Sure the political term white has been interchanged a lot but there’s a scientific definition to it to.
No, there isn't, because White as a label is a social construct, it's like defining who is Asian or mongoloid based on their slanted eyes
brown North Indians are considered white
Some cushites are even considered white
No they're not.
Also Chinese/Japanese were never white they were honorary white, a completely different thing.
Already showed you this was not the case, even Spanish who came in contact with Japs remarked that they were "white just like us"
Turks have admixture from Mongolians
So do Hungarians, Bulgarians, Finns, Ukranians, and Russians.
which is why they may have classified as mongols.
No, this was not the reason Turks were classified as mongols, they wre classified as such simply as a means of NOT having to classify Muslims as white, and great job ignoring how I mentioend that Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians were ALSO labeled "mongoloid/asiatic"
Also like I said you’re talking about the political term. The political term is different from the true definition of term. But either way it is stupid to refer to people as white when talking about science and race. They are scientific terms we should be using instead like caucasoid.
If you want to blather about science this science that, the very concept of a "White race" is rejected by all modern academics.
White specifically originally meant Germanics
No the fuck it did not, it was ORIGINALLY used by the fucking Spanish in reference to themselves
when most people refer to white they think of European
Because they have the whitest skin
They believe white is a subrace of caucasoid the subrace of white is European.
No, European is a subrace of Caucasoid. White is a term used to refer to white-colored Caucasoids. Not the same.
Good uralics are of Mongol ancestry. The Uralic origins are from ancient siberians and the Sami people are mongols. They only look whiter due to Germanic admixture across Finland. Slavs were also thought to be non white due to again mongol admixture as they mixed in with siberians.
They're still white, even if they have Mongol mix
Ok and? A lot of these people have brown skin
Get your eyes checked, not a single Algerian I posted has brown skin
and different features from the typical European we see.
Yeah, no shit nigger, just like how a Brit and Bulgarian and Italian have different features between one another, and there is no "typical European" features FFS, there are a fuckload of Phenotypical overlap between Europeans and MENA.
White again is a synonym for European
It isn't, and NEVER was a term for European, again, the French, British, and so on often classified North Africans, Middle Easterners and Central Asian is white.
they keep trying to change the definition because they’re trying to merge in with the term caucasoid.
They're not trying to do shit, since the term white has historically always been interchangeable with Caucasoid. And while Indians may be Caucasoid, they lack Neanderthal blood, much like South Arabs, and have plenty of Negro/Abo influence in their ancestory.
White caucasoid subrace = European
No.
That’s an appeal to popular opinion fallacy.
That's what you're doing.
Indo Aryan was a subgroup that spread into iran and India. North Indians have a caucasoid skull putting them into the caucasoid race. Same with some Ethiopian groups like Habesha or Somalians as well.
That doesn't make them white cause they dont have white skin.