[Truth Nuke] All Christians are Simps and Foid Worshippers by Default. Here's Why

[ResidentHell]

To start off, I am not a Christian. I have been critical of kike worship for a long time, and I am still critical of kike worship

I call it "kike worship" because that is exactly what Christianity is about. The worship and divinization of a kike

I've noticed a recent rise in threads endorsing the Christian religion. The original posters of these threads are all self-proclaimed Christians. I will not tag them, they know who they are. A Christian can be blackpilled on foid nature, but a Christian by default must simp and partake in foid worship

These are the reasons why Christians are generally foid worshippers and simps by default

Reason 1: Christians exalt a supposed female virgin called "Mary" who is the human mother of the central divine figurehead (Jesus Christ) of their religion

The degree to which Mary is exalted in Christianity extends to a point where she has achieved sainthood across various major sects of the Christian religion. Mary is formally recognized as a saint in various Christian sects, including Catholicism. Keep in mind the primary cause for her attainment of sainthood in the Christian movement is merely because she gave birth to a kike who is proclaimed to be the divine embodiment of God in the flesh and the Savior of mankind

In fact, Mary earned the title "Queen of Heaven" in the Catholic, Anglican, Lutherian and Orthodox Churches. And yes, this "Queen of Heaven" was a kike woman

This is a clear case of foid worship which I believe demands no further explanation


Reason 2: Christians believe that the obnoxious, harmful behaviors of women are excusable provided those women believe in Jesus Christ

I will try to state this in clearer words. Christians believe that a woman will be granted eternal life no matter how slutty, hurtful or manipulative she is, as long as she honestly believes that Jesus Christ is her Lord and Savior who mortally died for her sins and was resurrected from death

According to conventional Christian doctrine, these are the minimum requirements that must be fulfiled for a person to be granted eternal life and salvation from eternal suffering by God the Father through Jesus Christ:

1. The person must believe that Jesus Christ was sent to Mankind by God the Father. They must also believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God. This is backed up by the scripture, John 3:16 (NIV) : "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life"​

​

2. The person must believe that Jesus Christ died for the sins of Mankind and was resurrected from the dead​

This is backed up by the words of Saint Paul the Apostle in The Book of Corinthians I, Chapter 15. Saint Paul the Apostle is quoted in:​

​

1 Cor. 1 : 3 - 4 (NIV), "...Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures". ​

​

1 Cor. 1 : 13 - 14 (NIV), "If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith."​

​

1 Cor. 1 : 16 - 17 (NIV), "For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins."​

​

So there you have it. As long as you believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God sent by God himself to the human world to die for the sins of humans and resurrect from the dead, you will receive eternal life and be rescued from a fate of suffering for eternity. From the Christian perspective, it basically means any woman that is slutty and manipulative will be excused for their actions as long as they believe in Jesus Christ. This doesn't necessarily mean they will not be punished at all. It just means the woman will ultimately be excused of her hypergamous, obnoxious, deceptive ways, and granted eternal paradise. All for believing in a story about a divine kike

Christianity implicitly excuses whoredom, hypergamy, and all other harmful aspects of foid nature. This also explains why many Christians are oofy doofys, cuckolds and bluepillers
Reason 3: Christianity justifies the eternal salvation of hypergamous foids who believe in Jesus Christ, over blackpilled low-SMV males who fail to believe in Jesus Christ
I've added a simple hypothetical dliemma to clearly express this point

The Day of Judgement arrives. During this Day of Judgement, two "souls" are presented to God, as he will administer judgement upon these "souls":

1. The "soul" of a hypergamous, manipulative foid who slept around with multiple guys during her human life, within and/or outside of wedlock​

​

2. The "soul" of a stone-cold blackpilled chud who was MSTOWmaxxed and achieved wizard status and died a wizard​

​

But here's the difference. The foid believed in Jesus Christ, but chud didn't believe in Jesus Christ

Guess which "soul" will go to Heaven and receive eternal paradise? Guess which "soul" will go to Hell to suffer forever?

The point is that it doesn't matter how blackpilled you are, or how socially and sexually alienated you were during your human lifetime. You see that other foid who lived her best life by travelling across the world, staying in luxurious resorts, and having her guts re-arranged every other week by Chad and Tyrone. If you failed to believe in Jesus Christ during your lifetime... Yes, that foid will be accepted into Heaven to spend eternity in paradise, while you will get sent to Hell to receive an additional eternity of suffering on top of your previous incel suffering on Earth. All because she believed in the divinity and heroism of a kike, and you didn't


In summary, Christians are largely foid worshippers and simps. They are probably the largest demographic of simps and foid worshippers in the world by any social group or class. For all other members of the forum who aren't Christians, keep this in mind whenever you partake in discussion with them:

If they say they're Christian but deny being foid worshippers, now you know they're lying

If they say they're Christian but criticize other guys for being simps and foid worshippers, now you know they're a hypocrite

 

[Needle]

Its very easy god nakadashied divine sperm on mary so now she's queen of the skies

 

[Diddy]

Great post. Christianity only exists because Mary cheated on her husband but didn’t want to confess it to him, so she claimed the baby was from God and it ended up becoming a 2000 year old lie. This religion was specifically designed for foid worship and to absolve them from any accountability.

