Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is female sexuality per se a form of violence against men?

  • Thread starter Cybersex is our hope
  • Start date
Cybersex is our hope

Cybersex is our hope

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Posts
6,395
Think about it: women want men to not "whine" not being weak (but be Meeks) and to go out there fighting for resources with other men/animals/environment.
Both phisical and psychological traits women find attractive in men are traits that push men to the kill or be killed zone.

So you either
1 Risk your life more than women both at work and against other men or you slowly get consumed betabuxxing your wife and dying 10 years before her
2 You totally don't do that but that means you will probably be seen as a manchild, loser, weak good to nothing and you will Be killed off genetically and sexually

Male sexuality don't force women into dangerous roles. Wtf male sexuality don't force women into any role at all since men find attractive women who are pilots, engineers, teachers, nurses, unemployed, homeless, housewives and so on. Men are pathologically sexually inclusive and protective with women while there is a strong correlationg between female sexual standards for men and male mortality
 
no, because those traits are set at its core. all programmed.
 
no, because those traits are set at its core. all programmed.
Are set in men? And why? Because foids fondo those men attractive. You don't have such traits for whatever reason? Out of the sexual market, alone, no family, no sex, suicidal, cortisol etc
And there lies your problem
Not much. It's male sexuality. Female roles are irrelevant. Men find foids attractive just for existing. Them being pilotes or housewives is irrelevant while for men it's Not irrelevant at all to be NEET or a successfull broker
 
In monasteries ( where females have zero influence ) they promote humility, obedience, non-violence for men. So it's possible for men to be non-violent.
 
In monasteries ( where females have zero influence ) they promote humility, obedience, non-violence for men. So it's possible for men to be non-violent.
Man i was saying a completely different thing: female sexuality and how they select partners IS a form of violence AGAINST men (perpetrated by women indirectly).

I agree with monasteries tho
 
I'd say most of what women find sexual in men is toxic. Being tall, strong, threatening, etc. Female sexuality thus is toxic and harmful to men.
 
I'd say most of what women find sexual in men is toxic. Being tall, strong, threatening, etc. Female sexuality thus is toxic and harmful to men.
Agree. This is what i was trying to say with this thread
 
I'd say most of what women find sexual in men is toxic. Being tall, strong, threatening, etc. Female sexuality thus is toxic and harmful to men.
and the feeling of domination
 
Last edited:
women reward the violent,the bully,with sex ,they re violent beings,they LOVE violence

not against them ofc,but on others,because theyre sadistic
 
Think about it: women want men to not "whine" not being weak (but be Meeks) and to go out there fighting for resources with other men/animals/environment.
Both phisical and psychological traits women find attractive in men are traits that push men to the kill or be killed zone.

So you either
1 Risk your life more than women both at work and against other men or you slowly get consumed betabuxxing your wife and dying 10 years before her
2 You totally don't do that but that means you will probably be seen as a manchild, loser, weak good to nothing and you will Be killed off genetically and sexually

Male sexuality don't force women into dangerous roles. Wtf male sexuality don't force women into any role at all since men find attractive women who are pilots, engineers, teachers, nurses, unemployed, homeless, housewives and so on. Men are pathologically sexually inclusive and protective with women while there is a strong correlationg between female sexual standards for men and male mortality
The entire sexual reproductive behavior of foids revolves around the social inequality and division of men against other men in constant competition. If all men were equal to each other the sexual reproductive behavior of foids wouldn't know how to function or exist at all. In fact, total social equality of men is the antithesis of female sexual reproductive behavior and biological mating strategy.

One could argue that female sexuality revolves around the tyranny of men by other men, which we could then arguably state with that knowledge that the notion of female social equality is a joke since they offer none to men whatsoever in mutual form especially in regards to sex. In fact, since foid sexual reproductive behavior is purely determined or motivated by male social inequality one could argue that influences male sexual reproductive behavior to be socially inequal as a natural reacting consequence. [The only way to procreate as a winning male behavioral strategy is to embrace social inequality in all aspects of life because that completely determines a foid's whole entire sexual selection process.]

What do you call a creature that demands social equality, yet reproduces entirely on the basis of social inequality itself? The very epitome of hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
The entire sexual reproductive behavior of foids revolves around the social inequality and division of men against other men in constant competition. If all men were equal to each other the sexual reproductive behavior of foids wouldn't know how to function or exist at all. In fact, total social equality of men is the antithesis of female sexual reproductive behavior and biological mating strategy.

