Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

If you support capitalism, you are a slave-minded

Just say NIGGER!

Just say NIGGER!

A shower a day keeps inceldom away
★★★
Joined
Oct 5, 2023
Posts
5,232
Any, and I mean any economic system (slavery, feudalism, communism, socialism...) is more free and meritocratic compared modern capitalism or any form of it for that matter. A Roman slave or a medieval serf had more social mobility compared to "citizens" of capitalist societies. Compared to any other system, capitalism also practices the highest form of constant gaslighting, always blaming you for everything (no different than BP denier blaming your personality, confidence, style...).

Any lies you might be told about it's "success" (oh bro China pulled people out of poverty bro!) crumble at the slightest touch. All the improvement in QoL we see is simply due to technological and societal advancement, not due to a "chosen" economic system.
 
No capitalism for your face
 
this isn't tumblr
 
it's only makes sense to support capitalism if you're the one who got profitable business, part of rich/wealthy family or own plenty of real estate so you can rent out and live a good life. If you're typical wagie slave which works from salary to salary only to pay rent and afford food, and after all of that you still support capitalism, you're a cuck.
 
Last edited:
We needed NatSoc worldwide, but of course Germany had to try it first and fuck everything up forever in that regard.
 
We needed NatSoc worldwide, but of course Germany had to try it first and fuck everything up forever in that regard.
We need to castrate anyone who has a political label.
 
it's only makes sense to support capitalism if you're the one who got profitable business, part of rich/wealthy family or own plenty of real estate so you can rent out and live a good life. If you're typical wagie slave which works from salary to salary only to pay rent and afford food, and after all of that you still support capitalism, you're a cuck.
And you're not a cuck if you're sitting around a fire with your kin, and a barbarian army invades your village, butchers all the men, and takes your women as concubines. JFL.

fantasycels.is
 
just give me some money please
 
And you're not a cuck if you're sitting around a fire with your kin, and a barbarian army invades your village, butchers all the men, and takes your women as concubines. JFL.

fantasycels.is
That still happens under capitalism

Also
>your women
Where you think you are ?
 
I don't like Capitalism, but Communism is just as bad for a few reasons:
-Both undermine very valid constructs which are rooted in observable factors such as race, gender, and other established societal "values" which yes may have flaws but were conceived for valid reasons
-Both only value the "material" without realizing that it needs the "immaterial" to support if, if you understand what I mean by these hyperbole: If not, re-read above.
-Both seem to in a way, inhibit the human condition of creativity & wanting to innovate. Capitalism is very nepotistic, while Communism seems to stifle this through the hammered notion of "egalitarianism" which as stated, is in natural conflict with the human condition
-Both have ties to a certain group, one which is heavily involved in banking & helped finance both sides in history:

The bill was bitterly opposed in the Senate, with Senator Robert M. La Follette being one of its most "vociferous opponents". 11211 It was passed into law on 23 December 1913, after the members of the Senate had been threatened by the thoroughly disreputable President Woodrow Wilson, "who was as devoid of ethics and principle as he was of morality", 11221 that he would keep them in session until it had passed the bill and deny them their Christmas recess. Only a minority of 43 Senators supported the bill, with 25 voting against it, 27 refusing to vote and 5 members absent. The promoters of the bill promised that the United States dollar would become a stable currency and that business cycles and recessions would become a thing of the past.

In the event since the inception of the US Federal Reserve Bank in 1914, the US dollar has lost 97% of its purchasing power and there have been 19 recessions, the great depression of the 1930s and the current great recession which started in 2008, and notwithstanding main stream media propaganda to the contrary, appears to have all the symptoms of a depression. Since 1910 the National Debt has increased from $2.65 billion to $20 trillion in March 2017, while unfunded liabilities such as social security. Medicare and benefits for military veterans exceed $240 trillion 11221 .

The United States Federal Reserve Bank instead of functioning as the people's banker of the bankers, has operated solely as a private bank for the benefit of private bankers. It comes as no surprise that in its 104 years of existence its accounts have never been submitted to public audit
On 21 April 1921 Litvinov was appointed Commissioner of the Council of People's Commissars for currency transactions and sales of gold abroad. "Several hundred millions [roubles] of our gold went through my hands and was sold abroad. I sold the majority of this gold directly or through various intermediaries to large French companies which re¬ melted this gold either in France or Switzerland, and then this gold went to its final destination in storage at the American Reserve Bank" 11551 Rothschild's privately-owned bank! Litvinov had become the "authorised representative of the bankers - owners of the FRB, the Bank of England and Soviet Russia" 11521 . As can be seen the Bolshevik Revolution was little more than a giant asset stripping exercise by the Rothschilds.
In late 1941 Litvinov's services were once again required. With the Germans banging on the gates of Moscow, Stalin's desperate situation necessitated urgent help from the West. Litvinov was sent to Washington as Soviet ambassador. The Americans were reluctant to lend money to the Soviet Union, but Litvinov soon sorted everything out and within a few weeks a loan of one billion dollars was granted. A Lend Lease agreement was signed and over the next four years $11 billion worth of supplies and services were provided. Litvinov "could call the White House at any time and the President [Roosevelt] would see him immediately".^ Both these stooges of the international bankers pumped gold - the one out of Russia, the other from the people of the United States - into the vaults of Rothschild's Pederal Reserve Bank. 11551

