JFL Lol at this gigachad cope

[_incelinside]

This community seems to have gone to the extreme when assessing what women truly desire. Angular lower thirds, hunter eyes, 7 foot height. It's all cope. Maybe women desire these things during ovulation but it's better to have average to above average strength features with very good facial harmony. This is what yields the most success rate. Not hypermasculinity
Average features indicate genetic health, white but with dark colouring. Maybe blue eyes. Decent facial ratios
I've seen during tinder experiments the Nick Batemans seem to to better than the hypermasculine gigachad jocks

 

[mylifeistrash]

people report nick bateman destroyed chico in terms of matches and quality of girls
which destroys your theory

personally i think it's about being a generic looking jock who is good looking and has blue eyes

bateman has brown eyes which i think women deduct massive points for

 

[_incelinside]

people report nick bateman destroyed chico in terms of matches and quality of girls
which destroys your theory

personally i think it's about being a generic looking jock who is good looking and has blue eyes

bateman has brown eyes which i think women deduct massive points for

What?
You just confirmed what i said that Bateman did the best on tinder
You misunderstood me. What i meant is that you dont need a 90 degree gonial angle and hollow cheeks. Hooded eyes

 

[mylifeistrash]

What?
You just confirmed what i said that Bateman did the best on tinder
You misunderstood me. What i meant is that you dont need a 90 degree gonial angle and hollow cheeks. Hooded eyes

chico is regarded as less masculine as bateman and his common criticism is he doesn't look DOM at all

 

[_incelinside]

chico is regarded as less masculine as bateman and his common criticism is he doesn't look DOM at all

Yeah. You still need average masculinity. Hypermasculine is a disadvantage
Chico looks like a soyboy

 

[mylifeistrash]

Yeah. You still need average masculinity. Hypermasculine is a disadvantage
Chico looks like a soyboy

i don't see why people rail against hyper-masculinity. i've never seen an experiment done with a hypermasc guy. he's like the boogieman at this point.

 

[Deleted member 1039]

Yeah, Sean o pry is the basic Chad look. That super masculine muscular Giga Chad guy who was posted on the incels sub is too much.

 

[takERisks]

This community seems to have gone to the extreme when assessing what women truly desire. Angular lower thirds, hunter eyes, 7 foot height. It's all cope. Maybe women desire these things during ovulation but it's better to have average to above average strength features with very good facial harmony. This is what yields the most success rate. Not hypermasculinity
Average features indicate genetic health, white but with dark colouring. Maybe blue eyes. Decent facial ratios
I've seen during tinder experiments the Nick Batemans seem to to better than the hypermasculine gigachad jocks

There's dimorphism, which is height, brow ridge skull size frame
There's genetic quality which is jawline cheekbones maxilla eye shape
You basically need a good combination of the two

 

[mylifeistrash]

Yeah, Sean o pry is the basic Chad look. That super masculine muscular Giga Chad guy who was posted on the incels sub is too much.

that was a photoshop and even then he had a shitty non-masculine eye area with upper eyelid show

hypermasc would be randy orton

 

[_incelinside]

There's dimorphism, which is height, brow ridge skull size frame
There's genetic quality which is jawline cheekbones maxilla eye shape
You basically need a good combination of the two

that was a photoshop and even then he had a shitty non-masculine eye area with upper eyelid show

hypermasc would be randy orton

Average - slightly above average dimorphism is best. I looked a a study
https://incels.is/threads/study-masculinity-and-attractiveness.48054/

 

[mylifeistrash]

Average - slightly above average dimorphism is best. I looked a a study
https://incels.is/threads/study-masculinity-and-attractiveness.48054/

truely hypermasc guys are ultra rare let alone ones that are tall, white, good frame, good facial harmony

i can't even think of an experiment done with one

 

[_incelinside]

truely hypermasc guys are ultra rare let alone ones that are tall, white, good frame, good facial harmony

i can't even think of an experiment done with one

you should do one and prove me wrong
so far evidence posts to average masculinity being best

 

[mylifeistrash]

you should do one and prove me wrong
so far evidence posts to average masculinity being best

i don't even thikn i've seen a guy like that other than randy orton

which is why i think it's pointless to theorize about because such a person doesn't really even exist

 

[Jockcel]

I am not above average so it doesn't mattER for me.

 

[LebaneseCel]

Your thread is a cope.

Females desire masculine and Chaddy facial traits the most.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Nick Batemans seem to to better than the hypermasculine gigachad jocks

6'4

 

[superighteous]

blame lookism

 

[_incelinside]

View attachment 20185 6'4

>he is 6 foot 2 and height isn't the point
>his bone structure isn't hypermasculine

 

[Deleted member 5861]

>he is 6 foot 2 and height isn't the point
>his bone structure isn't hypermasculine

Well anybody with any kind of sense should know that going too extreme on what lookism theories say is good isn't the right way to look at it. I mean a forward chin is good but that doesn't mean this is

Too much of anything is not good. And it is because of that Nick Bateman is gigachad to me.

 

[FortunateMilkman]

You're right, good harmony is what's really important. Ryan Gosling is an attractive man comprised of terrible features. Just look at his highschool photos. He's proof that some amount of looksmaxxing can work. He even has uneven eyes and one of them is lazy.