One could argue that female sexuality revolves around the tyranny of men by other men, which we could then arguably state with that knowledge that the notion of female social equality is a joke since they offer none to men whatsoever in mutual form especially in regards to sex. In fact, since foid sexual reproductive behavior is purely determined or motivated by male social inequality one could argue that influences male sexual reproductive behavior to be socially inequal as a natural reacting consequence. [The only way to procreate as a winning male behavioral strategy is to embrace social inequality in all aspects of life because that completely determines a foid's whole entire sexual selection process.]

What do you call a creature that demands social equality, yet reproduces entirely on the basis of social inequality itself? The very epitome of hypocrisy.
And this is why female sexuality is a form of violence against men. Period.
women reward the violent,the bully,with sex ,they re violent beings,they LOVE violence

not against them ofc,but on others,because theyre sadistic
Also against them if done by chads. This is why i love love love when they get bruttally assaulted and beated
 
Violence is the wrong word. It's a form of abuse, it's the primary tool that women use to manipulate men into doing their bidding.

Even married women use it as a form of abuse by withholding six after getting married and using it to manipulate their husbands.
 
Violence is the wrong word. It's a form of abuse, it's the primary tool that women use to manipulate men into doing their bidding.

Even married women use it as a form of abuse by withholding six after getting married and using it to manipulate their husbands.
Married bunch of cucks.
 
Murdermaxxing is legit.

Just murder bro and foids will raid you with love letters
 
Murdermaxxing is legit.

Just murder bro and foids will raid you with love letters
Plays on their evolutionary subconscious psychology of an ancient past historical period of time where the bloodiest most savage killers got all the pussy held up in a cave somewhere where territorially they would kill their competitors for scarce resources of the local area.

On a long enough timeline going into our ancient past the alpha male wasn't that much different from your serial killer or rapist of today. In primordial ancient times where you could barely tell the difference between human and primate that was pretty much the norm back then.
 
Last edited:
Violence is the wrong word. It's a form of abuse, it's the primary tool that women use to manipulate men into doing their bidding.

Even married women use it as a form of abuse by withholding six after getting married and using it to manipulate their husbands.
No it's violence since they are violating men or pushing men to be violated.

Violating someone's will= violence.

Soyjew Western society has an horrible definition of violence. It basically equites phisical material competiotion with violence. Completely wrong
 
Murdermaxxing is legit.

Just murder bro and foids will raid you with love letters
Yes. This makes them the real violent ones
Plays on their evolutionary subconscious psychology of an ancient past historical period of time where the bloodiest most savage killers got all the pussy held up in a cave somewhere where territorially they would kill their competitors for scarce resources of the local area.

On a long enough timeline going into our ancient past the alpha male wasn't that much different from your serial killer or rapist of today. In primordial ancient times where you could barely tell the difference between human and primate that was pretty much the norm back then.
If men stop being performative, vibrant, strong, rich, stoici etc women will stop finding them attractive then proceed to take children and sex away and find another tribe of more dominant dark triad men to be submissive to (even pushing such men into killing their former husbands)
 
Yes. This makes them the real violent ones

If men stop being performative, vibrant, strong, rich, stoici etc women will stop finding them attractive then proceed to take children and sex away and find another tribe of more dominant dark triad men to be submissive to (even pushing such men into killing their former husbands)
What we're talking about here is a global phenomena of the social contract being destroyed in all of society and civilization around the world by foids, once things start affecting the majority of men negatively to which we're currently steadily arriving to it's over for them as a majority of men pull back from participating in society altogether coming to the point that it is better to be destroyed than actually preserved. [present time]

As for all of that, war, social inequality, and violence on the part of men acquiring resources constantly competing against each other comes with the package of sexual selection as a foid's insatiable desire of over all consumption is infinitely elastic never being satisfied always wanting more. The fact is, if foids sexual reproductive behavior weren't so completely determined on male social inequality chances are men wouldn't be as violent, competitive, and aggressive as we are. The root of all male war, violence, competition, social inequality, and general aggressiveness is due primarily to females sexual reproductive behavior that is entirely dependent on male social inequality itself, nothing will ever change concerning making the world a better place until female sexuality itself is rectified, regulated, or reigned in on. The root of a majority of the world's social problems stems from female sexuality with all the inequities that revolve around it, since modern feminism ideologically seeks to pin all the blame on men solely pretty much immunizing females from any kind of negative criticism the destruction of this world along with the general social contract is pretty much guaranteed.
 
