Introduction
Women are devoid of any intellectual ability nor any capacity for morality; for the female mind is only concerned with reproduction, dissimulation and her perceived status. Historically women have always been subservient to the man, it is this disposition towards obeying a man that has become innate in women – without the guidance of a man, women degenerate from caretakers to promiscuous, sexually deviant and hedonistic beings – these attributes are ubiquitous among modern women, although they are innate in women its presence has only been exacerbated by the sexual revolution. This analysis will explore the precarious state of the modern world’s sexual market and female nature through a strict rational observation based off scientific evidence, and Darwinian concepts without the obstruction of political correctness.
Women are predisposed towards manipulation and irrationality
Contemporary feminist postulates the idea that women are equal to men in intellectual ability and blames the lack of success on patriarchal preconceptions of women; this idea is contrary to modern science, ignores neuroanatomical sex-based differences and discredits rigorous IQ testing that show the differences in intellect between men and women. The difference in intellect between men and women are evident in a study that had a sample size of 320,000 school pupils, which found that “…for all three tests there were substantial sex differences in the standard deviation of scores, with greater variance among boys. Boys were overrepresented relative to girls at both the top and the bottom extremes for all tests…” - men are overrepresented in the upper echelons of intellect and this explains the disparity in the intellectual achievement between men and women (Strand et al., 2006). This finding is of course discredited as a sexist drivel as its political implications threaten the notion of equality feminism seeks to achieve. But if one difference between men and women can be asserted to be a priori, it is of intelligence – this can be seen in the perspective of neuroscience. Grey matter in the frontal cortex is strongly correlated with intelligence, and grey matter in the parietal and temporal lobes are positively correlated with intelligence in adults (Colom, R.; Jung, R. E.; Haier, R. J. ,2006). In men IQ grey matter correlations are strongest in the frontal and parietal lobes, and are evenly distributed (45% each), women had grey matter mostly in the frontal cortex – however this study also found that “With respect to voxel types, men had roughly 6.5 times the number of GM voxels identified as related to intellectual functioning as did women, and women had roughly nine times more WM voxels than did men…”, it can be concluded that the IQ discrepancies between men and women can be attributed to neuroanatomical differences rather than patriarchy or social reasons (Haier et al., 2005).
Ever wonder why women are such good manipulators of men? Well, its because their brain structure is similar a pathological liar's - obviously this would confer a survival advantage for women as the weaker sex. Pathological liars showed a 22-26% increase in prefrontal white matter and a 36-42% reduction in prefrontal grey/white ratios compared with both antisocial controls and normal control. Another study reported Liars showed a relatively widespread increase in white matter (23-36%) in orbitofrontal, middle and inferior, but not superior, frontal gyri compared with antisocial and normal controls. This white matter increase may predispose some individuals to pathological lying. Compared to men, women show more white matter and fewer grey matter areas related to intelligence. Women have more white matter in the frontal lobe, while men have more grey matter there; 86% of the identified white matter voxels were found in the frontal lobe (Haier et al., 2005). The reduced grey matter predisposes women to lie and grey matter is also correlated to moral behaviour - this can explain why a lot of women lack basic morality and virtue signal a lot.
Fisherian Selection and why Female free choice is dysgenic
Fisherian runaway is a sexual selection mechanism, that explains the evolution of ostentatious male ornamentation by persistent, directional female choice. Sexual dimorphism is the difference in form between individuals of different sex in the same species, these traits are subject to sexual selection. In intersexual selection, a mode of sexual selection where women select men, they seek attributes related to sexual dimorphism. In many non-monogamous species, the benefit to a male's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple females is large, whereas the benefit to a female's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple males is small or non-existent (Futuyama,2005).
Thus, women are more hypergamous as they must select the best genes, facial masculinity would have initially conferred an advantage to her offspring thus she would select for it. Subsequently many traits that would have conferred an advantage in other contexts (prehistory vs modern civilisation) would maladaptive. Facial masculinity is subject to sexual selection by women, as all his features from the wider bizogonial, the follow cheeks, the bigger nose the wider chin, the deep-set eyes, the "boxed off" hairline, and strong cheekbones are on the masculine side (Diagram 2).
