Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is nick fuentes a feminist plant?

currycell900

currycell900

If sex is not a human right, neither is abortion
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 10, 2025
Posts
6,369
Online time
1d 20h
He makes statements like how women are your no.1 political enemy and how women are only meant to be housewives and mum. Like i am not saying he is wrong with how he uses the incel to describe himself. Makes me wonder is it a plant to make us incels look more evil
 
He makes statements like how women are your no.1 political enemy and how women are only meant to be housewives and mum. Like i am not saying he is wrong with how he uses the incel to describe himself. Makes me wonder is it a plant to make us incels look more evil
fuentes is a mystery-meat faggot
 
He’s a worthless brain dead shock jock, typical for this shithole of a society.
 
He's a faggot
 
I wouldn’t be surprised if he is
 
i doubt it but he is still a fakecel
 
he's a volcel, if you watched his debate with Piers Morgan he says that he's got a ton of women offering themselves to him, I personally think it's bullshit but considering he is a LTN and became mainstream, I wouldn't doubt it.
 
He's not a jock but hes a narcissistic niggerfied zoomer mutt.

A shock jock is an old term, my apologies. It goes back to the late 80’s/early 90’s. It means idiots whose “appeal” is what is the next moronic/outrageous thing is he going to say next? It was coined to describe Howard Stern, Rush Limbaugh people like that.

You are absolutely right in your description of him.
 
Incels are nowhere near that politically relevant that we need plants put in place to defame us. We, as a community, were fringe from the beginning and will likely remain so till the end
 
Incels are nowhere near that politically relevant that we need plants put in place to defame us. We, as a community, were fringe from the beginning and will likely remain so till the end
Incels are irrelevant but the females and normies call evrything an Incel. The Nick Fuentes guy is probably a goy paid By jews
 
A shock jock is an old term, my apologies. It goes back to the late 80’s/early 90’s. It means idiots whose “appeal” is what is the next moronic/outrageous thing is he going to say next? It was coined to describe Howard Stern, Rush Limbaugh people like that.

You are absolutely right in your description of him.
I’m not RW but Nick objectively played a huge role in mainstreaming the Dissident Right among the younger generation. He’s not some ironybro using politics as an aesthetic. The fact that he tries to present as respectable with a suit and tie and everything is proof of this; if he wanted to be a shock jock he’d probably go for the skinhead look (like GypsyCrusader)
 
Controlled opposition, if nick Fuentes didn't do that the someone else will take his position and that person might not listen to them
I don’t think “controlled opposition” is mainstreaming Dissident Right views among young white men when Israel has already by and large lost leftist and non-white support. They need some demographic to lean on
 
I don’t think “controlled opposition” is mainstreaming Dissident Right views among young white men when Israel has already by and large lost leftist and non-white support. They need some demographic to lean on
It is even more important this guy glazed Epstein and says that he isn't a pedo and all that. So this will mean that a huge number of edgy men will be supporting Epstein.

These types of tactics is how they're doing damage control.
 
It is even more important this guy glazed Epstein and says that he isn't a pedo and all that. So this will mean that a huge number of edgy men will be supporting Epstein.

These types of tactics is how they're doing damage control.
Objectively speaking Epstein is not a pedo though. Pedophilia is a paraphilia/disorder involving sexual attraction to prepubescents. Most men have latent attraction to pubescent girls, meaning it cannot be considered a “disorder” of any kind.

And it’s support for Israel that the ruling class needs to drum up. Not support for Epstein who’s already dead
 
Objectively speaking Epstein is not a pedo though. Pedophilia is a paraphilia/disorder involving sexual attraction to prepubescents. Most men have latent attraction to pubescent girls, meaning it cannot be considered a “disorder” of any kind.

And it’s support for Israel that the ruling class needs to drum up. Not support for Epstein who’s already dead
That's only the recorded ones it's highly unlikely that he stopped at 14.

Also Epstein is one of the biggest Jewish scandals. Anyone with common sense can connect it with Israel. The goal is to keep the focus on Epstein and the goys than the ones actually behind him.
 
No, just an awkward guy (possibly gay). What would "feminists" get from him??
 
It is even more important this guy glazed Epstein and says that he isn't a pedo and all that. So this will mean that a huge number of edgy men will be supporting Epstein.

These types of tactics is how they're doing damage control.
:soy: :soy: :soy: :bluepill:

One of the most trutful and based things he has said. Epstein wasn't a "pedo" (means child) or a pedophile. "Damage control", the government and mass media keeps talking about how horrible he supposedly was, they want you to obsess over Epstein and his 14 year old innocent babies he kidnapped.
 
Objectively speaking Epstein is not a pedo though. Pedophilia is a paraphilia/disorder involving sexual attraction to prepubescents. Most men have latent attraction to pubescent girls, meaning it cannot be considered a “disorder” of any kind.
Truth
 
Can we stop discussing this faggot
 
I’m not RW but Nick objectively played a huge role in mainstreaming the Dissident Right among the younger generation. He’s not some ironybro using politics as an aesthetic. The fact that he tries to present as respectable with a suit and tie and everything is proof of this; if he wanted to be a shock jock he’d probably go for the skinhead look (like GypsyCrusader)

He’s changed positions on so much stuff, he’s flip flopped on Trump to many times to count, that I genuinely don’t think he’s serious.

He just says whatever he thinks is going to get him views, or whatever he thinks the wind is blowing, rather then anything out of actually convictions.

The idea that any talking head gives a shit about anything other than themselves is hard to believe.
 
do these kinds of conspiracies ever turn out true?

Are there ever 3d-chess type of political plans that are basically ideological false-flag operations with the goal of influencing the people into a certain direction? Or are we just being schizo?
 

Similar threads

four1298
Replies
20
Views
963
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV
CursedMutantSoul
Replies
33
Views
2K
A Life Of Defeat
A Life Of Defeat
basedbaumi
Replies
42
Views
2K
Zionist
Zionist
Shitskin=Shitlife
Replies
30
Views
2K
ogrecuck
ogrecuck

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top