To koniec
I AM A CURSE
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Posts
- 12,024
Nothing happenedBut since Anand vouched, I apologize for my caustic remarks.
Also sorry for my responses
Nothing happenedBut since Anand vouched, I apologize for my caustic remarks.
No need for even that most likely mythological account. They intermixed with arab tribes many times throught history (look at yemenites) and likewise probably share a common origin due to afro asiatic linguistic tiesEthiopians were spawned by Israelites who race mixed with sheboons
The Queen of Sheba is a sheboon empress who race mixed with King David of the Bible and spawned the Ethiopian half Jew half nigger race hence why they look curry
This isn't a cultural issue first of all. Niggers are niggers because of geneticsAn extremely unlikely scenario. You don't understand how hard it is to get out of your cultural vacuum and expose everything that you have received since childhood to a critical eye. Only about 10% will be able to leave their cultural vacuum and burn all the bridges: get rid of habits, get rid of lifestyle, get rid of the environment.
Let's just say this question depends on 30% of the culture of upbringing and 70% of genetics.This isn't a cultural issue first of all. Niggers are niggers because of genetics
Where did you get those percentages from?on 30% of the culture of upbringing and 70% of genetics.
Purely my opinionWhere did you get those percentages from?
@DarkStar reddit.isHe forgot about successful Africans like Ben Carson, barack Obama, Neil Tyson Degrasse, Clarence Thomas, Austin Loyd, Martin Luther King, and much more. This proves that blacks are just as capable as whites of being successful
Dravidians are 50-70% proto africanWhere did you get those percentages from?
You're fucking retardedDravidians are 50-70% proto african
Thing is, all of these kingdoms had some Caucasoid genetic influence on them as well as substantial MENA cultural influence:Tbh best you can do is show that historically speaking some african kingdoms like Nubia/Kush, any of the ethiopian empires, somali city states and some west african empires like mali werent retarded but actually quite rich and influential
We don't need studies to see some races are just smarter than others, the same way we don't need studies to tell us women want tall men or that people like blue eyes. Anyone with eyes can observe these facts in reality. And when it comes to niggers, they have never, NOT ONCE, had any succes in civilization building. Sure, alot of coping niggers will point out sudan, somalia, or ethiopia, but then they need to remember that these Cushite populations are 40-60% West Eurasian on average, mostly Natufian, which is a CAUCASION-related group from the Levant. In other words, they are not fully Negroid. In fact, the average Cushite is CLOSER to an Arab than they are to a Bantu. The physical similarities between a Cushite and a Bantu is more a result of living in a similar enviroment as opposed to sharing genes.
View attachment 1154592View attachment 1154604
And then those same niggers will point out mali, marutania, or ghana as another example of "black civilization", but once again, these West African empires, which I will call Moorish for now, had significant Caucasion-related ancestory, this time mostly coming from contact with Amazighs and Sahrawi populations. Notice how all of these west african empires overlap with the blue area of West Eurasian map?
View attachment 1154605View attachment 1154606View attachment 1154607View attachment 1154610
And of course, that's not to mention these Moorish empires were EVEN LESS RELEVANT in history compared to the Cushite empires. At least Cushites have SOME things they've invented or built, at least Cushites actually HAVE large buildings and ruins of their achievements, at least Cushites had their own script, but Moorish empires have nothing to look at, Moorish empires in fact mostly sustained themselves off of gold, slaves, salt, and other resources abundant in Sub-Saharan Africa. And of course, this fits when you look at their genetics. The average Cushite, like I said, is 40-60% Caucasion, while the average Moor is 15-35% Caucasion.
Lastly, we see 2 observations constantly in reality:
1. Niggers are failures in any non-Black country they are in
2. Niggers are outperformed by non-Blacks even in their own countries.
We all see point 1. Be it Canada, America, UK, Egypt, Iraq, or Saudi, wherever niggers go, they always end up failures among which ever group they live among. Niggers never economically or intellectually outperform other groups, which is why they always end up at the bottom of the totem pole in ANY society, regardless of ideology, religion, or circumstances. They always end up chimping out and forming typical hooligan nigger tribal gangs. In America, the average niggers is 15-25% white, yet they're still such a MASSIVE criminal element. Imagine how much worse pure niggers must be.
View attachment 1154620View attachment 1154622
However, the 2nd point is more hilarious. Any non-nigger population that has the misfortune of living in Sub-Saharan Africa ends out outperforming the local nigger baboon population.
