Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious If you believe inceldom or progressivism has accelerated the past 100 years, you agree then that it is the result of nonwhite people.

DarkStar

DarkStar

fuck it we ball
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
29,980
Online time
1m 37s
It is true that the progressive world order, that which is the cause of inceldom and many other problems, has accelerated the past hundred or so years. It is no coincidence that this pairs perfectly with the collapse of Eurocentric standards, the european population globally and decolonization. Even liberals say so, as they believe that white people are responsible for the patriarchies and global conservative order. Before the Europeans took to the oceans the world was a matriarchy, many in Africa, Asia, and even the middle east where women were granted financial independence and the ability to be scholars, among many other things (Which is why women in the middle east were so vital to anti colonial/imperialist activity).


View: https://medium.com/@MthiyaneShandu/a-stolen-legacy-the-matrilineality-of-pre-colonial-african-society-5307b8db3e5a


The decline of the European order for the Jewish and nonwhite one has taken place the past 100 years, and the past 100 years have been rocked by nothing but progressive nonsense. Had it not been for the afro-semites and their melanin demons we would not be in this situation. We would have already seen a reactionary movement similar to those in 1936, 1865 and 1922. Speaking of which, such waves of revaunchism and reactionary ideals never happened outside of Europe. I never saw a black hitler, an arab hitler or an indian one. It was a white one, and every single major reactionary was white and will always be white, as nonwhites have, as history shows, been complicit in incel societies even before the jews gave them political power.


One look at modern demographics of voting show this as well, for those that think history is just in the past, and things have changed now. The majority of incel-inducing policies (womens rights, feminism, lgbtq activism and social justice) come from progressive, or liberal parties. Universally these parties are supported not by the native population, but by the nonwhite immigrants sponsored by the jewish overlords of the party.


it is these nonwhite peoples, tool of their semitic overlords, that have and will continue to push the envelope into a completely destroyed society. Wether it be the Syrians in Germany, France, and Denmark supporting new women and trans rights, or mexicans and blacks in the United States supporting Joe Biden. It is a universal law, accepted by all including the liberals themselves, that the white man is the rock holding conservatism. The media and academics hate white males for a reason, it is because we are the keepers of patriarchy, conservatism and life in the west.


Whens the last time youve seen SJW's bitch about "Straight arab men" or "Straight black men". You never have. They bitch about "straight white men". and it is for good reason. We are their antithesis, not refugees voting for their parties, but us voting for our own parties. And that is why the SJW overlord, the semites, want to bring these people in so bad. They do not want another 1936, 1865 or 1922. So, to stop the new wave of reactionary revolutionary sentiment that would free all of us from our chains, they import nonwhite peoples. To disrupt homogeny and to serve as mercenaries for the jewish world order.

:feelsLSD: To SJW's; you are right. White men are the rock holding the progressive tides. We did establish worldwide patriarchy. And we will do it again. From the Indo Aryans stopping womens rights in India 9,000 years ago to us stopping Egyptian women's financial independence 160 years ago.
 
If only the cucked european men that allowed this to happen would stop drinking the kool-aid
 
High IQ. Bookmarked.
 
Sadly the war was lost even before any of us were born. We have no chance of reversing it.
You lose willy wonka GIF
 
nonwhite peoples, tool of their semitic overlords
Europeans have been ZOGbots for about 2000 years, spreading jewish tyranny through christianity. We are not so much better.
 
tagging anti-west copers

@The Notorious SLAV @PersonalityChad @Hoor Al-Ayn @AtrociousCitizen @wereq
 
Before the Europeans took to the oceans the world was a matriarchy, many in Africa, Asia, and even the middle east where women were granted financial independence and the ability to be scholars, among many other things (Which is why women in the middle east were so vital to anti colonial/imperialist activity).
Sub-Saharan Africa was matriarchal, but weren't Asia, MENA and curryland patriarchal? Modern jews are matriarchal and feminine, but not sure about ancient jews. Those people don't even properly exist anymore.

