Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal Intelligent men have the same sexual success as mentally retarded men - Women like men with below average and average IQ the most

I'm pretty sure I am retarded. But I am also high inhibition and neurotic. Jfl.
lmao, imagine being an asocial and not even getting a good paying stem job for it.

Absolute worst of both worlds.


Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.

They were property 5000 years ago, they were property 300 years ago, and they should be property again soon, if we want humanity to prosper, instead of regressing technologically.
 
lmao, imagine being an asocial and not even getting a good paying stem job for it.

Absolute worst of both worlds.


Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.

They were property 5000 years ago, they were property 300 years ago, and they should be property again soon, if we want humanity to prosper, instead of regressing technologically.
I've never asked a girl out until I was like 23 I am way to high inhibition for pussy
 
Here's a BRUTAL article that demonstrates that women favor dumb and average men the most. (article link at the end)

And before someone says I'm coping: the point of this isn't too circlejerk (haha i'm too smart to be a sexhaver XDDD), it's to disprove the just world fallacy and the whole "women are improving the gene pool bro"

The article has dozens of citations but sadly most of them don't lead to anywhere (the article is from 2007). Never the less it's filled with blackpills.




As always women favor men who have propensity for violence, destruction and abuse. So bluepillers stfu, you can't tell me that women are improving the gene pool when on average they're actively trying to reproduce as much as possible with violent criminals and complete morons.

For reference, 70 is the threshold of mental retardation and the US Army sets an IQ threshold of 92 for its applicants**. If you're under 92 IQ the army literally thinks you're too stupid, useless and dangerous to serve them. But remember women like men with an IQ of 70 to 90 the most. So?

THE MOST SEXUALLY SUCCESSFUL MEN ARE ON AVERAGE LITERALLY TOO STUPID TO GET IN THE ARMY, BUT JUST SMART ENOUGH TO NOT BE CLINICALLY RETARDED

**
Applicants are required by military regulation to have a percentile score on a standardized test called the ASVAB that is 31 or more, which is roughly comparable to an IQ score on the Stanford-Binet scale of a little bit less than 92, for high school graduates seeking to enter the Army or Navy


Yes even being handholdless or kissless are inversely correlated with IQ


@Grothendieck LMAO THIS IS WHAT WE GET FOR STEMCELING

View attachment 348404

I'd also like to add that those sexless majors are the ones which have the highest IQ students on average

View attachment 348405



Yet another proof that intelligence is correlated with virginity

For those who don't know, a correlation of .6 is considered a moderate to strong correlation in statistics.

Next up the article throws lots of hypothesis to try to explain those findings, the author ends up proving most of these wrong and ends up settling for the "they're low sex drive bro" without really thinking why that is. But don't worry, they later show that high IQ people go to prostitutes more often which contradicts this low sex drive idea.


This is what awaits you if you "ascend": you get married and barely get any sex, a deadbedroom ( :soy: ) awaits you.

And did you notice how hypocritical normies are? They say "waaah it's immoral" and yet fuck like rabbits. :feelsseriously:


"You don't put yourself out there enough bro!!"
"Have you tried making more friends??"

Stfu, plenty of people go out and try to socialize, it doesn't mean shit when it comes to getting sex or a gf.


Sadly all the links are dead again :feelsbadman:, not surprising since this is an article from 2007

It's really interesting though, smartcels are likely to escortmaxx. This really debunks the whole low sex drive hypothesis


So the conclusion of the article is that high testosterone is possibly making men dumb. Perhaps it's not that high intelligence is unattractive, or that being below average IQ is attractive. Rather:

BEING HIGH TEST IS ATTRACTIVE AND HIGH TEST JUST SO HAPPENS TO LOWER YOUR CHANCES OF BEING SMART

Women go after the men who can dominate and unleash violence upon others, regardless of whether or not those men are dumb. So long as they aren't dumb to the point of being mentally crippled they're fine.



My IQ is at least in the 130s since I was a teenager. I also didn't have a masculine build and my dick has always been short. My height is mogged even by 80% of females and the rest are about my height or my height. Almost everyone heightmogs me. I'm a mid-30s incel...

I feel like roping more than I already do right now...
 
Being smart and incel is far better than being ugly/a manlet and retarded.
 
Also females usually choose males that are mostly suited for hunter gatherer life style, that is why they didnt have any rights in most of the agricultural era.
The problem is that one gynopsuedoscience theory is that "Taller men make better protectors." A tall man is equally lunch to a tiger just as much as a short man is, and plus, a bow doesn't care about the shooter's height. I'm more afraid of the short guy with a bow because he can sneak up and kill you before you even notice, compared to a lumbering archer over 6ft who's easy to identify.
 
Tldr but that's literally the definition of being a geek...ever see a doctor irl? Ever think wow that person is attractive? Yeah me neither
 
The problem is that one gynopsuedoscience theory is that "Taller men make better protectors." A tall man is equally lunch to a tiger just as much as a short man is, and plus, a bow doesn't care about the shooter's height. I'm more afraid of the short guy with a bow because he can sneak up and kill you before you even notice, compared to a lumbering archer over 6ft who's easy to identify.
same thing even with a melee weapon such as the spear


but ya with guns in the modern era it's actually even a disadvantage to be taller because you're a bigger target
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
26
Views
776
CostaTheCrazyGreek
CostaTheCrazyGreek
W
Replies
15
Views
219
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
Nordicel94
Replies
4
Views
372
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper
Gendocel
Replies
17
Views
418
Gendocel
Gendocel
S
Replies
24
Views
441
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top