The most obvious example of this, of course, is the European population in countries like South Africa, Nambia, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Botswana. Most of these countries have anywhere from 2% to 8%, yet these whites are the ruling class in these countries. There is often a clearly strong correlation between European blood in Europe and being economically succesful, even in North Africa, you can see Algeria is the best country because of all the White slaves they used to kidnap.
View attachment 1154645
View attachment 1154631
You also have some Arab populations in Niger, Sudan, Tanzania, and Mozambique, both in modern times and historically, that likewise, outperformed the local niggers, to the point that, in fact, the niggers in Tanzania in fact KILLED the Arabs due to them seething out of jealousy at the Arabs (and Indians) living better lives than them. This was in the 1960s, and we see how much more of a shithole the country is now without the Arabs.
View attachment 1154629View attachment 1154635
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esVReZVGCSs&ab_channel=AlJazeeraEnglish
You also have plenty of Indians in East African countries, like Kenya or Uganda. In fact, Indians are so succesful in Africa, that despite being 1% of Kenya's population, they account for over 60% of the taxes in the country. That's fucking hilarious. And of course, there was an incident in Uganda where the nigger government expelled the Indians out of the country because they were assblasted at the Indians outperforming them, only for those retarded niggers to BEG the indians to come back due to the country going to shit. At lastly, the ONLY 1st world SUB-SAHRAN country, Mariturius, is 60% Indian.
View attachment 1154638View attachment 1154640
And LASTLY, I don't think I need to mention the sheer domination Chinese people are making in Sub-Saharan Africa in modern times. So whether it is Arabs, Europeans, Chinese, or EVEN FUCKING INDIANS, all of these people CONSTANTLY outperform the local niggers. Now ask yourself why. We all know why.
View attachment 1154641View attachment 1154642
Niggers gonna Nig.
View attachment 1154643
See aboveI forgot about those ancient African civilizations
Incorrect, and see above againYea theres that. Now one can make the claim that all these have some tie to the near east (especielly the eastern ones like ethiopia) but they are still blacks
Yes, there is basicallyAre there genes which link up to high IQ ? Not really into genetics but i'm into phenotypes and can for sure say that IQ variance scale exist quite a lot with dumbo phenos like brunn or high iq ones hallstatt
@based_meme ( can you provide information ? )
@DarkStar
@Chudpreet
Looking into the future, Lynn’s book provides a starting point for studies into the recent evolution of human intelligence. Rapid progress in the molecular genetics of intelligence and related constructs (Okbay et al., 2016), and in the sequencing of fossil DNA (Mathieson et al., 2015), mean that the genetic theory that Lynn espouses in his book can not only be tested in living populations. Studies of ancient DNA from populations that lived thousands of years ago can show directly whether the frequencies of intelligence-influencing genetic variants changed over time, when and where these changes took place, and whether any new mutations arose after the exodus from Africa about 60,000 years ago.Lynn proposes that there were two genetic processes in the evolution of higher intelligence in the northern latitudes. The first was that the frequencies of the alleles for lower intelligence were reduced and those for higher intelligence increased as a result of selection against those with lower IQ. One of the effects of this was to increase the frequency of the alleles determining brain size, which today averages 1,283 cc in Sub-Saharan Africans to 1,369 cc in Europeans to 1,416 cc in Northeast Asians. The second was that mutations for new alleles for higher intelligence must have appeared after the dispersal from Africa. Lynn proposes that this has to be assumed to explain the IQ of only 91 of the Arctic peoples who inhabited the coldest region and might be expected to have evolved the highest IQ if the only genetic process was a change in the frequencies of alleles that had been present already in the out-of-Africa population. His proposed explanation is that the Arctic population has been very small and the mutations for new alleles for higher intelligence never appeared in it
International differences in cognitive ability are related to international differences in global genetic factors.
Genetic distances and IQ differences are positively correlated (r = .37).
Genetic distances (ΔGEN) are positively related to cross-country differences in cognitive ability (rΔIQ = .37), geography (rΔGEO = .66, rΔLAT = .45, rΔEQU = .41, rΔLONG = .43) and human development
OP would never address this thoughIn 1989, scholar J.P. Rushton (who only studied the three major races (Negroids, Caucasoids, and Mongoloids) noted that racial differences in IQ and other higher traits seemed to correlate with the time period when each of the races branched off the main trunk of the human evolutionary tree. “One theoretical possibility,” said Rushton, “is that evolution is progressive and some populations are more advanced than others”.
As science writer Perter Knudtson noted, such thinking flies in the face of the mainstream scientific consensus that all extant life forms are equivalent cases of time tested evolutionary success. Nonetheless modern humans clearly colonized different regions of the World at different times, and for whatever reason, the legacy of these ancient migration lives on in the IQ scores of current populations.
