Discussion Labeling people with no friends as losers is a coping mechanism normies use to feel important

[Apati]

The reason why normies label people with no friends as losers is because the majority of normies have nothing to inflate their ego other than the validation they get from people. They are not smart, they don't have any talents or qualities that make them unique or successful people. They just have the validation of others. So in order to not feel like a useless piece of shit the average normie convince himself that validation is the most important thing in the world.

When some of these normies suddenly accomplish something like entering a good college they suddenly say they matured and no longer shit on unpopular people. In fact imo they don't become matured, they simply gain something that make them look valuable so they no longer need to use the validation they get to think that they are precious people.

So imo labeling people with no friends as losers is actually a coping mechanism that is created by normies who don't have anything to feel important other than the validation they get from other useless normies like themselves.

What do you think?

 

[Deleted member 20811]

I agree with you tbh. Normies are degenerate NPCs who cant live without validation.

 

[Anonymous MG]

Perhaps it's because social validation is actually the reasoning behind human existence.

Humans have been identified as social animals many times, those that require regular social interaction lest they develop mental problems over time.

The ultimate goal of a male human's life is to impregnate a female and pass on their genes, making human existence an inherently social process.

 

[Apati]

Perhaps it's because social validation is actually the reasoning behind human existence.

Humans have been identified as social animals many times, those that require regular social interaction lest they develop mental problems over time.

According to this statement, smart and talented men who refused or failed to pass their genes are losers compared to goodlooking people who get instant validation just for existing. Getting validation from normies is not an accomplishment since the majority of them only "truely" capable of validating things like looks only. Intelligence is the thing that makes us superior to animals, not our ability to passing our genes thus i think intelligence is the thing that determines who is actually the real loser.

 

[Anonymous MG]

According to this statement, smart and talented men who refused or failed to pass their genes are losers compared to goodlooking people who gets instant validation just for existing. Getting validation from normies is not an accomplishment since the majority of them only "truely" capable of validating things like looks only. Intelligence is the thing that makes us superior to animals, not our ability to passing our genes thus i think intelligence is the thing that determines who is actually the real loser.

Intelligence is what makes us superior to other animals, and it is what makes our species successful as a whole. I never denied that intelligence was the most important reasoning for human success as a species.

What I am saying is that human validation is necessary for human survival, and is the primary reason that humanity has for living. When it comes down to it, life is entirely about spreading genes to the next generation in terms of biology. Making those successful in reproducing the "winners" and those who fail to do so the "losers".

If you're talking influence in a quantifiable human sense, then yes people like Nikola Tesla were vastly more successful than Chad who fucks females on a regular basis and contributes almost nothing to society.

But when you get to the base animalistic roots of society, which is what we're slowly devolving into, you can see that reproduction is the primary indicator for success in general biology.

 

[Teutonic Knight]

Good point.

Also the vast majority of men actually don't have good friends. Most male friends these days are hanging out purely because they participate in a similar activity and then lose their friends once they move on to something else.

Men don't really give a shit about each other and can't form real friendships these days. Men who brag about having "friends" basically brag about having some random buddies.

 

[Deleted member 15737]

Looks, money and status are the keys to success and the only thing that matters on this hellscape of a world we live in. You are a loser by societal standards if you have none.

 

[Apati]

Intelligence is what makes us superior to other animals, and it is what makes our species successful as a whole. I never denied that intelligence was the most important reasoning for human success as a species.

What I am saying is that human validation is necessary for human survival, and is the primary reason that humanity has for living. When it comes down to it, life is entirely about spreading genes to the next generation in terms of biology. Making those successful in reproducing the "winners" and those who fail to do so the "losers".

If you're talking influence in a quantifiable human sense, then yes people like Nikola Tesla were vastly more successful than Chad who fucks females on a regular basis and contributes almost nothing to society.

But when you get to the base animalistic roots of society, which is what we're slowly devolving into, you can see that reproduction is the primary indicator for success in general biology.

Yeah good points i understand. I am not arguing against the fact that reproduction is our biological mission and yeah of course social validation is necessary for it.

My point is, In other animals yeah passing genes is the indicator of superiority because if beta males were the ones that are reproducing the species will not be strong enough and go extinct. So in animal kingdom, animals that advance their species reproduce.

But in humans, being able to complete our biological goal does not indicate superiority since the ones that are passing their genes are not selected by looking at their ability to advance the human race and contribute to society.

 

[Bakura806]

100% agree with you normies are the middle of the pack fucking scumbags that try to prove their worth by shaming those they believe are below them.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

I agree with you tbh. Normies are degenerate NPCs who cant live without validation.

This.

Also, that argument doesn't apply to attractive loners who don't want to conform.

 

[ChronicPaincel]

I agree with you tbh. Normies are degenerate NPCs who cant live without validation.

 

[Deleted member 16624]

agreed tbh.

 

[Villain]

According to this statement, smart and talented men who refused or failed to pass their genes are losers compared to goodlooking people who get instant validation just for existing.

In darwinian point of view yes

 

[Deleted member 21514]

I don't give a shit what the normies npcs think i hate having friends tbh it's a waste of time

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

yes, it's all a contest to be "in" and not "out", just dumb shit to dunk on others and increase the odds you'll get laid