Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Low IQ Individuals should’ve been wiped out thousands of years ago

C

cynical

Ethnic Mentalcel
★★
Joined
Feb 9, 2026
Posts
103
Online time
28m 1s
This is because throughout all of mankind history, humans reached the top of the food chain due to IQ and it’s a straight reductionist read of our evolution. This applies to ugly or short people too, they should’ve gone extinct thousands of years ago due to genetic filtering of them. Those who lacked intelligence or vital traits became the footnotes.

Us genetically inferior men, only exist because modern society removes natural consequences and lets genes that would’ve been weeded out, survive.
 
the proportion and quality of chads will only increase. a gigachad of today may be an incel of 1000 years from now. all short and ugly men will have gone extinct and humans will be 16 feet tall
 
low iq chads fuck high iq business women all the time
 
iq doesn't matter it's cope
 
This is because throughout all of mankind history, humans reached the top of the food chain due to IQ and it’s a straight reductionist read of our evolution. This applies to ugly or short people too, they should’ve gone extinct thousands of years ago due to genetic filtering of them. Those who lacked intelligence or vital traits became the footnotes.

Us genetically inferior men, only exist because modern society removes natural consequences and lets genes that would’ve been weeded out, survive.
b
 
I get your point, however we didn't succeed due to a singular number like IQ. You think only high IQ individuals reproduced over the years?

Evolution is about who survives to reproduce. Being ugly, short or low IQ does not stop you from having sex. A tall high IQ person could die before he has sex, leaving us to reproduce.
 
I get your point, however we didn't succeed due to a singular number like IQ. You think only high IQ individuals reproduced over the years?.
Yeah, obviously collective intelligence among tribes mattered too, I’m not denying that.
Evolution is about who survives to reproduce. Being ugly, short or low IQ does not stop you from having sex.

Also, if you were ugly or short or low IQ on the battlefield, it didn’t really matter because if your tribe won a war, they would rape all the women anyways and breed children with them. People say now the inferior genes are the most protected it’s ever been, but I say it’s the opposite due to the fact, rape is considered unlawful now so those bad genes will die off.
 
Us genetically inferior men, only exist because modern society removes natural consequences and lets genes that would’ve been weeded out, survive.
Genetically inferior men will always exist unless some extremely advanced genetic technology is developed. Random mutations or unlucky chromosomal assortment can doom people even if they were born to parents with very desirable sets of traits. There will also always be a bottom class of men no matter how high the average is or how tight the spread is, unless everyone is literally identical.
 
This is because throughout all of mankind history, humans reached the top of the food chain due to IQ and it’s a straight reductionist read of our evolution. This applies to ugly or short people too, they should’ve gone extinct thousands of years ago due to genetic filtering of them. Those who lacked intelligence or vital traits became the footnotes.

Us genetically inferior men, only exist because modern society removes natural consequences and lets genes that would’ve been weeded out, survive.
unless a sub 4 then genes didnt matter, they forced a girl to be their wife back before large scale civilization which has been most of human existance, hypergamy has not existed long enough to change our genetics. even if we killed all short and ugly men today, in 100 years they would be back. 2 attractive people can still create an ugly baby. if we eventually reached 8 feet tall we would go extinct. genetic diversity like an ugly and handsome person have to always exist or else a species goes extinct when change occurs
 
Genetically inferior men will always exist unless some extremely advanced genetic technology is developed. Random mutations or unlucky chromosomal assortment can doom people even if they were born to parents with very desirable sets of traits. There will also always be a bottom class of men no matter how high the average is or how tight the spread is, unless everyone is literally identical.
Who knows, with CRISPR and designer babies we could try to fix this, but random chance and mutation guarantee a permanent lower class of men. Nature doesn’t care. You can’t beat biology.
 
Also, if you were ugly or short or low IQ on the battlefield, it didn’t really matter because if your tribe won a war, they would rape all the women anyways and breed children with them. People say now the inferior genes are the most protected it’s ever been, but I say it’s the opposite due to the fact, rape is considered unlawful now so those bad genes will die off.
only exist because modern society removes natural consequences and lets genes that would’ve been weeded out, survive.
This just fully contradicts what you came here for. You are now saying that low IQ individuals reproduced regardless.
 
This just fully contradicts what you came here for. You are now saying that low IQ individuals reproduced regardless.
Exception ≠ Rule. Outside of rare circumstances, most reproduction historically was in normal social contexts, not wars.
 
Last edited:
Mb for late response kinda busy rn.

most reproduction historically was in normal social contexts, not wars.
Okay we have kind of looped back to your very first point. Involving IQ for human reproduction success is a far fetched idea. IQ Isn't some huge factor which will determine your reproductive success. Low IQ is not a flaw.

But if you are mentioning IQ in the sense of communication and fitting into social groups which helped humans achieve the position we are in today, I can understand your point.
 

Similar threads

turbocuckcel_7000
Replies
4
Views
759
Saarsmageddon_nuke
Saarsmageddon_nuke
oddneg
Replies
59
Views
11K
andinocel
andinocel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top