Mario Galaxy remaster looks better than I expected

[deleted fren]

It looks like Nintendo actually raised the resolution of in-game textures as well as added some new ones.

It's not much, but certainly more than I expected from them. Although, they might be using ai upscaling as it does seem some details were lost.

 

[AutistSupremacist]

I played the og AGES ago, So I'll be replaying it + I need something to help me cope.

 

[deleted fren]

I played the og AGES ago, So I'll be replaying it + I need something to help me cope.

It's a masterpiece. Although, I suggest you don't complete 1. It's not worth it.

 

[Geno]

I played 1 but not 2

 

[deleted fren]

I played 1 but not 2

Both are good. 1 is best.

 

[Glassness]

Only 70 for a game that came out 15 years ago this is the bare minimum

 

[CRASH THE CUCK]

Both are good. 1 is best.

mid

 

[starystulejarz]

It looks like Nintendo actually raised the resolution of in-game textures as well as added some new ones.

Right looks better than on Emulator

So it's a win for new version

It's not much, but certainly more than I expected from them. Although, they might be using ai upscaling as it does seem some details were lost.

However those looks extremely bad, detail is messed up and squished together and og version is also dated due resolution.

Emulator mogs 2 out of 3. It's a scam for $70 if they are that lazy and can only make character model better looking while rest is just ai slop inferior to the original and especially on emulators.

 

[starystulejarz]

And with free texture pack Dolphin emulator completely mogs both versions for free.

 

[Grodd]

Looks good