 

[Needle]

Great post. Christianity only exists because Mary cheated on her husband but didn’t want to confess it to him, so she claimed the baby was from God and it ended up becoming a 2000 year old lie. This religion was specifically designed for foid worship and to absolve them from any accountability.

 

[tired as fuck]

 

[yeetbender_]

Banger thread.

 

[ResidentHell]

Great post. Christianity only exists because Mary cheated on her husband but didn’t want to confess it to him, so she claimed the baby was from God and it ended up becoming a 2000 year old lie. This religion was specifically designed for foid worship and to absolve them from any accountability.

I strongly suspect this was the case also

Banger thread.

Appreciated fellowcel

 

[cathuluelitist]

Banger thread.

No, the thread is exhibit A of the clinical levels of retardment happening on the internet. Religion in general has a limited power over society, irregardless of its validity, we know a lot of so called Christian and Muslim nations that were Darwinian. The principals are there to make you feel better, how you behave is determent by economic forces affecting your life not by what priests have to say so obviously there will be a bunch of black swans, it's an IQ test, Christianity isn't really universalist in this way, Paul was prohibited from going to Asia and spreading the gospel there. e.g., Anglicans aren't Christian. When religion fails to make people feel better, it loses to a new form of religion that makes people feel better. It’s function is to make you feel superior and justified. Guess which religious expression does this? Satanic egoist forces. And, modern Jews have no connection to David since modern Jews descend from the Northern Kingdom whilst David entire habitus and lineage finds itself in the Southern Kingdom, modern Jews have virtually no ties to David's line. Retards who make threads like these have no idea how anything works, you have to be completely utterly retarded to cherrypick miscs online to try to exculpate a religion that has not only grafted the greatest civilizations that halted the mass lonelyness epidemic by tens of thousands of years but has at least a 1000 year history of burning whores in order to maintain this streak of preventing mass loneliness. The Romans murdered a Sennone diplomat sent by King Brennus. King Brennus sent some more diplomants. The Romans cut out their eyes, every single egoist force would have been mass prime hoarders and would have created loneliness for billions. I mean the thread is just absurd, modern day "strict" Anglicans would be hanged and burned by most churches from at least before 1500ad.

 

[grimlockcel]

On the first point you give you completely contradict yourself, Mary is not significant in Christianity BECUASE she is a foid, rather its more like she is only significant because she birthed Jesus who is man, he is the SON of God. Her status is entirely tied to him, and it's not some sort of independent foid worship sort of thing.

Your example is also tied to which type of Christian you are, (Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox), The Orthodox venerate Mary highly but even then it's only honoring her, not WORSHIPPING her. Protestants reject the Elevation that the Orthodox give her largely too, her significance is once again only tied to the fact that she birthed Jesus.

Your second reason is in bad faith, you are saying that foids are unique in salvation, but men are no different in salvation to Christ and access to heaven, we are all forgiven for our sins. Does that mean I am ignoring that foids on occasion are typically more degenerate in lustful acts than men? Of course not, am I saying all Christian women are trad and virgins and perfect? No, even the Bible knows this to not be true, but it does encourage foids to wait until marriage, which would better society as a whole, and not LAWFUL marriage that leads to divorce rapes jfl.

So you are ignoring that the same rules apply to men. Every Christian (male or foid) is a sinner saved by grace. But you can only be a true Christian if you are genuine and truly repent and have faith in Christ.

For your third reason you are giving a bad faith hypothetical that doesn't hold up. Salvation is not earned by suffering, the Bible is clear on the fact that NONE of us could ever be perfect, and we will always fall short and be sinners. This is Christianity 101. The woman in your example is not going to heaven because she is a woman or anything, it's simply because she accepted Jesus as her lord and savior and repented for her sins, now I am going to assume you might be trying portray this as if the woman in your example was not actually genuine about her faith, well then in that case this hypothetical falls apart even more, because then it would be impossible to go to heaven for her, this is like if I gave you a task you had to do, but then built the whole example around a false premise that's impossible to answer like telling you to "prove that 2+2=5 using normal math, and if you can't then you're a failure." It rigs the scenario from the start so the outcome is predetermined no matter what.

