Why subhumans are allowed to have kids ?

[vco]

I would never understand how certain individuals feel comfortable passing their genes on.​

obviously, from a sociological and economical perspective, we need low IQ subhumans to feed the workforce and justify the social hierarchy especially in a capitalist system. Government policies encourage people to reproduce because the birth rate is declining dangerously in Western countries, notably through welfare benefits.

But still, from an individual and moral perspective, how can a genetic defect even feel entitled to give life?

Today, I was in the checkout line at the supermarket. Behind me, there was a family and when i saw the parents i immediatly thought to myself "i would rather not be born than to be their fucking child". Both were extremely ugly with all the recessions in the book, below 5ft9 and you could easily tell by their grammar and mannerisms that they were low-IQ and from a lower social class.

The worst part was that on top of being genetically disadvantaged, they were giving the worst environnement for both physical and cognitive development to their child. The problem with these low IQ individuals is that they cannot comprehend how the environment can shape epigenetics.
The kid was watching bullshit on the mom's smartphone (while mouth breathing btw) despite being only five years old. This is litteraly a crime to put you child in front of a screen during those key years of neurogenesis that you will never get back. Furthermore, the food they bought was the most horrible sludge i've ever seen, not a single piece of non processed-garbage.

In what world would this young Homo sapiens not end up as a subhuman incel?

His life didn't even began and it's already over for him just because two genetic defects decided to reproduce. Not so long ago, they would probabaly be already dead due to natural selection. But now, everyone can pass their genes on wich will make the genetic gap between chads and normies/incels more and more brutal

The moral stantdards are so low nowadadays, it's mind-crushing.

 

[JesusChristReborn]

I don't believe in genetic determination. I believe environment has an equally powerful influence on how a person develops, which is why I agree with you; disgenics exists either way, whether it be the passing down of biological traits, or taught behaviors... subhumans still create subhumans.

 

[Chud Norris72]

greys

 

[chihiro]

fr and i also think its so terribly evil to have children when you have a genetic disability that can be passed on to offspring

 

[vco]

I don't believe in genetic determination. I believe environment has an equally powerful influence on how a person develops, which is why I agree with you; disgenics exists either way, whether it be the passing down of biological traits, or taught behaviors... subhumans still create subhumans.

Your craniofacial development is largely determined by genetics, as are your height, IQ, and neurochemistry.
Furthermore, I mentioned the low cognitive stimulation environment and the poor diet his mother gave him.

 

[vco]

greys

ok, then ?

 

[JesusChristReborn]

Your craniofacial development is largely determined by genetics, as are your height, IQ, and neurochemistry.
Furthermore, I mentioned the low cognitive stimulation environment and the poor diet his mother gave him.

Well yeah, obviously genetics have a lot with how someone turns out, but, in an example like yours, I think the kids could potentially end up superior to their parents, given an environment that nurtured their maximum potential rather than hindering it; unfortunately, as you said, the environment created by the subhuman parents is going to hinder any potential, and in turn, create more subhumans, as is usual for cases like these.

 

[vco]

Well yeah, obviously genetics have a lot with how someone turns out, but, in an example like yours, I think the kids could potentially end up superior to their parents, given an environment that nurtured their maximum potential rather than hindering it; unfortunately, as you said, the environment created by the subhuman parents is going to hinder any potential, and in turn, create more subhumans, as is usual for cases like these.

yeah, lower IQ and subhumans (often due to economic factors) give an environment less conducive to healthy development. But even with the best diet and all the pharmaceuticals in the world, this kid would still have remained short, stupid, and ugly (not his fault).

 

[vco]

fr and i also think its so terribly evil to have children when you have a genetic disability that can be passed on to offspring

That's why we are all rotting here

 

[parbate2025]

I don't believe in genetic determination. I believe environment has an equally powerful influence on how a person develops, which is why I agree with you; disgenics exists either way, whether it be the passing down of biological traits, or taught behaviors... subhumans still create subhumans.

There's a chance that kid will inherit Good quality genes from Grandfather or great-grandfather.
Autosoms work differentely.
Like my dad has more compact and small skull but my uncle has tall and robust skull and he is 6ft.
So it's pure luck

 

[poorenglishcel]

Funny such posts are made on incels.is

 

[FarangInDaNang]

I would never understand how certain individuals feel comfortable passing their genes on.​

obviously, from a sociological and economical perspective, we need low IQ subhumans to feed the workforce and justify the social hierarchy especially in a capitalist system. Government policies encourage people to reproduce because the birth rate is declining dangerously in Western countries, notably through welfare benefits.

