to the extent that surveys about female preferance are true (so who knows) women amongst the higher classes have less children than they ideally would want to. In part I would guess because they are empowered in their sexual hypergamy, but can't actually all marry the same men. So those that fail at securing chad's commitment might end up childless or start having chidlren very late in life in part because they can't find husbands they deem worthy.
This suggests that what needs to change is how men are percieved by women. If you increase the average male value by decreasing the supply of men relative to the demand for them exerted by women, who is deemed worthy aka the market price will go down. Making more men look like acceptable partners in women's eyes.

To me it seems the problem is not men not working hard enough (look at Japan for an extrem example where they work themselfs to death but fail to reproduce all the same), but instead that these hard working men are still not desirable enough for women to pursue.

The amount men invest in their offspring is also strongly dependend on racial differences and even cultural ones, it's much more than just a simple result of basic incentives around maximizing fertility.




As I said before, I think very little of communism as a political / socioeconomic system and judge the chance for that to change to round down to 0.
 
Last edited:
Elegant theory. Somehow reminds me of the marriages under Khmer Rouge's Democratic Kampuchea.
 
1693417183189


YOU BELIEVE ANIMALS MATTER MORE THAN JEWS, FAGGOTS, MUTTS, N1GGERS, NORMIES, AND INCELS
 
It may seem difficult to understand the realities of the blackpill. It may be hard to come to terms with how - and why - the world functions as it does. And even when you do, it is even harder to understand where to go next.

But there is one set of techniques which shines a clear light on the world we live in. A scientific and logical analysis of systems of limited resources - Marxism. When we undertake a Marxist analysis of the sexual economy, we immediately find its nuances explained and its realities presented for all to see.

The fundamental element of inequality is exploitation. In economic Marxism, exploitation occurs when a capitalist takes most of the value a worker's labor creates, leaving them barely enough to survive. In other words, the worker's surplus value is stolen from them. This is how capitalists make profits. Sometimes, the capitalists let some segments of workers keep more of their value, in order to bribe and pacify them.

In the sexual economy, there are two distinct classes of men - Chads...and everyone else. There is a group which keeps most women for itself - the Chad-Bourgeois - and a much larger group which, despite being responsible for maintaining global civilization with their labor so that Chad is free to take all he wants, is denied most women. These are the sexual proletariat.

The sexuality of women should be evenly spread among society, but it is not. Instead, it is commodified by sexual capitalism and given to Chad. The Chad-Bourgeoisie allow the sexual proletariat to have just as much pussy as they need to keep the human race alive through reproduction. But even here is it not fair; the proletariat get Chad's leftovers - only when the Chad-Bourgeois no longer want a woman does she go to settle down, marry, and reproduce with a non-Chad.

Now, I mentioned before that the economic bourgeois sometimes bribe workers by giving them more than they would otherwise. In the modern era, the Chad-Bourgeois are facing a world where the proletariat is no longer consigned to the feudal life of arranged marriages without any questions asked, and can see the reality of sexual inequality via media and their own insights. The Chad-Bourgeois responds by bribing the sexual proletariat - they, too, are now allowed to have sex before marriage, and perhaps fuck many women. These women are, of course, still the ones Chad doesn't want, but it bribes most of the world. Remember, this happened when the sexual free market, where women can now choose their partners without having to marry a non-Chad in the end, replaced the Feudal system of arranged marriage. This is sexual capitalism.

The people so bribed are normies. This is the main reason why normies are blind to the sexual capitalist system and lack revolutionary potential.

But the system is imperfect. Due to the female's nature, not all members of the proletariat can be bribed just by the Chad-Bourgeois allowing (pseudo) free sex for everyone. A group at the bottom is inevitability left out - incels.

As sexual feudalism shifted to sexual capitalism, a contradiction was exposed - the Contradiction of Sexual Capitalism is the existence of incels, and the conclusion of the capitalist stage of history must be the resolving of this contradiction. Due to how females are hardwired to be only attracted to Chads, incels always lose in a sexual free market. Many females would rather be single than marry an incel, and a result the incels become a class which doesn't even get marriage, much less any additional bribes. Due to their extreme condition, the incels become "blackpilled" and see the system as it is. The incels thus attain class consciousness.

The basic structure of the sexual world is that the Chad-Bourgeois take all the pussy they can, especially the desirable kind, while eventually passing their leftovers to the sexual proletariat as bribes and allowances. Among the latter group, those are who successfully bribed are normies, and those who become class conscious are incels.

