Emba
fondleslab opensorcerer
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 19, 2019
- Posts
- 105,000
- Online time
- 1d 9m
I need a heavy panax prescription.
I need a heavy panax prescription.
i’m against it, for a very very long time I thought that an incel was someone who hates women and wants to take out their hatred on women through violence that they take out on random people. it does more harm than good. it’s only going to feed people more harmful stereotypes about us. it’s not gonna shed light on shit, people are just gonna reaffirm their already hateful way of thinking to be more hateful.…in before glownigger thread…
I don’t care if you find ER´s personally despicable (you’re a cuck if you do btw), but do you think Incel mass shootings are beneficial or harmful to the Incel cause?
(Incel cause: blackpilling the masses + motivating society to offer REAL solutions to our plight + making foids seethe)
I obviously don’t condone violence of any kind. (Mass-)murder is always wrong and such individuals are rightfully despised by everyone (like Che Guevara, Assata Shakur or Vlad Țepeș for example).
Here are the positive and negative effects for the cause (in my pov):
Positive:
-spreading the concept of “Inceldom” and “Blackpill” to the masses
-forcing society (through fear) to no longer ignore our problems and develop solutions (of questionable effectiveness)
-hoes mad
Negative:
-making people fear/hate Incels
-increased monitoring and censoring of Incel spaces
-(presumably) innocent people die
You’re looking too much into it. Going ER is an emotional response and a final lash out against existence itself. When one is in that state of mind, one isn’t really thinking too clearly anymore.I don't really understand what incels hope to accomplish when they decide to give up and go ER, sure maybe it'll spread some light on an Incels struggle but the "solution" will be to ban every community we have and then put us on a watch list.
In the UK we have some cuck organization called "prevent" that's setup to deradicalize potential moslemcels from Jihadmaxxing or Natsoccels from Brenton Tarrantmaxxing but it won't be long before they include Incels.
What's the cure tho? Psych meds? Being sat in a classroom and berated by a fat Lesbian?
The only "good" thing that comes out of going ER is well... "the day of retribution" where you decide to check out of life and get revenge against the cruel world so to speak.
Obviously if you fail to an hero then you'll just get locked up for life or the death penalty or maybe thrown into a mental hospital for the rest of your life but it doesn't achieve nothing.
Call me a bluepilled cuck for saying that going ER doesn't help the Incel cause nor does it actually do anything positive.
ngl I do find them funny tho![]()
True. They bring a logical justification for the violence that is otherwise only perceived as an emotional action. Normies would like to think “no sane person would do something like this” but well thought out Manifestos can prove that there is a good reason for violence. At this point normies will have to think about real solutions instead of declaring it a mental health issue (their default response).The killers who write manifestos (not just incel killers, all manifesto-writing killers) are far, far, far, far, far more influential than those who do not write manifestos.
Is this not very very unlikely? If it ever happens it will be at a point in the future where society is almost fallen apart anyway.i said this many times - there is a peaceful way of vengeance for clown world, working men just need to simultaneously stop wageslaving for several months and economy will collapse
The perfect ER would be one where only the bullies get targeted and the shooter somehow gets away with it (leaving the country or going into hiding) and only leaves a well written and thought out manifesto.they are decent, but there's lots of space for improvement
JupIf incels kill people and we don't expresssly say over and over that its because of our mistreatment by society and sexual starvation, normies will keep falling back on "we just need to start mental health programmes" or "they all need assigned therapists"
Normies are dishonest pieces of shit, they will keep denying the problem and saying its something else if we don't keep shoving it down their throat
Every mass shooting without a manifesto stating that its because of sexual starvation and that men need a sexual outlet in order to have a stable society, is a wasted mass shooting
But they don’t guess. The immediately fall back to the default “mental health” and “groomed by hategroups” answer.I see. But wouldn't it be more terrifying to them if they could only guess why it's happening instead of knowing for sure why it's happening in the perpetrator's own words? In most situations they already suspect why socially isolated ugly males would do such things but they are left clueless to the exact reason why, which adds a level of fear.
Not sure if sarcasms or not. Normies always see Incels as the worst of the worst. We are despised more than a good looking child rapist if we step even an inch out of the place that normies have ordained for us... which is at the very bottom of the social hierarchy.They make us all look bad.
I don’t know what you mean, sry.did you just bypass reply merging limited-by-time?interesting glitch
How can you be opposed to violence while being treated like shit for reasons outside of your control?I'm unconditionally opposed to violence, so I don't like ER or any other mass shooters. I don't even pretend to like them ironically for the memes.
They benefit us by forcing society to actually think about our problems and develop solutions.Mate, in what way do they benefit us?
ERs bring negative attention towards incels, they exacerbate our suffering by ostracising us and most importantly, they end up KILLING some innocent men and women.
The men could have been incels too, so I don’t see why anyone would celebrate these events.