Asia, MENA and curryland didn't have hunter gatherer lifestyle and transitioned to agriculture faster, restricting women's rights earlier, and instituting arranged marriages which were not based on sexual competition but rather status obtained from wealth hoarding. This was the birth of the patriarchy which amplified inceldom. Its reason why Asia, MENA and curryland produces subhumanity and inceldom unlike in Northern colder parts of the world which were more egalitarian and changed to a patriarchal order only with the spread of Christianity which advocates for a more subhuman, domesticated, feminine way of living. What we are seeing now in the West is an embracing of r-selective behaviors from Africans and therefore a reawakening of the ancient prehistoric paganism by which European hunter gatherers lived. Unfortunately, such an r-selective shift towards Darwinian sexual competition renders large section of the population which lived by higher order piety, rationality, and intelligence (basis for successful civilization) worthless and consigns them to inceldom and oblivion.

and every single major reactionary was white and will always be white, as nonwhites have, as history shows, been complicit in incel societies even before the jews gave them political power.
Because like I mentioend above, non-Whites never hunted, never developed intelligence needed to succeed in risky ventures (like megafauna hunting), and never ate well, so they don't have that kind of promethean physiology needed to rebel against oppressive and degrading orders. Well, we did communist revolutions in China so that could be an exceptions. In general, pretty much all rebellions are carried out by those who have mogger physiology and ethnics in general don't have this. We are low T bugs.
Universally these parties are supported not by the native population, but by the nonwhite immigrants sponsored by the jewish overlords of the party.
Its kind of a weird scenario because on one hand, non-Whites have the most to lose from inceldom (since all of them except for Blacks are least biologically equipped for sexual competition due to lack of hunting pedigree) but they still vote for progressive misandrist policies which exacerbate inceldom because these policies also promise to uphold the bug life (government takes care of them through welfare spending, promises subhumans rights and privileges through preaching of slave morality, etc).
 
Last edited:
Before the Europeans took to the oceans the world was a matriarchy, many in Africa, Asia, and even the middle east where women were granted financial independence and the ability to be scholars, among many other things (Which is why women in the middle east were so vital to anti colonial/imperialist activity).
Sub-Saharan Africa was matriarchal
Insofar as the terms matriarchy and patriarchy mean anything at all (I'll have a vent-ish thread on this soon), no, not really. Political and military leadership basically everywhere in the world was and is held mostly by men, as men gravitate towards high-powered positions to gain access to women. The "matriarchal" hunter-gatherers/non-state societies are a myth.

On her book Kinship and Gender (2010), anthropologist Linda Stone writes that, "Today anthropologists generally agree that cases of true matriarchy do not exist in human society, and that they most probably never have." In the most matriarchal societies like the Amis and Puyuma, women have been very active in the market and the internal workings of clans, but men were trained as warriors and looked after military and diplomatic affairs (Lin & Chang, 2017). It is a myth that hunter-gatherers were gender-egalitarian. Out of a sample of 33 forager and hunter-gatherer societies, only 6 regarded the possibility of female leaders as a possibility (Karnofsky, 2021).



This follows nicely from what I've mentioned above. The fact that the only citations there are just mentions of books from some SJW Afrocentric writers probably high on "muh black girl magic" narratives alone speaks a lot as to its objectivity and probably usefulness.

Yeah, there were female rulers in Africa. Same in Europe, and probably even more so.

Yeah, some African societies had gender-equal inheritance. So did the Roman Empire by default in cases without a will, large parts of Europe for most of the Middle Ages, and large parts of Eastern Europe in the Early Modern period after the rest of Europe made a turn towards a more male-oriented inheritance system, with daughters instead receiving inflated dowries.


Yet, none of those societies are called anything except extremely patriarchal despite all of that, because that designation really means nothing at all (again, vent-ish thread likely coming soon.)

