Deleted member 24297
With the intent to inflict death
-
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2020
- Posts
- 2,331
Return to dolphin
Last edited:
Well of course you don't.View attachment 379280Ahh yes, look at that white skin tone.
CopeWell of course you don't.
He isn't fucking this thing in the picture, so why would you?
Oh look, a substantially lighter skin tone. I wonder who could be behind this.
@Wizard32 what are your thoughts on the matter?
Are incels actually volcels if they refuse ascension with dolphins?
Incel counterpart of the dogpill: dogs always bark at you.
Interesting and nuanced analysis. I have never thought about the vaginal/penile diameter ratio in relation to the incel/volceldom spectrum before. Thank you for taking your time to share this.As stated before I do not believe in absolute volceldom or absolute inceldom. They are directions to the left/right extremes of a continuum we lie in the middle of, some more to left and some more to right.
I guess you could quantify broad categoriztion like...
"incels" are 75% incel 25% volcel"volcels" are 75% volcel 25% incel
If you fell too close to the middle then maybe neither would be clear and you'd call them midcels or something.
You're more volcel for refusing sex with a 10ft female dolphin than for refusing sex with a 10inch female doormouse, because sex with the former is a more tenable idea than the latter.
At some point if we're considering species whose max vag diameter is half (or less) our dicks that volceldom toward them is negligible because it ceases to be sex as we traditionally understand it when the primary result is causing mutual discomfort for both parties unlikely to result in orgasm for either of them.
The same could apply to species whose minimum vag diameter is double (or more) one's penile diameter: if you can literally walk inside the hallway-vag of a 98ft Blue Whale then even though your dick is technically inside her, without proximal hugging sensations we associate with sex, classifying it as sex merely by "A in B" oversimplifies what sex is.
As stated before I do not believe in absolute volceldom or absolute inceldom. They are directions to the left/right extremes of a continuum we lie in the middle of, some more to left and some more to right.
I guess you could quantify broad categoriztion like...
"incels" are 75% incel 25% volcel"volcels" are 75% volcel 25% incel
If you fell too close to the middle then maybe neither would be clear and you'd call them midcels or something.
You're more volcel for refusing sex with a 10ft female dolphin than for refusing sex with a 10inch female doormouse, because sex with the former is a more tenable idea than the latter.
At some point if we're considering species whose max vag diameter is half (or less) our dicks that volceldom toward them is negligible because it ceases to be sex as we traditionally understand it when the primary result is causing mutual discomfort for both parties unlikely to result in orgasm for either of them.
The same could apply to species whose minimum vag diameter is double (or more) one's penile diameter: if you can literally walk inside the hallway-vag of a 98ft Blue Whale then even though your dick is technically inside her, without proximal hugging sensations we associate with sex, classifying it as sex merely by "A in B" oversimplifies what sex is.
Interesting and nuanced analysis.
I have never thought about the vaginal/penile diameter ratio in relation to the incel/volceldom spectrum before.
Hahahaha
where's this from?
NGL, looks better then most roasties with loose beef flaps. I would