Last edited:
What we're talking about here is a global phenomena of the social contract being destroyed in all of society and civilization around the world by foids, once things start affecting the majority of men negatively to which we're currently steadily arriving to it's over for them as a majority of men pull back from participating in society altogether coming to the point that it is better to be destroyed than preserved. [present time]
I agree but i think it's mainly a cucked liberal Western world problem. Turkey and Saudi Arabia are much more stable f eks
 
Everything about female sexuality is immoral and inequitable and they're proud of that.

They really are demonic creatures.
 
I agree but i think it's mainly a cucked liberal Western world problem. Turkey and Saudi Arabia are much more stable f eks
They won't be for very long if the (((west))) has its way, those in control over here want the current ideology to be enforced worldwide in every nation, society, race, and culture. Whether they'll succeed or not has yet to be remained seen. Hopefully not, we shall see within the next decade where this abysmal social experiment will lead to in the greater finality of things.
Everything about female sexuality is immoral and inequitable and they're proud of that.

They really are demonic creatures.
Every party has an end, right now foids are drunk on power feeling invincible with nobody to challenge them otherwise, but eventually in the near future the destructive hangover will prevail, the party will eventually come to an end. That's when things will get very interesting.
 
Last edited:
They won't be for very long if the (((west))) has its way, those in control over here want the current ideology to be enforced worldwide in every nation, society, race, and culture. Whether they'll succeed or not has yet to be remained seen. Hopefully not, we shall see within the next decade where this abysmal social experiment will lead to in the greater finality of things.

Every party has an end, right now foids are drunk on power feeling invincible with nobody to challenge them otherwise, but eventually in the near future the destructive hangover will prevail, the party will eventually come to an end. That's when things will get very interesting.
Even under extreme patriarchy, women were at least treated with respect and valued for being mothers/wives.

Under gynocracy, 60% of the male population is treated like absolute trash. Used and abused and they laugh in our faces.
 
Even under extreme patriarchy, women were at least treated with respect and valued for being mothers/wives.

Under gynocracy, 60% of the male population is treated like absolute trash. Used and abused and they laugh in our faces.
All of existence is cyclical be it history, society, or civilization, what goes around comes back around again, the pendulum will shift heavily against them overtime in the form of severe punitive male backlash. Actions have consequences overtime.
 
They won't be for very long if the (((west))) has its way, those in control over here want the current ideology to be enforced worldwide in every nation, society, race, and culture. Whether they'll succeed or not has yet to be remained seen. Hopefully not, we shall see within the next decade where this abysmal social experiment will lead to in the greater finality of things
Lol the West is in total complete decay/collapse. It basically holds up only thanks to technology but it's rotten to the core. White women probably have a birthrate below 1 kid per woman
Every party has an end, right now foids are drunk on power feeling invincible with nobody to challenge them otherwise, but eventually in the near future the destructive hangover will prevail, the party will eventually come to an end. That's when things will get very interesting.
Lots of femoids already are angry because they can't find rich Chad who will commit lol
Even under extreme patriarchy, women were at least treated with respect and valued for being mothers/wives.

Under gynocracy, 60% of the male population is treated like absolute trash. Used and abused and they laugh in our faces.
High iq. It's much better for women to live under patriarchy than it Is for men to live under gynocracy.

Oh and it's Not 60% of men, much like 90%
 
Last edited:
I'd say most of what women find sexual in men is toxic. Being tall, strong, threatening, etc. Female sexuality thus is toxic and harmful to men.
To society too. As reproducing with those men will just make society more barbaric and unstable in the long run (as we are seeing now).
 
Everything about female sexuality is immoral and inequitable and they're proud of that.

They really are demonic creatures.
Based
To society too. As reproducing with those men will just make society more barbaric and unstable in the long run (as we are seeing now).
Yes. This is also why our IQ in Europe is going down. We'll probably be africn American nigga tier by the end of the century. All divided in ethnic tribes. A New dark age is coming
 
Last edited:
Lol the West is in total complete decay/collapse. It basically holds up only thanks to technology but it's rotten to the core. White women probably have a birthrate below 1 kid per woman

Lots of femoids already are angry because they can't find rich Chad who will commit lol

High iq. It's much better for women to live under patriarchy than it Is for men to live under gynocracy.

Oh and it's Not 60% of men, much like 90%
Yeah, the west is pretty fucked for us White Europeans which is sad because I love European history, culture, aesthetics, and such. I sometimes wonder if we're currently dead on arrival to which there is nothing that can be done about the impending doom or disaster hanging over us. White European women for all their physical beauty or attraction are dumb awful creatures that would gladly sell out our future for momentary comfort, material luxury, and convenience, they're loyal to nothing but themselves and as a direct result European civilization is dying across the planet. Foreigners observing our stupidity joke and jest about all of this where I can't really blame them for it, but what they don't understand quite yet is that what is happening to us today (((they))) are planning the same fate for their nations tomorrow, it won't end with our extinction, it will simply move onto other peoples until they've completely subjugated the entire planet with everybody in it.

Rich wealthy Chads don't need to settle down with any particular foid as they can easily acquire any foid they want dumping them for the next one at their leisure within any time, dumb foids haven't figured this out yet chasing after all the wealthy swinging dicks and they probably never will either as they're total mental slaves to their collective greed or overall resentment of what they view as being inferior men. A woman left to herself is loyal to nothing and lacks all forms of social compassion, her loyalty is to her own individual superfluous pleasures, ambitions, or desires only.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the west is pretty fucked for us White Europeans which is sad because I love European history, culture, aesthetics, and such. I sometimes wonder if we're currently dead on arrival to which there is nothing that can be done about the impending doom or disaster hanging over us. White European women for all their physical beauty or attraction are dumb awful creatures that would gladly sell out our future for momentary comfort, material luxury, and convenience, they're loyal to nothing but themselves and as a direct result European civilization is dying across the planet. Foreigners observing our stupidity joke and jest about all of this where I can't really blame them for it, but what they don't understand quite yet is that what is happening to us today (((they))) are planning the same fate for their nations tomorrow, it won't end with our extinction, it will simply move onto other peoples until they've completely subjugated the entire planet with everybody in it.

Rich wealthy Chads don't need to settle down with any particular foid as they can easily acquire any foid they want dumping them for the next one at their leisure within any time, dumb foids haven't figured this out yet chasing after all the wealthy swinging dicks and they probably never will either as they're total mental slaves to their collective greed or overall resentment of what they view as being inferior men. A woman left to herself is loyal to nothing and lacks all forms of social compassion, her loyalty is to her own individual superfluous pleasures, ambitions, or desires only.
I don't think the same will happen to them. They will probably destroy kikes after having replaced us
 
They will probably destroy kikes after having replaced us

I'm starting to think that the us is literally a puppet ,,country" of the jews at this point
imagine israel throwing bombs at them, it's so uncanny to question myself if they would really react
 
I'd say most of what women find sexual in men is toxic. Being tall, strong, threatening, etc. Female sexuality thus is toxic and harmful to men.
Ironically, Renaissance Europe may have been the moment in time when European civilization was most peaceful.

Wars Long Run military and civilian fatalities from Brecke1


And it makes sense why when you look at the culture of the period. Arranged marriage was universal, monogamy was enforced, and prostitution was completely normalized. There was no requirement for men to approach, seduce, and dominate women. You just asked your parents to introduce you to the cute village girl next door and if her parents agree, you have a wife for the rest of your life. Women pretty much had no power over society and when women have no power, men treat both other men and women better. This is because sexual frustration and the desire to please women is really the only thing that drives men towards violent behavior and people in Renaissance Europe explicitly recognized that and thus believed that all men needed regular sex. A book I read that really changed my opinion on society in the Middle Ages is "Medieval Prostitution" by Jacques Rossiaud. You can borrow it for free on Internet Archives.

As a teenager I believed in the myth of women being nicer, more gentle, and more moral then men. The truth is, however, that women only behave that way in male dominated societies because men want them to act that way. Basically, when men raise women to behave in their ideal image of femininity, girls act like the way we were raised to believe they'd act. Men are the truly moral ones who are constantly striving to make the world more peaceful, build more resource rich civilizations. Men are the ones who invented everything, not just technology but all our moral concepts that create civilization.

The only exception I'd say is when the wrong kind of men get into power. A lot of the Ancient societies allowed polygamy in outrageous numbers. In the Ancient Middle East and China, the royalty or aristocrats could literally keep harems of up to a thousand women if they wanted. If greedy, R-selected men are the ones in power, it doesn't matter if women have no power, everybody is fucked anyway. But if K-selected men are in power, you typically get men who understand how important sex is to men's psychological health and they become determined to make sure every man can get a wife. You do not need resource equality to create true peace, you need to guarantee marriage and a family as a right. In the 1950s, you pretty much had that informally even if it wasn't explicitly recognized which is why we had the lowest rate of violent crime in the 50s.
 
I don't think the same will happen to them. They will probably destroy kikes after having replaced us
People forget that there are kike colonies all throughout the entire world extending well beyond the west, they're fucking everywhere my dude.:dafuckfeels:
I'm starting to think that the us is literally a puppet ,,country" of the jews at this point
imagine israel throwing bombs at them, it's so uncanny to question myself if they would really react
I always joke and say that the United States might as well be called Greater Jerusalem at this point.

Even the useful idiots of freemasons that founded the United States modelled Washington D.C. as a sort of second Jerusalem in true Christian Zionist fashion. "The city on the shining hill." :feelsthink:
 
Last edited:
Ironically, Renaissance Europe may have been the moment in time when European civilization was most peaceful.

View attachment 450943

And it makes sense why when you look at the culture of the period. Arranged marriage was universal, monogamy was enforced, and prostitution was completely normalized. There was no requirement for men to approach, seduce, and dominate women. You just asked your parents to introduce you to the cute village girl next door and if her parents agree, you have a wife for the rest of your life. Women pretty much had no power over society and when women have no power, men treat both other men and women better. This is because sexual frustration and the desire to please women is really the only thing that drives men towards violent behavior and people in Renaissance Europe explicitly recognized that and thus believed that all men needed regular sex. A book I read that really changed my opinion on society in the Middle Ages is "Medieval Prostitution" by Jacques Rossiaud. You can borrow it for free on Internet Archives.

As a teenager I believed in the myth of women being nicer, more gentle, and more moral then men. The truth is, however, that women only behave that way in male dominated societies because men want them to act that way. Basically, when men raise women to behave in their ideal image of femininity, girls act like the way we were raised to believe they'd act. Men are the truly moral ones who are constantly striving to make the world more peaceful, build more resource rich civilizations. Men are the ones who invented everything, not just technology but all our moral concepts that create civilization.

The only exception I'd say is when the wrong kind of men get into power. A lot of the Ancient societies allowed polygamy in outrageous numbers. In the Ancient Middle East and China, the royalty or aristocrats could literally keep harems of up to a thousand women if they wanted. If greedy, R-selected men are the ones in power, it doesn't matter if women have no power, everybody is fucked anyway. But if K-selected men are in power, you typically get men who understand how important sex is to men's psychological health and they become determined to make sure every man can get a wife. You do not need resource equality to create true peace, you need to guarantee marriage and a family as a right. In the 1950s, you pretty much had that informally even if it wasn't explicitly recognized which is why we had the lowest rate of violent crime in the 50s.
I agree however i don't Believe in the "violent crimes" Thing. Every crime is violent. No such thing as a non violent crime
As a teenager I believed in the myth of women being nicer, more gentle, and more moral then men. The truth is, however, that women only behave that way in male dominated societies because men want them to act that way. Basically, when men raise women to behave in their ideal image of femininity, girls act like the way we were raised to believe they'd act. Men are the truly moral ones who are constantly striving to make the world more peaceful, build more resource rich civilizations. Men are the ones who invented everything, not just technology but
High iq and high informations
People forget that there are kike colonies all throughout the entire world extending well beyond the west, they're fucking everywhere my dude.:dafuckfeels:
But they are going extinct like us
 
Last edited:
Female sexuality is outdated and dysgenic. It probably served its purpose back when we wore loincloths and nibbled on rocks as a pasttime but has since become extremely maladaptive.

Women are still using the abacus, while men have long since moved on to using Windows 11.
 
Last edited:
Female sexuality is outdated and dysgenic. It probably served its purpose back when we wore loincloths and nibbled on rocks as a pasttime but has since become extremely maladaptive.

Women are still using the abacus, while men have long since moved on to using Windows 11.
Extremrely high awareness and high iq
 
You totally don't do that but that means you will probably be seen as a manchild, loser, weak good to nothing
I don't care at all about what soyciety says about me, i just want a GF for me
 

Similar threads

Viskallide
Replies
3
Views
264
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
Destroyed lonely
Replies
68
Views
3K
faded
faded
Seahorsecel
Replies
11
Views
412
anandkonda
anandkonda
Spooky_Heejin
Replies
27
Views
802
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
Logic55
Replies
6
Views
225
Logic55
Logic55

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top