Whens the last time youve seen SJW's bitch about "Straight arab men" or "Straight black men". You never have.
AFAIK, the feminists and SJW in those countries do seem to shit on their local men, at least in addition to shitting on us. They might believe in the "global white supremacy" bullshit stuff:rolleyes:, but there's no getting around that a lot of them have never even seen a white man IRL, so their ability to shit on us for being racist oppressive hegemons or whatever, is rather limited.
 
Because like I mentioend above, non-Whites never hunted, never developed intelligence needed to succeed in risky ventures (like megafauna hunting), and never ate well, so they don't have that kind of promethean physiology needed to rebel against oppressive and degrading orders. Well, we did communist revolutions in China so that could be an exceptions. In general, pretty much all rebellions are carried out by those who have mogger physiology and ethnics in general don't have this. We are low T bugs.
.
??? Subsahrans definitely hunted and they are also the highest T out of any race. Although they are too stupid to carry out any meaningful rebellion
 
??? Subsahrans definitely hunted and they are also the highest T out of any race. Although they are too stupid to carry out any meaningful rebellion
Yes and that hunting made them more r-selective, gender egalitarian or matriarchal. Whites embracing this kind nigger behavior due to jewism or whatever have effectively undone and reversed their patriarchal inheritance which was instilled in them through Christianity. Now, Christianity is also fundamentally feminine and jewish in nature, but because it was born in the middle east, a land of scarcity, it preaches patriarchy through strong conservative familial ties and restricts women's rights because women's mating instincts are naturally chaotic.

I guess there are two kinds of feminine:

master morality feminine - upheld by hunter gatherer peoples (Whites and Blacks) which are built on sexual competition, darwinism through women's gate keeping of sex and reproduction. Here women are more masculine and assertive with their reproductive rights and hegemony.

slave morality feminine - upheld by sedentary agrarian peoples (middle easterners, curries, rice) which are patriarchal but built on low T activities which evoke a kind of femininity (like how weak and docile curries are). Here women are naturally more subservient but so are the men because they didn't engage in any sexual competition through fighting, hunting, etc.
 
Africa, Asia, and even the middle east where women were granted financial independence
Women in Europe also had financial independence for most of history by any reasonable metric.
 
Insofar as the terms matriarchy and patriarchy mean anything at all (I'll have a vent-ish thread on this soon), no, not really. Political and military leadership basically everywhere in the world was and is held mostly by men, as men gravitate towards high-powered positions to gain access to women. The "matriarchal" hunter-gatherers/non-state societies are a myth.





This follows nicely from what I've mentioned above. The fact that the only citations there are just mentions of books from some SJW Afrocentric writers probably high on "muh black girl magic" narratives alone speaks a lot as to its objectivity and probably usefulness.

Yeah, there were female rulers in Africa. Same in Europe, and probably even more so.

Yeah, some African societies had gender-equal inheritance. So did the Roman Empire by default in cases without a will, large parts of Europe for most of the Middle Ages, and large parts of Eastern Europe in the Early Modern period after the rest of Europe made a turn towards a more male-oriented inheritance system, with daughters instead receiving inflated dowries.


Yet, none of those societies are called anything except extremely patriarchal despite all of that, because that designation really means nothing at all (again, vent-ish thread likely coming soon.)


AFAIK, the feminists and SJW in those countries do seem to shit on their local men, at least in addition to shitting on us. They might believe in the "global white supremacy" bullshit stuff:rolleyes:, but there's no getting around that a lot of them have never even seen a white man IRL, so their ability to shit on us for being racist oppressive hegemons or whatever, is rather limited.
No offense but you shit on Europe too much and blame “muh West” too much while excusing and sometimes even praising turdies too much

Point is blaming “muh west” for so
many issues is like blaming Jews for every single thing
 
Because like I mentioend above, non-Whites never hunted
??? Subsahrans definitely hunted and they are also the highest T out of any race. Although they are too stupid to carry out any meaningful rebellion
I should've excluded Blacks in my statement tbh.
 