Long before people that killed used inceldom as an explicit justification, people always talked about how men that killed in incidents like school shootings and terrorist attacks were probably sexually frustrated. It doesn't matter what justification you give for it but writing a lengthy manifesto and carrying out such an attack is going to lose its effect after some time and they will back to those default answers anyway because no matter what they are not going to roll back the sexual revolution or its effects that gave rise to modern inceldom.But they don’t guess. The immediately fall back to the default “mental health” and “groomed by hategroups” answer.
Completely false, at some point they will concede, especially if the death toll starts going up and men start using bombs, chemical weapons, etc. I keep telling you guys, its not going to stop at mass shootings, things are going to get much worse. At some point there will even be a guy who gets inspired by Indians and throws acid in women's faces lolwriting a lengthy manifesto and carrying out such an attack is going to lose its effect after some time
You are confusing men with womenBtw the "mental health" response is far better than the response when they actually find out why the person did it. You think anyone sympathizes with men that can't get laid to the point that they'll restructure society or make things easier?
Western countries will never tolerate it going that far. They will imprison and in many cases kill virgin males with little to no evidence if it does. Specifically ethnic males living in western countries that are already viewed with hostility and with whom acid attacks are more commonly associated with in people's minds.Completely false, at some point they will concede, especially if the death toll starts going up and men start using bobs, chemical weapons, etc. I keep telling you guys, its not going to stop at mass shootings, things are going to get much worse. At some point there will even be a guy who gets inspired by Indians and throws acid in women's faces
In this day and age of advanced military power, you need overwhelming force and scope of damage. Mass shootings and acid attacks pale in comparison.You are confusing men with women
Women get things from society due to sympathy, because humans have evolved to care for and favor women
Men get things from society due to fear, men have to make society concede to their demands, not "ask nicely"
Yeah and then what changed? Military power, the ability for the status quo to preserve itself through media propaganda, shilling and co-option all advanced. Not to mention that was back when countries weren't part of a global economy. The stakes are pretty high now for countries. They won't tolerate an uprising. Remember what happened to the Jan 6 capitol protestors?Look back in history, men only get the things they want through violent rebellion, when people fear for their lives or a societal collapse that's when men get what they want
That was back when it was easier to rebel.Heck America only exists because men decided to fight and die over taxes lol, men don't get anything through sympathy
Government is a protection racket yeah. Ideally the duty of the government is to enforce the nation's borders and provide for the general welfare of the people, not shake down its citizens for income taxes and social faux paus. In the absence of a government, groups of marauders and gangs would serve the same role. It's the age old debate between what level of government is necessary to safeguard the essentials of a nation without spilling over into tyranny. That threshold was passed a long time ago.We have to use the selfishness (self interest) of society against itself in order to get what we want
And I'll say it again, the mantra of "we don't negotiate with terrorists" IS A LIE, countries do it ALL THE TIME, and as citizens we deal with it everyday. If you don't pay your taxes men with guns will come for you, imprison you, and take your property, THAT IS TERRORISM. Were all at the mercy of some form of terrorism and we concede to the demands of others everyday due to fear
I don't disagree but the government has the monopoly on force, ability to persecute you and imprison you, ability to kill you and get away with it and access to much more powerful weaponry, surveillance and comprehensive behavioral profiles. It's tough to beat.We just classify these other forms of terrorism as "valid" or "justified", and we pretend like "its different", it really isn't
Those individuals aren't suicidal and willing to blow their brains out after their murder spree, its easy to control someone that is afraid to die and cares about "morality". Incels that are in bloodlust mode do not give a fuck about any of that shitRemember what happened to the Jan 6 capitol protestors?
Stakes don't matter, whether you can identify and control the uprising doesThe stakes are pretty high now for countries. They won't tolerate an uprising.
