>forced their culture
As in raped them and admixxed with them. They are not desendants of anything. Modern egyptians are not ancient egyptians, and modern iraqis are not Assyrians or Sumerians. They are Arab, Caucasoid, levant and Aryan rape babies.
This is not true, genetic testing has shown that modern egyptians, persians, palestinians, and many other groups are the native descendants that lived there before.
Actual population replacements are very rare, even modern so called Turks from Turkey are mostly of Greek descend. The Mongol invasions in Central Asia are an example of actual population replacement, as the native Iranian peoples of that region got raped out.
and the claim that all civilization came from these?
A cradle of civilization is a location where civilization is understood to have independently emerged.
By definition these are the only places where it independently emerged. Every other civilization has to have emerged by contact with one of these in some way, or it would be it's own indenedent cradle of civilization.
This is denmark. A country of at the time like 1-2 million, if that.
Yes, and their best development was how blood flow rate is regulated into tissue and some guy who built a slightly better telescope but didn't know what to do with his observations.
French was philosophical. The enlightenment JFL. They didn't do shit philosophically. They did do technological advancements but there's just as many German and continental European inventors as there was English.
French philosophy was mostly cucked trash. It is the source of far leftist ideology, romanticism (which doomed incels forever), and the origin of feminist ideology. There were only a few important actual philosophers worth mentioning like Descarte, Voltaire, and Foucault who were of any good and imporant consequence.
Many of the important philsophers that laid the groundwork for modern society, like Francis Bacon (who pretty much made modern science), John Lock (pretty much conceptualized the modern liberal democracies and individual rights), Isaac Newton (pretty much made Calculus and Physics), Adam Smith (pretty much made capitalism) were almost all British.
German philsophers weren't even close to the level of infuence as the English, but I personally think many of them were based. And Germans have invented lots of important stuff and are important in science, but they are a blip compared to British and even America. I think it was you who posted a few days back how the British made 50% of all important inventions.
In historical terms yes. Denmarks made a few modern things like that one guy who invented a new software development system thing, but Japanese technological innovations stem from whites and globalisation. If we go back to even the 1960's Denmark dwarfed Japan easily.
If you want to claim that Japanese innovation stems from whites and globalism, then it's even worse for other whites. Because modern science, industrial revolution, the second agricultural revolution, liberal democracies, calculus, and physics all originate from the British and only came to Europe because contact of with Britain. The rest of Europe would be as much of a shit hole as any ethnic country if it weren't for Britain, and would have fallen just like Islamic countries after their golden age. The industrial revolution and capitalism is what changed that.
you sound like a nigger we wuzzing as egyptians.
Yeah, no shit their not the same, ALL groups change. Anglos also mixed with Jews, Irish, Nords, and so on. Doesn't still mean they aren't the descendants of ancient egyptians. Population dont change as fast as your dumbass thinks they do.
Whites were the original we wuz kangz and shit people (other than us kikes tbh).
That's why many white copers claimed Greeks and Romans were white Nords back in the day, and somehow modern greeks and italians are mixed with other things. THis is the same cope excuse blacks use as why modern egyptians arent black.