Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal Intelligent men have the same sexual success as mentally retarded men - Women like men with below average and average IQ the most

I'm pretty sure I am retarded. But I am also high inhibition and neurotic. Jfl.
lmao, imagine being an asocial and not even getting a good paying stem job for it.

Absolute worst of both worlds.


Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.

They were property 5000 years ago, they were property 300 years ago, and they should be property again soon, if we want humanity to prosper, instead of regressing technologically.
 
lmao, imagine being an asocial and not even getting a good paying stem job for it.

Absolute worst of both worlds.


Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.

They were property 5000 years ago, they were property 300 years ago, and they should be property again soon, if we want humanity to prosper, instead of regressing technologically.
I've never asked a girl out until I was like 23 I am way to high inhibition for pussy
 
Here's a BRUTAL article that demonstrates that women favor dumb and average men the most. (article link at the end)

And before someone says I'm coping: the point of this isn't too circlejerk (haha i'm too smart to be a sexhaver XDDD), it's to disprove the just world fallacy and the whole "women are improving the gene pool bro"

The article has dozens of citations but sadly most of them don't lead to anywhere (the article is from 2007). Never the less it's filled with blackpills.




As always women favor men who have propensity for violence, destruction and abuse. So bluepillers stfu, you can't tell me that women are improving the gene pool when on average they're actively trying to reproduce as much as possible with violent criminals and complete morons.

For reference, 70 is the threshold of mental retardation and the US Army sets an IQ threshold of 92 for its applicants**. If you're under 92 IQ the army literally thinks you're too stupid, useless and dangerous to serve them. But remember women like men with an IQ of 70 to 90 the most. So?

THE MOST SEXUALLY SUCCESSFUL MEN ARE ON AVERAGE LITERALLY TOO STUPID TO GET IN THE ARMY, BUT JUST SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE CLINICALLY RETARDED

**
Applicants are required by military regulation to have a percentile score on a standardized test called the ASVAB that is 31 or more, which is roughly comparable to an IQ score on the Stanford-Binet scale of a little bit less than 92, for high school graduates seeking to enter the Army or Navy


Yes even being handholdless or kissless are inversely correlated with IQ


@Grothendieck LMAO THIS IS WHAT WE GET FOR STEMCELING

View attachment 348404

I'd also like to add that those sexless majors are the ones which have the highest IQ students on average

View attachment 348405



Yet another proof that intelligence is correlated with virginity

For those who don't know, a correlation of .6 is considered a moderate to strong correlation in statistics.

Next up the article throws lots of hypothesis to try to explain those findings, the author ends up proving most of these wrong and ends up settling for the "they're low sex drive bro" without really thinking why that is. But don't worry, they later show that high IQ people go to prostitutes more often which contradicts this low sex drive idea.


This is what awaits you if you "ascend": you get married and barely get any sex, a deadbedroom ( :soy: ) awaits you.

And did you notice how hypocritical normies are? They say "waaah it's immoral" and yet fuck like rabbits. :feelsseriously:


"You don't put yourself out there enough bro!!"
"Have you tried making more friends??"

Stfu, plenty of people go out and try to socialize, it doesn't mean shit when it comes to getting sex or a gf.


Sadly all the links are dead again :feelsbadman:, not surprising since this is an article from 2007

It's really interesting though, smartcels are likely to escortmaxx. This really debunks the whole low sex drive hypothesis


So the conclusion of the article is that high testosterone is possibly making men dumb. Perhaps it's not that high intelligence is unattractive, or that being below average IQ is attractive. Rather:

BEING HIGH TEST IS ATTRACTIVE AND HIGH TEST JUST SO HAPPENS TO LOWER YOUR CHANCES OF BEING SMART

Women go after the men who can dominate and unleash violence upon others, regardless of whether or not those men are dumb. So long as they aren't dumb to the point of being mentally crippled they're fine.



My IQ is at least in the 130s since I was a teenager. I also didn't have a masculine build and my dick has always been short. My height is mogged even by 80% of females and the rest are about my height or my height. Almost everyone heightmogs me. I'm a mid-30s incel...

I feel like roping more than I already do right now...
 
Being smart and incel is far better than being ugly/a manlet and retarded.
 
Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.
The problem is that one gynopsuedoscience theory is that "Taller men make better protectors." A tall man is equally lunch to a tiger just as much as a short man is, and plus, a bow doesn't care about the shooter's height. I'm more afraid of the short guy with a bow because he can sneak up and kill you before you even notice, compared to a lumbering archer over 6ft who's easy to identify.
 
Tldr but that's literally the definition of being a geek...ever see a doctor irl? Ever think wow that person is attractive? Yeah me neither
 
The problem is that one gynopsuedoscience theory is that "Taller men make better protectors." A tall man is equally lunch to a tiger just as much as a short man is, and plus, a bow doesn't care about the shooter's height. I'm more afraid of the short guy with a bow because he can sneak up and kill you before you even notice, compared to a lumbering archer over 6ft who's easy to identify.
same thing even with a melee weapon such as the spear


but ya with guns in the modern era it's actually even a disadvantage to be taller because you're a bigger target
 
Here's a BRUTAL article that demonstrates that women favor dumb and average men the most. (article link at the end)

And before someone says I'm coping: the point of this isn't too circlejerk (haha i'm too smart to be a sexhaver XDDD), it's to disprove the just world fallacy and the whole "women are improving the gene pool bro"

The article has dozens of citations but sadly most of them don't lead to anywhere (the article is from 2007). Never the less it's filled with blackpills.




As always women favor men who have propensity for violence, destruction and abuse. So bluepillers stfu, you can't tell me that women are improving the gene pool when on average they're actively trying to reproduce as much as possible with violent criminals and complete morons.

For reference, 70 is the threshold of mental retardation and the US Army sets an IQ threshold of 92 for its applicants**. If you're under 92 IQ the army literally thinks you're too stupid, useless and dangerous to serve them. But remember women like men with an IQ of 70 to 90 the most. So?

THE MOST SEXUALLY SUCCESSFUL MEN ARE ON AVERAGE LITERALLY TOO STUPID TO GET IN THE ARMY, BUT JUST SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE CLINICALLY RETARDED

**
Applicants are required by military regulation to have a percentile score on a standardized test called the ASVAB that is 31 or more, which is roughly comparable to an IQ score on the Stanford-Binet scale of a little bit less than 92, for high school graduates seeking to enter the Army or Navy


Yes even being handholdless or kissless are inversely correlated with IQ


@Grothendieck LMAO THIS IS WHAT WE GET FOR STEMCELING

View attachment 348404

I'd also like to add that those sexless majors are the ones which have the highest IQ students on average

View attachment 348405



Yet another proof that intelligence is correlated with virginity

For those who don't know, a correlation of .6 is considered a moderate to strong correlation in statistics.

Next up the article throws lots of hypothesis to try to explain those findings, the author ends up proving most of these wrong and ends up settling for the "they're low sex drive bro" without really thinking why that is. But don't worry, they later show that high IQ people go to prostitutes more often which contradicts this low sex drive idea.


This is what awaits you if you "ascend": you get married and barely get any sex, a deadbedroom ( :soy: ) awaits you.

And did you notice how hypocritical normies are? They say "waaah it's immoral" and yet fuck like rabbits. :feelsseriously:


"You don't put yourself out there enough bro!!"
"Have you tried making more friends??"

Stfu, plenty of people go out and try to socialize, it doesn't mean shit when it comes to getting sex or a gf.


Sadly all the links are dead again :feelsbadman:, not surprising since this is an article from 2007

It's really interesting though, smartcels are likely to escortmaxx. This really debunks the whole low sex drive hypothesis


So the conclusion of the article is that high testosterone is possibly making men dumb. Perhaps it's not that high intelligence is unattractive, or that being below average IQ is attractive. Rather:

BEING HIGH TEST IS ATTRACTIVE AND HIGH TEST JUST SO HAPPENS TO LOWER YOUR CHANCES OF BEING SMART

Women go after the men who can dominate and unleash violence upon others, regardless of whether or not those men are dumb. So long as they aren't dumb to the point of being mentally crippled they're fine.


Brutal bro. It never began
 
Holy shit Polisci has more virgins that Comp Sci? What fucking program lmaoooo
 
I’m well aware of this fact, even though I had a fairly decent childhood. I thought I would grow out of being the outcast but I just became bitter as I’ve grown older. Women don’t value intelligence or anything with meaning. They value the man who doesn’t look like a crackhead
 
Here's a BRUTAL article that demonstrates that women favor dumb and average men the most. (article link at the end)

And before someone says I'm coping: the point of this isn't too circlejerk (haha i'm too smart to be a sexhaver XDDD), it's to disprove the just world fallacy and the whole "women are improving the gene pool bro"

The article has dozens of citations but sadly most of them don't lead to anywhere (the article is from 2007). Never the less it's filled with blackpills.




As always women favor men who have propensity for violence, destruction and abuse. So bluepillers stfu, you can't tell me that women are improving the gene pool when on average they're actively trying to reproduce as much as possible with violent criminals and complete morons.