Dude, what you believe in is classified as "theories" as wellThe authors say it themselves, 'it is our opinion" they didnt say, "it is a fact that....."
I care about facts not opinions. Facts are more important than fringe theories
And ofc, this is where most Black or African civilization existed....Somalians speak an afro-asiatic language, a group that also includes semitic languages like hebrew or arabic. Much of the east africa region is afro-asiatic and cultural interactions with the arabian peninsula, as well as migrations from and to that region are historically common.
I agree being extremely self-hating is cucked, and I do think anyone who is truly blackpilled has to self-hate to some degree. For example, I do admit there's a lot of cucks within my race.Idk how you can be a curry and NOT self-hate to some degree
You're either full of shit or you haven't looked hard enough.
Literally less than a minute of searching yielded this paper from 2005 that was published by the APA.
I've quoted the relevant excerpt.
Yeah exactlyAn extremely unlikely scenario. You don't understand how hard it is to get out of your cultural vacuum and expose everything that you have received since childhood to a critical eye. Only about 10% will be able to leave their cultural vacuum and burn all the bridges: get rid of habits, get rid of lifestyle, get rid of the environment.
If you are gl as a curry you would be self-hating even more. Why'd you want to be associated with a race in which 99% are short and ugly?However, as @@wereq once told me: Unless you're an extreme outlier Chadpreet or rare IQ mogger, you have no reason to not be self hating as a curry.
If you're a mogger curry, there's a very high chance you could easily LARP as a Sand I'd say and/or easily use stuff to appear less curry.If you are gl as a curry you would be self-hating even more. Why'd you want to be associated with a race in which 99% are short and ugly?
If you are mogger curry, your race would be your biggest falio
I don't think so. Sendhil and Moose Ali Khan can't be anything but curry. And race larping is the most pathetic jflIf you're a mogger curry, there's a very high chance you could easily LARP as a Sand I'd say and/or easily use stuff to appear less curry.
Literally every Chadpreet example I've seen has been Gulf-Arab passing.
@comradespiderman29 thots?. And race larping is the most pathetic jfl
@comradespiderman29 thots?
You obviously didn't read the paper. They're citing various studies with hard evidence on both sides. Keep in mind that this is the APA, which is basically a vital organ of the left-leaning liberal academia that is ideologically on your side of this. It's just easier for you (or anyone) to dismiss shit for any convenient reason without actually putting in the effort and addressing any of it. This is why I tell people to do their own homework and research. I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but it was clearly an error.The authors say it themselves, 'it is our opinion" they didnt say, "it is a fact that....."
I care about facts not opinions. Facts are more important than fringe theories
Thanks for posting these, buddy boyo.Richard Lynn on Race Differences in Intelligence - American Renaissance
Second revised edition of his classic book is now available.www.amren.com
Richard Lyn's theories on race and IQ have been rejected by the scientific community. I've read some of his theories and they don't add up. Why should I believe in a scientific theory that hasn't been accepted as scientific fact?Thanks for posting these, buddy boyo.
I'm sick and tired of these soys spouting bullshit, here of all places.
I did, and it seems like the majority of scientists agree that race doesn't determine IQ.This is why I tell people to do their own homework and research. I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but it was clearly an error.
But you told me to show examples of blacks that are successful or normal. I'm not a Redditor, I actually have made posts condemning IT. Whenever I say something that you disagree with, you call me a "Redditor" which is immature. Instead of calling me names why don't you give me a serious response?@DarkStar reddit.is
Niggers in America earn the least. Again, in which country do they perform on par with whites and other races?But you told me to show examples of blacks that are successful or normal.
IQ can be from 40-80% genetics but it varies by person. In some cases, environment factors are more important than genetics when it comes to IQ, this is not my opinion this has been stated by studies that I've looked atThis isn't a cultural issue first of all. Niggers are niggers because of genetics
Most blacks live in poor neighborhoods, how tf do you expect them to make a lot of money? Are you retarded?Niggers in America earn the least. Again, in which country do they perform on par with whites and other races?
Still haven't shown me one place where niggers outperform other races One place, just oneIQ can be from 40-80% genetics but it varies by person. In some cases, environment factors are more important than genetics when it comes to IQ, this is not my opinion this has been stated by studies that I've looked at
They live in poor neighborhoods because they are retardedMost blacks live in poor neighborhoods, how tf do you expect them to make a lot of money? Are you retarded?