Women in Europe also had financial independence for most of history by any reasonable metric.
Point is i’m tired of people on here, yourself a bit even pal, shitting all over the West, which is why EE and every other place are developing due to Western innovation and acting like their own places were great

In fact i’d say they were more matriarchal than Europe was, such as Africa

I will show some stuff I found later im about to work
 
Point is i’m tired of people on here, yourself a bit even pal, shitting all over the West, which is why EE and every other place are developing due to Western innovation and acting like their own places were great
Well, we all have different kinds of problems so we shouldn't criticize each other too much tbh ngl, but then again, this is .is and here we are all no-holds-barred with our opinions. We are inflammatory and don't hold back even with our friends. :feelsYall::feelsYall: In fact, this place was much more inflammatory back then around 2018. I think @Ryo_Hazuki will remember since he was mod back then. Conversations now are way more respectful and empathic. :feelsokman::feelsokman:
 
It's true that the White man still runs the world and every culture present and future will bend to White order.

White men are the solution to the woman question, shitskin races don't have much of a role to play besides getting out of the way and maybe posting online. So it's important to know that the future is White and any revolution starts with the White man leading the way.
 
Well, we all have different kinds of problems so we shouldn't criticize each other too much tbh ngl, but then again, this is .is and here we are all no-holds-barred with our opinions. We are inflammatory and don't hold back even with our friends. :feelsYall::feelsYall: In fact, this place was much more inflammatory back then around 2018. I think @Ryo_Hazuki will remember since he was mod back then. Conversations now are way more respectful and empathic. :feelsokman::feelsokman:
Well i for one am sick of this trash heap of a website and honestly wish i’d never joined it just used less, but then again that all ties back to my obsessive escapism from reality, ADD, Autism and what else

I tried sharing my issues and no one gave a shit it feels like
 
It's true that the White man still runs the world and every culture present and future will bend to White order.

White men are the solution to the woman question, shitskin races don't have much of a role to play besides getting out of the way and maybe posting online. So it's important to know that the future is White and any revolution starts with the White man leading the way.
@The Notorious SLAV why can’t you be more like this?
 
Well i for one am sick of this trash heap of a website and honestly wish i’d never joined it just used less, but then again that all ties back to my obsessive escapism from reality, ADD, Autism and what else
You hate this place but have no where else to go though. We are your last refuge because despite (or rather because of) our inflammatory, uncaring, and evil nature we understand you better than any normoid devoid of self-awareness and intelligence. so you better accept our fucked up way of socializing and community engagement. :feelsdevil:
 
You hate this place but have no where else to go though. We are your last refuge because despite (or rather because of) our inflammatory, uncaring, and evil nature we understand you better than any normoid devoid of self-awareness and intelligence. so you better accept our fucked up way of socializing and community engagement. :feelsdevil:
Dude i’m not trying to argue on this and i assume you’re just half joking but come on now, normies behave the same way in this regard
 
No offense but you shit on Europe too much and blame “muh West” too much while excusing and sometimes even praising turdies too much

Point is blaming “muh west” for so
many issues is like blaming Jews for every single thing
That was a "denying foids' supposed oppression "post, not an anti-West one (which I barely indulge in, anyway). But fair enough, I guess I unintentionally sometimes sound more anti-West than I would like to.

Point is i’m tired of people on here, yourself a bit even pal, shitting all over the West, which is why EE and every other place are developing due to Western innovation and acting like their own places were great
The only place I've been consistently shitting on here is Russia ngl.

I will show some stuff I found later im about to work
OK:feelsokman:.

@The Notorious SLAV why can’t you be more like this?
I'm way too passive and numbers-obsessed:feelsbadman:.
 
It's true that the White man still runs the world and every culture present and future will bend to White order.
Whites are the key to uplifting the human condition because of their nature of engaging with the physical world and overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds, but I'm not sure Whites can solve the women question because Whites have been egalitarian than ethnics.
future is White and any revolution starts with the White man leading the way.
Ironic that Whites kill themselves the most when they chimp out and revolt against the world order. Two World Wars killed 70 to 100 million prime age men. And tens of millions killed from abortions and contraceptives. Whites should do the bug work of quietly breeding lots of children for a few decades while keeping deportations high and ensuring their borders remain closed. That will solve a lot of their problems.
 