For reference, 70 is the threshold of mental retardation and the US Army sets an IQ threshold of 92 for its applicants**. If you're under 92 IQ the army literally thinks you're too stupid, useless and dangerous to serve them. But remember women like men with an IQ of 70 to 90 the most. So?

THE MOST SEXUALLY SUCCESSFUL MEN ARE ON AVERAGE LITERALLY TOO STUPID TO GET IN THE ARMY, BUT JUST SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE CLINICALLY RETARDED

**
Applicants are required by military regulation to have a percentile score on a standardized test called the ASVAB that is 31 or more, which is roughly comparable to an IQ score on the Stanford-Binet scale of a little bit less than 92, for high school graduates seeking to enter the Army or Navy


Yes even being handholdless or kissless are inversely correlated with IQ


@Grothendieck LMAO THIS IS WHAT WE GET FOR STEMCELING

View attachment 348404

I'd also like to add that those sexless majors are the ones which have the highest IQ students on average

View attachment 348405



Yet another proof that intelligence is correlated with virginity

For those who don't know, a correlation of .6 is considered a moderate to strong correlation in statistics.

Next up the article throws lots of hypothesis to try to explain those findings, the author ends up proving most of these wrong and ends up settling for the "they're low sex drive bro" without really thinking why that is. But don't worry, they later show that high IQ people go to prostitutes more often which contradicts this low sex drive idea.


This is what awaits you if you "ascend": you get married and barely get any sex, a deadbedroom ( :soy: ) awaits you.

And did you notice how hypocritical normies are? They say "waaah it's immoral" and yet fuck like rabbits. :feelsseriously:


"You don't put yourself out there enough bro!!"
"Have you tried making more friends??"

Stfu, plenty of people go out and try to socialize, it doesn't mean shit when it comes to getting sex or a gf.


Sadly all the links are dead again :feelsbadman:, not surprising since this is an article from 2007

It's really interesting though, smartcels are likely to escortmaxx. This really debunks the whole low sex drive hypothesis


So the conclusion of the article is that high testosterone is possibly making men dumb. Perhaps it's not that high intelligence is unattractive, or that being below average IQ is attractive. Rather:

BEING HIGH TEST IS ATTRACTIVE AND HIGH TEST JUST SO HAPPENS TO LOWER YOUR CHANCES OF BEING SMART

Women go after the men who can dominate and unleash violence upon others, regardless of whether or not those men are dumb. So long as they aren't dumb to the point of being mentally crippled they're fine.


Probably because its correlated with autism or similar stuff
 
THE MOST SEXUALLY SUCCESSFUL MEN ARE ON AVERAGE LITERALLY TOO STUPID TO GET IN THE ARMY, BUT JUST SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE CLINICALLY RETARDED
The army lowered their standard on that test.
 
I mean, is this really surprising though? Most foids we see in our day to day lives as well as online are lusting after complete simians who happen to trigger their lizard brains as well as their beans. That's why they stay with men who beat them consistently as well as destroy everything around them; they love the rush they get from having sex with chads so much that they'll put up with their lives being literally ruined by them and ignore all other attributes men possess in pursuit of that high.
 
Here's a BRUTAL article that demonstrates that women favor dumb and average men the most. (article link at the end)

And before someone says I'm coping: the point of this isn't too circlejerk (haha i'm too smart to be a sexhaver XDDD), it's to disprove the just world fallacy and the whole "women are improving the gene pool bro"

The article has dozens of citations but sadly most of them don't lead to anywhere (the article is from 2007). Never the less it's filled with blackpills.




As always women favor men who have propensity for violence, destruction and abuse. So bluepillers stfu, you can't tell me that women are improving the gene pool when on average they're actively trying to reproduce as much as possible with violent criminals and complete morons.

For reference, 70 is the threshold of mental retardation and the US Army sets an IQ threshold of 92 for its applicants**. If you're under 92 IQ the army literally thinks you're too stupid, useless and dangerous to serve them. But remember women like men with an IQ of 70 to 90 the most. So?

THE MOST SEXUALLY SUCCESSFUL MEN ARE ON AVERAGE LITERALLY TOO STUPID TO GET IN THE ARMY, BUT JUST SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE CLINICALLY RETARDED

**
Applicants are required by military regulation to have a percentile score on a standardized test called the ASVAB that is 31 or more, which is roughly comparable to an IQ score on the Stanford-Binet scale of a little bit less than 92, for high school graduates seeking to enter the Army or Navy


Yes even being handholdless or kissless are inversely correlated with IQ


@Grothendieck LMAO THIS IS WHAT WE GET FOR STEMCELING

View attachment 348404

I'd also like to add that those sexless majors are the ones which have the highest IQ students on average

View attachment 348405



Yet another proof that intelligence is correlated with virginity

For those who don't know, a correlation of .6 is considered a moderate to strong correlation in statistics.

