D
Virgin shaming basically puts pressure on men to score in order to get rid of the stigma of being a virgin, in essence looking at women as a means to an end.
Normie logic = no logic
Normie logic = no logic
Hypocrisy If women aren't sex objects, why does virgin shaming for men exist?
because they are sex objects
virgin when applied to males is more of a genetic status category than anything
females dont care if a incel looking male had transactional sex in the past. he is always a virgin in their eyes
females dont care if a incel looking male had transactional sex in the past. he is always a virgin in their eyes
They live in a doublethink world: Sex is unimportant and unnecessary, but somehow "virgin" is one of the biggest and most commonly used insults in existence.
Men bad women good. That's pretty much how normies think.
Virgin-shaming is literally rape-encouragement.
Foids respect rapists more than they do virgins.
If this weren't the case they'd be putting their energy exclusively into shaming rapists instead of secretly shlicking to them and mocking virgins instead.
R
Because everything men do is wrong and everything women do is right
I
Its wrong to shame someone for their sexual past, also ew virgin men are disgusting xD
R
yeah, JFL
its also okay to shame "mansluts" even tho women secretly crave them. all virtue signaling but still hypocritical as fuck
Foids entire being revolves around sex. They are basically a sex doll attached to a speak n say, only less intelligent.
This.
Everything is here.
It also bridges the gap between "women are human beings who can decide who they fuck, not sex objects" and "you have to fuck or you are nothing".
Of course, you can be a loser on a lot of different fronts. Like never obtaining your driving license, failing your exams, failing to run Y miles in less than X minutes. But in these situations, you are facing either objects or abstract situations where theoretically you can improve yourself in order to succeed, such as by training or buying lessons with a tutor/teacher/trainer.
But women are not objects or abstract situations. They are full actors in the game, unlike previous situations where you theoretically are the only actor. And they judge your genetics, which can't be changed by training or buying lessons. If they were sexual objects, you could train anything you want (such as your game, your sex movements and so on) on them, like redpillers believe. But you can't do that. They aren't objects of any king, and they already decided before if you won or lost, which is permanent. So losing on the sexual front is not exactly the same as losing in sports, academia and given tasks. It means being an inherent genetic loser, judged as such by women.
This is why there is no contradiction in "women aren't sex objects" and "it is bad for a man to be a virgin".
D
cope, normies unironically believe in "game", and that the way you talk to girls matters.
Plus you can improve yourself via looksmaxxing
I think that either way it does not matter, virgins will remain shamed.
You can improve yourself = "You are a loser who can't move his ass to improve himself, kill yourself virgin"
You can't improve yourself = "You are an inherent loser whose genetics are trash, kill yourself virgin"
I want to own one of those s.x objects ngl.
D
You will be shamed either way, of course.I think that either way it does not matter, virgins will remain shamed.
You can improve yourself = "You are a loser who can't move his ass to improve himself, kill yourself virgin"
You can't improve yourself = "You are an inherent loser whose genetics are trash, kill yourself virgin"
But it's still hypocritical for normies, they are telling you that you need to "conquer" the task of bedding a woman
Women are sex objects. Our brains are wired to identify their bodies, and want to have sex with them regardless of their opinions, meaning they are objects to us in terms of how we handle them sexually. Sex with a female is something that men naturally want, and any specific female is just an object to fill in that pre-existing role in a man's life.
Yeah normies do not realize what lies behind this "conquest".
It's like trying to conquer a country which has billions of nuclear weapons. That country would fight back against you and you usually would be destroyed. But if you were Chad, then that country would be happy to be invaded by you instead, and it would give you a free pass! Your victory or defeat is entirely determined by factors other than military ones.
Hole always allows beta to "conque" herself, it has nothing to do with conqueror's perseverance, etc
The game is rigged from the beginning all such conquerors become self cucked by stepping into the game.
While Chad does not need to conque at all, what a comedy.
The game is rigged from the beginning all such conquerors become self cucked by stepping into the game.
While Chad does not need to conque at all, what a comedy.
Last edited:
D
Tell me about it. I'm a reject solely because of my looks. Truly over.
You mean chad, not beta right?
D
he's talking about betabuxxing
Similar threads
Discussion
When bluepillers claim that we don't treat women like human beings, what do they mean exactly?
- Seahorsecel
- Inceldom Discussion
Tacomonkey
Users who are viewing this thread