Dude i’m not trying to argue on this and i assume you’re just half joking but come on now, normies behave the same way in this regard
Normies are less aware of everything than us. We mog normies in awareness because of our suffering.
 
@The Notorious SLAV why can’t you be more like this?
Bruh! This is just partisanship, not critical thinking. @Maikowski is a hyper-partisan stereotype, not a critical thinker. Why are you asking him to be like that? :feelsseriously:
 
dnr but I already know the title is a huge leap no matter what. appreciate the high effort though
 
Yeah exactly the response i expected
I skimmed through it. you're just wrong and it's the other way around. nonwhites are more conservative on average compared to whites. infact thats the reason behind alot of the anti-immigration sentiment in western europe
 
Not to be that guy, but you're making the mistake of conflating correlation with causation. Blaming nonwhite people for social decay ignores the fact that these ideas originated in Europe itself and were primarily European inventions, and that the reason they emerged is multifactorial.

Before the Europeans took to the oceans the world was a matriarchy, many in Africa, Asia, and even the middle east where women were granted financial independence and the ability to be scholars, among many other things (Which is why women in the middle east were so vital to anti colonial/imperialist activity).
The societies you are referring to are outliers, an exception to the norm; virtually every civilizations throughout history—in and outside of Europe—were patriarchal in their policies, values, and leadership. Even the civilizations mentioned here were matrilineial at best, yet they were still fundamentally patriarchal. Furthermore, it really isn't difficult to cherry-pick counterexamples from European civilizations, as there were multiple societies there that granted women some rights, financial mobility, and freedom. It should also be noted that some of the oldest European civilizations were, in fact, relatively egalitarian, particularly before the spread of Christianity which solidified patriarchal values and ideas.

Also, I would not consider myself anti-west.
 
Here we go with the race autistry again
 
I skimmed through it. you're just wrong and it's the other way around. nonwhites are more conservative on average compared to whites. infact thats the reason behind alot of the anti-immigration sentiment in western europe
Not all non-Whites are conservative. Blacks are not conservative. This was to do with r-selection vs k-selection. Ethnics like curries, Sands, Rice are conservative due to k-selection. Whites and Blacks are less conservative due to r-selection, Whites being more conservative than Blacks, but still much less than ethnics.
infact thats the reason behind alot of the anti-immigration sentiment in western europe
Yeah, Whites want mogger sexual risk-takers and innovators not risk averse subhuman conservatives who live in perpetual fear like bugs. They are not wrong to want this.
 
Not to be that guy, but you're making the mistake of conflating correlation with causation. Blaming nonwhite people for social decay ignores the fact that these ideas originated in Europe itself and were primarily European inventions, and that the reason they emerged is multifactorial.


The societies you are referring to are outliers, an exception to the norm; virtually every civilizations throughout history—in and outside of Europe—were patriarchal in their policies, values, and leadership. Even the civilizations mentioned here were matrilineial at best, yet they were still fundamentally patriarchal. Furthermore, it really isn't difficult to cherry-pick counterexamples from European civilizations, as there were multiple societies there that granted women some rights, financial mobility, and freedom. It should also be noted that some of the oldest European civilizations were, in fact, relatively egalitarian, particularly before the spread of Christianity which solidified patriarchal values and ideas.

