looksmatch is a retarded concept

[counterboingo]

You should be concerned more with HOW mates are selected than some arbitrary standard you heard from someone else.

Everyone is guided by self interest not by some random moralizing bs about what is "fair".

Modern society doesn't really function on darwinian selection it's why TFR is sub 2, with birth rates below 1.8 etc like in the West, most socieites will be extinct in 10-30 generations depending on how low it is.

 

[Luzifer]

Jews

 

[PLA1092]

Important concept to show just how fucked things are. Not retarded just because it doesn't apply IRL.

 

[counterboingo]

Important concept to show just how fucked things are. Not retarded just because it doesn't apply IRL.

looksmatch is retarded because its based on moralfagging women are moralfagging to you because they are hiding their self interest you arent going to "debate' and prove them wrong by doing more moralfagging

 

[meta-cel(celcel)]

You should be concerned more with HOW mates are selected than some arbitrary standard.

Isn't this part of examining how mates are selected? By assigning numbers 1-10 and seeing how people pair up according to their ranking.

A looksmatch shows who you're supposed to pair with and how it matches to reality.

 

[counterboingo]

Isn't this part of examining how mates are selected? By assigning numbers 1-10 and seeing how people pair up according to their ranking.

A looksmatch shows who you're supposed to pair with and how it matches to reality.

Why exactly should men be forced to pair injectively with women based on their looks?

Ive never seen this proven rather than just stated and assumed it should be.

I'd rather have a 150 IQ perelman who is ugly get a hot chick and a 80 IQ guy w chad looks still be castrated

 

[meta-cel(celcel)]

Why exactly should men be forced to pair with women based on their looks?

Because no matter how smart, kind, funny; etc someone is if there is no attraction
it's over.

That's why being ugly and trying to 'maxx' will get you nowhere in most cases.

People should pair by attractive they are AND consider personality features too but that's only afterwards.

 

[counterboingo]

Because no matter how smart, kind, funny; etc someone is if there is no attraction
it's over.

That's why being ugly and trying to 'maxx' will get you nowhere in most cases.

So people just pair by how attractive they are AND consider personality features too but that's only afterwards.

I guess it's a mentality to have to care about validation, which can matter a lot to incels, but from friends I have they seem to not care about female validation the more they slay.

i think validation doesnt really matter from a functoinal perspective, so I believe in the pre french revolution idea of marriage

 

[IceStorm]

Jews

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Jews

Chrome.

 

[meta-cel(celcel)]

I think validation doesn't really matter from a functional perspective.

Oh. you're saying marriage should be logical and not solely based on attraction.

I'd rather have a 150 IQ perelman who is ugly get a hot chick and a 80 IQ guy w chad looks still be castrated

It kinda makes sense but at the same time it feels like betabuxxing territory.

That hot woman is with the successful man because he is.
Men shouldn't have do EXTRA things to get women (High IQ; etc) while they just look good