I got the solution, buddy boyos. It's plain and simple:
Convince the 80% of guys who get little to no sex to follow the following rules as if they were the Ten Commandments.
Some forms of intent are: being friends, flirting, dating, having sex, and marrying.
1. You will never show intent to a woman who looks worse than you facially.
It simplifies the traditional rating system. You are not taking the woman's body into consideration, and you don't have to come up with a specific number out of your a$$. You only focus on her face and compare it to yours. It should make it easier to tell if she is above or below your looks level, or if she is your facial looksmatch, because you are comparing only two faces rather than assigning ratings.
Also, being aware of the bias that men generally overrate women's looks should help you judge more accurately. You have to be conscious of not considering the "potential" a woman has, but rather her actual face, and the same applies to your own face.
This rule prevents you from contributing to the facial aspect of hypergamy (that you hate so much, except when it's your turn to fuck the looksmatch of some uglier guy than you).
2. You will never show intent to a woman who is shorter than you by 12 cm or more (4.7 inches or more).
It avoids the problem of integrating body factors into the overall looks rating. You won't have to consider body fat percentage, waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, shoulder-to-waist ratio, or penis size. You only consider the woman's height and compare it to yours.
Because body fat percentage is reflected in the face according to Rule #1, and frame size and penis size are correlated with height in men, as well as breast size in women, there is little to no correlation between waist-to-hip ratio and height in women. Therefore, this is a little oversimplified, but it complements the first rule very well, and it is a better system than either ignoring height when dating women or trying to consider every body factor.
In the worst-case scenario, every man dates a woman exactly 12 cm shorter than himself. Since that difference corresponds roughly to the average height difference between men and women, it would not leave many men out of the market.
Every time you show intent to a girl who is shorter than you by 12 cm or more (4.7 inches or more), you are contributing to the height aspect of hypergamy, also known as heightism (that you hate so much, except when it's your turn to fuck the looksmatch of some shorter guy than you).
This is often seen in looksmatch couples. In the majority of cases, the guy is the one who takes the first step, puts in more effort, and compensates with money or status.
Ideally, men would only show intent half of the time. This could be achieved if you only show intent to a girl after a different girl has shown intent to you first. That way, men would initiate only 50% of the time. However, considering the difference between the size of the signals men tend to show compared to women (asking someone out versus giving a flirty look or smile), and the fact that most guys tend to see indicators of interest when there are none, this would only complicate things.
If men tend to see intent where there is none, how do you know that she showed interest first? That's where Rule #4 comes in.
If she makes eye contact, you only make eye contact back. Nothing else.
If she is friendly, you are friendly too, but you don't flirt.
If she flirts with you, you only flirt back, but you don't ask her out.
If she asks you out on a date, you go on the date, but you don't try to escalate to a kiss.
If she tries to escalate to a kiss, you kiss her, but you don't try to escalate to sex.
If she tries to escalate to sex, you have sex with her, but you don't ask her to be your girlfriend.
If she asks you to be her boyfriend, you accept, but you don't ask her to marry you.
If she asks you to marry her, you get married.
If you pay attention, you'll notice that women instinctively follow many of these rules, but on steroids.
The only way to combat hypergamy is with hypergamy itself. Looksmaxxing, geomaxxing, transmaxxing, gaymaxxing, gymmaxxing, moneymaxxing, gamemaxxing, statusmaxxing, and every other maxxing are merely solutions to the symptoms, not the cause.
Hypergamymaxxing is the only true solution (although it has its own flaws).
5. You will never spend money on a woman in order to show intent unless she does it for you first.
Ideally, you should take the same approach you do with your friends. About 95% of the time, everyone pays for their own things, and when someone is short on money, you help them out, and they do the same for you from time to time.
However, we know that men often look for the tiniest excuse to compensate with money:
6. You will never spend more money on a woman than she spends on you.
Never give free things unless she gave you something first. Then, and only then, you may reciprocate, and only with something of equal or lower monetary value.
If she gives you chocolates, you do not take her on an expensive date. Instead, you give her something of equal or lesser value.
This means never paying for a woman's meal on a date unless you are already a couple and she has paid for your meal first. In that case, you may reciprocate and pay for her meal, but only if the amount you spend is equal to or less than what she spent on you.
The same principle applies to flowers, gifts, trips, and other expenses. It also applies to hookups and situationships.
"Okay, but what if I have a big house, and instead of taking her on a date, I invite her to my place, we drink, and hook up? Technically, I'm not spending money on her, and it still follows status/money hypergamy."
That is precisely why Rule #7 exists.
7. You will never show intent to a woman who is not in your same social class/status or higher.
If you become a couple, she should not earn less than 90% of what you earn, and you should not possess major assets that she does not have, such as houses or cars.
Of course, it is harder to determine the social class of someone you have just met and are planning to hook up with, but it is not impossible. By knowing what she studies or does for work, where she lives, and by observing her clothes and lifestyle, you can usually make a reasonable estimate.
Yes, we know. Technically, races do not exist, but everyone knows what I mean. Let's say there are white, black, Hispanic, and Asian people simply to make things easier.
The idea is that some races may have a higher average SMV than others, such as whites compared to Hispanic or Asian men, for example. However, there are still 50% men and 50% women within every race.
If we want to avoid passport bros and hypergamy in general, we cannot simply say that only face and height matter. We also have to acknowledge the importance of race in order to avoid biases, such as men overrating white women and Asian women while underrating black women.
Someone could argue that this is not actually overrating, and that white women are objectively more attractive, and that this is supported by evidence.
So we would have to come up with some complicated rule that acknowledges a racial hierarchy and says that white men cannot date outside their race, while some other groups, such as Hispanic or Asian men, could date white women because it would go against female hypergamy.
However, this would only overcomplicate things. It is simpler if everyone stays within their own race.
This means only approaching or showing intent to girls who are visibly more attractive than you, and only as long as you follow the previous rules.
This avoids PUA practices that inflate women's value, while also allowing men to actively improve their social skills without negatively affecting the market.
Although it makes learning social skills much more difficult, because you lose the feedback that many PUA practitioners receive from women who are less attractive than themselves.
I know legitimate guys who practice daygame and nightgame and who are capable of being with their looksmatches, but only after sleeping with 20 or more girls whom they considered less attractive than themselves, thereby ruining the market for everyone.
"Okay, but only Chads could follow these rules. I don't have any interactions with women."
This is partially true. We need to convince as many Chads as possible for this to work.
However, what most people do not see is the "whitepill," which is the power that the bottom 80% of men possess, for better or worse.
If the bottom 80% of men followed these rules, the change would be enormous.
9. Do not give your money to scorts or OnlyFans.
Of course, things like these, as well as corn addiction in general, are not the cause of male loneliness but rather a consequence of it.
Trying to avoid these things while hypergamy still exists is, once again, fighting the consequences rather than the root of the problem.
However, paying money is obviously contributing to hypergamy.
You can watch as much corn as you want (although preferably not; ideally, only fap using your imagination), but the moment you pay money to women who despise you simply to be able to touch them—or worse, merely watch them—you are engaging in pure hypergamy.
10. Create support groups for other men.
It would take many years to convince a sufficiently large number of men for these rules to achieve their purpose of controlling female hypergamy.
If we do not see results after abstaining from being with women whom we perceive as less attractive than ourselves, we may relapse into the hypergamy game.
Therefore, in order to maintain our motivation and mental health, it is necessary to socialize and develop groups of friends.
Ideally, these groups should not consist entirely of normies, because it is very easy to feel judged or intimidated by them. Even among close normie friends, it can be difficult to open up emotionally due to the fear of damaging one's social status.
However, with guys who have consumed the blackpill, it is much easier to be vulnerable. The only problem is that they are often very unlikely to go outside and participate in real-world activities.
Ideally, these groups would allow members to:
These groups would also help members follow Rule #9 and all the other rules in general.
Ultimately, this is the key for the entire system to work.
If men do not begin congregating physically, creating a sense of belonging, and helping one another, nothing will ever change.
It does not need to start big. Simply find one or two blackpillers in your city and suggest hanging out.
(Of course, this may sound similar to a Chad telling incels to "just smile at women because it always works for me.")
In reality, it would be much more difficult than that, but I think it may be the only chance we have.
Men in the blackpill sphere generally do not judge other men physically as harshly as women do, and that is one advantage we possess.
However, as one BP creator once said, women have a stronger in-group bias. They support one another more, tell each other that they are pretty, and reinforce one another's self-esteem.
By contrast, men often do the opposite. We sometimes put other men down in order to make ourselves appear better.
Convince the 80% of guys who get little to no sex to follow the following rules as if they were the Ten Commandments.
Some forms of intent are: being friends, flirting, dating, having sex, and marrying.
- You will never show intent to a woman who looks worse than you facially.
- You will never show intent to a woman who is shorter than you by 12 cm or more (4.7 inches or more).
- You will never show intent first to your looksmatch (a girl facially equal to you and within the 12 cm range).
- You will never show more intent to your looksmatch than she shows to you.
- You will never spend money on a woman in order to show intent unless she does it for you first.
- You will never spend more money on a woman than she does on you.
- You will never show intent to a woman who is not in your same social class/status or higher.
- You will never show intent to a woman who is not the same race as you.
- Do not give your money to scorts or OnlyFans.
- Create support groups for other men.
1. You will never show intent to a woman who looks worse than you facially.
It simplifies the traditional rating system. You are not taking the woman's body into consideration, and you don't have to come up with a specific number out of your a$$. You only focus on her face and compare it to yours. It should make it easier to tell if she is above or below your looks level, or if she is your facial looksmatch, because you are comparing only two faces rather than assigning ratings.
Also, being aware of the bias that men generally overrate women's looks should help you judge more accurately. You have to be conscious of not considering the "potential" a woman has, but rather her actual face, and the same applies to your own face.
This rule prevents you from contributing to the facial aspect of hypergamy (that you hate so much, except when it's your turn to fuck the looksmatch of some uglier guy than you).
2. You will never show intent to a woman who is shorter than you by 12 cm or more (4.7 inches or more).
It avoids the problem of integrating body factors into the overall looks rating. You won't have to consider body fat percentage, waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, shoulder-to-waist ratio, or penis size. You only consider the woman's height and compare it to yours.
Because body fat percentage is reflected in the face according to Rule #1, and frame size and penis size are correlated with height in men, as well as breast size in women, there is little to no correlation between waist-to-hip ratio and height in women. Therefore, this is a little oversimplified, but it complements the first rule very well, and it is a better system than either ignoring height when dating women or trying to consider every body factor.
In the worst-case scenario, every man dates a woman exactly 12 cm shorter than himself. Since that difference corresponds roughly to the average height difference between men and women, it would not leave many men out of the market.
Every time you show intent to a girl who is shorter than you by 12 cm or more (4.7 inches or more), you are contributing to the height aspect of hypergamy, also known as heightism (that you hate so much, except when it's your turn to fuck the looksmatch of some shorter guy than you).
3. You will never show intent first to your looksmatch (a girl facially equal to you and within the 12 cm range).
In order to eliminate hypergamy, you and your looksmatch should have the same sexual market value. Even if you follow Rules #1 and #2 and only show intent to your looksmatch, the fact that you are the one showing intent first implies that she is worth more than you (which right now she does, but we're trying to reverse that).This is often seen in looksmatch couples. In the majority of cases, the guy is the one who takes the first step, puts in more effort, and compensates with money or status.
Ideally, men would only show intent half of the time. This could be achieved if you only show intent to a girl after a different girl has shown intent to you first. That way, men would initiate only 50% of the time. However, considering the difference between the size of the signals men tend to show compared to women (asking someone out versus giving a flirty look or smile), and the fact that most guys tend to see indicators of interest when there are none, this would only complicate things.
If men tend to see intent where there is none, how do you know that she showed interest first? That's where Rule #4 comes in.
4. You will never show more intent to your looksmatch than she shows to you.
The idea is that if you only show the same amount of intent that she showed to you, then you don't have to be 100% sure that she was actually interested. Even if you misinterpret her kindness as interest, you will only respond with the same level of interest, and you will never show more intent than she did.If she makes eye contact, you only make eye contact back. Nothing else.
If she is friendly, you are friendly too, but you don't flirt.
If she flirts with you, you only flirt back, but you don't ask her out.
If she asks you out on a date, you go on the date, but you don't try to escalate to a kiss.
If she tries to escalate to a kiss, you kiss her, but you don't try to escalate to sex.
If she tries to escalate to sex, you have sex with her, but you don't ask her to be your girlfriend.
If she asks you to be her boyfriend, you accept, but you don't ask her to marry you.
If she asks you to marry her, you get married.
If you pay attention, you'll notice that women instinctively follow many of these rules, but on steroids.
The only way to combat hypergamy is with hypergamy itself. Looksmaxxing, geomaxxing, transmaxxing, gaymaxxing, gymmaxxing, moneymaxxing, gamemaxxing, statusmaxxing, and every other maxxing are merely solutions to the symptoms, not the cause.
Hypergamymaxxing is the only true solution (although it has its own flaws).
5. You will never spend money on a woman in order to show intent unless she does it for you first.
Ideally, you should take the same approach you do with your friends. About 95% of the time, everyone pays for their own things, and when someone is short on money, you help them out, and they do the same for you from time to time.
However, we know that men often look for the tiniest excuse to compensate with money:
- "She is studying, she doesn't have any money."
- "She is not working right now."
- "She lives with her parents."
- "I have money to spend."
6. You will never spend more money on a woman than she spends on you.
Never give free things unless she gave you something first. Then, and only then, you may reciprocate, and only with something of equal or lower monetary value.
If she gives you chocolates, you do not take her on an expensive date. Instead, you give her something of equal or lesser value.
This means never paying for a woman's meal on a date unless you are already a couple and she has paid for your meal first. In that case, you may reciprocate and pay for her meal, but only if the amount you spend is equal to or less than what she spent on you.
The same principle applies to flowers, gifts, trips, and other expenses. It also applies to hookups and situationships.
"Okay, but what if I have a big house, and instead of taking her on a date, I invite her to my place, we drink, and hook up? Technically, I'm not spending money on her, and it still follows status/money hypergamy."
That is precisely why Rule #7 exists.
7. You will never show intent to a woman who is not in your same social class/status or higher.
If you become a couple, she should not earn less than 90% of what you earn, and you should not possess major assets that she does not have, such as houses or cars.
Of course, it is harder to determine the social class of someone you have just met and are planning to hook up with, but it is not impossible. By knowing what she studies or does for work, where she lives, and by observing her clothes and lifestyle, you can usually make a reasonable estimate.
8. You will never show intent to a woman who is not the same race as you.
"But races don't exist, science says..."Yes, we know. Technically, races do not exist, but everyone knows what I mean. Let's say there are white, black, Hispanic, and Asian people simply to make things easier.
The idea is that some races may have a higher average SMV than others, such as whites compared to Hispanic or Asian men, for example. However, there are still 50% men and 50% women within every race.
If we want to avoid passport bros and hypergamy in general, we cannot simply say that only face and height matter. We also have to acknowledge the importance of race in order to avoid biases, such as men overrating white women and Asian women while underrating black women.
Someone could argue that this is not actually overrating, and that white women are objectively more attractive, and that this is supported by evidence.
So we would have to come up with some complicated rule that acknowledges a racial hierarchy and says that white men cannot date outside their race, while some other groups, such as Hispanic or Asian men, could date white women because it would go against female hypergamy.
However, this would only overcomplicate things. It is simpler if everyone stays within their own race.
8. You will charge a "beauty tax" in order to show intent.
If you want to use dating apps, social media, cold approach, social circles, daygame, nightgame, or any other method of meeting women, especially if your goal is to improve your social skills, you must charge a beauty tax.This means only approaching or showing intent to girls who are visibly more attractive than you, and only as long as you follow the previous rules.
This avoids PUA practices that inflate women's value, while also allowing men to actively improve their social skills without negatively affecting the market.
Although it makes learning social skills much more difficult, because you lose the feedback that many PUA practitioners receive from women who are less attractive than themselves.
I know legitimate guys who practice daygame and nightgame and who are capable of being with their looksmatches, but only after sleeping with 20 or more girls whom they considered less attractive than themselves, thereby ruining the market for everyone.
"Okay, but only Chads could follow these rules. I don't have any interactions with women."
This is partially true. We need to convince as many Chads as possible for this to work.
However, what most people do not see is the "whitepill," which is the power that the bottom 80% of men possess, for better or worse.
If the bottom 80% of men followed these rules, the change would be enormous.
9. Do not give your money to scorts or OnlyFans.
Of course, things like these, as well as corn addiction in general, are not the cause of male loneliness but rather a consequence of it.
Trying to avoid these things while hypergamy still exists is, once again, fighting the consequences rather than the root of the problem.
However, paying money is obviously contributing to hypergamy.
You can watch as much corn as you want (although preferably not; ideally, only fap using your imagination), but the moment you pay money to women who despise you simply to be able to touch them—or worse, merely watch them—you are engaging in pure hypergamy.
10. Create support groups for other men.
It would take many years to convince a sufficiently large number of men for these rules to achieve their purpose of controlling female hypergamy.
If we do not see results after abstaining from being with women whom we perceive as less attractive than ourselves, we may relapse into the hypergamy game.
Therefore, in order to maintain our motivation and mental health, it is necessary to socialize and develop groups of friends.
Ideally, these groups should not consist entirely of normies, because it is very easy to feel judged or intimidated by them. Even among close normie friends, it can be difficult to open up emotionally due to the fear of damaging one's social status.
However, with guys who have consumed the blackpill, it is much easier to be vulnerable. The only problem is that they are often very unlikely to go outside and participate in real-world activities.
Ideally, these groups would allow members to:
- Be vulnerable and discuss their feelings.
- Work out.
- Looksmaxx.
- Socialize.
- Do cold approach together.
- Go to the movies.
- Go to the beach.
- Travel.
- Learn about game and nutrition.
- Go fishing.
- Participate in other activities that improve mental health and involve social interaction.
These groups would also help members follow Rule #9 and all the other rules in general.
Ultimately, this is the key for the entire system to work.
If men do not begin congregating physically, creating a sense of belonging, and helping one another, nothing will ever change.
It does not need to start big. Simply find one or two blackpillers in your city and suggest hanging out.
(Of course, this may sound similar to a Chad telling incels to "just smile at women because it always works for me.")
In reality, it would be much more difficult than that, but I think it may be the only chance we have.
Men in the blackpill sphere generally do not judge other men physically as harshly as women do, and that is one advantage we possess.
However, as one BP creator once said, women have a stronger in-group bias. They support one another more, tell each other that they are pretty, and reinforce one another's self-esteem.
By contrast, men often do the opposite. We sometimes put other men down in order to make ourselves appear better.