So how do the Chad-Bourgeois manage to keep society under their control, even with incels attain class consciousness? In Marxism, the answer is the Base and superstructure. In a sexual capitalist society, all we know is shaped by the system of sexual economy we live in. Our culture, beliefs, and so on are bent to conform to and reinforce the Chad-Bourgeois narrative. In order to prevent the sexual proletariat from attaining class consciousness, the Chad-Bourgouse use culture to create a false consciousness for them to live in instead.

The key to understanding this is to understand that truth is relative to one's class. Comrade Lenin explained this with his concept of partiinost, party truth. What is "true" depends on your class, truth for one class may be falsehood for another. Thus, what class's "truth" you're listening to is very important.

For example, let's take the Chad-Bourgeois idea of "confidence." Confidence is an intentionally vague idea to explain Chad's sexual success as anything besides winning the genetic lottery. It is said that someone - anyone - with "confidence" can also live like Chad does. For the Chad-Bourgoise, this is true. All a Chad has to do is be willing step outside or set up an online dating profile and they will get all the pussy they want. However, for the rest of the world, this is not the case. By enforcing the idea of confidence instead of genetic luck, Chad yet again bribes the sexual proletariat - bribes them with hope. The idea of confidence explains structural inequality as personal failure - in the same way the capitalist tells the exploited worker that he, too, would be rich if he only worked harder, so does the Chad tell the sexual proletariat that they could have sex if they were only just a little more confident. In this way, the sexual proletariat are blamed for their own oppression - their celibacy is a result of their own moral failings, because they were not "confident" enough. The Chad-Bourgeois present themselves as having earned the pussy they inherent, while the rest of the world deserves to live without. Confidence is just one example of how sexual capitalism distorts culture and creates false narratives to keep people blind.

Normies love false narratives because they are bribed. A normie, who may have even had sex, believes that his success in the past means the confidence narrative and so on is true - he can truly be a Chad, if he works hard enough! Thus the normies convince themselves Chad's world is not only fair but desirable, because they too might have a chance of being chad.

Normies are deceived to varying degrees.

A regular normie has had their bribe a few times and doesn't bother to think about the realities of exploitation and the sexual economy. These normies can be blackpilled with evidence, but most of them just double down on the false consciousness due to their hope that they can be a Chad.

A beta is a normie who is faced with the reality of sexual inequality. He may be an orbiter, hanging around women in the hope he'll get sex. He may be a nice guy, who is nice to women for the same reason. He may be cucked, whereby he shares a single woman with other men so that he can at least get laid. Though he may deny it, he is painfully aware of these material and sexual realities.

A white knight has come against a blackpill before, and it scared them. They swing the other way - they actively try and spread Chad's narrative and enforce it, because they are trying convince themselves. There is great overlap between white knights and Betas, as the latter often exhibit white knight behavior. Many Betas turn into white knights when confronted with the black pill.

All normies have one thing in common - they do not want to accept the reality of the blackpill because they want to continue to believe they can be Chad. Another element is that they enjoy Chad's narrative when it suits them - regarding incels. They don't like to remember that Chad is sexually more successful then them because he is just better....but that's not so bad if it means that they are better than incels in turn, since they at least "earned" some sex and incels could not! In economic capitalism, the reality of economic status defined by class is ignored in favor of an individualist, democratic narrative, and sexual capitalism works the same way. The realities of incels and the Chad-Bourgeois are overlooked in favor of the lie that it's all about individual action, that any individual can work his way to the top of the sexual marketplace through hard work and imaginary concepts like "confidence."

By the methods described above, the Chad-Bourgeois extract all of the surplus value - in this context, surplus pussy - from the workers/sexual proletariat for themselves, and maintain the system through bribing normies and creating false consciousness. But here's where it gets really interesting - the immortal science of historical materialism explains even more than this.

Everyone knows that even among Chads there is a hierarchy - a racial hierarchy, with white Chad at the top. In the 1960s, Comrade Mao Zedong developed Marxist-Leninist-Maoism to explain the differences between the first world and the third world. Maoism reveals the first world exploits the third world through imperialism, and sets up a global class hierarchy of sorts. This economic hierarchy in turn ties into a sexual hierarchy - one where the imperialist white Chads are above the colonized Chads. A critique of imperialism explains the racial Chad hierarchy - which, of course, filters down into the sexual proletariat as well.

Following this trend, we can see the close interconnection between looks (Chad privilege) and economic success. Females like money and power...and it seems Chad ends up with those as well.

