Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious @Logic55 Is An Example Of Why California Is The Way It Is.

DarkStar

DarkStar

R1bcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
37,871
Simply, he typifies the average individual from that State, and I'm sure all of my non-Americancels know about the memes from the place which are very accurate.

He is duning-kurger incarnate every time me and him have spoken on any given topic; resorting to tangents, whataboutisms, and generally behaving in a "holier than thou" attitude.

The dialectic which he seemingly utilizes, clearly follows the classic "woke" frame of arguing, which is typified by behaving in the aforementioned manner.

I have also seen him regularly espouse about his personal wealth, which whilst is not necessarily "humble bragging" does reflect as to how Californians have an ignorant worldview: In which, they perceive even fellow Americans as essentially "below" them due to the fact they perceive themselves as "better" yet will resort to pearl-clutching arguments, virtue-signaling, and just general hypocrisy when confronted with the facts.

Furthermore, a big part of the American "stereotype" comes from that of Californians, who are some of the most NPC-tier individuals I have ever met. Since sadly, they're flooding my State and others in masses, which they always have some excuse for.

Individuals such as @Logic55 who reside in the State have a very narrow-minded worldview, simply adhering to whatever nonsense is yapped by Hollywood and the such. They view themselves as these "saviors" when in reality, they do not even know what the actual problem is, leading to their rash judgements and genuine pretentious behavior. Sadly, they drag the rest of the US down with them.

@based_meme thoughts?
 
@Castaway
@beyondschizo
@Chudpreet
@Regenerator
 
but... but... california is the richest state! :feels::feels:
 
Isn't California full of latinx and niggers? That explains a lot
 
I didn't even know he lives in Cuckifornia AND that he has wealth he can boast about.

That other thread about IQ and race makes a whole lot more sense now. JFL
 
I agree
I'm glad that Californians aren't moving en masse to Michigan like Texas and Florida
 
always thought it was some ethnic immigrant from UK
 
Says the one who cherry-picks data and cites debunked racial theories with weak evidence
Qdhbtu4vc1w51
 
hes a retarded poopskin shit muncher
 
New .is beef?

Anticipation Popcorn GIF
 
I have also seen him regularly espouse about his personal wealth, which whilst is not necessarily "humble bragging" does reflect as to how Californians have an ignorant worldview: In which, they perceive even fellow Americans as essentially "below" them due to the fact they perceive themselves as "better" yet will resort to pearl-clutching arguments, virtue-signaling, and just general hypocrisy when confronted with the facts.
I voted for Donald Trump. I do not brag about the money i have. I am middle class not rich, there is no reason for to me brag lol. I am pro life, I oppose the LGBTQ community. While I do believe in racial equality, I oppose women’s rights. I dont look down on poor people at all. My parents used to poor city dwellers back in the 1990s. I’ve made friends with poor people. Regrading my takes on race, I am objective. I dont rely on unsupported studies from people like Richard Lyn. I’ve done my research on that guy, he is known to be a racial realist but he makes up theories that most scientists disagree with. As a Californian, I have respect for red states like Florida and Texas because they have good policies that should be implemented in my own state. You are just salty because i am critical of your views on race. Just relax.
 
Simply, he typifies the average individual from that State, and I'm sure all of my non-Americancels know about the memes from the place which are very accurate.

He is duning-kurger incarnate every time me and him have spoken on any given topic; resorting to tangents, whataboutisms, and generally behaving in a "holier than thou" attitude.

The dialectic which he seemingly utilizes, clearly follows the classic "woke" frame of arguing, which is typified by behaving in the aforementioned manner.

I have also seen him regularly espouse about his personal wealth, which whilst is not necessarily "humble bragging" does reflect as to how Californians have an ignorant worldview: In which, they perceive even fellow Americans as essentially "below" them due to the fact they perceive themselves as "better" yet will resort to pearl-clutching arguments, virtue-signaling, and just general hypocrisy when confronted with the facts.

Furthermore, a big part of the American "stereotype" comes from that of Californians, who are some of the most NPC-tier individuals I have ever met. Since sadly, they're flooding my State and others in masses, which they always have some excuse for.

Individuals such as @Logic55 who reside in the State have a very narrow-minded worldview, simply adhering to whatever nonsense is yapped by Hollywood and the such. They view themselves as these "saviors" when in reality, they do not even know what the actual problem is, leading to their rash judgements and genuine pretentious behavior. Sadly, they drag the rest of the US down with them.