But still, from an individual and moral perspective, how can a genetic defect even feel entitled to give life?

Today, I was in the checkout line at the supermarket. Behind me, there was a family and when i saw the parents i immediatly thought to myself "i would rather not be born than to be their fucking child". Both were extremely ugly with all the recessions in the book, below 5ft9 and you could easily tell by their grammar and mannerisms that they were low-IQ and from a lower social class.

The worst part was that on top of being genetically disadvantaged, they were giving the worst environnement for both physical and cognitive development to their child. The problem with these low IQ individuals is that they cannot comprehend how the environment can shape epigenetics.
The kid was watching bullshit on the mom's smartphone (while mouth breathing btw) despite being only five years old. This is litteraly a crime to put you child in front of a screen during those key years of neurogenesis that you will never get back. Furthermore, the food they bought was the most horrible sludge i've ever seen, not a single piece of non processed-garbage.

In what world would this young Homo sapiens not end up as a subhuman incel?

His life didn't even began and it's already over for him just because two genetic defects decided to reproduce. Not so long ago, they would probabaly be already dead due to natural selection. But now, everyone can pass their genes on wich will make the genetic gap between chads and normies/incels more and more brutal

The moral stantdards are so low nowadadays, it's mind-crushing.

Idk I’m not a eugenicist

 

[vco]

Idk I’m not a eugenicist

why not ?

 

[FarangInDaNang]

why not ?

I don’t wanna play god with human lives, also many people are eugenicists today. The elites, Jews, women, all in different ways but very application I’ve seen hasn’t bettered anything for anyone. It’s an interesting topic for sure though I see the pros and cons but atleast the everyday practice of it is fucked

 

[tradswede]

I agree, I wanna have a kid so bad but I can't because I'm incel and even if I got a girlfriend I could not because I wouldn't feel good of myself knowing I'll put someone on earth that's my family that'll go thru what I went thru if not worse!

 

[ToBurble&Pine]

JFL

 

[Purple Necromancer]

Eating goyslop as a little child and constantly staring at the phone screen might cause issues but if he instead spent his time with other kids or was on a diet it wouldn't make things better for him. For the most part, an individual's life doesn't need certain treatment to make it better, since you can't improve this boring and meaningless world and therefore your own life, but you can make it worse by bringing another human being here. If you have Chad genes, or especially inferior genes, don't reproduce.

 

[RandomGuy]

Your craniofacial development is largely determined by genetics, as are your height, IQ, and neurochemistry.
Furthermore, I mentioned the low cognitive stimulation environment and the poor diet his mother gave him.

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/TuCfxb70Tps?si=0n5SDq-mDnr7ApPm

 

[ultraincelmega]

I would never understand how certain individuals feel comfortable passing their genes on.​

obviously, from a sociological and economical perspective, we need low IQ subhumans to feed the workforce and justify the social hierarchy especially in a capitalist system. Government policies encourage people to reproduce because the birth rate is declining dangerously in Western countries, notably through welfare benefits.

But still, from an individual and moral perspective, how can a genetic defect even feel entitled to give life?

Today, I was in the checkout line at the supermarket. Behind me, there was a family and when i saw the parents i immediatly thought to myself "i would rather not be born than to be their fucking child". Both were extremely ugly with all the recessions in the book, below 5ft9 and you could easily tell by their grammar and mannerisms that they were low-IQ and from a lower social class.

The worst part was that on top of being genetically disadvantaged, they were giving the worst environnement for both physical and cognitive development to their child. The problem with these low IQ individuals is that they cannot comprehend how the environment can shape epigenetics.
The kid was watching bullshit on the mom's smartphone (while mouth breathing btw) despite being only five years old. This is litteraly a crime to put you child in front of a screen during those key years of neurogenesis that you will never get back. Furthermore, the food they bought was the most horrible sludge i've ever seen, not a single piece of non processed-garbage.

In what world would this young Homo sapiens not end up as a subhuman incel?

His life didn't even began and it's already over for him just because two genetic defects decided to reproduce. Not so long ago, they would probabaly be already dead due to natural selection. But now, everyone can pass their genes on wich will make the genetic gap between chads and normies/incels more and more brutal

The moral stantdards are so low nowadadays, it's mind-crushing.

I have brutal genetics but at least im somewhat high iq. I would still probably never reproduce, unless I could make sure the child was a girl, making a man at this height is too brutal