Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based Iqs in China weren't always high. They became high as a result of living conditions improving. This is evidence that race realism is bullshit

Logic55

Logic55

The Incel Skeptic
★★★★★
Joined
May 10, 2023
Posts
13,808
Iqs in China were not high before the advent of the 21st century. As economic reforms were out into place by the CCP, poverty was reduced, nutrition was improved. Simply, living conditions got better from a series of reforms. After learning more about the history of China, It made me think of how wrong race realists are when it comes to IQ. Did Chinese DNA evolve during this time which caused them to become smartest people on earth? no, it's because is environmental factors like the ones i stated above. Of course, race copers will ignore these simple facts and resort to name calling like children with temper tantrums instead of making a valid argument. What a bunch of fools. The Dunning Kruger effect is a real thing. Lastly, I don't need to cite sources because you can easily find them on Google. I'm going to be honest, those who deny these truths are coping so hard that they don't even know it.
 
Last edited:
This is a dumb argument.
Even taking it at face value just because environment matters doesn't negate race.
 
Race realists downplay importance of environment when it comes to IQ
I don't think so.
I'm a race realist and racial separatist advocate. IQ isn't the only thing that matters it just gets talked about a lot because it's something this is easily quantifiable and has a clear racial distinction. Surely you are aware that there are studies that control for environment related to intelligence and race?
 
Wignats simp for rices not for IQ but that they're massive filthy cucks and noodlewhores fuck white normies which is what wignats tend to be
 
No IQ for shitting in the streets
 
I don't think so.
I'm a race realist and racial separatist advocate. IQ isn't the only thing that matters it just gets talked about a lot because it's something this is easily quantifiable and has a clear racial distinction. Surely you are aware that there are studies that control for environment related to intelligence and race?
Yes. Darkstar showed me them but those studies don't take into account all the important socioeconomic factors. Those studies are limited because for example, having a high income doesn't equate to higher intelligence. Socioeconomic factors are not equal between races. Additionally, poor whites have better living conditions than poor blacks in the USA. Obviously, the poor whites will have better results than the poor blacka even when socioeconomic factors are controlled. Its not an equal playing field.
 
Last edited:
This is a dumb argument.
Even taking it at face value just because environment matters doesn't negate race.
:yes::yes::yes:There's a inextricable blood-n-soil relationship where the environment shapes a gene pool over tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years. OP thinks a short term upgrade in environmental conditions is enough to dramatically change IQ/looks/height/etc when that's clearly just not possible.
 
:yes::yes::yes:There's a inextricable blood-n-soil relationship where the environment shapes a gene pool over tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years. OP thinks a short term upgrade in environmental conditions is enough to dramatically change IQ/looks/height/etc when that's clearly just not possible.
Prove to me that their DNA evolved in the 1989s which caused their high IQ scores. I'm not going to take this comment at face value unless more information is provided
 
Prove to me that their DNA evolved in the 1989s which caused their high IQ scores. I'm not going to take this comment at face value unless more information is provided
I don't think DNA evolves that quickly.
 
I don't think DNA evolves that quickly.
But you said that their DNA evolved and the living conditions that improved decades ago didnt make them smarter. Prove it.
 
It's more so that those studies are bunk. A lot of what he says about Jewish IQ in this video applies to China:
 
@wereq, you still haven't proved your hypothesis
 
Massive cope white people are gods on earth
 
Okay now explain this.

1000025142
 
Based post, mang. All the race realist retards can go fuck themsleves.
 
Based post, mang. All the race realist retards can go fuck themsleves.
They think they are superior
Like I said many times before, Africa suffers from extreme poverty due to lack of funding for services and corruption prevents progress from being made. Extreme poverty causes low IQs and make people stupid in the long run
 
I think it's nutrition. China increased the consumption of meat after WW2. B12, iron, protein is really important for development of brain.
 
I think it's nutrition. China increased the consumption of meat after WW2. B12, iron, protein is really important for development of brain.
IQs of Chinese people are going downhill because of poor air quality, poor nutrition, and excessive screen time. This is a event phenomenon that can be explained by the environment
 
Cope & Seethe:

 
I think it's nutrition. China increased the consumption of meat after WW2. B12, iron, protein is really important for development of brain.
Only plays a role when you already have good genes
All the race realist retards can go fuck themsleves.
Race is very real, and denying it is denying the blackpill

I also like how you just agreed without adding anything on, which is to be expected.
 
Chinks were always smarter than most races though.
 