@based_meme thoughts?
high iq post
 
Says the one who cherry-picks data and cites debunked racial theories with weak evidence
You handwaved evidence I gave you that conflicted with your beliefs - evidence from the same academia that is ideologically aligned with you and sympathetic to you - that you claimed you searched hard and didn't find when I found it in literally minutes. Then you moved the goalpost to consensus - FUCKING CONSENSUS :feelskek: - as your new standard of evidence. JFL

You don't have a leg to stand on when you talk about being critical of data and evidence. Just admit you can't accept evidence that challenges your worldview. It's not so bad. Your world won't implode. You'll still have your cushy life and bank account in one piece.
 
Over for californiacels
 
You handwaved evidence I gave you that conflicted with your beliefs - evidence from the same academia that is ideologically aligned with you and sympathetic to you - that you claimed you searched hard and didn't find when I found it in literally minutes. Then you moved the goalpost to consensus - FUCKING CONSENSUS :feelskek: - as your new standard of evidence. JFL

You don't have a leg to stand on when you talk about being critical of data and evidence. Just admit you can't accept evidence that challenges your worldview. It's not so bad. Your world won't implode. You'll still have your cushy life and bank account in one piece.
just because some experts say that race and iq are related it doesnt mean its true. Thats not now science works. If someone wants to put out a Theory it must be evaluated by other experts.
 
just because some experts say that race and iq are related it doesnt mean its true. Thats not now science works. If someone wants to put out a Theory it must be evaluated by other experts.
most experts suffer from bounded cognition stemming from either conscious or subconscious ideological bias

Which is why the 'consensus' among scientists should not be taken at face value

Look at intellectuals like Francis Fukuyama and Steven Pinker who typify the average naive and foolish liberal academic
 
Last edited:
Which is why the 'consensus' among scientists should not be taken at face value
Same applies to racial theorists such as Richard Lyn. Their theories shouldn’t be taken at face value too
 
just because some experts say that race and iq are related it doesnt mean its true. Thats not now science works. If someone wants to put out a Theory it must be evaluated by other experts.
Just stop. You didn't read the paper (or my posts, it seems). I had already explained that they observed and analyzed studies that used both models (genetic and environmental).

I knew it was a lofty expectation (and delusional on my part) to think that some progressive lefty (who in lives in California JFL) would wade through 60 pages of a paper that makes conclusions that challenges their preconceived notions.
 
Just stop. You didn't read the paper (or my posts, it seems). I had already explained that they observed and analyzed studies that used both models (genetic and environmental).

I knew it was a lofty expectation (and delusional on my part) to think that some progressive lefty (who in lives in California JFL) would wade through 60 pages of a paper that makes conclusions that challenges their preconceived notions.
I skimmed through it. I still don’t believe that race determines your iq because it’s actually a combination of genetics and environmental factors. Am I wrong?
Jfl for thinking that some random racial “realist” on internet will be open to accepting other viewpoints. This is the worst place to discuss science because of people like you. You are close minded
 
Same applies to racial theorists such as Richard Lyn. Their theories shouldn’t be taken at face value too
Just apply Occam's razor to the situation at hand


Why is it that the black-white IQ gap persists to this day? Even with muh discrimination, their starting point in a developed, first world country is much higher than that of other ethnicities located outside of the West

Look at the East Asian countries, which were among the poorest in the world just in the past few generations, who were able to economically converge with the West and have average IQs slightly higher than most Western countries

Look at North Korea, which has an estimated average IQ of three digits, despite literally being one of the poorest countries on the planet


Why is it that blacks still average sub 100 on IQ tests after all this time?
 
Last edited:
I skimmed through it. I still don’t believe that race determines your iq because it’s actually a combination of genetics and environmental factors. Am I wrong?
It's heavily skewed towards genetics. Environment affects whether or not you reach the ceiling of your genetic potential.
 
Just stop. You didn't read the paper (or my posts, it seems). I had already explained that they observed and analyzed studies that used both models (genetic and environmental).

I knew it was a lofty expectation (and delusional on my part) to think that some progressive lefty (who in lives in California JFL) would wade through 60 pages of a paper that makes conclusions that challenges their preconceived notions.
Bruh, why can't people accept different races are different? Where does this SJW urge to believe all people are muh same come from?

