Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Is incest only seen as wrong due to hypergamy?

cymbeline

cymbeline

deformed slave
★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Posts
646
Online time
6d 19h
You may think, "oh well, if they reproduce, the child may be born with defects", but young females are already strongly discouraged to reproduce and are on birth control anyway.

So might it only be so stigmatized, because most female's brothers are only their looksmatch?
 
Effects of incest on the health of a child are greatly exagerated iirc.
 
There is zero moral reason why incest should be illegal, not that I care though, the foids in my family would reject me too.
 
Its probably because it would fuck up families, literally.
 
Idk. I have two stacy sisters though and they would reject me if I wasn't their brother anyways.
 
Its probably because it would fuck up families, literally.
1760718012037

Your casual European monarch's throne descendant.
 
I never understood why incest is seen as such a wrong thing. As long as they don't make kids, it's perfect
 
I never understood why incest is seen as such a wrong thing. As long as they don't make kids, it's perfect
And even if you do we have ability to edit genes so not a single defect could be left untreated if you have money ofc.
 
There's nothing objectively wrong with incest. Incels should see through the fact that its just another baseless social taboo made up by normfags.

Also, its usually ugly siblings who incestmaxx, so yeah, the anti-incest propaganda is really just lookism at its core.
 
You may think, "oh well, if they reproduce, the child may be born with defects", but young females are already strongly discouraged to reproduce and are on birth control anyway.

So might it only be so stigmatized, because most female's brothers are only their looksmatch?
incest makes me want to throw up, but i see nothing wrong with it. but your sisters will only considering do incest if you are an chad or something. incest is because of chad brothers.
 
Not only that. What would happen if someone cheated or dumped the other? In regular relationships usually go no contact, which is impossible if you share the family and the house.
That's the reason monarchs and nobles were doing incest. Do you imagine being a king, and condemning your sister/cousin queen as well as 75% of your family because of cheat/dump or vice-versa? And as a regular noble lose your potential benefits from severed relations with influential father or mother-in-law?
I've heard though punishment for adulting women was closing them into monastery, so they'd remain wives, but punished ones and in internal infamy.
I know it's weird, gross and anything else - but some people, especially privileged ones were doing ultra weird shit long before sexual revolution. At least commoners were forced to obey God's law of divinity sacrament of marriage.
 
Not only that. What would happen if someone cheated or dumped the other? In regular relationships usually go no contact, which is impossible if you share the family and the house.
Husband-wife cheating is apparently ok, what's so different about brother-sister cheating? Doesn't seem to be that big of a moral issue to me.
 
That's the reason monarchs and nobles were doing incest. Do you imagine being a king, and condemning your sister/cousin queen as well as 75% of your family because of cheat/dump or vice-versa? And as a regular noble lose your potential benefits from severed relations with influential father or mother-in-law?
I've heard though punishment for adulting women was closing them into monastery, so they'd remain wives, but punished ones and in internal infamy.
I know it's weird, gross and anything else - but some people, especially privileged ones were doing ultra weird shit long before sexual revolution. At least commoners were forced to obey God's law of divinity sacrament of marriage.
Interesting stuff, i didnt knew that.
 
Husband-wife cheating is apparently ok, what's so different about brother-sister cheating? Doesn't seem to be that big of a moral issue to me.
I dont know how people can accept cheating. Its the only unforgivable thing in a relationship imo.
 
I dont know how people can accept cheating. Its the only unforgivable thing in a relationship imo.
it's definitely more socially acceptable than incest though.
 
it's definitely more socially acceptable than incest though.
It is. Desperation makes men accept things that are completely against their nature.
 
It is. Desperation makes men accept things that are completely against their nature.
That's just the shitty twisted world we live in. Cheating should be punishable by law whereas incest shouldn't, but we got it the other way around.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top