Also, I would not consider myself anti-west.
once conservative white nats realize that their conservative views are viewed as backwards by the majority of their racial peers, they rightfully leave white nationalism and turn to inceldom
 
Not to be that guy, but you're making the mistake of conflating correlation with causation. Blaming nonwhite people for social decay ignores the fact that these ideas originated in Europe itself and were primarily European inventions, and that the reason they emerged is multifactorial.
Not true. Inceldom originated in regions of the third world that are prone to scarcity, and the middle east was such a place. Christianity which preaches incel style of living spread throughout Pagan barbarian Europe and domesticated the mogger Chad barbarians, thereby setting in a new class of Whites who are more prone to inceldom.
 
once conservative white nats realize that their conservative views are viewed as backwards by the majority of their racial peers, they rightfully leave white nationalism and turn to inceldom
Most Whites don't want to be conservative. That's the truth. And tbh, I don't blame them. Conservatism is a recipe for fearful asexual living and is therefore naturally unattractive.
 
The societies you are referring to are outliers, an exception to the norm; virtually every civilizations throughout history—in and outside of Europe—were patriarchal in their policies, values, and leadership. Even the civilizations mentioned here were matrilineial at best, yet they were still fundamentally patriarchal. Furthermore, it really isn't difficult to cherry-pick counterexamples from European civilizations, as there were multiple societies there that granted women some rights, financial mobility, and freedom. It should also be noted that some of the oldest European civilizations were, in fact, relatively egalitarian, particularly before the spread of Christianity which solidified patriarchal values and ideas.

Also, I would not consider myself anti-west.
The more subhuman a class of people are, the more patriarchal, conservative, and risk averse they are because they know their weak biology can't withstand risk taking without population collapse.
 
Not all non-Whites are conservative. Blacks are not conservative. This was to do with r-selection vs k-selection. Ethnics like curries, Sands, Rice are conservative due to k-selection. Whites and Blacks are less conservative due to r-selection, Whites being more conservative than Blacks, but still much less than ethnics.
no, blacks being progessive is really only a recent phenomenon since they're forced to align with leftism and therefore have to ally with their other retarded idpol causes. blacks used to be as patriarchial and conservative as any other nonwhite group
Yeah, Whites want mogger sexual risk-takers and innovators not risk averse subhuman conservatives who live in perpetual fear like bugs. They are not wrong to want this.
white men hate nonwhite men because nonwhite men go against their rainbow capitalist status quo. they say it all the time and it's not any deeper than that
 
blacks used to be as patriarchial and conservative as any other nonwhite group
Bullshit. Blacks were only patriarchal and conservative when they were seriously oppressed under Jim Crow.
 
white men hate nonwhite men because nonwhite men go against their rainbow capitalist status quo. they say it all the time and it's not any deeper than that
Its not wrong for Whites to hate risk averse, asexual, third world, bug lifestyle of fearful conservatism. Whites want more. Whites are strivers.
 
Most Whites don't want to be conservative. That's the truth. And tbh, I don't blame them. Conservatism is a recipe for fearful asexual living and is therefore naturally unattractive.
conservatism sucks but the way you say it makes it sound like you prefer libtards more. I hope that's not what you're implying
 
conservatism sucks but the way you say it makes it sound like you prefer libtards more. I hope that's not what you're implying
I don't want to be a libtard because that ideology is characterized by behavioral sink and out-right delusion.
 
Its not wrong for Whites to hate risk averse, asexual, third world, bug lifestyle of fearful conservatism. Whites want more. Whites are strivers.
by worshipping white men you're worshipping redditors in proxy. I hope you're smart enough to realize that
 
I don't want to be a libtard because that ideology is characterized by behavioral sink and out-right delusion.
well that's what a majority of the white men you worship so much believe in
 
by worshipping white men you're worshipping redditors in proxy. I hope you're smart enough to realize that
I don't worship soy redditors. I appreciate the genetics of barbarian moggers.
 
well that's what a majority of the white men you worship so much believe in
Not all Whites are soy. Only some 30% are. Many are normal and want to strive for more.
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
10
Views
539
RealSchizo
RealSchizo
TheScientist445446
Replies
3
Views
217
PhineasSpear
PhineasSpear
Claudius the God
Replies
7
Views
733
Rick prime
Rick prime
L
Replies
24
Views
2K
UndeadDeadMan
UndeadDeadMan

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →