In the movie 120 Days of Sodom, a woman shares her sexual experiences to the crowd until members of the crowd become aroused, and select someone to have sex with them (who cannot refuse their advances).
This is a good representation of short-term sexual relationships, in which scandalous affairs serve as accelerants for further depravity, and where traumas become fetishes and the greatest trauma of all is coercion.
It provides a stark contrast to long-term sexual relationships, where the concept of consent reigns and "the past is the past" (because at that point, the past triggers PTSD in roasties, and it physically hurts them to think about how they were used and abused by psychopathic Chads).
How can highly conscientious men who are selected to be providers and proletarians cope with this? The modern left-wing empowers promiscuous psychopaths who ravage their wives before they ever get to know them, and the modern right-wing empowers plutocratic psychopaths who exploit all their hard work, and both categories overlap, as one sees in the movie 120 Days of Sodom, which is set in an aristocratic manor.
This is a good representation of short-term sexual relationships, in which scandalous affairs serve as accelerants for further depravity, and where traumas become fetishes and the greatest trauma of all is coercion.
It provides a stark contrast to long-term sexual relationships, where the concept of consent reigns and "the past is the past" (because at that point, the past triggers PTSD in roasties, and it physically hurts them to think about how they were used and abused by psychopathic Chads).
How can highly conscientious men who are selected to be providers and proletarians cope with this? The modern left-wing empowers promiscuous psychopaths who ravage their wives before they ever get to know them, and the modern right-wing empowers plutocratic psychopaths who exploit all their hard work, and both categories overlap, as one sees in the movie 120 Days of Sodom, which is set in an aristocratic manor.
Last edited:
