Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Is men homosexuality a response to inceldom?

Don Vito

Don Vito

Cinemaxxxed
★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2022
Posts
2,331
Before an admin will bash me with a +20% warning for stop be redundant or regurtitating in well known blackpills, please hear me out.

We all know that foids are lesbians by default because is a waste of resources and pretty dangerous to get pregnant from an ugly and specially a short guy.
1. Be a manlet means bad health and 0 firepower to defend the foid during pregnancy or 0 firepower to defend the children. Many people here cope that a manlet can knock out a tallfag. But such thing is only possible if the manlet weights more than a tallfag and is usually the opposite. The same applies with ugly face. Ugly face is often a sign of aging or bad health (bug eyes, balding, be a chinlet, be jawless etc). 11000 years of civilization wont change this program in foids that had for eons. Reason of why they didn't have same rights as men.

Since these Hypergamy led to the point where there were 17 foids aviable for 1 man. What if I tell you that the remaining 16 were waisted and for this reason evolution did an update named homosexuality?

Yes. My hypothesis is that homosexuality was a feature added to men in order to evolve and have wombs. In this way no one would remain sexless and men would have an opportunity to give birth and improve their genetics from horny gay Chads. They are countless Tinder experiments of gay Chads who are willing to plow ugly ass/short incels.

For good or for worse. This process of making men with wombs was delied by civilization since it would be the next step in evolutionary process. This is nothing new. Neardenthals were affraid of homosapiens so the same could apply in a relation of homosexual and heterosexual men.

So what you think about this hypothesis?
 
Last edited:
Before an admin will bash me with a +20% warning for stop be redundant or regurtitating in well known blackpills, please hear me out.

We all know that foids are lesbians by default because is a waste of resources and pretty dangerous to get pregnant from an ugly and specially a short guy.
1. Be a manlet means bad health and 0 firepower to defend the foid during pregnancy or 0 firepower to defend the children. Many people here cope that a manlet can knock out a tallfag. But such thing is only possible if the manlet weights more than a tallfag and is usually the opposite. The same applies with ugly face. Ugly face is often a sign of aging or bad health (bug eyes, balding, be a chinlet, be jawless etc). 11000 years of civilization wont change this program in foids that wqs for eons. Reason of why they didn't have same rights as men.

Since these Hypergamy led to the point where there were 17 foids aviable for 1 man. What if I tell you that the remaining 16 were waisted and for this reason evolution did an update named homosexuality?

Yes. My hypothesis is that homosexuality was a feature added to men in order to evolve and have wombs. In this way no one would remain sexless and men would have an opportunity to give birth and improve their genetics from horny gay Chads. They are countless Tinder experiments of gay Chads who are willing to plow ugly ass/short incels.

For good or for worse. This process of making men with wombs was delied by civilization since it would be the next step in evolutionary process. This is nothing new. Neardenthals were affraid of homosapiens so the same could apply in a relation of homosexual and heterosexual men.

So what you think about this hypothesis?
Um, men were never designed to give birth. Not even gay men.
 
Homosexuality is usually caused by a hormonal imbalance in the pregnant woman. Given how plastic (not literally, but how unnatural in general) our modern soyciety is, cases of homosexuality increase. It is not an evolutionary benefit, in fact it is by definition a defect.
 
Last edited:
Um, men were never designed to give birth. Not even gay men.
I never stated that. I stated that gay men could've been the first step to make men like snails.

Snails change sex. Some seasons they receive sperm and in others they give it.

Due to the lack of sex and tons of human material sexless. Remember out 16/17 men were death ends to their lineage.
 
@BlkPillPres this is the funniest and most retarded thread I read on this forum, I can’t stop laughing hahahaahahHahahahaha
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
For good or for worse. This process of making men with wombs was delied by civilization since it would be the next step in evolutionary process. This is nothing new. Neardenthals were affraid of homosapiens so the same could apply in a relation of homosexual and heterosexual men.

The moderators strongly oppose any sort of homosexual sympathizing...expect punishment.
 
What if I tell you that the remaining 16 were waisted and for this reason evolution did an update named homosexuality?
Stoped reading at this point. Homos can’t have children and therefore can’t pass their genes. That makes your theory pointless
 
@BlkPillPres this is the funniest and most retarded thread I read on this forum, I can’t stop laughing hahahaahahHahahahaha
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
It is not as retarded as posting your face on this site
 
That makes no fucking sense. Gay men don't have wombs and do not birth children. Doesn't change the fact that gay is disgusting globohomo psyop
 
Where would q faggot keep the fetus ...his asshole :feelspuke:?????
 
The LGBTQIA+ community knows the power of words. We use words to tell loved ones that we’re queer, and they, hopefully, use words to say they love and accept us. And of course, we know about the bigots who wield words to defame the queer community, to invoke hate and provoke violence.

It’s no wonder, then, that so many queer people have turned an obsession with the power of words into a profession to leverage that power. We’re proud of all the queer novelists and journalists, screenwriters and, in our case, speechwriters.

So, to celebrate Pride Month, four queer speechwriters on the West Wing Writers’ team shared their thoughts on four queer speeches.

The one where Rosie O’Donnell came out at a comedy club​

In middle school, I would run from the bus to catch Rosie O’Donnell’s talk show. She fascinated me. There was something about her that felt so familiar. A few years later, I found out what that something was: in 2002, I met my first girlfriend at freshman orientation and O’Donnell came out publicly at a comedy club.

Celebrities have come out in all sorts of ways. A stirring speech. A short tweet. A solemn statement. But years before same-sex marriage was legal, amid heavy speculation about her sexual orientation, O’Donnell came out during a stand up set. “I’m a dyke!” she declared. And she followed that up with material on everything from Anne Heche’s relationship with Ellen DeGeneres to Florida’s law prohibiting gay men and lesbians from adopting children.