We all know that studies have proven Chads are much more likely to succeed in economic sphere. They are given quality jobs and often end up in very social, very prestigious positions like executive officers. But this shows us that wealth comes second. Poor Chads still dominate the sexual proletariat, and their poverty, on average, never lasts long. In other words, sexual inequality comes before economic inequality, and due to how intertwined they are, it means that economic inequality is a consequence of sexual inequality due to society's constant preference for Chad. Sexual inequality predates economic capitalism, feudalism, even primitive tribalism - sexual inequality is the original and eternal form of hierarchy, it is harbinger of all other inequalities in other areas.

Thus, the Revolutionary and Immortal Science of Marxist-Rodgerism is born. We see that the fundamental conflict is between the well endowed Chad-Bourgeoisie and the sexual proletariat, and that all other conflicts ultimately derive from this great inequality. We see that the Chad-Bourgeois manipulates culture and society to further its narratives and worldview to maintain this power structure. Finally, we must conclude that the only way forward for humanity is to dismantle the system of sexual capitalism so that sex can be distributed fairly to all members of society.

Incels of the world, rise up! You have nothing to lose but your chains!


u/Communecel
Marxism is cringe. I'm a national rodgerist
 
South sudan has an impressive average IQ of 58.61.

Obviously that will be more influenced in 3rd world countries by enviormetnal factors, though those enviormental factors are in some way just an indirect expression of the low innate IQ. From what I have read


it seems like these countries will still be more than a SD below whites even if they ever catch up in terms of eliminating malnourishment and diseases. Western countries already manage impressive amounts of people who are nothing but a drain on the economy. The burden women inflict on the economy could be lowered simply by reducing some of the female only welfare expenses. Though that might not even be necessary, just the higher productivity through higher IQ might be enough.

Some women will always choose to remain single. If polygamy is prohibited and the number of women who strongly prefer to not end up without a partner is as high as the number of men available it will still equalize the power dynamics between the sexes. If there are more women looking than men available, it might even flip it on its head.


With nukes available large scale invasions are off the table. Even if your economy crashes, your nuclear defenses will be the last thing you cut down on (below a certain minimum necessary for nuclear deterance).


Not sure how true that holds. We are no longer in the wilderness and basic evolutionary logic does no longer apply the same way it did before. Right now the most reproductively successful people are low IQ underclass people who just pump out kids since their early years and rely on state support to afford their high number of offspring.

While the hardest working members of the middle class are too busy working hard to even have any children. Right now, to the extent that surveys about female preferance are true (so who knows) women amongst the higher classes have less children than they ideally would want to. In part I would guess because they are empowered in their sexual hypergamy, but can't actually all marry the same men. So those that fail at securing chad's commitment might end up childless or start having chidlren very late in life in part because they can't find husbands they deem worthy.
This suggests that what needs to change is how men are percieved by women. If you increase the average male value by decreasing the supply of men relative to the demand for them exerted by women, who is deemed worthy aka the market price will go down. Making more men look like acceptable partners in women's eyes.

To me it seems the problem is not men not working hard enough (look at Japan for an extrem example where they work themselfs to death but fail to reproduce all the same), but instead that these hard working men are still not desirable enough for women to pursue.

The amount men invest in their offspring is also strongly dependend on racial differences and even cultural ones, it's much more than just a simple result of basic incentives around maximizing fertility.




As I said before, I think very little of communism as a political / socioeconomic system and judge the chance for that to change to round down to 0.
Imagine letting a 58 IQ into a 100 IQ land by opening the borders
 
Marxism is cringe. I'm a national rodgerist
literally wanted to make a thread about national rodgerism (androcentric national bolshevism) the other day, you kinda beat me to the punch.
 
literally wanted to make a thread about national rodgerism (androcentric national bolshevism) the other day, you kinda beat me to the punch.
National rodgerism is national socialist rodgerism
 
National rodgerism is national socialist rodgerism
based. rodgerism in my opinion could be defined as ultrareactionary chauvinism
 
Marxism is cringe. I'm a national rodgerist
If you let SS Chad have a freeuse haram of blonde Stacies while incel Ignatz freezes his dick off in Stalingrad, then your ideology is no better than feminism
 
Indeed, funniest shit I've read all day.

In a way ER has transcended death, while all these Chads and Stacy's he despised will die and be forgotten to time, ER will be remembered and talked about forever, so he sorta won in the end.
He did win.
 
