That doesn't mean normie Whites are soy like Vaush and Destiny.
Serious If you believe inceldom or progressivism has accelerated the past 100 years, you agree then that it is the result of nonwhite people.
That doesn't mean normie Whites are soy like Vaush and Destiny.
Not necessarily. One could just as easilt argue that strong civilizations with high-risk tolerance and intelligence tend to be patriarchal because they reward male competence, not because they’re subhuman. Look at Japan or Europe — they were highly patriarchal, but also technologically advanced and risk-taking in warfare and exploration.
Europeans aren't superior because of patriarchy and religion bro, they are superior because of their hunter-gatherer genetics. High risk tolerance and intelligence are at opposite poles of the spectrum. Intelligence is an adaptation of subhumans in any population in order to optimize their decision making rather than do things with brute force to mitigate the risks of subhumanity. Patriarchy just made them a bit more domesticated and allowed their intelligence to flourish, but their overall superiority is due to evolutionary ancestry not religion.
In regards to Japan, they are quite subhuman, meek and risk averse. East Asians are known for their wageslaving bug life.
Last edited:
Domesticating said moggers was the correct path towards a civilized, monogamous, and competent society, one that can flourish and develop. There is a reason monogamy is generally beneficial for humanity, for it eradicates dissent, and increases the variability in the gene pool — often leading to the increase in IQ and other beneficial traits.
Ok but now you're more prone to subhumanity and inceldom. Your mating strategy isn't optimized for performance.
There's a good argument to be made on your behalf here. Monogamy prevents gene hoarding, harem formation, and elite overproduction, all of which are destabilizing forces in society (its what we are witnessing now). Still, I rather be a mogger than a subhuman.
Intelligence and risk-taking are not mutually exclusive; that seems like an untenable idea to hold. There are many societies that combined both, and innovation often arises because of calculated risk. Also, Japan has been one of the most technologically advanced and economically dynamic societies in history, so I don't think it's accurate to call them subhumans, especially in imperialist japan, and even further back in history. Japan is also just one out of many examples.
I won't deny the genetic factor though, but I doubt it's as crucial as you are making it out to be.
Its not mutually exclusive now, but at one point in nature from an evolutionary point of view, it was. Intelligence and awareness are adaptations meant to optimize decision making and avoid brute force because the path of force and violence is too fatal for subhumans. Moggers don't need intelligence; they just brute force their way to success. Its why intelligence is inversely correlated with reproductive success.
They are also the biggest rotters. They are dysgenic, if that's not the case, then why are they breeding less and less to point where their population is old now?
How is adapting intelligence for cold weather avoiding brute force?
By your logic blacks are the master race and whites are subhumans since on a physiological level, they are inferior to blacks
I suppose it depends on the type of performance you are seeking.
That's definitely true on the superficial level, especially regarding female sexuality which is, as far as I am concerned, highly animalistic and irrational — but brute force only takes you so far. Besides, I don't think a barbaric way of living would solve the root of inceldom.
Every advanced industrial society faces similar demographic decline, including European ones. This is the outcome of a neutered population of men, urbanization, high cost of living, long work hours, education, and the current gender dynamics.
I think White hunter-gatherers needed more intelligence and awareness of their surrounding to plan and coordinate their hunts compared to Blacks in the savanna where it was easy to move about. That's why Whites are intelligence and physically superior while Blacks are just physically superior especially when it comes to running because their open environment allowed them a kind of mobility that prehistoric Whites didn't get the luxury of in their cold environments.
Well, in barbaric world, incels would just be culled off in their rite of passage.
This is why I'm against advanced civilizations as they currently stand. Its degrading to exist in such an artificial environment.
It's not advanced civilizations. It's femtards. You would kill yourself out of boredom if you went to back to the pre-internet era.
Because I lack the physiological adaptations needed to succeed in nature. I rather have those adaptations than live in stagnation tbh.
You're wasting your time arguing with him. He is like those anti-religious and anti-natalist fucks. He argues from the comfort of modernity against the very thing that provided the basis for the modern comfort.
No really. Your brain chemistry would just adapt. Zoomer these days need constant stimulation from using screens all day.
What makes you think the incels of the past lacked in that department? When you talk about physiology, hunter-gathering, and adaptation you're just imagining a specific scenario from the past in your head which is akin to pitting a heavyweight fighter against a lightweight inside an octagon. That's your basis for incels being inferior.
In a free-for-all environment, human intelligence trumps human physiological advantage every day.
Yes anti-religion and anti-natalism is where the blackpill ultimately takes you if you're subhuman like me. I live in both comfort and pain at the same time. I have civilizational comfort but also the agony of failed biology.
THen why are intelligent people losing out on reproductive success? Intelligence beyond a certain point is dysgenic because it breeds risk-aversion through optimization trap. Intelligent and intellectual people will do everything except build and maintain the power of their bodies.
I think Covid comprehensively showed that wouldn't be the case.
