Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Irrefutable Proof of the Hypergamy and why the current mode of sexual selection is dysgenic.

  • Thread starter HedonisticRecluse
  • Start date
HedonisticRecluse

HedonisticRecluse

Temporal Aimless Futile Existence
★★★
Joined
Aug 3, 2022
Posts
239
Online
3d 1h 18m
Introduction
Women are devoid of any intellectual ability nor any capacity for morality; for the female mind is only concerned with reproduction, dissimulation and her perceived status. Historically women have always been subservient to the man, it is this disposition towards obeying a man that has become innate in women – without the guidance of a man, women degenerate from caretakers to promiscuous, sexually deviant and hedonistic beings – these attributes are ubiquitous among modern women, although they are innate in women its presence has only been exacerbated by the sexual revolution. This analysis will explore the precarious state of the modern world’s sexual market and female nature through a strict rational observation based off scientific evidence, and Darwinian concepts without the obstruction of political correctness.


Women are predisposed towards manipulation and irrationality

female_brains.png

Contemporary feminist postulates the idea that women are equal to men in intellectual ability and blames the lack of success on patriarchal preconceptions of women; this idea is contrary to modern science, ignores neuroanatomical sex-based differences and discredits rigorous IQ testing that show the differences in intellect between men and women. The difference in intellect between men and women are evident in a study that had a sample size of 320,000 school pupils, which found that “…for all three tests there were substantial sex differences in the standard deviation of scores, with greater variance among boys. Boys were overrepresented relative to girls at both the top and the bottom extremes for all tests…” - men are overrepresented in the upper echelons of intellect and this explains the disparity in the intellectual achievement between men and women (Strand et al., 2006). This finding is of course discredited as a sexist drivel as its political implications threaten the notion of equality feminism seeks to achieve. But if one difference between men and women can be asserted to be a priori, it is of intelligence – this can be seen in the perspective of neuroscience. Grey matter in the frontal cortex is strongly correlated with intelligence, and grey matter in the parietal and temporal lobes are positively correlated with intelligence in adults (Colom, R.; Jung, R. E.; Haier, R. J. ,2006). In men IQ grey matter correlations are strongest in the frontal and parietal lobes, and are evenly distributed (45% each), women had grey matter mostly in the frontal cortex – however this study also found that “With respect to voxel types, men had roughly 6.5 times the number of GM voxels identified as related to intellectual functioning as did women, and women had roughly nine times more WM voxels than did men…”, it can be concluded that the IQ discrepancies between men and women can be attributed to neuroanatomical differences rather than patriarchy or social reasons (Haier et al., 2005).

Ever wonder why women are such good manipulators of men? Well, its because their brain structure is similar a pathological liar's - obviously this would confer a survival advantage for women as the weaker sex. Pathological liars showed a 22-26% increase in prefrontal white matter and a 36-42% reduction in prefrontal grey/white ratios compared with both antisocial controls and normal control. Another study reported Liars showed a relatively widespread increase in white matter (23-36%) in orbitofrontal, middle and inferior, but not superior, frontal gyri compared with antisocial and normal controls. This white matter increase may predispose some individuals to pathological lying. Compared to men, women show more white matter and fewer grey matter areas related to intelligence. Women have more white matter in the frontal lobe, while men have more grey matter there; 86% of the identified white matter voxels were found in the frontal lobe (Haier et al., 2005). The reduced grey matter predisposes women to lie and grey matter is also correlated to moral behaviour - this can explain why a lot of women lack basic morality and virtue signal a lot.

Fisherian Selection and why Female free choice is dysgenic
facial_sexual_dimorphismUntitled.png


Fisherian runaway is a sexual selection mechanism, that explains the evolution of ostentatious male ornamentation by persistent, directional female choice. Sexual dimorphism is the difference in form between individuals of different sex in the same species, these traits are subject to sexual selection. In intersexual selection, a mode of sexual selection where women select men, they seek attributes related to sexual dimorphism. In many non-monogamous species, the benefit to a male's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple females is large, whereas the benefit to a female's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple males is small or non-existent (Futuyama,2005).

Thus, women are more hypergamous as they must select the best genes, facial masculinity would have initially conferred an advantage to her offspring thus she would select for it. Subsequently many traits that would have conferred an advantage in other contexts (prehistory vs modern civilisation) would maladaptive. Facial masculinity is subject to sexual selection by women, as all his features from the wider bizogonial, the follow cheeks, the bigger nose the wider chin, the deep-set eyes, the "boxed off" hairline, and strong cheekbones are on the masculine side (Diagram 2).

The particular traits that are found in almost all 'chads' adored by women are; larger bigonial, deep set eyes, large brow ridge, higher nose bridge, taller chin, prominent cheekbones, thicker and a symmetrical face. Across many species including human males with low FAs enjoy better health and more mating success than asymmetrical males. Asymmetries can arise as a result of parasites, toxins or other insults encountered during the course of development, so global body symmetry is believed to be a valid index of immunocompetence. These authors concluded that facial masculinity serves as a proxy for bilateral symmetry. A follow-up study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between facial masculinity and body symmetry so it appears that, just like a peacock's tail, the testosterone markers on a human male's face might be attractive because they serve as 'honest' signals of good genetic quality.

Along with having a sexually dimorphic face, collagen is another indicator of health to women, thus is positively selected for, its why you see so many 'pretty boys' adored by women. These types of effeminate men also commonly have sexually dimorphic features. Hair quality is also important, '"Research is showing men with male pattern baldness have an increased risk of developing heart disease and prostate cancer. Research is showing men with male pattern baldness have an increased risk of developing heart disease and prostate", being bald can be a massive blow to your perceived sexual dimorphism. Another factor is height which is selected for by women, if you are taller you are more attractive, if you are shorter less.

Statistics show increasing female hypergamy
female_hypergamy.png

height.png



Data was drawn to assess trends in sexual behavior from the 2002 and 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health. Researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an even more dramatic 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (ie. "Chads"). Thus it is clear that the most attractive men are truly having more sex than ever before.

Female hypergamy is corroborated with research from the pew research centre which stated; 'Single men are far more likely than single women to be looking for a relationship or dates - 61% vs. 38%. This gender gap is especially apparent among older singles,' it seems like single women these days don't really need a relationship, while single men are struggling to find one. Another study by the pew research centre reported, 'Single-and-looking women are far more likely than single-and-looking men to say that trouble finding someone who was looking __who meets their expectations are major reasons they've had difficulty. In turn, men are much more likely than women to say difficulty approaching people is a major reason,' both these articles support the fact that women are becoming increasingly hypergamous and refusing to date down, while more and more men are struggling to find a relationship, with the top 5-20% of men having much more sex then ever before. Its seems that women are refusing to date men that do not meet their standards and opt to have short term relationships with more sexually dimorphic males (i.e. chads) and remain single.

By 2019, 39% of men were unpartnered, compared with 36% of women. Most single women can be classed as hypergamous refusing to date men that do not meet their standards, while a lot of men are struggling to find a partner. The general social survey also found that 28% of young men report being sexless compared to 18% of women. There are massive discrepancies in how men and women are fairing on the dating market.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-...-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-...dults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/



Why is the current mode of sexual selection bad?
Untitled.png


Because women will prefer sexually dimorphic males for short term relationships even if they have other traits that are maladaptive such as psychopathy, impulsivity, and lower IQ. If anyone says that women pick their partners based on personality rather than sexually dimorphic traits they are brainwashed by feminists into believing females are anything but superficial. This explains the female dating strategy to have short term hook-ups with men who have 'good genes' and long-term relationships with less sexually attractive men due to additional parental investment as well as financial benefits. But then why have marriages rates been dwindling, well because women now do not need financial aid from men. Women can have access to hundreds of men from social media or online dating apps, she can easily choose the most sexually dimorphic male without the risk of being a single mother due to condoms, abortions and contraceptives if she so pleases.