This is the only type of marxism that I support. Redistributing (virgin) women to men so that all men who desire have an equal access to a partner is a moral imperative.
 
This is the only type of marxism that I support. Redistributing (virgin) women to men so that all men who desire have an equal access to a partner is a moral imperative.
Inshallah
 
groundbreaking, revolutionary and ahead of its time :feelsYall:
 
Fuckin hell , this one is a fine article. absolutely mind blowing.
read word for word.
you on point where you wrote "The incels thus attain class consciousness".
 
groundbreaking, revolutionary and ahead of its time :feelsYall:
Fuckin hell , this one is a fine article. absolutely mind blowing.
read word for word.
you on point where you wrote "The incels thus attain class consciousness".
We are the sexual lumpebproletariat, the sexually unemployed.

Just like the USSR guaranteed employment for all citizens, the ussER will guarantee a virgin foid for every man
 
I don’t really care about this ideology, but I love the praxis!!! You know what the implementation is :feelshaha:
 
I don’t really care about this ideology, but I love the praxis!!! You know what the implementation is :feelshaha:
 
First marxism seeks to destroy the family unit, now you're telling me marxism is going to reinstate it? When will this stupid meme die already.
Marxism works for me
IMG 2058
 
I could afford a mail order bride and I consider myself poor. The problem with greencardmaxxing is that when the vulnerable woman comes to a feminist country, she suddenly has all the power. We will turn that around.

Single mother? Dude, I'll get you a virgin.
Can you get me virgin
 
It may seem difficult to understand the realities of the blackpill. It may be hard to come to terms with how - and why - the world functions as it does. And even when you do, it is even harder to understand where to go next.

But there is one set of techniques which shines a clear light on the world we live in. A scientific and logical analysis of systems of limited resources - Marxism. When we undertake a Marxist analysis of the sexual economy, we immediately find its nuances explained and its realities presented for all to see.

The fundamental element of inequality is exploitation. In economic Marxism, exploitation occurs when a capitalist takes most of the value a worker's labor creates, leaving them barely enough to survive. In other words, the worker's surplus value is stolen from them. This is how capitalists make profits. Sometimes, the capitalists let some segments of workers keep more of their value, in order to bribe and pacify them.

In the sexual economy, there are two distinct classes of men - Chads...and everyone else. There is a group which keeps most women for itself - the Chad-Bourgeois - and a much larger group which, despite being responsible for maintaining global civilization with their labor so that Chad is free to take all he wants, is denied most women. These are the sexual proletariat.

The sexuality of women should be evenly spread among society, but it is not. Instead, it is commodified by sexual capitalism and given to Chad. The Chad-Bourgeoisie allow the sexual proletariat to have just as much pussy as they need to keep the human race alive through reproduction. But even here is it not fair; the proletariat get Chad's leftovers - only when the Chad-Bourgeois no longer want a woman does she go to settle down, marry, and reproduce with a non-Chad.

Now, I mentioned before that the economic bourgeois sometimes bribe workers by giving them more than they would otherwise. In the modern era, the Chad-Bourgeois are facing a world where the proletariat is no longer consigned to the feudal life of arranged marriages without any questions asked, and can see the reality of sexual inequality via media and their own insights. The Chad-Bourgeois responds by bribing the sexual proletariat - they, too, are now allowed to have sex before marriage, and perhaps fuck many women. These women are, of course, still the ones Chad doesn't want, but it bribes most of the world. Remember, this happened when the sexual free market, where women can now choose their partners without having to marry a non-Chad in the end, replaced the Feudal system of arranged marriage. This is sexual capitalism.

The people so bribed are normies. This is the main reason why normies are blind to the sexual capitalist system and lack revolutionary potential.

But the system is imperfect. Due to the female's nature, not all members of the proletariat can be bribed just by the Chad-Bourgeois allowing (pseudo) free sex for everyone. A group at the bottom is inevitability left out - incels.

As sexual feudalism shifted to sexual capitalism, a contradiction was exposed - the Contradiction of Sexual Capitalism is the existence of incels, and the conclusion of the capitalist stage of history must be the resolving of this contradiction. Due to how females are hardwired to be only attracted to Chads, incels always lose in a sexual free market. Many females would rather be single than marry an incel, and a result the incels become a class which doesn't even get marriage, much less any additional bribes. Due to their extreme condition, the incels become "blackpilled" and see the system as it is. The incels thus attain class consciousness.