The particular traits that are found in almost all 'chads' adored by women are; larger bigonial, deep set eyes, large brow ridge, higher nose bridge, taller chin, prominent cheekbones, thicker and a symmetrical face. Across many species including human males with low FAs enjoy better health and more mating success than asymmetrical males. Asymmetries can arise as a result of parasites, toxins or other insults encountered during the course of development, so global body symmetry is believed to be a valid index of immunocompetence. These authors concluded that facial masculinity serves as a proxy for bilateral symmetry. A follow-up study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between facial masculinity and body symmetry so it appears that, just like a peacock's tail, the testosterone markers on a human male's face might be attractive because they serve as 'honest' signals of good genetic quality.
Along with having a sexually dimorphic face, collagen is another indicator of health to women, thus is positively selected for, its why you see so many 'pretty boys' adored by women. These types of effeminate men also commonly have sexually dimorphic features. Hair quality is also important, '"Research is showing men with male pattern baldness have an increased risk of developing heart disease and prostate cancer. Research is showing men with male pattern baldness have an increased risk of developing heart disease and prostate", being bald can be a massive blow to your perceived sexual dimorphism. Another factor is height which is selected for by women, if you are taller you are more attractive, if you are shorter less.
Statistics show increasing female hypergamy
Data was drawn to assess trends in sexual behavior from the 2002 and 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health. Researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an even more dramatic 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (ie. "Chads"). Thus it is clear that the most attractive men are truly having more sex than ever before.
Female hypergamy is corroborated with research from the pew research centre which stated; 'Single men are far more likely than single women to be looking for a relationship or dates - 61% vs. 38%. This gender gap is especially apparent among older singles,' it seems like single women these days don't really need a relationship, while single men are struggling to find one. Another study by the pew research centre reported, 'Single-and-looking women are far more likely than single-and-looking men to say that trouble finding someone who was looking __who meets their expectations are major reasons they've had difficulty. In turn, men are much more likely than women to say difficulty approaching people is a major reason,' both these articles support the fact that women are becoming increasingly hypergamous and refusing to date down, while more and more men are struggling to find a relationship, with the top 5-20% of men having much more sex then ever before. Its seems that women are refusing to date men that do not meet their standards and opt to have short term relationships with more sexually dimorphic males (i.e. chads) and remain single.
By 2019, 39% of men were unpartnered, compared with 36% of women. Most single women can be classed as hypergamous refusing to date men that do not meet their standards, while a lot of men are struggling to find a partner. The general social survey also found that 28% of young men report being sexless compared to 18% of women. There are massive discrepancies in how men and women are fairing on the dating market.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-...-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-...dults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/
Why is the current mode of sexual selection bad?
Because women will prefer sexually dimorphic males for short term relationships even if they have other traits that are maladaptive such as psychopathy, impulsivity, and lower IQ. If anyone says that women pick their partners based on personality rather than sexually dimorphic traits they are brainwashed by feminists into believing females are anything but superficial. This explains the female dating strategy to have short term hook-ups with men who have 'good genes' and long-term relationships with less sexually attractive men due to additional parental investment as well as financial benefits. But then why have marriages rates been dwindling, well because women now do not need financial aid from men. Women can have access to hundreds of men from social media or online dating apps, she can easily choose the most sexually dimorphic male without the risk of being a single mother due to condoms, abortions and contraceptives if she so pleases.
IQ rates lowering for decades: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...-developed-countries-doesn-t-bode-ncna1008576
Women sexually select men who are in the 70-110 IQ range, adolescents with an IQ score of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than an adolescent with an above-average score of about 120 to 130. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10706169/
Antisocial, criminal and violent men have greater sexual access to women, A study by Barbaro and Shackelford (2016) found evidence that male-perpetrated female-directed violence may be associated with greater sexual access to a female, and that it may in part be due to women responding favorably to male aggression. Despite the fact that fathers who engage in high levels of antisocial behavior make up a small proportion of fathers overall, they are responsible for a disproportionate number of births
For example, Moffitt and colleagues (2002) found that although men who engaged in high levels of antisocial behavior constituted only 10% of a birth cohort, they accounted for 27% of the babies fathered by the time the men were age 26. (Jaffee et al. 2003).Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000038
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000774
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_898-1
This recent paper from Britain is called "Human Capital Mediates Natural Selection in Contemporary Humans." That's a fancy way of saying evolution is affected by the traits of people who have children. This paper used what are called polygenic scores. If you don't know what they are, you should learn about them, because they are a vital tool for analysing the influence of genes - everything from how smart you are to whether you will get diabetes or even a divorce. This graph shows how a polygenic risk score (PRS) predicts the chances of getting a disease as you get older. The paper used a sample of more than 400,000 white people in Britain and compared the number of children they had to the traits they had - good and bad - as shown by their polygenic scores. Here are the 33 traits the researchers looked at, listed on the left.