IQ rates lowering for decades: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...-developed-countries-doesn-t-bode-ncna1008576

Women sexually select men who are in the 70-110 IQ range, adolescents with an IQ score of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than an adolescent with an above-average score of about 120 to 130. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10706169/

Antisocial, criminal and violent men have greater sexual access to women, A study by Barbaro and Shackelford (2016) found evidence that male-perpetrated female-directed violence may be associated with greater sexual access to a female, and that it may in part be due to women responding favorably to male aggression. Despite the fact that fathers who engage in high levels of antisocial behavior make up a small proportion of fathers overall, they are responsible for a disproportionate number of births

For example, Moffitt and colleagues (2002) found that although men who engaged in high levels of antisocial behavior constituted only 10% of a birth cohort, they accounted for 27% of the babies fathered by the time the men were age 26. (Jaffee et al. 2003).Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000038
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000774
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_898-1


This recent paper from Britain is called "Human Capital Mediates Natural Selection in Contemporary Humans." That's a fancy way of saying evolution is affected by the traits of people who have children. This paper used what are called polygenic scores. If you don't know what they are, you should learn about them, because they are a vital tool for analysing the influence of genes - everything from how smart you are to whether you will get diabetes or even a divorce. This graph shows how a polygenic risk score (PRS) predicts the chances of getting a disease as you get older. The paper used a sample of more than 400,000 white people in Britain and compared the number of children they had to the traits they had - good and bad - as shown by their polygenic scores. Here are the 33 traits the researchers looked at, listed on the left.

Traits are passed on to children, so the next generation will have more of the traits to the right of the dotted line, and fewer of those to the left. At the top, the traits most rapidly spreading in the next generation are ADHD, smoking, extraversion, high BMI, and large waist circumference. These last two are measures of fatness. Heart disease, depression, Alzheimer's, and schizophrenia are also on the right. To the left are the traits that are being bred out, and at the bottom, being bred out most rapidly, are three measures of intelligence.

The authors of the study are blunt: Consistently over time, polygenic scores associated with lower earnings, education, and health are selected for, and higher earnings, education and better health are selected against.
Study: https://ueaeco.github.io/working-papers/papers/ueaeco/UEA-ECO-21-02_Updated.pdf

Women are selecting for maladaptive traits that will have disastrous consequences on modern civilisation. It can be concluded that women seek out sexually dimorphic males (i.e. chads) for short term relationships, and settle down with average looking men. It can also be asserted that the amount of women refusing to date men, attribute this to the fact that potential suitors do not meet their standards. Additionally, men in the top 20% of looks are having more sex then ever, suggesting that single women rather have short term hookups then long term relationships with average men. Furthermore, height a sexually dimorphic trait effects a mans overall quality of life and shorter heights are correlated to higher suicide rates. Women also positively select more psychopathic, lower IQ and impulsive males. This effect can be seen in the IQ scores lowering in first world countries. Women also have lower cognitive ability and are predisposed to manipulation.
 
MACHETE

MACHETE

The highest -cel on the .is
★★★
Joined
Jul 25, 2021
Posts
2,770
Online
77d 6h 23m
the.oracle

the.oracle

There is no happiness - only pleasure or pain.
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Posts
1,063
Online
36d 15h 9m
Man

Man

Verified Rapist
★★
Joined
Jul 11, 2022
Posts
1,125
Online
14d 3h 26m
How can you not see that taking away foids 'freedoms' is what is best for us?

It is increasingly apparent with every passing day.

Our collective philosophy is so far detached from this idea that it will probably be too late before people consider viable solutions to the problem.
 
B

BRCel123

Veteran
★★★★★
Joined
May 13, 2018
Posts
1,480
Online
30d 18h 12m
bagofshit99

bagofshit99

Based TROLLCEL and SHITPILLED
★★
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Posts
1,685
Online
26d 1m
Good, I made a similar post a while back


erectus walks among us
 
turbosperg

turbosperg

PTSD ADD NW4 5'9 4/10 sperg
★★★★
Joined
Mar 21, 2022
Posts
1,314
Online
15d 6h 29m
Historically women have always been subservient to the man
Hard disagree.

Foids exhibit all the characteristic adaptations (hidden ovulation, emotional disengagement, zero truth-preference, a proclivity to lie even to themselves etc. etc.) in order to master the ability to manipulate men, especially beta males, to do their bidding.
guidance of a man, women degenerate from caretakers to promiscuous
Hard disagree.

Foids reproductive system show characteristic adaptations to profit from promiscuity -- hidden ovulation, the fast and selective modification of the vaginal anatomy. by enlarging or shrinking the anterior fornix, the vagina retains twice the amount of sperm from rapists, and from Chads, than it does from beta males. Also, beta males were selected to simp for foids (women-are-wonderful effect), which allows promiscuous, pregnant, and single mothers to always find a willing beta male to care for them. Foids are always oscillating between alpha sperm acquisition ("slutty phase") and beta resource acquisition ("whore phase", "time to settle down"), these are the only two behavior modes a foid displays.