The basic structure of the sexual world is that the Chad-Bourgeois take all the pussy they can, especially the desirable kind, while eventually passing their leftovers to the sexual proletariat as bribes and allowances. Among the latter group, those are who successfully bribed are normies, and those who become class conscious are incels.

So how do the Chad-Bourgeois manage to keep society under their control, even with incels attain class consciousness? In Marxism, the answer is the Base and superstructure. In a sexual capitalist society, all we know is shaped by the system of sexual economy we live in. Our culture, beliefs, and so on are bent to conform to and reinforce the Chad-Bourgeois narrative. In order to prevent the sexual proletariat from attaining class consciousness, the Chad-Bourgouse use culture to create a false consciousness for them to live in instead.

The key to understanding this is to understand that truth is relative to one's class. Comrade Lenin explained this with his concept of partiinost, party truth. What is "true" depends on your class, truth for one class may be falsehood for another. Thus, what class's "truth" you're listening to is very important.

For example, let's take the Chad-Bourgeois idea of "confidence." Confidence is an intentionally vague idea to explain Chad's sexual success as anything besides winning the genetic lottery. It is said that someone - anyone - with "confidence" can also live like Chad does. For the Chad-Bourgoise, this is true. All a Chad has to do is be willing step outside or set up an online dating profile and they will get all the pussy they want. However, for the rest of the world, this is not the case. By enforcing the idea of confidence instead of genetic luck, Chad yet again bribes the sexual proletariat - bribes them with hope. The idea of confidence explains structural inequality as personal failure - in the same way the capitalist tells the exploited worker that he, too, would be rich if he only worked harder, so does the Chad tell the sexual proletariat that they could have sex if they were only just a little more confident. In this way, the sexual proletariat are blamed for their own oppression - their celibacy is a result of their own moral failings, because they were not "confident" enough. The Chad-Bourgeois present themselves as having earned the pussy they inherent, while the rest of the world deserves to live without. Confidence is just one example of how sexual capitalism distorts culture and creates false narratives to keep people blind.

Normies love false narratives because they are bribed. A normie, who may have even had sex, believes that his success in the past means the confidence narrative and so on is true - he can truly be a Chad, if he works hard enough! Thus the normies convince themselves Chad's world is not only fair but desirable, because they too might have a chance of being chad.

Normies are deceived to varying degrees.

A regular normie has had their bribe a few times and doesn't bother to think about the realities of exploitation and the sexual economy. These normies can be blackpilled with evidence, but most of them just double down on the false consciousness due to their hope that they can be a Chad.

A beta is a normie who is faced with the reality of sexual inequality. He may be an orbiter, hanging around women in the hope he'll get sex. He may be a nice guy, who is nice to women for the same reason. He may be cucked, whereby he shares a single woman with other men so that he can at least get laid. Though he may deny it, he is painfully aware of these material and sexual realities.

A white knight has come against a blackpill before, and it scared them. They swing the other way - they actively try and spread Chad's narrative and enforce it, because they are trying convince themselves. There is great overlap between white knights and Betas, as the latter often exhibit white knight behavior. Many Betas turn into white knights when confronted with the black pill.

All normies have one thing in common - they do not want to accept the reality of the blackpill because they want to continue to believe they can be Chad. Another element is that they enjoy Chad's narrative when it suits them - regarding incels. They don't like to remember that Chad is sexually more successful then them because he is just better....but that's not so bad if it means that they are better than incels in turn, since they at least "earned" some sex and incels could not! In economic capitalism, the reality of economic status defined by class is ignored in favor of an individualist, democratic narrative, and sexual capitalism works the same way. The realities of incels and the Chad-Bourgeois are overlooked in favor of the lie that it's all about individual action, that any individual can work his way to the top of the sexual marketplace through hard work and imaginary concepts like "confidence."

By the methods described above, the Chad-Bourgeois extract all of the surplus value - in this context, surplus pussy - from the workers/sexual proletariat for themselves, and maintain the system through bribing normies and creating false consciousness. But here's where it gets really interesting - the immortal science of historical materialism explains even more than this.

Everyone knows that even among Chads there is a hierarchy - a racial hierarchy, with white Chad at the top. In the 1960s, Comrade Mao Zedong developed Marxist-Leninist-Maoism to explain the differences between the first world and the third world. Maoism reveals the first world exploits the third world through imperialism, and sets up a global class hierarchy of sorts. This economic hierarchy in turn ties into a sexual hierarchy - one where the imperialist white Chads are above the colonized Chads. A critique of imperialism explains the racial Chad hierarchy - which, of course, filters down into the sexual proletariat as well.