Traits are passed on to children, so the next generation will have more of the traits to the right of the dotted line, and fewer of those to the left. At the top, the traits most rapidly spreading in the next generation are ADHD, smoking, extraversion, high BMI, and large waist circumference. These last two are measures of fatness. Heart disease, depression, Alzheimer's, and schizophrenia are also on the right. To the left are the traits that are being bred out, and at the bottom, being bred out most rapidly, are three measures of intelligence.
The authors of the study are blunt: Consistently over time, polygenic scores associated with lower earnings, education, and health are selected for, and higher earnings, education and better health are selected against.
Study: https://ueaeco.github.io/working-papers/papers/ueaeco/UEA-ECO-21-02_Updated.pdf
Women are selecting for maladaptive traits that will have disastrous consequences on modern civilisation. It can be concluded that women seek out sexually dimorphic males (i.e. chads) for short term relationships, and settle down with average looking men. It can also be asserted that the amount of women refusing to date men, attribute this to the fact that potential suitors do not meet their standards. Additionally, men in the top 20% of looks are having more sex then ever, suggesting that single women rather have short term hookups then long term relationships with average men. Furthermore, height a sexually dimorphic trait effects a mans overall quality of life and shorter heights are correlated to higher suicide rates. Women also positively select more psychopathic, lower IQ and impulsive males. This effect can be seen in the IQ scores lowering in first world countries. Women also have lower cognitive ability and are predisposed to manipulation.
Women are devoid of any intellectual ability nor any capacity for morality; for the female mind is only concerned with reproduction, dissimulation and her perceived status. Historically women have always been subservient to the man, it is this disposition towards obeying a man that has become innate in women – without the guidance of a man, women degenerate from caretakers to promiscuous, sexually deviant and hedonistic beings – these attributes are ubiquitous among modern women, although they are innate in women its presence has only been exacerbated by the sexual revolution. This analysis will explore the precarious state of the modern world’s sexual market and female nature through a strict rational observation based off scientific evidence, and Darwinian concepts without the obstruction of political correctness.
Women are predisposed towards manipulation and irrationality
Contemporary feminist postulates the idea that women are equal to men in intellectual ability and blames the lack of success on patriarchal preconceptions of women; this idea is contrary to modern science, ignores neuroanatomical sex-based differences and discredits rigorous IQ testing that show the differences in intellect between men and women. The difference in intellect between men and women are evident in a study that had a sample size of 320,000 school pupils, which found that “…for all three tests there were substantial sex differences in the standard deviation of scores, with greater variance among boys. Boys were overrepresented relative to girls at both the top and the bottom extremes for all tests…” - men are overrepresented in the upper echelons of intellect and this explains the disparity in the intellectual achievement between men and women (Strand et al., 2006). This finding is of course discredited as a sexist drivel as its political implications threaten the notion of equality feminism seeks to achieve. But if one difference between men and women can be asserted to be a priori, it is of intelligence – this can be seen in the perspective of neuroscience. Grey matter in the frontal cortex is strongly correlated with intelligence, and grey matter in the parietal and temporal lobes are positively correlated with intelligence in adults (Colom, R.; Jung, R. E.; Haier, R. J. ,2006). In men IQ grey matter correlations are strongest in the frontal and parietal lobes, and are evenly distributed (45% each), women had grey matter mostly in the frontal cortex – however this study also found that “With respect to voxel types, men had roughly 6.5 times the number of GM voxels identified as related to intellectual functioning as did women, and women had roughly nine times more WM voxels than did men…”, it can be concluded that the IQ discrepancies between men and women can be attributed to neuroanatomical differences rather than patriarchy or social reasons (Haier et al., 2005).