Litvinov 11 ^ was recalled in 1943 when the war turned in Russia's favour. His successor as foreign minister, Vyacheslav Molotov, provides an apt epitaph."Litvinov was utterly hostile to us ... He deserved the highest measure of punishment at the hands of the proletariat. Every punishment" . am

Lrom 1-22 July 1944 the international bankers organised a conference at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. Its purpose was to establish a World Bank and an International Monetary Lund which would govern relations amongst independent nations and maintain fixed exchange rates. Soviet


representatives attended the conference, but refused to sign, stating that the proposed institutions were "branches of Wall Street". 11221 This impertinence of Stalin in all probability angered the Rothschilds, but there was little that they could do, while Germany remained undefeated.

Between 17 July and 2 August 1945 the Potsdam conference was held in Germany. It determined the new borders of Europe. From this time the Soviet Union was gradually frozen out and the start of the Cold War commenced. Stalin had no designs on Western Europe. His army was completely exhausted and he had more than enough tasks on his hands in absorbing Eastern Europe under his hegemony and repairing all the damage to his country,which he had inflicted on himself by provoking Germany into starting a preventative war. M From a military perspective the dropping of alleged 11221 nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unnecessary, as in January 1945 Japan was already trying to secure surrender terms. The firebombing of these two cities served two more sinister purposes: (i) as a punishment to the Japanese for having set up their own state bank and (ii) as a warning to the Soviet Union which also had a state bank.

The Cold War was prosecuted, initially, by the Western countries in order to bring the Soviet Union to heel. Stalin, who was rather more of a nationalist 11211 than a communist, resisted and was allegedly poisoned, and then allowed to die from a massive stroke for which he did not receive any medical treatment, on 1 March 1953 11221 . Thereafter the Cold War degenerated into a farce, as the West, and in particular the United States, invested heavily in the Soviet Union. Huge investments were made at the Gorki plant which built Ford trucks, and the largest automotive plant in the world at Volgograd, which manufactured Fiat cars. There were also substantial investments in aviation, computers and electricity.The Soviet Union became an investment destination of choice.The Russians soldiered on, but with 50% of their budget being allocated to armaments, this was a war which they could not win in the long term. This explains why living standards in the Soviet Union could never match those achieved in the West, notwithstanding the provision of free services such as education and housing
On 17 November 1917, the Rothschilds, fearful that replication of this extraordinary example of freedom and prosperity would destroy their malevolent banking empire, instigated and financed a Judeo-Bolshevik revolution in Russia, 11 ^ 1 which wrecked and ruined a wonderful country and resulted in the deaths by murder and starvation, according to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, of 66 million innocent people.^
In Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution— author. Professor Antony Sutton, with the assistance of State Department documents and personal papers of American international bankers, details the "enthusiastic alliance of Wall Street and Marxist Socialism".^ Without the financial support of J P Morgan's Guaranty Trust Company, John D Rockefeller's Chase National Bank, Jacob's Schiff's Kuhn Loeb and Company and Olf


Aschberg of the Swedish Nya Banker^, the Judeo-Bolshevik revolution would not have succeeded. Of more particular interest in the financing of the revolution is the role which Maxim Litvinov (1876-1951),who was born Meyer-Genokh Mojsjewicz Wallach-Finkelstein, played as a "revolutionary" in destroying Imperial Russia and handing it over to the international bankers.

Interested users: @Uggo Mongo @LeFrenchCel @Koomersarj @WorthlessSlavicShit @PersonalityChad
We needed NatSoc worldwide
Tbh yeah, but with an emphasis on men taking back control also & some form of heavy investment in genetic research to try & improve the overall human condition
 
True. Rape should be legal
I support Government-ran looksmatching programs, based around using tech to allocate someones closest match not just on "looks" but also IQ, genetic disease history, etc.
 
