This is inspired by a recent thread made by one of the newcels where he linked a neurodivergence test. A decent chunk of users posted their results and scored quite high in ND. I scored exceptionally low. Meaning, according to the test, I'm fully neurotypical, even more so than the statistical average. Simply put, my mind is more normal than the mind of normies. Yet, I truly am an incel. Is this not the ultimate proof of the looks theory?
Because if you are both ugly and autistic and have no romantic success, then the normies can claim that you not having a romantic partner is due to your autism, not your looks. And, technically, you have no way to prove them wrong. It might as well be. And the rejection is somehow more justified, according to them, even when they don't say this explicitly. Rejecting a person on the basis of their looks is wrong, so they claim, while in reality they very much do this. On the other hand, say the man is autistic; he then sometimes cannot properly read the emotions of his girlfriend because of his autism. He means well but he just can't. Still, the woman feels not understood. And she has the right to feel understood, right, RIGHT? Hence the rejection on the basis of the man's autism is "justified".
But of course the blackpill is not only about looks. It's about genetic determinism more generally. You are born with your looks and you are born with your neurodivergence, and both affect your dating life. Yet, you did not choose either. You cannot change either. And that's the tragedy. Still, I very much suspect that autism is heavily overdiagnosed in these circles. You are a below average looking man; you don't get positive affirmations in your life because of this. Then you do the ND test, asking, do you feel comfortable around people? And of course you fucking don't. But it's not autism.
Because if you are both ugly and autistic and have no romantic success, then the normies can claim that you not having a romantic partner is due to your autism, not your looks. And, technically, you have no way to prove them wrong. It might as well be. And the rejection is somehow more justified, according to them, even when they don't say this explicitly. Rejecting a person on the basis of their looks is wrong, so they claim, while in reality they very much do this. On the other hand, say the man is autistic; he then sometimes cannot properly read the emotions of his girlfriend because of his autism. He means well but he just can't. Still, the woman feels not understood. And she has the right to feel understood, right, RIGHT? Hence the rejection on the basis of the man's autism is "justified".
But of course the blackpill is not only about looks. It's about genetic determinism more generally. You are born with your looks and you are born with your neurodivergence, and both affect your dating life. Yet, you did not choose either. You cannot change either. And that's the tragedy. Still, I very much suspect that autism is heavily overdiagnosed in these circles. You are a below average looking man; you don't get positive affirmations in your life because of this. Then you do the ND test, asking, do you feel comfortable around people? And of course you fucking don't. But it's not autism.