Especially when you can clearly SEE how retarded niggers are in every environment. All these BBC cucks defending niggers will stop doing that if they actually lived among niggers and get their family raped by packs of niggers :feelskek:
 
Bruh, why can't people accept different races are different? Where does this SJW urge to believe all people are muh same come from?
humans came from Africa, that’s a simple fact. We all look different but its not accurate to say that a group of people is inherently Low iq.
 
Last edited:
It's heavily skewed towards genetics. Environment affects whether or not you reach the ceiling of your genetic potential.
There are thousands of genes that contribute to intelligence, one race doesnt have a monoply over smart genes. The genes that contribute to iq are found in all races.
 
humans came from Africa, that’s a simple fact.
The humans that migrated out of Africa to form rest of the races weren't genetically same as niggers :feelstastyman::feelstastyman:

And humans came from apes too, are chimps and humans the same?
 
humans came from Africa, that’s a simple fact. We all look different but its not accurate to say that a group of people is inherently Low iq.
I don't know mane, but you're cool
 
The humans that migrated out of Africa to form rest of the races weren't genetically same as niggers :feelstastyman::feelstastyman:

And humans came from apes too, are chimps and humans the same?
I know that, we all developed different genes to adapt to our environments. Migrating out of Africa doesnt change your iq over time.
 
The humans that migrated out of Africa to form rest of the races weren't genetically same as niggers :feelstastyman::feelstastyman:

And humans came from apes too, are chimps and humans the same?
Stop dogpiling on my nigga JFL
 
I'm not saying blacks are necessarily inferior, just that they are different.

Especially when you can clearly SEE how retarded niggers are in every environment. All these BBC cucks defending niggers will stop doing that if they actually lived among niggers and get their family raped by packs of niggers :feelskek:
 
Migrating out of Africa doesnt change your iq over time.
Height, skull shape, skin eye colors, strength everything changed but IQ couldn't. Wow :feelskek:
 
black ppl dumb as shit
 
Bruh, why can't people accept different races are different? Where does this SJW urge to believe all people are muh same come from?

Especially when you can clearly SEE how retarded niggers are in every environment. All these BBC cucks defending niggers will stop doing that if they actually lived among niggers and get their family raped by packs of niggers :feelskek:
Belief precedes evidence in the mind. People believe things because they've been taught it, were raised that way, and/or their life experiences molded their beliefs. Evidence is often sought after the fact to confirm what they already believe (confirmation bias). Whether we like it or not, we all have our bubbles of belief that we comfortably keep ourselves tucked inside. This is why the black pill can be devastating. It says "fuck you and your beliefs, this is reality."

It's just human nature to seek things out there that confirm what we believe inside (confirmation bias). Every human suffers from this, even scientists. Unlike the average person, though, scientists are in a position to officially verify things that they believe when they write grant proposals for experiments. I imagine many of them are disappointed when the data challenges what they believe and they're left with no choice but to report what they've found. Then there's some scientists who are corrupt and bullshit the results, like the Stanford case with fraudulent data.

Look at North Korea, which has an estimated average IQ of three digits, despite literally being one of the poorest countries on the planet
Don't forget that much of the population is severely malnourished, while their fat fuck dear leader gorges himself on food and whores.
 
Last edited:
Height, skull shape, skin eye colors, strength everything changed but IQ couldn't. Wow :feelskek:
It changed physical appearance but not intelligence. Am i wrong?
 
@InsidiousMerchant sense of superiority or inferiority is only in the head, it's subjective. But objectively blacks have lower IQ but mogg hard in terms of physique and athletics. I want to have children with a sheboon tbh :owo:
 
It changed physical appearance but not intelligence. Am i wrong?
Yes. Yes, you are. Don't fret. The world isn't finished, because of this.
 
It changed physical appearance but not intelligence. Am i wrong?
How could everything change but IQ remained unaltered bruh? :feelskek:
 
@InsidiousMerchant sense of superiority or inferiority is only in the head, it's subjective. But objectively blacks have lower IQ but mogg hard in terms of physique and athletics. I want to have children with a sheboon tbh :owo:
Dance Dancing GIF by Soul Train
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
7
Views
242
whenitsoveritsover
whenitsoveritsover
earming
Replies
13
Views
368
Izayacel
Izayacel
Linesnap99
Replies
5
Views
153
Animecel2D
Animecel2D
Diddy
Replies
37
Views
397
ilieknothing
ilieknothing

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top