Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Least delusional blackpill denier

  • Thread starter WizardInTraining
  • Start date
WizardInTraining

WizardInTraining

10/10 personality, 3/10 looks, 0/10 SMV
★★★★
Joined
May 13, 2026
Posts
892
Online time
3d 2h
I have discussed this individual previously in this thread.

But now I feel as if I need to show you the levels of his delusions. He is probably the biggest blackpill denier I have ever met irl or even online but despite this is ironically amazing proof of the blackpill.

He claims that my arguments are stupid despite me being the one with real scientific evidence while he doesn’t and he even in fact blocked me because I sent him scientific evidence proving the blackpill.

He will claim I just need to put effort in to get laid despite the fact he puts no effort in and still literally has foids approaching him.

And despite being a WN and anti faggot is still a pro foid simp who will do insane mental gymnastics to defend foids and their rights. He acknowledges the Jews pushing racemixing, mass immigration and LGBT agendas on to the goyim but yet refuses to acknowledge the Jews ultimate weapon against the goyim feminism.

He will also always claim that I make every argument physical despite the fact whenever I have any sort of point in an argument he resorts to aggression and sometimes violence because he knew he lost.

Tldr: This guy is a delusional, asshole, simp, sex haver who is seemingly incapable of seeing reality for what it is if it makes women look le heckin bad.
 
Last edited:
what is the claimed scientific evidence?
 
le blackedpill :worryfeels:
 
Take it easy
 
I asked for the specific evidence, which I'd assume to be a study/paper of sorts.
He doesn’t have the attention span to read those plus would instantly dismiss it as “shit written but some loser who doesn’t talk to women”
 
He doesn’t have the attention span to read those plus would instantly dismiss it as “shit written but some loser who doesn’t talk to women”
but you wrote in the OP you sent it to em?
 
some evolutionary psychology stuff? hardly scientific m8
But yet a very small number of male bonobos mate with a majority of females similar to in humans.
 
But yet a very small number of male bonobos mate with a majority of females similar to in humans.
that just means there's a similarity. The necessary implication isn't there. Can't verify evolutionary psychological statements because we can't go in the past. Much better to study the present. Tho I hold reserves about the methodology of the studies... I should consult each individually but it is going to take a lot of time which I don't have at the moment unfortunately.
 

Similar threads

itsover1020
Replies
10
Views
464
xxdarkpixelsxx
xxdarkpixelsxx
TheFinalFrontier
Replies
23
Views
1K
TheFinalFrontier
TheFinalFrontier
Dr. Butane
Replies
8
Views
485
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
TheFinalFrontier
Replies
2
Views
474
TheFinalFrontier
TheFinalFrontier
End Hypergamy
Replies
33
Views
1K
Initium
Initium

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top