For most queer people, coming out is a process. I assume that was true for O’Donnell; it certainly was for me. It doesn’t always feel freeing to tell your friends, family, or the world that you’re queer, but a sense of freedom is exactly what you feel when you read about O’Donnell’s set. In that moment, she no longer felt a responsibility to be the “Queen of Nice,” that closeted character I related to while eating cereal and watching my 13-inch TV so many years ago. She was simply herself. Bold. Bawdy. Brassy. And queer.

Kate Childs Graham

The one where Harvey Milk taught us how to hope​

In the eighth grade, I dumped my boyfriend for Harvey Milk.

Alright — it was a little more complicated. But barely. In the eighth grade, per the suggestion of my favorite teacher, I chose Harvey Milk’s Hope speech for a research paper our class was assigned on historical texts. This was the fall of 2008, when “hope” was a buzzword for a wholly different reason, associated with a wholly different man.

But I first had eyes — and ears — for Harvey. I’d stay up late each night, my eyes glued to the bulky computer monitor in my kitchen and a pair of wiry airline headphones wrapped around my ears, binging all the footage I could find of the country’s first openly gay elected official delivering his signature stump. Over the next month or so, I memorized the text in full — and then the pauses, the pacing, the pitch of his voice.

I used to joke that the speech was a gateway drug to so many of the identities I now claim. It awoke my inner politico and made me a Democrat. It hooked me on the power of words and led me to my current job.

Still, for most of my life, its actual content — a call for the LGBTQ+ community to come out of the closet, to replace stigmas and stereotypes with family and friends — felt beside the point. I was straight, I thought. And so, Milk’s words weren’t aimed at me.

Then, a year ago, I fell in love with a woman. And the speech went from poetic and powerful to deeply, deeply personal. Though mine is a generation that spurns labels as limiting, calling myself queer felt important — and freeing. Like coming up for air.

“Without hope, the us’s give up,” Harvey Milk said to eighth-grade me.

Today, I can still recite his whole speech from memory. But it reverberates differently. Now, when I talk about hope, I’m speaking from experience. And when I talk about “the us’s,” I’m included.

Jordana Narin

The one where Hillary Clinton said “gay rights are human rights”​

Sometimes a great speech deserves a sequel. That was the case on December 10, 2011, International Human Rights Day, when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared “gay rights are human rights” at the United Nations (UN) in Geneva. Echoing her famous “women’s rights are human rights” speech, Clinton sought to elevate LGBTQ rights as the next frontier in the moral arc of history.

Clinton spoke before an audience that included delegates from countries with harsh anti-LGBTQ laws and attitudes. She pulled no punches in describing the legally sanctioned violence imposed on the LGBTQ community, and called for all countries, rich and poor, to recognize the basic dignity of its citizens. Her words were even backed by action, as she announced policies to protect queer people around the globe.

In 2018, I stood in the room where Clinton delivered this speech. As I reflected on its importance, I realized for the first time that I could be both out and safe. Clinton — and the Obama Adminstration — imagined a world where queer voices are heard, and queer lives are valued. In a time of rising phobias, this speech, delivered not even a decade ago, may seem but a relic of some bygone age. But so long as ordinary people stand up for our rights, its dream of a bright future will never disappear.

Violet Lhant

The one where Alok Vaid-Menon proclaims fashion’s degendered future​

Every day, an infinite amount of rebellions transpire around the planet. Trans and gender nonconforming (TGNC) people everywhere are constantly defying a world defined by the gender binary. They are breaking free of the arbitrary distinctions of “man” and “woman” to live as their truly diverse, authentic selves. Alok Vaid-Menon, better known as Alok, is an artist and designer whose voice speaks to the heart of this uprising. On December 5, 2019, Alok highlighted the importance of this struggle at the Business of Fashion’s annual fashion gathering, and declared a vision of gender liberation for all people.

Drawing from the struggles of their trancestors, Alok powerfully indicted the fashion world for being complicit in societal oppression of TGNC people. They talked about how colors, fabrics, scents, and more have been arbitrarily assigned one of two rigid genders, and how those who attempt to break free of the Western gender binary are viciously attacked. As Alok knows well, TGNC folks have always been a part of the story of fashion (as stylists, for example) but their labor and creativity get exploited, and they are denied opportunities to take center stage. Alok charts the course for a better future where clothes can be so much more than merely masculine or feminine. “Fashion,” Alok emphatically states, “should proliferate possibility, not constrain it.”

Fashion is such a powerful mode of expression, not only because it lets us be who we want to be, but also see who we want to be. In being their genuine self, Alok represented a path forward, and in being my genuine self, I hope to do the same for others. After coming to terms with my identity, I found myself in society where TGNC representation is dominated by white people, and in industries like fashion, cisgender heterosexual people are often the ones modelling “gender neutral” bodies. I could never see myself truly escaping the binary walls that had long since enclosed around me. But through the smallest opening, I finally saw and heard someone like me making the impossible seem possible, and I found a way out.

Muizz Akhtar

Is there a queer speech you love? Tell us why in the comments, and we’ll try to tweet about it.

There may not be parades and parties this Pride Month, but there will always be powerful speeches to share.

TLDR: Yes:dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab::dab:
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
11
Views
274
TheJoker
TheJoker
AsiaCel
Replies
57
Views
2K
Jotasso
Jotasso
Misogynist Vegeta
RageFuel My Response
Replies
23
Views
509
Vendetta
Vendetta
Destroyed lonely
Replies
22
Views
522
Julaybib
Julaybib
TheJoker
Replies
5
Views
153
TheJoker
TheJoker

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top