I don't like Capitalism, but Communism is just as bad for a few reasons:
-Both undermine very valid constructs which are rooted in observable factors such as race, gender, and other established societal "values" which yes may have flaws but were conceived for valid reasons
-Both only value the "material" without realizing that it needs the "immaterial" to support if, if you understand what I mean by these hyperbole: If not, re-read above.
-Both seem to in a way, inhibit the human condition of creativity & wanting to innovate. Capitalism is very nepotistic, while Communism seems to stifle this through the hammered notion of "egalitarianism" which as stated, is in natural conflict with the human condition
-Both have ties to a certain group, one which is heavily involved in banking & helped finance both sides in history:







Interested users: @Uggo Mongo @LeFrenchCel @Koomersarj @WorthlessSlavicShit @PersonalityChad

Tbh yeah, but with an emphasis on men taking back control also & some form of heavy investment in genetic research to try & improve the overall human condition
1748638120031
 
I support Government-ran looksmatching programs, based around using tech to allocate someones closest match not just on "looks" but also IQ, genetic disease history, etc.
Thats nice but we'll never have that. I just hope one day i'll have the strengh to rape and kill a foid
 
rugged individualism for you
corporate welfare for them
 
-Both only value the "material" without realizing that it needs the "immaterial" to support if, if you understand what I mean by these hyperbole: If not, re-read above.
communism with incel characteristics is the way
 
rugged individualism for you
corporate welfare for them
yeah it's funny that richfags that advocate for free-market and individualism never apply it to themselves. it's a weaponized system meant to only apply to undesirable men
 
yeah it's funny that richfags that advocate for free-market and individualism never apply it to themselves. it's a weaponized system meant to only apply to undesirable men
those niggas always beg the feds for a bailout, "too big to fail"

but when you apply to any of these big companies, you have to compete with 200 people. JFL
 
Didn't understand what i meant award
I did. the immaterial = foid nature to reject subhuman men, lookism, and judaism that needs to be addressed. communism is so close to being based if they didn't hyperfixate on the economy
 
Communism with Ethono-racial nationalist characteristics
Eh, i'd say more socialism in the traditional sense in which we understand some are more suited for certain positions/roles makes sense, but ofc this would be meritocratic

For example, if you are objectively the best in Science, you deserve to be recognized & also should be the one to sort of "oversee" things & should be rewarded for it ofc. That's my issue with Communism, since it denies people who can objectively benefit their overall field through their talents. Everyone deserves to have good living standards ofc, but just thinking someone who is innovative & can help in lets say, medicine deserves to be seen on the same level as someone who is suited as just a manual worker is unfair imo.

Hence, why I say i'm "third position" or rather "Prussian Socialist"
Spengler claimed that socialistic Prussian characteristics existed across Germany that included creativity, discipline, concern for the greater good, productivity, and self-sacrifice.[3] He described socialism outside of a class conflict perspective and said "The meaning of socialism is that life is controlled not by the opposition between rich and poor, but by the rank that achievement and talent bestow. That is our freedom, freedom from the economic despotism of the individual."

I will say, foids need to work though, but it should be suited to their nature & also ofc be segregated from males & below us.

Only men deserve the fruits of a truly meritocratic, socialist system which rewards their actual talent.
communism is so close to being based if they didn't hyperfixate on the economy
Read what I wrote above

I do agree, the rich have too much power & individualism is bad, but overall I value a meritocratic system where those who actually shine in their fields are rewarded & recognized more, as well as hold a position to better it if they exhibit they are better than those in it. And yeah, imo they should get rewarded more & be of "higher status" in a way.

Another beef I have with communism, is how it disregards valid constructs such as race+ethnicity. It's one thing to say that one group shouldn't have power over the other, but to claim that race/ethnicity is "arbitrary" or "doesn't exist" when although a few "gray areas" might exist -such as if Jews are White or if skin-tone really is that much of a determinant(I mean some White people are basically "light brown" but you can tell them apart by facial features)- it is clear groups have always "defined" themselves for various reasons that have validity.

I do agree foids should work, but as I said, they should never be "equal" to a male & ofc have no role in governance or matters concerning collective societal wellbeing: We're doing this right now, and yeah it's working great!:feelsgah::feelsahh::feelsahh:(sarcasm)
 
Hence, why I say i'm "third position" or rather "Prussian Socialist"
What about English Socialism as envisioned in 1984. Peak system.
 
Capitalism is the best system we have.
 
I don't like Communism. We can have Capitalism while getting the kikes out.
Capitalism will always create kike-like groups, even if you eradicate the original kikes. Capitalism promotes kike-ish behavior and ways of thinking.
 
Capitalism will always create kike-like groups, even if you eradicate the original kikes. Capitalism promotes kike-ish behavior and ways of thinking.
How about incels become the ones who control the markets once we eradicate the kikes and we sexually trade foids?
 
How about incels become the ones who control the markets once we eradicate the kikes and we sexually trade foids?
A portion of them would become new kikes, reintroduce the same systems and laws that they fought against and the cycle would repeat.
 
sounds like our mods :feelsgah:
that is an anti-semetic conspiracy theory goyim, our moderation team is all pure aryan dedicated national socialists. trust and believe.
 
Anti-capitalist cope on .is?

I love fascism with all my heart, it's special for me, but I already KNOW that it will never happen again, so the next best thing is Capitalism.

Capitalism is much better than socialism, just look at Venezuela, and North Korea.
 
Any, and I mean any economic system (slavery, feudalism, communism, socialism...) is more free and meritocratic compared modern capitalism or any form of it for that matter. A Roman slave or a medieval serf had more social mobility compared to "citizens" of capitalist societies. Compared to any other system, capitalism also practices the highest form of constant gaslighting, always blaming you for everything (no different than BP denier blaming your personality, confidence, style...).

Any lies you might be told about it's "success" (oh bro China pulled people out of poverty bro!) crumble at the slightest touch. All the improvement in QoL we see is simply due to technological and societal advancement, not due to a "chosen" economic system.
In capitalism you can’t be a slave. If you work you become a King of the world

Socialism is the most evil ideology known to man. You can’t have rights or freedom with socialism.
 
In capitalism you can’t be a slave. If you work you become a King of the world
Only way to succeed under (((capitalism))) is for your surname to end with -stein or -berg.
Socialism is the most evil ideology known to man. You can’t have rights or freedom with socialism.
That is a good thing. (((freedoms))) and (((rights))) are the reason why we are in this predicament.
 
Capitalism is much better than socialism, just look at Venezuela, and North Korea.
NK is better to live in than the west. What's the "material plenty" when most can only look at it with collapsing communities, rampant hypergamy and degeneracy, mass incledom, companies investing in AI to replace workers or importing masses of slave labor from the 3D world to increase costs. It is objectively better to live in a commie block and be a bolt counter at the factory with no prospects of advancing, but to have wife and kids, a proper functioning community, no degeneracy etc.
 
Capitalism and communism are basically the same thing because both of them were made by jews and view material wealth as the ultimate source of happiness.
 
Only way to succeed under (((capitalism))) is for your surname to end with -stein or -berg.

That is a good thing. (((freedoms))) and (((rights))) are the reason why we are in this predicament.
No, we are in this predicament because of Socialism and Tyranny. Freedom and Capitalism are the solution. Under capitalism anyone can succeed as long as they get a job.
 
Did you like forgot to take your anti-psychotics or something?

The perfected goy. Scholmo might even give you extra bug rations.
You literally believe in Jewish World Domination conspiracy theories and you unironically ask me if I forgot to take anti-psychotics meds?

You're batshit crazy.
 
Any, and I mean any economic system (slavery, feudalism, communism, socialism...) is more free and meritocratic compared modern capitalism or any form of it for that matter. A Roman slave or a medieval serf had more social mobility compared to "citizens" of capitalist societies. Compared to any other system, capitalism also practices the highest form of constant gaslighting, always blaming you for everything (no different than BP denier blaming your personality, confidence, style...).

Any lies you might be told about it's "success" (oh bro China pulled people out of poverty bro!) crumble at the slightest touch. All the improvement in QoL we see is simply due to technological and societal advancement, not due to a "chosen" economic system.
Capitalism is different. The capitalism of 1949-1968 in the West was different than it is now. The problem is not with capitalism, but with its application. Capitalism is an elemental, like fire, you can use it correctly and it will benefit you - it can cook you food or warm you in the forest, and if it is not used correctly, it will burn down your house. Today's neoliberal libertarian capitalism is terrible, but capitalism before the 1970s in the West was fucking awesome, it was the peak of prosperity in the history of mankind.
 
Last edited:
You literally believe in Jewish World Domination conspiracy theories and you unironically ask me if I forgot to take anti-psychotics meds?
Ah, the most anti-Jewish system somehow.. supports Jews? While the most pro-Jewish system (capitalism) somehow opposes them?
 
Capitalism is different. The capitalism of 1949-1968 in the West was different than it is now. The problem is not with capitalism, but with its application. Capitalism is an elemental, like fire, you can use it correctly and it will benefit you - it can cook you food or warm you in the forest, and if it is not used correctly, it will burn down your house. Today's neoliberal libertarian capitalism is terrible, but capitalism before the 1970s in the West was fucking awesome, it was the peak of prosperity in the history of mankind.
Even if rested it to this supposedly good time (which it wasn't due to the economic system), it is bound to develope to what it is now. That is to be expected, when the system is not only based, but encourages the boundless greed of humanity, why would you be surprised it ended up like this?
 
maybe it's because English isn't my first language, but this word's sound has always been really weird to me
It's probably not of Germanic origin, likely Latin.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top