They are not imagined scenarios. Those people lasted day after day in tough conditions. We can see this in wild animals and stray dogs as well; they are biologically resilient and resistant to illness. They maintain a certain level of strength and adaptability unlike civilizationcels. They have less intelligence and awareness than us, but I think that ultimately helps them because they are less aware of how shitty everything is. They have peace of mind from being at harmony with nature unlike us.
Yes you're a cuck. I already knew.Sometimes I love it! Actually I love it most of the time. I love race-baiting.
What do you mean? If a person was born in the pre-internet era they wouldn't of had the dopamine access, they do now. Their brain would be more satisfied with less.
Are you a Goatis viewer?
Because men completely gave away their control over reproduction to foids.
Dunno who that is. Just looked him up on YouTube. Might start watching him.
Ok fair, but even in more patriarchal times, intellectual people weren't as inclined to reproduce. History shows this.
I just want to know for clarity.
Would you want to be as yourself now, or a mogger hunter gatherer back then?
Except I have seeing malnourished and homeless curries living well into their 50s since childhood. How many years do these animals live in comparison?
Mogger barbarian hunter gatherer! Absolutely! Life fast, breed faster, die young and quickly!
Understand your decision but I am unsure if I would pick the same.Mogger barbarian hunter gatherer! Absolutely! Life fast, breed faster, die young and quickly!
I meant during Covid these normies, who were socially so successful, were finding it incredibly difficult to adapt to their new, albeit temporary, reality.
If internet disappeared tomorrow for a year, forget adaptation, there'd be chaos in streets.
I agree
U
enlighten me?
1. Human naure.
2. Domestication (changes the bones; makes them more subhuman).
3. Behavioral sink
4. Globalization and mass immigration.
5. Consumerism and excessive capitalism.
I mean not entirely true. White countries tend to be more progressive than ethnic countries by miles, at least definitely by todays standards. Most ethnics tend to be socially conservative even if they vote for more progressive parties in the west. Even if you think about stereotypes, this is true. You really think inner city black gangs, Mexican cartels, and Islamic extremists are 100% supportive of homosexuality and women's rights? Obviously not.
The reason liberals don't talk about "straight Arab men" or "straight black men" is because liberals are pussies and don't want to be called racist. That's it. Liberals will still technically talk about Arab and black men, but they'll include them when talking about "men" in general. They either talk about white men, or all men since specifying "Arab" or "black" would get them labeled as racist.
Also I don't know if you remember but for a while conservatives were complaining about muslim men immigrating to the west because they would inevitably bring "Sharia Law" with them. Muslims who actually believe in Sharia Law are by no definition progressive.
If you think about the views of certain ethnic populations, especially on a world wide scale, the average non white is much more right leaning than the average white
The reason liberals don't talk about "straight Arab men" or "straight black men" is because liberals are pussies and don't want to be called racist. That's it. Liberals will still technically talk about Arab and black men, but they'll include them when talking about "men" in general. They either talk about white men, or all men since specifying "Arab" or "black" would get them labeled as racist.
Also I don't know if you remember but for a while conservatives were complaining about muslim men immigrating to the west because they would inevitably bring "Sharia Law" with them. Muslims who actually believe in Sharia Law are by no definition progressive.
If you think about the views of certain ethnic populations, especially on a world wide scale, the average non white is much more right leaning than the average white
Last edited:
This is so true.
In Western Europe, much of the anti immigrant sentiment is because “third world immigrants don’t share western values like gay marriage, women’s liberation and atheism”. This is why so many of our far right activists are gay or women.
In the UK, polls consistently show white men in gen z and millennial generations are far more progressive than minorities- in fact white British men are more progressive and woke than Korean women.
And yet all these autistic white nationalists on here support the very people who would throw them into prison for their thoughts given half a chance.
Yep and yet retards still believe white people are some ultra conservative based race. Your average white, at least in Western Europe, is basically a redditor.
With that being said, OP is a pajeet and I think ALOT of internet white nationalists are actually self hating minorities. Let’s not forget the university student who got beaten up by woke white broccoli hairs for doing a nazi salute at his school was literally Jewish. And the Reddit account “GreaterGermanicReich” belonged to a guy called Jonathan Sapirman.
I wish Hitler had won the war, even though he was a lookist, he was the last bastion of defense of patriarchal values, everything went to hell since he left this world.
Whites weren't historically progressive though. Egalitarian pagans in Europe prior to Christianity weren't progressive or degenerate. Progressiveness is a result of advanced stage of utopic Western civilization which caused feminization, jewishness, and behavioral sink.
More so because they are anti-White more than anti-patriarchy, otherwise Muslims would be their number one target. They see Whites as the most oppressive, not ethnic misogynists and patriarchs.
Agree upon this. So much anti male rhetoric is covert anti white
Well that's probably somewhat due to the fact that most men in the West are white. Like in America, Muslims are only about 1% of Americans (and slice that in half to account for women). It doesn't really make sense for feminists and progressives in the west to put a lot of attention to misogynistic muslim men since they're not the ones in power.
I do agree that progressives would be very hesitant to specifically call out muslim men in fear of being called racist (something they don't have to worry about with whites), but that could very well change if muslim men made up a significant chunk of the male population in the west.
This has truth to it, though I'd argue that what we see today is more relevant. Regardless of the reason, in todays world white nations tend to be far more progressive and feminist than non-white nations.
U
based
I'm White you moron
I've shown my face on here to others before
@NeverGetKangas @wereq @St.Greypiller
And fyi, you seem like the Pajeet: You accuse others with no information, and then also have spent all your time shitting on WNs
@Castaway
true
Yeah I see, I jumped to that conclusion because it's just a narrative on this forum, alongside turdworldism, that is just so...damned...beaten to death.
When i joined, I was hoping for more "West has fallen let's save it" and not "muh West is evil! Oh but you guys can't blame le Joos!" which is clear hypocrisy, yet what else do I expect from Shitskins or Negroids? They are dishonest, low-trust, and generally incapable of higher thought due to their brains lacking the capacity for any meaningful thoughts.
It just irritates me people never acknowledge the positive stuff it did, but oh wait let's all cocksuck Chy-na or some other ethnoid place.
Based, I can't believe I used to shill for it
National Corps - Wikipedia
I like Ukraine simply for the fact I think these guys, who are basically WN/NS, can possibly influence politics heavily post election. The AZOV brigade are revered in Ukraine, plus it's socially acceptable to be a "Nazi" there
Tbh I expect too much of this place, i just find for a cope it doesn't work as it shouldI'm way too passive and numbers-obsessed
It used to but eh not so much anymore.
I'm not, and correlation also means that there often is some underlying current pushing things.
Are you kidding me mang
-Nonwhites molest kids at a higher rate
-Nonwhites burn and loot cities whenever something happens
-Nonwhites use White technology and then show zero appreciation, same when they move to the West
-Nonwhites use colonialism and slavery as a scapegoat
-Nonwhites vote left-wing overwhelmingly
-Nonwhites are imported to perform cheap labor
-Nonwhites are more LGBT on average
List goes on, but they're a big factor in it
No they weren't, as @The Notorious SLAV at least is right on, matriarchies have always existed and in fact have been present in MENA, Africa, etc.
Again, "muh europe caused all the issues"
And fyi, a lot of Feminism comes from Jews:
Feminism And Its JEWISH Origins
Explore the deep connection between Feminism and Jewish heritage in this video, where we discuss how Jewish women have been pivotal in shaping feminist movements from the 19th century to today. Discov
rumble.com
The Origins of American Jewish Feminism | My Jewish Learning
Origins of American Jewish Feminism. Modern Jewish Thought. Jewish History and Community.
www.myjewishlearning.com
Judaism is very matriarchal also btw, I like how you left that out.
Thanks for at least acknowledging Europe/Whites were patriarchal
Incorrect, Greece & Rome were quite patriarchal as were the Yamnaya/Steppe
You may not claim to be, but certain comments you made have been to that affect: Your claim above also seems to show it, but perhaps i'm being too harsh since i'm sick of people -even some whites here- shilling for turdworldism while also never acknowledging the good the West did
Again, it's something i'm sick of on here & I can see through the bullshit & hypocrisy, as I always do
Unironically, you have the mental capacity of a Redditor
It's always "muh whitey/west bad and muh ethnoids(made up term btw neglecting race realism) good and innocent!" The fact you also looked past this because of the title showcases this.
Ok, I agree Christianity has been an issue
But Jews didn't have any major influence until somewhat recently, as in the past few hundred years
Can't believe a European/White user would be self-hating like this and basically argue what ethnics did
You vastly overestimate your intelligence, fyi
I love how you say this, yet in every argument(which i've destroyed you in btw), you never cite anything & often retort to normie-tier or reddit tier arguing attitudes.
Nope. Except maybe MENA.
Huh? You're making stuff up here
Blacks 100% are not "conservative" and they always have been very r-selective historically
No, they were not. Again, you are doing the "whitey evil and caused all these issues oh but nvm all the tech they gave us! while
Again, read this:
View: https://medium.com/@MthiyaneShandu/a-stolen-legacy-the-matrilineality-of-pre-colonial-african-society-5307b8db3e5a
Hunter-gatherer societies were usually matriarchal btw, which most African/Black/Negroid ones were
No, buddy
Again, you're living in your own warped reality where you think that every White is individualist and pro faggotry. We hate them because they cause crime and rape disproportionately, while also eroding the social trust.
Once again, i'm citing facts and you're speaking out of your schizo head
Where? Maybe one conservacuck party in Europe.
And how do ethnoids have anything to do with this?
Strawman argument, and a shit one
@wereq has criticized White soys, and admires the better traits of the White race- funny how you praise every other race yet never acknowledge what Whites did.
He wasn't, and conservatism is very flawed for many reasons.
Huh? many WNs are normies- how can they "turn" to inceldom
And no, most WNs are very anti homphobic. Again, you're making shit up
And as if a leftoid has any right to speak:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