Following this trend, we can see the close interconnection between looks (Chad privilege) and economic success. Females like money and power...and it seems Chad ends up with those as well.

We all know that studies have proven Chads are much more likely to succeed in economic sphere. They are given quality jobs and often end up in very social, very prestigious positions like executive officers. But this shows us that wealth comes second. Poor Chads still dominate the sexual proletariat, and their poverty, on average, never lasts long. In other words, sexual inequality comes before economic inequality, and due to how intertwined they are, it means that economic inequality is a consequence of sexual inequality due to society's constant preference for Chad. Sexual inequality predates economic capitalism, feudalism, even primitive tribalism - sexual inequality is the original and eternal form of hierarchy, it is harbinger of all other inequalities in other areas.

Thus, the Revolutionary and Immortal Science of Marxist-Rodgerism is born. We see that the fundamental conflict is between the well endowed Chad-Bourgeoisie and the sexual proletariat, and that all other conflicts ultimately derive from this great inequality. We see that the Chad-Bourgeois manipulates culture and society to further its narratives and worldview to maintain this power structure. Finally, we must conclude that the only way forward for humanity is to dismantle the system of sexual capitalism so that sex can be distributed fairly to all members of society.

Incels of the world, rise up! You have nothing to lose but your chains!


u/Communecel
Normies can't even spell Proletariat or Bourgeoisie and you expect them to become Marxists and overthrow the government and establish communism. This is copium of the highest levels.

Capitalists own the MoP because they invested in it because they're smarter than the working class. No one is stopping the working class from forming coops or communes. They don't because they're too stupid to organize together.
 
Marxism believes all problems are due to material conditions like wealth, so it denies genetics and inherent nature. Therefore its incompatible with incelism. If anything capitalism is the way you can get a partner by moneymaxxing.
 
I will never forgive a whore and marry a "born-again virgin". Christianity is for roman slaves. Christian pastors tell incels to pray to God for comfort, FUCK that. I used to be a Christian.

MR guarantees virgin pussy to all men. MR guarantees mandatory paternity testing. MR guarantees making adultery illegal.
BASED !!!!!! ALL FOIDS NEED TO BE PUNISHED SEVERLEY!!!
 
@mlcurrycel please release a whole book detailing your teachings :feelsaww:
 
What a fuckin retard jfl. The mod who pinned this bs is even dumber. Congrats
Comunecel is one of the r/incels all-timers you 2021cel. R9K and Elliot Rodger used to talk about the Beta Uprising and this is the highest theoretical development of that idea.
 
Normies can't even spell Proletariat or Bourgeoisie and you expect them to become Marxists and overthrow the government and establish communism. This is copium of the highest levels.

Capitalists own the MoP because they invested in it because they're smarter than the working class. No one is stopping the working class from forming coops or communes. They don't because they're too stupid to organize together.
The working class creates co-ops in every century, they usually fail because keeping up with capitalists requires loans, and the bourgeois would obviously only loan to each other rather than left wing revolutionaries. After the fall of the gold standard, the bankers can literally invent money our of thin air. Compete with that.
 
The working class creates co-ops in every century, they usually fail because keeping up with capitalists requires loans, and the bourgeois would obviously only loan to each other rather than left wing revolutionaries. After the fall of the gold standard, the bankers can literally invent money out of thin air. Compete with that.
I’m rich
 
Marxism believes all problems are due to material conditions like wealth, so it denies genetics and inherent nature. Therefore its incompatible with incelism. If anything capitalism is the way you can get a partner by moneymaxxing.
It doesn't deny nature. But it doesn't use the naturalistic fallacy either. Is polygamy more natural than monogamy? Marxists don't care, because humans are adaptable and consider whatever they grew up with to be 'natural'. All the incels mad at hypergamy are mad because it feels unnatural to them.

Moneymaxx? You'll just get used up gold diggers who'll divorce you and take your shit. Or MeToo you if you refuse to marry.

You can always get mogged too.

MR will end the very concept of mogging.
 

Similar threads

Old Ironsides
Replies
4
Views
225
Abacaxi14
Abacaxi14
Anarcho Nihilist
Replies
41
Views
600
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
Darth Aries
Replies
9
Views
266
Neucher The Kanga
Neucher The Kanga
InTheSnow
Replies
24
Views
204
InTheSnow
InTheSnow

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top