They were forced into poor neighborhoods by whites a long time ago, that's why they are stuck in those areas, dumbass, do you know American history?They live in poor neighborhoods because they are retarded
Nigger shoots himself in the foot and blames white man, muh colonization muh slavery
Coincidentally blacks that make more money have more white DNA in them, that has nothing to do with anything ig right?They were forced into poor neighborhoods by whites a long time ago, that's why they are stuck in those areas, dumbass, do you know American history?
Comrade was obsessed with BLC:@DarkStar @Chudpreet least BBC obsessed faggot curry
And he is too a Mallu christian like our @comradespiderman29
Comrade was obsessed with BLC:
Is Your country in this list of world's biggest and smallest dick size?
Lifefuel for us Lebanesecels. Over for chinks.incels.isLEBANESE and Polish men are dick moggers
incels.isLebanon is in the top 10 countries, in terms of dick size.
Since, people said tiktok wasn't a source the last time I posted this. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/penis-size-by-countryincels.is
African countries don't have funds to develop advanced technologies because African Elites are stealing their money.Coincidentally blacks that make more money have more white DNA in them, that has nothing to do with anything ig right?
Also how come niggers never even invented a writing system or the FUCKING WHEEL?
African countries don't have funds to develop advanced technologies because African Elites are stealing their money.
Because Africans back then were isolated from the rest of the world, and developing advanced civilizations in sun saharan wasn't possible because of diseases, lack of land for agricultural purposes, and the fragmentation of tribes meant that these groups of people didn't collaborate to work on projects together.Were these "African Elites" stealing even 1000s of years ago that's why they weren't able to develop a writing system or the wheel? Can't be 'cause they are retarded right?
And that's why they are retardedBecause Africans back then were isolated from the rest of the world, and developing advanced civilizations in sun saharan wasn't possible because of diseases, lack of land for agricultural purposes, and the fragmentation of tribes meant that these groups of people didn't collaborate to work on projects together.
It's not because of race, these problems were out of their control. It was purely their geography that prevented them from progressing.And that's why they are retarded
Then how were Arabs living in a barren fucking desert able to create one the greatest civilizations? Can't be genetics that's playing a role here right?It's not because of race, these problems were out of their control. It was purely their geography that prevented them from progressing.
Middle eastern people had contact with Asia and Europe due to their geography. This meant that they received ideas from other civilizations unlike Sub Saharan Africa.Then how were Arabs living in a barren fucking desert able to create one the greatest civilizations? Can't be genetics that's playing a role here right?
Keep coping harder and harder hereMiddle eastern people had contact with Asia and Europe due to their geography. This meant that they received ideas from other civilizations unlike Sub Saharan Africa.
It's true that middle easterners had the benefit of receiving new ideas and technology from Asia and Europe, this is not a cope, it's a historical fact. You behave like a child, saying "cope" in response to a historical fact shows that you are low IQKeep coping harder and harder here
Richard Lyn's theories on race and IQ have been rejected by the scientific community. I've read some of his theories and they don't add up. Why should I believe in a scientific theory that hasn't been accepted as scientific fact?
Again, you just handwaved and didn't read it. It has contains studies with both models - cultural and genetic. The title of the paper is literally, "THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY."I did, and it seems like the majority of scientists agree that race doesn't determine IQ.
I acknowledge that there are studies that support both sides. Are you 100% sure that race determines IQ or are you undecided?Again, you just handwaved and didn't read it. It has contains studies with both models - cultural and genetic. The title of the paper is literally, "THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY."
First, you asked for evidence and I promptly gave it, claiming you did extensive research and didn't find anything. Bullshit #1.
Then when I gave you the evidence you tried moving the goalpost and wanted to use consensus as a standard of evidence. Bullshit #2.
You do all of this, while claiming that you've being objective and disregarding any evidence anyone gives you, including what @DarkStar linked. Bullshit #3.
You're not interested in truth. You're simply an ideologue who wants to finesse the Overton window here and we see right through you. Before anyone forgets, we're in the POLITICS forum. It's not surprising that you'd want to push this idea that Blacks everywhere are suppressed through "muh slavery" and "muh colonization" (and if it's neither of those, the good ol' "muh racism" is the default).
Dude, as always you are Gish-galloping here.I acknowledge that there are studies that support both sides. Are you 100% sure that race determines IQ or are you undecided?
Yes, yes. Acknowledge their existence, but dismiss their veracity.I acknowledge that there are studies that support both sides.
There is a strong genetic component to it. We already know that IQ is highly heritable from twin studies. If genetics wasn't a key factor in IQ, then twins separated at birth growing up in vastly different environments wouldn't have similar IQs decades later.Are you 100% sure that race determines IQ or are you undecided?
I fucking HATE nigger culture.
Dude, as always you are Gish-galloping here.