If youre a pedocel kys

[Deleted member 39443]

Teenage girls are not children, I don't care if they are underage

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

Not necessarily. How would lowering the age of consent make them more whoreish? They're already going to have sex with guys their age- if anything older guys are less likely to pump and dump them (possibly). She'll fuck top 20% anyway. And you'll slam me for this, but promiscuous sex is *fine* as long as they're making the babies of their high IQ, productive provider at a young age (as determined by a paternity test) and he is OK with it.

Because the point of most of you wanting to lower the AoC is so that it's legal for you to have sex with them without intent to marry them.

And I know regardless of the law, many teenage foids are already fucking adult men without consequences. They're just gonna ride the cock carousel instead of going for incels

And how is promiscuous sex good in terms of having babies? That's just gonna leave single moms and bastard children without fathers.

 

[Robtical]

It should be legal for men to have sex with or marry pubescent teens.

 

[Robtical]

how isn’t op banned yet? he is literally suggesting users with a normal sexual preference (attraction to teens) to kill themselves.

It's pretty cucked, I guess the only thing we can do is make a thread about why agecucks should kill themselves since threads telling others to commit suicide seem to be allowed.

 

[curryboy420]

Ok greynigger, it's ok when rich Chad fucks a 14 year old tho I guess

 

[Robtical]

but isn’t what op posted a ban-able offense? imo agecuck faggots like him should have no voice on this forum.

It would be bannable if it was up to me, but I can't ban anyone unless they break the current rules.

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

It would be bannable if it was up to me, but I can't ban anyone unless they break the current rules.

Yet @Fat Link gets to make up his own rules.

 

[SentimentalCel]

Because the point of most of you wanting to lower the AoC is so that it's legal for you to have sex with them without intent to marry them.

Not me, lol. Not necessarily.

And I know regardless of the law, many teenage foids are already fucking adult men without consequences. They're just gonna ride the cock carousel instead of going for incels

It's adult women who get away with fucking young boys more than anything.

[UWSL]And how is promiscuous sex good in terms of having babies? That's just gonna leave single moms and bastard children without fathers.[/UWSL]

Not if the women making the babies of the man who will take care of them and then going out and having sex with an effective condom, or performing sodomy. I thought that was what I said.

 

[BrettyBoy]

“Oh no my innocent teenage whores are in danger because some people on an incel forum stated that they can be attractive”

Kill yourself faggot, you are an obvious IT infiltrator.

Also the age of consent should be 12

under what age do you personally draw the line?

OP is telling dudes to kill themselves over words on a screen. IT level shit, dude.

 

[Deleted member 40627]

OP is telling dudes to kill themselves over words on a screen. IT level shit, dude.

The local pussy drier.

 

[Robtical]

Yet @Fat Link gets to make up his own rules.

Yes because he's the admin, we can only make suggestions for him to consider.

 

[pixy.]

@[UWSL]/data/avatars/s/29/29526.jpg?1641569449 [/UWSL]@Pixycel my nigga you didn’t answer my question

sorry I just got back.

under what age do you personally draw the line?

Though I'm not personally attracted to 14 year olds I'd say from a pragmatic view 14 is a good AOC. Old enough that most women would have gone through or mostly through puberty so they can bare children and developed secondary sexual characteristics but young enough that they haven't lost any years of fertility for no reason.

This is also under the assumption that we'd live in a traditional society where these women would be married off to their husbands and start producing children quickly there after. Since in a modern decadent society the AOC doesn't really matter that much as 20 something year old chadrones will be fucking underage girls regardless of the law.

 

[Subhuman Niceguy]

 

[pixy.]

Interesting, honestly I agree with most of the things you said. 14 seems to be the optimal age for woman to bare children, but I don’t think there should be strict penalties for guys found guilty by the court of law for engaging in any sort of sexual conduct with a girl younger than 14, at most they should receive a fine if it was done against the “victim/s” will.

I think the statutory and standard rape laws made more sense when it was a traditional society because you would be destroying another man's property by taking a girl's virginity, which should be the right of her husband to take.

I agree that these laws are pretty useless in the modern day and just exist to "protect muh queen"