Liked both the writing and the articles and nothing really comes to my mind that you could've done better, I'm not really much of a critic like this, even when we have uni assignments where we are supposed to grade each other's work, I can never find anything to dislike apart from obvious stuff like entire sections missing and such
.
Hahah kek; I know that feeling as a unicel.
Definitely an Inkwell trait; not being too harsh on who you are grading out of fear of mistreatment.
However, recently, I had to grade some work for one of my classmates....a Negress who is an athlete for my university.
Had her in a few classes, she treated more poorly like all foids ofc; even made me fail an assignment once.
If I had to guess explanations for this... The coronary artery disease one is probably simply because there's never a single gene responsible for a trait, and genes can also simultaneously affect multiple traits.
This is true: However, it is obvious that some genes will likely have a higher correlation with certain traits & thus can impact some more.
It's simply heightened by genes which simultaneously heighten some attractive traits, and so it simply gets taken along for the ride.
Truly, it is blackpilling in various ways to see something such as this: Oftentimes, the data you see simply reinforces your own observations.
Many stated how it correlated heavily with the fact foids will choose that kind of dumbo Jock or Thugmaxxer in HS.
However, when examining the wealth gap I fall into, it further confirmed to me the consequences of late-life child birth.
In fact, it prompted me to text my mother when she had me, since I wasn't exactly sure: Turns out, she had me at 35.
I plan on making a thread about late-life child bearing, and it's connection to Inceldom: I'm worried it would be just another "water" thread, but I will try 7 find a way to put a spin on it.
As for height, obviously that's a wanted trait, but that doesn't necessarily translate into actual reproductive success. For example, as was posted about here a lot, good looks are correlated with income, height is a very important part of that, and it just so happens that poor people tend to have more children
.
hmmmm, good point.
The height part stumped me a bit, I will say that.
Height does seemingly correlate well with income(and thus good looks) which as you said, clearly correlates with the poor in this case having more children.
Regardless, it is evident that either way foids dysgenic choices rule our world: This is done by design, for many reasons.
Or, for another example, I made a thread some time ago about how all non-white man/white woman couples have higher fertility than their genderswapped counterparts, despite white men usually being taller than non-white ones.
Interesting:feelsstudy::feelsjuice:. Racial Pairings and Fertility: Do Interracial Couples Have Fewer Children? These data also indicate substantial variation in fertility across different racial-gender pairings (Table 2, off-diagonal cells). Of these racial pairings, fertility was lowest...
incels.is
Quite the interesting find, but don't forget "muh JBW is law all Whites can ascend with a Noodle Stacy & have Elliot Rodger-tier kids!" Or "muh great replacement isn't real! And if it is, just let your foids(likely your looksmatch, since I admit its usually lower-tier white women I see with ethnics) get used to breed Inkwells who will have it 10x worse"
Honestly, I think people on here associate in absolutes too much: For example, if I were to point this fact out, or the fact that immigration & multicultural societies tend to make things worse in most wats for everyone, people would spurge out about "muh protecting foids & normies" when in reality, they are the ones who actually tend to encourage this:
(sorry for the blur, had to SS)
I'm a general misanthrope, but the reason why I despise certain races more, is due to the fact that to normies of my race, I may be ugly & autistic, but that's it. However, to Blacks or Hispanics, I am ugly, autistic, and White.