Next up the article throws lots of hypothesis to try to explain those findings, the author ends up proving most of these wrong and ends up settling for the "they're low sex drive bro" without really thinking why that is. But don't worry, they later show that high IQ people go to prostitutes more often which contradicts this low sex drive idea.


This is what awaits you if you "ascend": you get married and barely get any sex, a deadbedroom ( :soy: ) awaits you.

And did you notice how hypocritical normies are? They say "waaah it's immoral" and yet fuck like rabbits. :feelsseriously:


"You don't put yourself out there enough bro!!"
"Have you tried making more friends??"

Stfu, plenty of people go out and try to socialize, it doesn't mean shit when it comes to getting sex or a gf.


Sadly all the links are dead again :feelsbadman:, not surprising since this is an article from 2007

It's really interesting though, smartcels are likely to escortmaxx. This really debunks the whole low sex drive hypothesis


So the conclusion of the article is that high testosterone is possibly making men dumb. Perhaps it's not that high intelligence is unattractive, or that being below average IQ is attractive. Rather:

BEING HIGH TEST IS ATTRACTIVE AND HIGH TEST JUST SO HAPPENS TO LOWER YOUR CHANCES OF BEING SMART

Women go after the men who can dominate and unleash violence upon others, regardless of whether or not those men are dumb. So long as they aren't dumb to the point of being mentally crippled they're fine.


no smarter people just care about it less

in fact intelligence is correlated with facial attractiveness in males
 
Surprised to see the computer science ratio that low. Female/Male ratio is shit there also.

Also, mods, move this to must-read section.

Also, an explanation to those who wonder how looks play into this: These articles talk about correlation, not causation. No one is claiming that low iq > looks. The causal mechanism behind is that low iq = lower inhib and more extroverted.

Of course high iq chad > low iq chad.
all chads are smarter
 
lmao, imagine being an asocial and not even getting a good paying stem job for it.

Absolute worst of both worlds.


Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.

They were property 5000 years ago, they were property 300 years ago, and they should be property again soon, if we want humanity to prosper, instead of regressing technologically.
The best system for humans is patriarchy. Actually keeping women inferior to men 100% and giving them child-like status. Not a single other system has been shown to be as functional let alone more functional than this one. We have actually evidence to argue the contraru

I litterally challenge anyone to prove me wrong right here right now
 
The best system for humans is patriarchy. Actually keeping women inferior to men 100% and giving them child-like status. Not a single other system has been shown to be as functional let alone more functional than this one. We have actually evidence to argue the contraru

I litterally challenge anyone to prove me wrong right here right now
Just one correction. Not child-like, but object-like status. Patriarchy showed way too much respect to foids.
 
Brutal. No wonder society is such a shithole now. Women's dysgenic breeding practices have created a whole generation of retards.
 
Smart people reproduce far less than dumb people. But here's the catch: smart people raise their children better, leading to a higher survival rate which counterbalances the lower reproduction.


But in the west nowadays with modern medicine and technology? I doubt that high iq changes the survival rate much sadly ...


Yeah low iq means low inhib so I would expect a low iq chad to impregnate more women than the high iq chad.
Even if there was an equal amount of low iq chads and high iq chads i'd expect the low iq ones to come out on top in terms of reproduction
There's a good book about this called "Why Civilizations Self-Destruct" that talks about how the natural disparity in breeding between low iq and high iq people (stupid people breed more) is what causes societies to collapse.
 
It's true. I have a very high IQ like 140-150 which could've been way higher like 200 had I had a life.
 
Water is wet but good thread nevertheless
 
They were property 5000 years ago, they were property 300 years ago, and they should be property again soon, if we want humanity to prosper, instead of regressing technologically.
 
Just one correction. Not child-like, but object-like status. Patriarchy showed way too much respect to foids.
This. Also, even giving the women the right to educate your son would be too much.
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
4
Views
194
Nordicel94
Nordicel94
Rapistcel
Replies
16
Views
340
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
NIKOCADO AVOCADO
Replies
7
Views
196
HomicidalSuicidal88
HomicidalSuicidal88
Stupid Clown
Replies
16
Views
653
VintageCarCoper
VintageCarCoper
B
Replies
9
Views
162
RechargedSamsung
RechargedSamsung

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top