Discussion Incels.is on Twitter

[Cunning Linguist]

Who runs this account and how do they have the patience to argue with rabid radfems who never listen to logic and instead make one fallacy after another?

I've had my own phase of vehemently debating these self-proclaimed femcels but at some point it becomes so repetitive and annoying. It's like they're determined to come up with whatever twisted "logic" they can get their hands on in order to prove that women have it infinitely harder. And don't even get me started on the absolute hate and vitriol of men they express openly on practically every mainstream social media site and yet if we dare hint that women might not be perfect little angels then we get banned.

At some point you'd have to realize that arguing with a femoid over the internet isn't gonna change much and it'd probably just make you more irritable. She would change her stance for Chad in a heartbeat anyway so what's the point of debating her paper tiger views?

 

[LeFrenchCel]

I think it's @Master

 

[Old Ironsides]

I asked this yesterday, mang.
I think someone said @Master does




it's over

 

[subhuman]

I agree that you will never convince these twitter retards, so arguing with them is futile. However, I think it is useful to advertise the website and expose onlookers to blackpill arguments.

 

[Cunning Linguist]

I agree that you will never convince these twitter retards, so arguing with them is futile. However, I think it is useful to advertise the website and expose onlookers to blackpill arguments.

Tiktok and the various blackpill YouTube channels have already been blackpilling the zoomer masses but I suppose it's not the worst thing to have one of our own represent our side of the argument, as long as he does it competently.
I have spent so much time debating these freaks myself that I've become completely jaded.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Who runs this account and how do they have the patience to argue with rabid radfems who never listen to logic and instead make one fallacy after another?

Master.

I've had my own phase of vehemently debating these self-proclaimed femcels but at some point it becomes so repetitive and annoying. It's like they're determined to come up with whatever twisted "logic" they can get their hands on in order to prove that women have it infinitely harder. And don't even get me started on the absolute hate and vitriol of men they express openly on practically every mainstream social media site and yet if we dare hint that women might not be perfect little angels then we get banned.

At some point you'd have to realize that arguing with a femoid over the internet isn't gonna change much and it'd probably just make you more irritable. She would change her stance for Chad in a heartbeat anyway so what's the point of debating her paper tiger views?

But it's still funny to trigger the hell out of them.

 

[LesscoBlob]

I agree that you will never convince these twitter retards, so arguing with them is futile. However, I think it is useful to advertise the website and expose onlookers to blackpill arguments.

Yeah, i would go as far as to say that .is should have an instagram account too.

 

[Cunning Linguist]

Master.

But it's still funny to trigger the hell out of them.

I support trolling and baiting them to piss them off but arguing in good faith in order to make them see things from our POV is futile.

 

[LesscoBlob]

I support trolling and baiting them to piss them off but arguing in good faith in order to make them see things from our POV is futile.

He's not arguing in good faith. He's clearly trolling them. Also, even if he did argue in good faith, it would just show how easily triggered sexhavers really are compared to incels.