It's become common practice for cops to corner suspects before they can kill themselves after committing a murder spree. And the reaction of the police to the Jake Davison shooting was faster than expected. Police will just be trained to respond to the scene of the incident way faster and neutralize the shooter before the shooter can do any damage to himself or others.Those individuals aren't suicidal and willing to blow their brains out after their murder spree, its easy to control someone that is afraid to die and cares about "morality". Incels that are in bloodlust mode do not give a fuck about any of that shit
The government seems to believe it has a handle on this though. That may not be true but their actions demonstrate that this is what they appear to believe.Stakes don't matter, whether you can identify and control the uprising does
EVERY SINGLE AVERAGE MAN IS A POTENTIAL MASS SHOOTER (for the most part), there is no way to "screen" for this. That's the problem when you start disenfranchising a large and diverse group in your country
But they know most men are passive and take the path of least resistance even if those men are suicidal or homicidal. Therefore it's still pretty easy for them to focus on immediate threats like men that start stockpiling weapons and openly expressing such thoughts and desires to hurt others, even if they know that a large population could be prone to such inclinations.Were all like "sleeper agents" and they don't know which one of us is going to be activated or when, there is no way to police inceldom or men who are against hypergamy, because it affects every man, and more and more men are being affected over time. These idiots are literally fighting against human nature itself
Think about Elliot Rodger, who the hell would have expected that the son of a famous director would become a "mass shooter"? (nobody)
How about that guy who did the Plymouth shooting recently, I would never see a guy like that and expect that he'd do a mass shooting
There is no "mass shooter look"
There is no "mass shooter socioeconomic class"
That's why they will pass stricter gun control laws and behavioral checks for guns and other weapons, making the penalties for evading this more severe. When it comes to the law there's not really a carrot and stick method, it's just the stick.If you have the desire and the will you can get your hands on a gun through illegal channels
THERE IS NO WAY FOR THEM TO STOP THIS AND THEY KNOW IT
If they really want to stop the spread of the black pill, they need to restrict social media. And not just incel and manosphere groups, but all social media that talks about and reminds sexless males of what they are missing out on. That already takes out a wide swath of social media if this is implemented because social media is all about bragging about social and sexual success.All they are doing is hoping they can keep most men docile enough so that it doesn't happen to often, but more and more men are coming under the influence of the black pill, more and more men are sex starved virgins in their 20's that ever before (the stats show this and its probably UNDER REPORTED)
Re-education courses for chronically unemployed, single virgin males. All they would have to look at is whether a male has had any contact with the outside world and is employed and they'd be able to guess whether that male bears watching for signs of radicalization and frustration with their life.@your personality
Let me makes this simple
You tell me how the fuck are they going to ACCURATELY screen for incel males in the coming future
They are willing to take that risk. And most incels that hear about such incidents still have a normie mindset and are very complacent and accepting of increasing authoritarian overreaches. All they'll do is mostly complain about it and act outraged, but in the end they'll mostly do nothing, specifically if they become convinced it's overall pointless to do anything.Keep in mind that if they mistakenly misidentify and persecute a male who was never going to do it, THEY WOULD END UP RADICALIZING HIM, then he will spread the story online, it will go viral ("man targeted by authorities for being an unattractive loner"), AND THEN THAT WILL FURTHER RADICALIZE MORE MALES WHO NEVER THOUGHT OF THEMSELVES AS INCELS
They'll probably target chronically unemployed virgin males first or males working in low wage jobs in addition to people browsing "extremist" sites or talking publicly about black pill topics. Economically disenfranchised men are recognized as a potential threat.How are they going to do it?
Not all future mass shooters are browsing this forum or posting youtube videos talking about black pill topics, some are silently in the background, wage slaving, slowly reaching their breaking point
It doesn't matter what justification you give for it but writing a lengthy manifesto and carrying out such an attack is going to lose its effect
My hope is that it will not just be isolated in the future but a regular occurrence.Btw the "mental health" response is far better than the response when they actually find out why the person did it. You think anyone sympathizes with men that can't get laid to the point that they'll restructure society or make things easier? Everyone here knows how much that isn't true from how society already doesn't care about most men, so why would you expect that just because you engaged in a (in the grand scheme of things) isolated murder-suicide attack that people will begin to hear and acknowledge your demands?
If you actually think anything like this will happen you are delusional, I know people like to always trot out that book "1984" by George Owell like were in some kind of dystopian future but you are seriously underestimating men here, maybe you are just projecting, or maybe I'm just projecting my mindset on other men, but based on my observations its only a matter of time (a decade or so) before shit really hits the fan, and no amount of re-education is going to make a differenceIt's become common practice for cops to corner suspects before they can kill themselves after committing a murder spree. And the reaction of the police to the Jake Davison shooting was faster than expected. Police will just be trained to respond to the scene of the incident way faster and neutralize the shooter before the shooter can do any damage to himself or others.
The government seems to believe it has a handle on this though. That may not be true but their actions demonstrate that this is what they appear to believe.
But they know most men are passive and take the path of least resistance even if those men are suicidal or homicidal. Therefore it's still pretty easy for them to focus on immediate threats like men that start stockpiling weapons and openly expressing such thoughts and desires to hurt others, even if they know that a large population could be prone to such inclinations.
That's why they will pass stricter gun control laws and behavioral checks for guns and other weapons, making the penalties for evading this more severe. When it comes to the law there's not really a carrot and stick method, it's just the stick.
If they really want to stop the spread of the black pill, they need to restrict social media. And not just incel and manosphere groups, but all social media that talks about and reminds sexless males of what they are missing out on. That already takes out a wide swath of social media if this is implemented because social media is all about bragging about social and sexual success.
Re-education courses for chronically unemployed, single virgin males. All they would have to look at is whether a male has had any contact with the outside world and is employed and they'd be able to guess whether that male bears watching for signs of radicalization and frustration with their life.
They are willing to take that risk. And most incels that hear about such incidents still have a normie mindset and are very complacent and accepting of increasing authoritarian overreaches. All they'll do is mostly complain about it and act outraged, but in the end they'll mostly do nothing, specifically if they become convinced it's overall pointless to do anything.
They'll probably target chronically unemployed virgin males first or males working in low wage jobs in addition to people browsing "extremist" sites or talking publicly about black pill topics. Economically disenfranchised men are recognized as a potential threat.





