Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Communism is the most logical and rational thing we have, while capitalism is irrational and self-destructive.

PLS HALP ME

PLS HALP ME

๐•ฎ๐–๐–—๐–Ž๐–˜๐–™๐–•๐–Ž๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–‰
-
Joined
May 22, 2026
Posts
16,062
Online time
11d 7h
Humanity has reached a point in history where scarcity is no longer the main obstacle to social development. Thanks to the advancement of science, technology, and the productive capacity accumulated over centuries, today we are capable of producing enough food to feed the entire world population, manufacturing clothes for everyone, building housing on a large scale, and generating resources capable of meeting the basic needs of the whole society.Given this reality, a logical question arises. If we possess the material capacity to guarantee a dignified life for everyone, why do we still live alongside hunger, homelessness, and precarity in healthcare and education? The answer, from a communist perspective, lies in how production is organized within capitalism.In capitalism, production does not have the primary objective of satisfying human needs, but rather generating profit and accumulating capital. This means that society's productive resources, such as land, factories, machinery, and infrastructure, are used primarily to increase the wealth of those who control them. The result is an evident contradiction. While the capacity to produce abundance exists, millions of people remain deprived of access to the most basic goods.The very idea of turning land into a commodity is irrational. Land was not created by entrepreneurs or investors. It is a fundamental natural resource for the entire society. However, under capitalist logic, vast expanses of land can remain unproductive or be used solely for speculative purposes while there are people without housing, cities with insufficient infrastructure, and communities lacking hospitals, schools, and production centers.From a logical standpoint, it would be much more rational to use these resources according to collective needs. Land could be designated for building housing, hospitals, schools, universities, research centers, industries, and infrastructure projects capable of benefiting the entire population. Instead of serving the private accumulation of wealth, existing resources would be directed toward raising the quality of life for society as a whole.Communism is based on the idea that the economy must function in a planned manner, oriented toward the collective interest. If a society has the capacity to produce a certain good, this potential must be used to meet human needs, not to indefinitely increase the wealth of a minority. The wealth produced by the collective effort of workers must return to the collective in the form of better living conditions, universal access to essential services, and social development.From this perspective, communism is the most logical and rational system because it seeks to align economic production with the interests of the majority of the population. Instead of organizing society around competition for capital accumulation, it seeks to organize production around people's concrete needs. The goal is not just to produce more, but to ensure that what is produced benefits the entire society.
 
Communism has already been tried, and it failed.
 
Thoughts on incel communism?
 
Humanity has reached a point in history where scarcity is no longer the main obstacle to social development. Thanks to the advancement of science, technology, and the productive capacity accumulated over centuries, today we are capable of producing enough food to feed the entire world population, manufacturing clothes for everyone, building housing on a large scale, and generating resources capable of meeting the basic needs of the whole society.Given this reality, a logical question arises. If we possess the material capacity to guarantee a dignified life for everyone, why do we still live alongside hunger, homelessness, and precarity in healthcare and education? The answer, from a communist perspective, lies in how production is organized within capitalism.In capitalism, production does not have the primary objective of satisfying human needs, but rather generating profit and accumulating capital. This means that society's productive resources, such as land, factories, machinery, and infrastructure, are used primarily to increase the wealth of those who control them. The result is an evident contradiction. While the capacity to produce abundance exists, millions of people remain deprived of access to the most basic goods.The very idea of turning land into a commodity is irrational. Land was not created by entrepreneurs or investors. It is a fundamental natural resource for the entire society. However, under capitalist logic, vast expanses of land can remain unproductive or be used solely for speculative purposes while there are people without housing, cities with insufficient infrastructure, and communities lacking hospitals, schools, and production centers.From a logical standpoint, it would be much more rational to use these resources according to collective needs. Land could be designated for building housing, hospitals, schools, universities, research centers, industries, and infrastructure projects capable of benefiting the entire population. Instead of serving the private accumulation of wealth, existing resources would be directed toward raising the quality of life for society as a whole.Communism is based on the idea that the economy must function in a planned manner, oriented toward the collective interest. If a society has the capacity to produce a certain good, this potential must be used to meet human needs, not to indefinitely increase the wealth of a minority. The wealth produced by the collective effort of workers must return to the collective in the form of better living conditions, universal access to essential services, and social development.From this perspective, communism is the most logical and rational system because it seeks to align economic production with the interests of the majority of the population. Instead of organizing society around competition for capital accumulation, it seeks to organize production around people's concrete needs. The goal is not just to produce more, but to ensure that what is produced benefits the entire society.
Because communism can only coerce people through fear and violence. What did the Communists do when the peasants in the USSR did not want to sell their products at the prices set by the state? They simply sent Red army detachments to the villages to take away grain, meat, and milk with weapons, although such a policy led to the sabotage of people by the system, and Lenin and the Bolsheviks were forced to switch to NEP and a hybrid economy. The same thing happened in China when Deng Xiaoping told the Chinese: "Enrich yourselves!" As a result, China is now a superpower. Market socialism, the New Economic Policy, socialism with Chinese characteristics - the Chinese New Economic Policy, corporatism - all work. Pure communism is always a disaster.
 
arent u a christian or something? also these are bad arguments even from a marxist's perspective. the fundamental contradiction of capitalism is between the private ownership of means of production and socialization of production.
 
Yes, just a silly topic to see opinions.
arent u a christian or something? also these are bad arguments even from a marxist's perspective. the fundamental contradiction of capitalism is between the private ownership of means of production and socialization of production.
 
Communism has failed so far because it has been tried a few times over the last 100 and so years, there are flaws, that can be resolved by changing a few things, experimenting, etc.

Capitalism, or any other ideology based on inequality, has been tried since basically the start of humanity so it had time to be developed into the soulless and despicable system it is now.
 
Communism has already been tried, and it failed.
17157
 
Communism has failed so far because it has been tried a few times over the last 100 and so years, there are flaws, that can be resolved by changing a few things, experimenting, etc.

Capitalism, or any other ideology based on inequality, has been tried since basically the start of humanity so it had time to be developed into the soulless and despicable system it is now.
I don't know why Marxists always play a shell game where they blame the issues of existence on โ€œcapitalismโ€. I guess for an incel, they would be more prone to gnosticism and stuff alike but poverty, inequality, war etc were all things that existed everywhere, e.g., the Soviet Union, medieval China, Pharoanic Egypt..etc. it's just how life works in general
 
I detest communism; it's an ideology for mentally retarded people.
 
Communism is ok, just donโ€™t tryhard and go full revolutionary. Stick to like socialism or state capitalism instead
 
Communism is ok, just donโ€™t tryhard and go full revolutionary. Stick to like socialism or state capitalism instead
I actually don't like communism; it was just a silly question.
 
The problem is our world is not rational and will never will be. Trying to autistically change how the universe works to be orderly and predictable never ends well.
 
NEET reads communist manifesto, turns retarded. We have yet to achieve enough innovation in our society to meet everyone's needs, ever since the haber process transportation has been the issue. We did get planes and more efficient modes of transportation but those don't solve the issue
 
The problem is our world is not rational and will never will be. Trying to autistically change how the universe works to be orderly and predictable never ends well.
Humans are garbage, at fhe end of the day, whether under communism, national socialism or whatever.

I know for a fact that in Soviet Russia the big cities were just as corrupt as nowadays.
The same shenanigans were going on.

Have had relatives living there and they saw it with their own eyes.

Maybe such systems are good in their infancy, but eventually it all turns into shit because of richfags and normscum.
 
Thanks to the advancement of science, technology, and the productive capacity accumulated over centuries, today we are capable of producing enough food to feed the entire world population, manufacturing clothes for everyone, building housing on a large scale, and generating resources capable of meeting the basic needs of the whole society
No we can't, and we aren't even a type 1 civilization yet. The whole world operating under communism is completely impractical and stagnates society
 
No we can't, and we aren't even a type 1 civilization yet. The whole world operating under communism is completely impractical and stagnates society
Is the dollar low or high? Does your currency have value or not? My currency is just like Venezuela's.
 
Communism is shit. Every nation that was communist collapsed and the people fled to capitalist nations.
 
The real question is will I be able to pay for sex under this?
 
can someone give me an educated opinion on if I as an incel would be able to pay for sex (prostitution) under this?
 
can someone give me an educated opinion on if I as an incel would be able to pay for sex (prostitution) under this?
No, in the communist society. Prostitutes will be non-existent. As in communism, there is no money. Without money, you can't pay a prostitute.

"What about bartering for a prostitute?"

Bartering would occur in a communist society informally.

TLDR prostitutes wouldn't cost 10 euros and be very hard to find
 
No, in the communist society. Prostitutes will be non-existent. As in communism, there is no money. Without money, you can't pay a prostitute.

"What about bartering for a prostitute?"

Bartering would occur in a communist society informally.

TLDR prostitutes wouldn't cost 10 euros and be very hard to find
So you would be but with bartering?
 
No, in the communist society. Prostitutes will be non-existent. As in communism, there is no money. Without money, you can't pay a prostitute.

"What about bartering for a prostitute?"

Bartering would occur in a communist society informally.

TLDR prostitutes wouldn't cost 10 euros and be very hard to find
But saar prostitution existed even before capitalism
 
No, in the communist society. Prostitutes will be non-existent. As in communism, there is no money. Without money, you can't pay a prostitute.

"What about bartering for a prostitute?"

Bartering would occur in a communist society informally.

TLDR prostitutes wouldn't cost 10 euros and be very hard to find
saar listen to me, prostitution predates capitalism by thousands of years saar!
 
can someone give me an educated opinion on if I as an incel would be able to pay for sex (prostitution) under this?
We will make prostitution irrelevant thanks to our lobotomisation of foids to make them monogamous, not chad-only and loyal to you.

One people, one woman, for every man.
 
We will make prostitution irrelevant thanks to our lobotomisation of foids to make them monogamous, not chad-only and loyal to you.

One people, one woman, for every man.
We need socialism, pan-European nationalism, anti-feminism.

Europe needs to become one single patriarchal country.
 
We need socialism, pan-European nationalism, anti-feminism.

Europe needs to become one single patriarchal country.
Not pan-european nationalism
 
So you would be but with bartering?
Yes, you wouldn't be able to pay for it so you trade instead at a higher cost(like 10 sacks of rice for 10mins)
 
Yes, you wouldn't be able to pay for it so you trade instead at a higher cost(like 10 sacks of rice for 10mins)
Thank you for letting me know saar!
 
Humanity has reached a point in history where scarcity is no longer the main obstacle to social development. Thanks to the advancement of science, technology, and the productive capacity accumulated over centuries, today we are capable of producing enough food to feed the entire world population, manufacturing clothes for everyone, building housing on a large scale, and generating resources capable of meeting the basic needs of the whole society.Given this reality, a logical question arises. If we possess the material capacity to guarantee a dignified life for everyone, why do we still live alongside hunger, homelessness, and precarity in healthcare and education? The answer, from a communist perspective, lies in how production is organized within capitalism.In capitalism, production does not have the primary objective of satisfying human needs, but rather generating profit and accumulating capital. This means that society's productive resources, such as land, factories, machinery, and infrastructure, are used primarily to increase the wealth of those who control them. The result is an evident contradiction. While the capacity to produce abundance exists, millions of people remain deprived of access to the most basic goods.The very idea of turning land into a commodity is irrational. Land was not created by entrepreneurs or investors. It is a fundamental natural resource for the entire society. However, under capitalist logic, vast expanses of land can remain unproductive or be used solely for speculative purposes while there are people without housing, cities with insufficient infrastructure, and communities lacking hospitals, schools, and production centers.From a logical standpoint, it would be much more rational to use these resources according to collective needs. Land could be designated for building housing, hospitals, schools, universities, research centers, industries, and infrastructure projects capable of benefiting the entire population. Instead of serving the private accumulation of wealth, existing resources would be directed toward raising the quality of life for society as a whole.Communism is based on the idea that the economy must function in a planned manner, oriented toward the collective interest. If a society has the capacity to produce a certain good, this potential must be used to meet human needs, not to indefinitely increase the wealth of a minority. The wealth produced by the collective effort of workers must return to the collective in the form of better living conditions, universal access to essential services, and social development.From this perspective, communism is the most logical and rational system because it seeks to align economic production with the interests of the majority of the population. Instead of organizing society around competition for capital accumulation, it seeks to organize production around people's concrete needs. The goal is not just to produce more, but to ensure that what is produced benefits the entire society.
Based. Communism is good but i hate modern woke communism
 
Honestly, it was a stupid topic; I just had questions and wanted to hear your answers. My country is capitalistโ€”communism never worked; it looks good on paper, but in practice, itโ€™s completely different.
Based. Communism is good but i hate modern woke communism
 
Mixed economy is the ideal balance, but corporate management literally can't see beyond their financial reports. American capitalism was at risk of collapse in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Progressives stopped the collapse by giving the people basic rights and a better standard of living, saving capitalism. But now, the rich are out of control. Capitalism could fail.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top