Ever wonder why women are such good manipulators of men? Well, its because their brain structure is similar a pathological liar's - obviously this would confer a survival advantage for women as the weaker sex. Pathological liars showed a 22-26% increase in prefrontal white matter and a 36-42% reduction in prefrontal grey/white ratios compared with both antisocial controls and normal control. Another study reported Liars showed a relatively widespread increase in white matter (23-36%) in orbitofrontal, middle and inferior, but not superior, frontal gyri compared with antisocial and normal controls. This white matter increase may predispose some individuals to pathological lying. Compared to men, women show more white matter and fewer grey matter areas related to intelligence. Women have more white matter in the frontal lobe, while men have more grey matter there; 86% of the identified white matter voxels were found in the frontal lobe (Haier et al., 2005). The reduced grey matter predisposes women to lie and grey matter is also correlated to moral behaviour - this can explain why a lot of women lack basic morality and virtue signal a lot.
Fisherian Selection and why Female free choice is dysgenic
Fisherian runaway is a sexual selection mechanism, that explains the evolution of ostentatious male ornamentation by persistent, directional female choice. Sexual dimorphism is the difference in form between individuals of different sex in the same species, these traits are subject to sexual selection. In intersexual selection, a mode of sexual selection where women select men, they seek attributes related to sexual dimorphism. In many non-monogamous species, the benefit to a male's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple females is large, whereas the benefit to a female's reproductive fitness of mating with multiple males is small or non-existent (Futuyama,2005).
Thus, women are more hypergamous as they must select the best genes, facial masculinity would have initially conferred an advantage to her offspring thus she would select for it. Subsequently many traits that would have conferred an advantage in other contexts (prehistory vs modern civilisation) would maladaptive. Facial masculinity is subject to sexual selection by women, as all his features from the wider bizogonial, the follow cheeks, the bigger nose the wider chin, the deep-set eyes, the "boxed off" hairline, and strong cheekbones are on the masculine side (Diagram 2).
The particular traits that are found in almost all 'chads' adored by women are; larger bigonial, deep set eyes, large brow ridge, higher nose bridge, taller chin, prominent cheekbones, thicker and a symmetrical face. Across many species including human males with low FAs enjoy better health and more mating success than asymmetrical males. Asymmetries can arise as a result of parasites, toxins or other insults encountered during the course of development, so global body symmetry is believed to be a valid index of immunocompetence. These authors concluded that facial masculinity serves as a proxy for bilateral symmetry. A follow-up study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between facial masculinity and body symmetry so it appears that, just like a peacock's tail, the testosterone markers on a human male's face might be attractive because they serve as 'honest' signals of good genetic quality.
Along with having a sexually dimorphic face, collagen is another indicator of health to women, thus is positively selected for, its why you see so many 'pretty boys' adored by women. These types of effeminate men also commonly have sexually dimorphic features. Hair quality is also important, '"Research is showing men with male pattern baldness have an increased risk of developing heart disease and prostate cancer. Research is showing men with male pattern baldness have an increased risk of developing heart disease and prostate", being bald can be a massive blow to your perceived sexual dimorphism. Another factor is height which is selected for by women, if you are taller you are more attractive, if you are shorter less.
Statistics show increasing female hypergamy
Data was drawn to assess trends in sexual behavior from the 2002 and 2011-2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health. Researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an even more dramatic 38% increase in the number of sexual partners. Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (ie. "Chads"). Thus it is clear that the most attractive men are truly having more sex than ever before.
Female hypergamy is corroborated with research from the pew research centre which stated; 'Single men are far more likely than single women to be looking for a relationship or dates - 61% vs. 38%. This gender gap is especially apparent among older singles,' it seems like single women these days don't really need a relationship, while single men are struggling to find one. Another study by the pew research centre reported, 'Single-and-looking women are far more likely than single-and-looking men to say that trouble finding someone who was looking __who meets their expectations are major reasons they've had difficulty. In turn, men are much more likely than women to say difficulty approaching people is a major reason,' both these articles support the fact that women are becoming increasingly hypergamous and refusing to date down, while more and more men are struggling to find a relationship, with the top 5-20% of men having much more sex then ever before. Its seems that women are refusing to date men that do not meet their standards and opt to have short term relationships with more sexually dimorphic males (i.e. chads) and remain single.