_________________________
"the current mode of sexual selection is dysgenic."

foids have ALWAYS been that way.

this behavior results in cycles:
- resource abundance drives foids to reject or cuck betas and procreate with Chads
- abundance of Chad bastards results in a decline in the resource availability
- scarce resources drive foids to seek security in betas
- industrious and hardworking beta offspring produce a wealth of resources.

The foid behavior oscillates wildly in this classic boom-bust ecological cycle.

The environment ultimately determines who are the best Chads (in times of resource abundance) and who are the best betas (in times of resource scarcity), which results in a alternate selection of the best betas and best Chads, over and over, and over through millions of years.
 
HedonisticRecluse

HedonisticRecluse

Temporal Aimless Futile Existence
★★★
Joined
Aug 3, 2022
Posts
239
Online
3d 1h 18m
Hard disagree.

Foids exhibit all the characteristic adaptations (hidden ovulation, emotional disengagement, zero truth-preference, a proclivity to lie even to themselves etc. etc.) in order to master the ability to manipulate men, especially beta males, to do their bidding.

Hard disagree.

Foids reproductive system show characteristic adaptations to profit from promiscuity -- hidden ovulation, the fast and selective modification of the vaginal anatomy. by enlarging or shrinking the anterior fornix, the vagina retains twice the amount of sperm from rapists, and from Chads, than it does from beta males. Also, beta males were selected to simp for foids (women-are-wonderful effect), which allows promiscuous, pregnant, and single mothers to always find a willing beta male to care for them. Foids are always oscillating between alpha sperm acquisition ("slutty phase") and beta resource acquisition ("whore phase", "time to settle down"), these are the only two behavior modes a foid displays.


_________________________
"the current mode of sexual selection is dysgenic."

foids have ALWAYS been that way.

this behavior results in cycles:
- resource abundance drives foids to reject or cuck betas and procreate with Chads
- abundance of Chad bastards results in a decline in the resource availability
- scarce resources drive foids to seek security in betas
- industrious and hardworking beta offspring produce a wealth of resources.

The foid behavior oscillates wildly in this classic boom-bust ecological cycle.

The environment ultimately determines who are the best Chads (in times of resource abundance) and who are the best betas (in times of resource scarcity), which results in a alternate selection of the best betas and best Chads, over and over, and over through millions of years.
It seems these female biological dating strategies were infact controlled in times of enforced monogamy.
In medieval times women who were accused of cheating were literally tortured in the most grotesque times, keep in mind this was europe. When agricultural societies started forming (From europe, the middle east, india, japan etc) monogamy and belief in higher gods were founded in order to keep a sense of morality and to mitigate sexual inequality. Monogamy was a fundemental building block in society, because then beta males would have an incentive to work. The higher ups in these monogamous societys were 'aristocrats' , yes these men would rise to the top due to sociopathy and higher IQ, and would rule the masses. These men would most likely be polygamous with their own sexual harems, they probably cucked men at the bottom at rare occurences.
1660194611053

Genetic studies show that sexual polygny aka chad fucks beta bucks was the norm until agricultural societies formed, and in order to encourage mutual intrest amongst the non chad males they would have introduce monogamy in order to have a more beneficial society. All those adapataions you posted that women have more then likely was due to the sexual selection prior to agricultural societies forming. The way the female sexuality was controlled was through religon and monogamy, i.e. "your going to hell if you commit adultery and going to be tortured very grotesquely if you do so" was enough to make sure women don't pick 80 IQ chads are 6'4 chads and lead to a total decline in society.
 
turbosperg

turbosperg

PTSD ADD NW4 5'9 4/10 sperg
★★★★
Joined
Mar 21, 2022
Posts
1,314
Online
15d 6h 29m
It seems these female biological dating strategies were infact controlled in times of enforced monogamy.
In medieval times women who were accused of cheating were literally tortured in the most grotesque times, keep in mind this was europe. When agricultural societies started forming (From europe, the middle east, india, japan etc) monogamy and belief in higher gods were founded in order to keep a sense of morality and to mitigate sexual inequality. Monogamy was a fundemental building block in society, because then beta males would have an incentive to work. The higher ups in these monogamous societys were 'aristocrats' , yes these men would rise to the top due to sociopathy and higher IQ, and would rule the masses. These men would most likely be polygamous with their own sexual harems, they probably cucked men at the bottom at rare occurences.
View attachment 646904
Genetic studies show that sexual polygny aka chad fucks beta bucks was the norm until agricultural societies formed, and in order to encourage mutual intrest amongst the non chad males they would have introduce monogamy in order to have a more beneficial society. All those adapataions you posted that women have more then likely was due to the sexual selection prior to agricultural societies forming. The way the female sexuality was controlled was through religon and monogamy, i.e. "your going to hell if you commit adultery and going to be tortured very grotesquely if you do so" was enough to make sure women don't pick 80 IQ chads are 6'4 chads and lead to a total decline in society.
The evolution of these sexual behaviors is an arms race between beta males who desire paternity certainty; and foids that want to cuck their beta providers with alpha seed.

This "arms race" is evident beyond obvious in the evolution of human sexual behavior and even anatomy -- the shape of the penis evolved to avoid cuckoldry by removing other males sperm, even the copulatory movement (in-out-in-out) is anti-cuckoldry, as it tends to remove semen from other males. The anatomy of the vagina also evolved to selectively retain more sperm from certain partners over others (the vagina retains twice the amount of sperm from rape and alpha males, over what it retains from sex with beta males). These anatomical adaptations take millions of years to complete, they're not the result of this ideology or that religion over there.

Of course, it's possible do construct a society that enforces certain behaviors, and discourages others. But there is always this tendency for ideologies to crumble in the face of biological reality.

In medieval times
You know what is funny about medieval times? The smartest men were selected to be "celibate" as priests and monks.

Since IQ is genetic, one would expect the IQ to drop precipitously in such soyciety, right?

Wrong. What happened is that IQ increased during medieval times. How?

Obvious: these "celibate" priests and monks were I.M.P.R.E.G.N.A.T.I.N.G. foids left and right. High-IQ priests were cucking the farmer's wives while the husband was away, believing his honourable and faithful wife was getting "directions" from the "celibate" priest at the parish. Oh, how quaint! :bluepill:
 
Last edited:
Zhou Chang-Xing

Zhou Chang-Xing

Mythic
★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
4,831
Online
17d 21h 6m
Literally this:


View: https://youtu.be/gJDcoqrh1ac


:society::blackpill::society::blackpill::society::blackpill:

High IQ post, hopefully this will one day be classified as "Must-read content". Kudos to the author and welcome aboard. ;)
 
Zhou Chang-Xing

Zhou Chang-Xing

Mythic
★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
4,831
Online
17d 21h 6m
This "arms race" is evident beyond obvious in the evolution of human sexual behavior and even anatomy -- the shape of the penis evolved to avoid cuckoldry by removing other males sperm, even the copulatory movement (in-out-in-out) is anti-cuckoldry, as it tends to remove semen from other males. The anatomy of the vagina also evolved to selectively retain more sperm from certain partners over others (the vagina retains twice the amount of sperm from rape and alpha males, over what it retains from sex with beta males). These anatomical adaptations take millions of years to complete, they're not the result of this ideology or that religion over there.

Gallup et al. (2003)[6] tested Baker and Bellis's (1995)[13] hypothesis that the shape of the human penis was specifically designed to scoop out human semen. Important to note is that these experiments utilized fake penises, fake vaginas, and fake cum (yes, literally dildos and fleshlights). They contend that the 'large' diameter of the human glans and corona in particular have been selected for due to sperm competition. Outside of this study, there is no other evidence to support the view that the shape of the human penis has evolved to displace sperm.
[UWSL][/UWSL]
[UWSL]'Acorn-like' glans (like seen in humans) are extremely common in old-world monkeys regardless of whether or not they have monogamous, polygynous, or multi-male/multi-female mating systems. In fact, the human penis is remarkably similar to the gorilla (who experiences virtually no sperm competition) and differs only in size. Gallup and Burch (2004)[7] have even noted that semen displaced by rival males might be transferred to other females and thus fertilize her. If we compare humans to the more promiscuous chimpanzee and bonobos, it becomes very obvious that the human penis has not evolved adaptations to sperm competition. In both the bonobo and the chimpanzee, a glans is lacking, and the penis is filiform; the bonobo, in particular, has a distinctive Y-shape.[26] Measurements of penile and vaginal lengths in the chimpanzee indicate that the long and filiform penis probably co-evolved in association with the development of the large sexual skin swelling which characterizes this species.s. s. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]Let's assume for a moment that rampant sperm competition was a consistent feature of ancestral human mating. For there to be selection pressures that, due sperm competition, have formed -what is apparently- a long thick penis to plunge out rival sperm, how quickly after insemination does your ancestral male have to copulate with a female to scoop out rival sperm before the sperm has passed into the uterus? Depending on how much mucous the cervix is secreting, it takes about 5 - 60 minutes for sperm to reach the fallopian tubes (oviduct), which means that it takes even less time for the (motile) sperm to leave the vagina and enter into just the uterus.[27] So, for the penis to have evolved due to the need for it to suction out rival sperm, ancestral females must've had multiple gangbangs around ovulation; this level of wild promiscuity is quite unlikely especially considering concealed ovulation in females which ensures that sexual activity doesn't converge around ovulation as much when compared to Chimpanzees and Bonobos. But let's grant that gangbangs were rampant and that the penis has evolved as a plunging device. If so, why has sperm competition selected for larger penises but not larger testicles when larger testicles (greater ammunition) are far more important in sperm competition?[28][/UWSL]
[UWSL][/UWSL]
[UWSL]Another point that controverts penis plunger is the time it takes most men to ejaculate. Contrary to current popular notions, sex within traditional cultures (i.e hunter gatherer tribes) tends to not last very long, often lasting only a few seconds; this implies that premature ejaculation, far from signifying sexual dysfunction, was the norm (or was at extremely least common) for ancestral mating and that it is rather the contemporary notion that men ought to last longer during sex for the sake of their partner that is exceptional as opposed to the biological norm of premature ejaculation. However this does not bode well for 'penis plunger' theory as, if it were true, then there would be selection against premature ejaculation as men who lasted longer during sex would be able to scoop out rival sperm more efficiently than men predisposed to premature ejaculation (whom would be done with the entire ordeal within a few thrusts). In an eviroment where it would be common for a woman to be carrying rival sperm in her vagina when mating with a man then (assuming the penis is ergonomic for the purposes of plunging out sperm) men who can effortlessly mate for long periods of time out to be selected for; that this is no the case, i.e the ability for most men to have sex for prolonged periods of time relatively effortlessly, implies that selective pressures for the ability for prolonged periods of sex in men were lax/non-existant and the corollary of which effectively debunks plunger theory as plunger theory would predict selective pressures in favour of prolonged sex. x. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]A final point to undermines the displacement theory is the assumption that, in the absence of sperm competition, the human penis ought not to possess any capacity for sperm displacement. Indeed one has to wonder if it even possible for the penis to both perform its function of delivering sperm adequately and simultaneously be unable to displace any sperm whatsoever; were this true then a reduction in the ability to displace sperm would also result in a significant reduction in the ability to deliver sperm as the two properties cannot be divorced easilly. Under this view any capacity for the human penis for displacing sperm would thus arise as a byproduct from the intense evolutionary pressure for the penis to efficiently place sperm and need not refer to sperm competition to explain this capacity. Indeed one argument in favour of the displacement theory is the fact that men experience a refractory period after ejaculation (going limp). The question arises then, why ought this refractory phase be neccesary if the penis did not possess the capacity for sperm displacement? Surely there'd be no harm for a little romping after ejaculation if it did not? Ergo (they conclude) the penis must have the capacity for sperm displacement (thus the refractory period ensures that the male does not displace his own semen) which must of arisen due to sperm competition.[/UWSL]
[UWSL][/UWSL]
[UWSL]This is erroneous for a number of reasons. Firstly it assumes that the only possible (though still plausible) reason for a refractory period is to prevent the displacement of one's semen. Another possible reason could be to prevent subsequent matings. There are two reasons as to why multiple serial matings could be disadvantagous. The first being that, assuming he's mating with the same female, the male might go on to mate until he's exhausted and has no more sperm to offer. The excess sperm he's delivered to the female might put her at risk for polyspermy which will in turn lower his reproductive fitness. The second reason would be sperm depletion. Your average male can ejaculate about six times in one day before depletion.[29] A male might benifit from have sperm reserves at all times so as to strategically mate with females should the oppurtunity arise. As we can see, the ability to displace sperm need not neccesarilly cause selection for a refractory period though it still could. The next point being that it assumes that the capacity for displacement and the capacity for sperm delivery are independant properties; if this were not the case, then the capacity for sperm displacement could of arisen as a byproduct (as previously explained) and (due to the difficulty in divorcing these two functions) a refractory period was selected for to ensure the male did not scoop out his own semen.[/UWSL]

Unlike testes size, which is an established metric by which to assess the level of sperm competition within a species, the capacity and the extant to which sperm displacement occurs during thrusting in other primates has not been measured. So even if we grant that the shape of the penis was subject to pressures due to sperm competition, it would be impossible to tell just exactly how much sperm competition it was subject to unless between species comparisons are made. Thus the conclusion that sperm competition has played a large role in human evolution based on this is premature.
[UWSL][/UWSL]
[UWSL]So ''penis plunger'' theory is unsound because of a number of reasons; namely: The evidence for it comes from artificial samples, not organic ones; thus, there is no evidence that 'penis plunger theory' even occurs outside the minds of evolutionary psychologists. The specific shape of the human penis is common amongst a variety of old-world monkeys (monogamous or not), and thus the specific shape of the human penis is a vestige of these penis shapes. In order for the "penis plunger" theory to be valid, gangbangs around ovulation must've been a common feature of ancestral mating, common enough at least to exert consistent selection pressure on the human penis. This is unlikely considering concealed ovulation amongst human females. Penis plunger theory is reliant on the existence of sperm competition in humans, which, across a multitude of species, demands larger testicles in species adapted to it; the lack of large testicles in homo sapiens implies little to no sperm competition, which as an extension means the penis plunger theory is invalid. The norm for most modern men is to ejaculate prematurely (and that most men have to discipline themselves to last for an adequate duration) rather than to effortlessly copulate for prolonged periods of time (and thus more efficiently scoop out sperm) effectively belies penis plunger theory as false. Finally, penis plunger theory makes the unwarrented assumption that the capacity to displace semen ought only arise due sperm competition. n. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]https://incels.wiki/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=69674 [/UWSL]
 
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

Just Replace Them Already
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,986
Online
75d 22h 37m
Hard disagree.

Foids exhibit all the characteristic adaptations (hidden ovulation, emotional disengagement, zero truth-preference, a proclivity to lie even to themselves etc. etc.) in order to master the ability to manipulate men, especially beta males, to do their bidding.

Hard disagree.

Foids reproductive system show characteristic adaptations to profit from promiscuity -- hidden ovulation, the fast and selective modification of the vaginal anatomy. by enlarging or shrinking the anterior fornix, the vagina retains twice the amount of sperm from rapists, and from Chads, than it does from beta males. Also, beta males were selected to simp for foids (women-are-wonderful effect), which allows promiscuous, pregnant, and single mothers to always find a willing beta male to care for them. Foids are always oscillating between alpha sperm acquisition ("slutty phase") and beta resource acquisition ("whore phase", "time to settle down"), these are the only two behavior modes a foid displays.


_________________________
"the current mode of sexual selection is dysgenic."

foids have ALWAYS been that way.

this behavior results in cycles:
- resource abundance drives foids to reject or cuck betas and procreate with Chads
- abundance of Chad bastards results in a decline in the resource availability
- scarce resources drive foids to seek security in betas
- industrious and hardworking beta offspring produce a wealth of resources.

The foid behavior oscillates wildly in this classic boom-bust ecological cycle.

The environment ultimately determines who are the best Chads (in times of resource abundance) and who are the best betas (in times of resource scarcity), which results in a alternate selection of the best betas and best Chads, over and over, and over through millions of years.
The only way out of this cycle is to remove reproductive control from women. Essentially, either chain them to the kitchen or invent a machine that does their biological role better.
 
war_with_myself

war_with_myself

blackpilled by reality
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Posts
2,081
Online
38d 20h 18m
ucw209

ucw209

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Posts
255
Online
6d 10h 18m
Good post OP. Well cited sources and research statistics to support your observation. Not that I give a fuck about the future of humanity.

Across many species including human males with low FAs enjoy better health and more mating success than asymmetrical males. Asymmetries can arise as a result of parasites, toxins or other insults encountered during the course of development, so global body symmetry is believed to be a valid index of immunocompetence.
Assuming humans operate by their "biological purpose", I think this section accurately explains the reason for the Lookspill. The idea that good face indicates fine health and optimal genetics (as to the survival of the human species). Whereas ugly face indicates poor health and genetic genetic defectiveness.

It seems there's a strictly biological / economic imperative to sexual selection in foids, as well as the incentive to "test out" a variety of "high-quality" specimens in the process (hence hypergamy and foid promiscuity) --- Would you suggest the dysgenic-ness of sexual selection in foids is primaily due to the way they are biologically wired?



Another thing. Unless when foid tries to exploit the economic resources of various different men via entering a sexual / romantic relation with them, there would be no biological reason for foid to sleep with multiple men.

You stated sexual dimorphism has importance to sexual selection in foids.
In intersexual selection, a mode of sexual selection where women select men, they seek attributes related to sexual dimorphism

You also stated that female repoductive fitness is not benefited by the more male sex partners they have during their lifespan.
the benefit to a female's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple males is small or non-existent (Futuyama,2005)


If this is all true --- Wouldnt it mean the mode of sexual selection among foids is actually converging towards the "optimal human male specimen" aka "the ultimate version of Chad"???

Also --- If we hypothezise the situation where this "absolute version of Chad" actually exists, and they publicly announced to offer consensual sex to all foids on the planet. Lets say all the other non-Chad males on the planet were diplomatic about it and decided to allow foids to exercize total sexual freedom (even though realistically men probably woudnt allow foids to have this much freedom in sexual selection).

Wouldnt it mean that all foids on the planet (who operate with a biological imperative in sexual selection) would necessarily limit their sexual contact to this single "ultimate Chad" (or very few "ultimate Chads"), resulting in a worldwide harem where all foids (who have a biological imperative to their choice of sex partners) restrict their sexual relations to this one single man (or very few men) who make up 0.000000000000001%, while the remaining 99.999999999999999% of men on the planet are forced into celibacy?
 
Last edited:
C

ConservativeCel

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Dec 17, 2020
Posts
320
Online
17d 8h 39m
Wouldnt it mean that all foids on the planet (who operate with a biological imperative in sexual selection) would necessarily limit their sexual contact to this single "ultimate Chad" (or very few "ultimate Chads"), resulting in a worldwide harem where all foids (who have a biological imperative to their choice of sex partners) restrict their sexual relations to this one single man (or very few men) who make up 0.000000000000001%, while the remaining 99.999999999999999% of men on the planet are forced into celibacy?
Yes, I think they would be fine with that, provided that celibate men would be work slaves who'd provide resources. Women don't want to fuck men other than Chads just for varieties' sake, it's Chads who occasionally fuck relatively unattractive foids when bored. Also cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect

If you think about prehistoric times, foids were mostly Chad/Alpha male property. That might also explain foids' bisexual inclinations: in a Chad harem, it would have been preferable from chad's point of view if his female property licked each others' pussy rather than fuck Betas or Omegas.
 
Last edited:
ucw209

ucw209

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Posts
255
Online
6d 10h 18m
Yes, I think they would be fine with that, provided that celibate men would be work slaves who'd provide resources. Women don't want to fuck men other than Chads just for varieties' sake, it's Chads who occasionally fuck relatively unattractive foids when bored. Also cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect

If you think about prehistoric times, foids were mostly Chad/Alpha male property. That might also explain foids' bisexual inclinations: in a Chad harem, it would have been preferable from chad's point of view if his female property licked each others' pussy rather than fuck Betas or Omegas.
This a reasonable observation. Polyamory would be suitable for foids, when you consider their biological imperative to reproduce with males who posess "alpha" traits and high-value genetics (like harmonius face and tall height). The sub-standard men could take on the role of economic providers who dont receive sex (aka betabux), while the men with high-value genetics take on the role to propagate their genes to new humans via foid impregnation.

As some foids tend to be possessive and jealous of other foids who recieve dick from the same males they are attracted to, I think polygyny can be very effective if foids dont become aware they are sharing the same dick with other foids.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

InMemoriam
Replies
14
Views
342
Retardinator
Retardinator
NT Master
Replies
22
Views
742
bagofshit99
bagofshit99
Indracel
Replies
7
Views
261
StayFrosty
StayFrosty
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top