Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

If Jesus Christ had been sub5 would people have believed in him?

He is a sub5 brown semetic, they had to make fake Aryan paintings so people believe in him that's how much people hate sub5s
TRUE, people don’t feel uncomfortable worshipping a chad whereas they would if he was a sub5
 
I don't believe The Bible was altered
You might want to keep to cope but it was, indeed altered. Multiple times actually. 3 times significantly and syatemically, other infinite times depending of its distribution like any other book in the world (torah and curan included). Not that i give a fuck obviously, it's just a fact.
 
Last edited:
You might want to keep to cope but it was, indeed altered. Multiple times actually. 3 times significantly and syatemically, other infinite times depending of its distribution like any other book in the world (torah and curan included). Not that i give a fuck obviously, it's just a fact.
Elaborate then
 
He was average in terms of looks, if he existed.
 
I think ironically Jesus being a 5'5 brown skinned man fits Christian message better than with him being a tall white Chad.

Why? You may ask.

Because it would've followed the message that it's all about your inner soul, rather than exterior. Him looking like an average man and not like some mystical figure, would've elevated message, showing anyone could be capable of good deeds.

That what's inside your soul matters more than the appearance outside. I would've liked the idea of a 5'5 brown man winning people over with his teachings and wisdom more than of some tall Chad simply getting praised and seen as a god for being born pretty.
And based on everything we know. That's exactly what happened.
 
If Jesus Christ was god's only begotten son and he was sent to die for our sins, but he was a short sub5 man with a small dick, would anyone believe in his religion?
God knows humans are vain and selfish, that's why he made his son conventionally handsome.
 
Elaborate then

it's common knowledge! You're asking to elaborate why water is wet, why a leaf is green in spring and brown in fall, ask ChatGPT, i'm not a tutor for down syndrome "special children", the Bible was rewritten approximatively 80'000 times in a span of 400 century lol, the audacity :feelskek:

You may not believe in Christianity, but Jesus himself definitely existed

The only actual historic, not religious, document we have is a small quote in Tacitus writings saying, among governative measures, "ah, a maniacal jew named Yussuf causing small disrupts in Galilea region got crucified. The crazy guy was in his 30s". That's literally it. No mentioning of anything else. Be aware Yussuf (and similar) was basically the "John" of Palestine, vary common name.
 
it's common knowledge! You're asking to elaborate why water is wet, why a leaf is green in spring and brown in fall, ask ChatGPT, i'm not a tutor for down syndrome "special children", the Bible was rewritten approximatively 80'000 times in a span of 400 century lol, the audacity :feelskek:



The only actual historic, not religious, document we have is a small quote in Tacitus writings saying, among governative measures, "ah, a maniacal jew named Yussuf causing small disrupts in Galilea region got crucified. The crazy guy was in his 30s". That's literally it. No mentioning of anything else. Be aware Yussuf (and similar) was basically the "John" of Palestine, vary common name.
Sure bro, Suetonius, Pliny the younger, Flavius Josephus and many others were all talking about a different person named Jesus!

Even the talmud talks about Jesus (in a very disgusting and satanic way but they still talk and gives the descriptions of Christ "criticizing the elders" matches The Biblical Gospel where Jesus harshly criticized the pharisees.)

Also don't get me started to early Christians accounts such as Clement of Rome, Polycarp and etc.

About the 80000 "rewritings" you are probably talking about the variants manuscript of The Bible, small variants that are very common in basically all old books, from the 5000 greek copies of The New Testament.

But you guess, those variants are basically small corrections or minuscule details while translated that do not change the content or the meaning of the content The Gospel says. I google it and AI say the opposite you are trying to impose.

Because the gutenberg press was only invented on 1440, which means through all of this time Bible copies were made by hand.

The Bible have alot of variants because it was the most copied book in history, having a absurdly high alot of variants (400000)


It may sound bad to have alot of variants but it's actually very good because the small grammatical or ortographical mistakes are very easy to indentify and just shows The Bible is a reliable source that wasn't altered.

One could argue that 1% of the variants actually skip a verse or something like, but that wasn't done as a "different Gospel" but just the same Gospel that a scribe simply skipped or missed out while copying the same original copies when translating it.

If that was the case, if there was multiple Gospel rewriten 80000 or 400000 times it would be a disaster to everyone including basically all churches and the avarage believer from all churches. Simple, important and crucial details that change everything would be found that would create alot of controversy even apostasy and it wouldn't be simply separation of Church and State but actual end of Churches and Christianity we know of.

Christianity would simply be too different then we know today, probably wouldn't reach billions of people in the whole world.
 
it's common knowledge! You're asking to elaborate why water is wet, why a leaf is green in spring and brown in fall, ask ChatGPT, i'm not a tutor for down syndrome "special children", the Bible was rewritten approximatively 80'000 times in a span of 400 century lol, the audacity :feelskek:



The only actual historic, not religious, document we have is a small quote in Tacitus writings saying, among governative measures, "ah, a maniacal jew named Yussuf causing small disrupts in Galilea region got crucified. The crazy guy was in his 30s". That's literally it. No mentioning of anything else. Be aware Yussuf (and similar) was basically the "John" of Palestine, vary common name.
Very dishonest to say that The Bible was rewritten btw, when in reality those "rewritings" are just copies of the same book with small textual differences.

My Faith would be meaningless if it was proven that Jesus didn't die on the cross, or wasn't God, or it was falsefied by scribes.

And i and basically everyone else would be doomed.

But i know for sure it wasn't altered, and no one can say the opposite because anyone who says that it was altered knowing it wasn't is a liar
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top