By 2019, 39% of men were unpartnered, compared with 36% of women. Most single women can be classed as hypergamous refusing to date men that do not meet their standards, while a lot of men are struggling to find a partner. The general social survey also found that 28% of young men report being sexless compared to 18% of women. There are massive discrepancies in how men and women are fairing on the dating market.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-...-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-...dults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/
Why is the current mode of sexual selection bad?
Because women will prefer sexually dimorphic males for short term relationships even if they have other traits that are maladaptive such as psychopathy, impulsivity, and lower IQ. If anyone says that women pick their partners based on personality rather than sexually dimorphic traits they are brainwashed by feminists into believing females are anything but superficial. This explains the female dating strategy to have short term hook-ups with men who have 'good genes' and long-term relationships with less sexually attractive men due to additional parental investment as well as financial benefits. But then why have marriages rates been dwindling, well because women now do not need financial aid from men. Women can have access to hundreds of men from social media or online dating apps, she can easily choose the most sexually dimorphic male without the risk of being a single mother due to condoms, abortions and contraceptives if she so pleases.
IQ rates lowering for decades: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...-developed-countries-doesn-t-bode-ncna1008576
Women sexually select men who are in the 70-110 IQ range, adolescents with an IQ score of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than an adolescent with an above-average score of about 120 to 130. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10706169/
Antisocial, criminal and violent men have greater sexual access to women, A study by Barbaro and Shackelford (2016) found evidence that male-perpetrated female-directed violence may be associated with greater sexual access to a female, and that it may in part be due to women responding favorably to male aggression. Despite the fact that fathers who engage in high levels of antisocial behavior make up a small proportion of fathers overall, they are responsible for a disproportionate number of births
For example, Moffitt and colleagues (2002) found that although men who engaged in high levels of antisocial behavior constituted only 10% of a birth cohort, they accounted for 27% of the babies fathered by the time the men were age 26. (Jaffee et al. 2003).Sources:
https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000038
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000774
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_898-1
This recent paper from Britain is called "Human Capital Mediates Natural Selection in Contemporary Humans." That's a fancy way of saying evolution is affected by the traits of people who have children. This paper used what are called polygenic scores. If you don't know what they are, you should learn about them, because they are a vital tool for analysing the influence of genes - everything from how smart you are to whether you will get diabetes or even a divorce. This graph shows how a polygenic risk score (PRS) predicts the chances of getting a disease as you get older. The paper used a sample of more than 400,000 white people in Britain and compared the number of children they had to the traits they had - good and bad - as shown by their polygenic scores. Here are the 33 traits the researchers looked at, listed on the left.
Traits are passed on to children, so the next generation will have more of the traits to the right of the dotted line, and fewer of those to the left. At the top, the traits most rapidly spreading in the next generation are ADHD, smoking, extraversion, high BMI, and large waist circumference. These last two are measures of fatness. Heart disease, depression, Alzheimer's, and schizophrenia are also on the right. To the left are the traits that are being bred out, and at the bottom, being bred out most rapidly, are three measures of intelligence.
The authors of the study are blunt: Consistently over time, polygenic scores associated with lower earnings, education, and health are selected for, and higher earnings, education and better health are selected against.
Study: https://ueaeco.github.io/working-papers/papers/ueaeco/UEA-ECO-21-02_Updated.pdf
Women are selecting for maladaptive traits that will have disastrous consequences on modern civilisation. It can be concluded that women seek out sexually dimorphic males (i.e. chads) for short term relationships, and settle down with average looking men. It can also be asserted that the amount of women refusing to date men, attribute this to the fact that potential suitors do not meet their standards. Additionally, men in the top 20% of looks are having more sex then ever, suggesting that single women rather have short term hookups then long term relationships with average men. Furthermore, height a sexually dimorphic trait effects a mans overall quality of life and shorter heights are correlated to higher suicide rates. Women also positively select more psychopathic, lower IQ and impulsive males. This effect can be seen in the IQ scores lowering in first world countries. Women also have lower cognitive ability and are predisposed to manipulation.