From what I can find, the lowest average IQ score for testing done in China was 92.5 from testing done in 1986 with an unknown sample size. It also contradicts another study done in the same year with a sample of 5,108, which had an average score of 100. Granted, the former test was done on adults, while the latter was done on kids aged 5-16 (and heritability of IQ increases with age), but so long as we have no sample size for the 92.5 study, it means nothing.

Why is your “evidence” always so shit?
 
Chinks were always smarter than most races though.
Their pattern of thinking is more "convergent" as I've explained though, whereas Whites are more "divergent"

Basically, they're more focused on finding one-single solution whereas Whites look for more outcomes, which is why people say Asians are less "creative"

So they're not really less-creative, but just are more focused on one specific outcome & goal.
From what I can find, the lowest average IQ score for testing done in China was 92.5 from testing done in 1986 with an unknown sample size. It also contradicts another study done in the same year with a sample of 5,108, which had an average score of 100. Granted, the former test was done on adults, while the latter was done on kids aged 5-16 (and heritability of IQ increases with age), but so long as we have no sample size for the 92.5 study, it means nothing.

Why is your “evidence” always so shit?
Ashton Kutcher Burn GIF
 
Yes. Darkstar showed me them but those studies don't take into account all the important socioeconomic factors
Such as? These show that after certain socio-economic factors are adjusted for, which implies their parents "worked harder" by your logic which I'm sure they did but ofc IQ matters.
. Those studies are limited because for example, having a high income doesn't equate to higher intelligence.
Batman Facepalm GIF by WE tv


Socioeconomic factors are not equal between races.
They're unequal in general jfl
Additionally, poor whites have better living conditions than poor blacks in the USA.
That's such nonsense, read this:
Main qimg ba898b33d536f4f620b57eb81049f735


 
You are an insufferable piece of shit whom I'm very tempted to put on ignore.
He just repeats his argument of "muh environment" which I mean we all agree does matter, but genetics trump all which is LITERALLY the premise of the blackpill
 
He just repeats his argument of "muh environment" which I mean we all agree does matter, but genetics trump all which is LITERALLY the premise of the blackpill
Muh Whites are superior, foids like you, we get it.
 
Only plays a role when you already have good genes

Race is very real, and denying it is denying the blackpill

I also like how you just agreed without adding anything on, which is to be expected.
By what standard do you delineate different racial groups? Isn’t it arbitrary?
 
By what standard do you delineate different racial groups? Isn’t it arbitrary?
this is what's called a "whataboutism"

And no, race is clearly defined by genotype
 
From what I can find, the lowest average IQ score for testing done in China was 92.5 from testing done in 1986 with an unknown sample size. It also contradicts another study done in the same year with a sample of 5,108, which had an average score of 100. Granted, the former test was done on adults, while the latter was done on kids aged 5-16 (and heritability of IQ increases with age), but so long as we have no sample size for the 92.5 study, it means nothing.

Why is your “evidence” always so shit?
Regardless of those IQs scores you saw on the Internet. My point is that IQs in China increased as socioeconomic factors improved. Stop denying simple facts
 
:yes::yes::yes:There's a inextricable blood-n-soil relationship where the environment shapes a gene pool over tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years. OP thinks a short term upgrade in environmental conditions is enough to dramatically change IQ/looks/height/etc when that's clearly just not possible.
Well, you see, the thing is, OP is retarded.
 
Muh Whites are superior, foids like you, we get it.
Darkstar is repeating the same argument which is "much genetics". Genetics matters but environment is also important. Darkstar and his race realist friends constantly downplay importance of socioeconomic factors. This is why we will never agree
 
Darkstar is repeating the same argument which is "much genetics". Genetics matters but environment is also important. Darkstar and his race realist friends constantly downplay importance of socioeconomic factors. This is why we will never agree
@Biowaste Removal was trolling there, I didn't notice until he implied it & you seem to see the same

Honestly man you're probably autistic as I am, no offense but you are just giving me so many signs
 
Well, you see, the thing is, OP is retarded.
Hey based meme, prove to me that Chinese people became smart because of their geography. If you don't have any evidence other than "muh blood and soil' then shut the fuck up.
 
Regardless of those IQs scores you saw on the Internet. My point is that IQs in China increased as socioeconomic factors improved. Stop denying simple facts
You didn’t claim they increased, “Logic.” You claimed or at least implied they DRASTICALLY increased. You literally said Chinese IQ scores “were not high before the advent of the 21st century.” Yet your only evidence of that is a study with no sample size
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top