 

[PLS HALP ME]

delayed post

 

[ResidentHell]

No, the thread is exhibit A of the clinical levels of retardment happening on the internet

Thank you for this response. I will try to dissect your response carefully

Religion in general has a limited power over society, irregardless of its validity, we know a lot of so called Christian and Muslim nations that were Darwinian

Laws and systems of administration in Europe and the Middle East were largely influenced by religion throughout common era. Societies conventionally are by and large regulated by laws and systems of administration, e.g., tax systems, national surveys, local councils, schools

For example, Corpus Juris Civis was a Roman code of law which ultimately served as the foundation of modern civil law systems in Europe

Corpus Julis Civilis is probably the most influental code of law in European history, and it was a code of law inspired by Christian doctrine, to such a point that it was designed to integrate Christian principles with Roman law, effectively integrating the Church with the state

Corpus Julis Civilis is evidence of the influence of religion across Europe. The Darwinian theory was first proposed in the mid-19th century, almost two millennia after Christianity was formally recognized as the state religion of the Roman Empire. I will not argue agains the claim that Christian or Muslim nations were Darwinian. But claiming that religion in general has a limited power over society, is such a claim that can only be made by someone who is uninformed or wilfully ignorant of the historical connection between religion and state law

The principals are there to make you feel better, how you behave is determent by economic forces affecting your life not by what priests have to say so obviously there will be a bunch of black swans

I agree with this to an extent, but only to an extent

How you behave can also be determined if not at least influenced by legislature that are enforceble at law. If murder was legal, it would be reasonable to assume that more people would commit murder. If extramarital rape was legal, it would be reasonable to assume that more people would commit extramarital rape for the same reason. As stated in my previous point, laws across jurisdictions in Europe and the Middle East have been influenced by religion to some extent

Anglicans aren't Christian

No True Scotsman Fallacy

How do you know what truly defines a Christian? There are various Christian denomoinations in the world with very divergent beliefs

Even then, Anglicans still believe Jesus is the Son of God who was sent by God to die for the sins of Man and resurrected from the dead. This is quite clearly stated in the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Anglican Church. Even if Anglicans diverge from Catholics and Protestants on some beliefs about Christ, the core belief about the divinity and purpose of Jesus Christ is shared by all three Christian denominations

Guess which religious expression does this? Satanic egoist forces. And, modern Jews have no connection to David since modern Jews descend from the Northern Kingdom whilst David entire habitus and lineage finds itself in the Southern Kingdom, modern Jews have virtually no ties to David's line.

I cannot provide a relevant statement for this quote as I do not know what constitutes "Satanic egoism" and I have not learned enough about the "Northern Kingdom" and "Southern Kingdom" and it's relevance to the claim that modern Jews aren't connected to King David

Retards who make threads like these have no idea how anything works, you have to be completely utterly retarded to cherrypick miscs online to try to exculpate a religion that has not only grafted the greatest civilizations that halted the mass lonelyness epidemic by tens of thousands of years but has at least a 1000 year history of burning whores in order to maintain this streak of preventing mass loneliness.

I did not cherrypick anything. I clearly made a coherent line of argument as to why Christians are foid worshippers

My points are backed by the scriptures themselves. Mary, "Queen of Heaven" is widely exalted across the Christian world. By the doctrines of Christianity, foids can be excused for their whorish activities provided they believe in Jesus Christ

Foid whores who believe in Jesus Christ have a place in Heaven over stone-cold blackpilled chuds who dont believe in Jesus Christ. This is all in agreement with the doctrines of Christianity and is directly supported by the scriptures

Even if medieval Christians were more ruthless to women and lynched or publicly executed women who were suspected of witchcraft or adultery, it doesn't take away from the fact that the core doctrines of Christianity are rooted in foid worship

 

[ResidentHell]

On the first point you give you completely contradict yourself, Mary is not significant in Christianity BECUASE she is a foid, rather its more like she is only significant because she birthed Jesus who is man, he is the SON of God. Her status is entirely tied to him, and it's not some sort of independent foid worship sort of thing

No I did not contradict myself. You did not identify any contradiction. My point is consistent

Mary is a major figure in the Christian religion to such a degree that she achieved sainthood and is regarded the "Queen of Heaven" by various sects

You are correct in the observation that the status of Mary is tied to her motherhood of Jesus Christ

I did not present my point as an "independent foid worship" thing. I quite clearly stated that Mary is highly regarded in the Christian religion due to her connection to Jesus Christ. Please refer to the following quote from OP if you need further clarity:

Keep in mind the primary cause for her [Mary] attainment of sainthood in the Christian movement is merely because she gave birth to a kike [Jesus Christ] who is proclaimed to be the divine embodiment of God in the flesh and the Savior of mankind

Your example is also tied to which type of Christian you are, (Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox), The Orthodox venerate Mary highly but even then it's only honoring her, not WORSHIPPING her. Protestants reject the Elevation that the Orthodox give her largely too, her significance is once again only tied to the fact that she birthed Jesus.

Personally I think "Queen of Heaven" is a bit more than just an honorary title

You are correct in identifying that Protestants did not exalt Mary, mother of Jesus, to the same degree as the other denominations (Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherean etc). So yes it can depend on which type of Christian you are

However this does not overrule the fact that the majority of Christians are members of the Christian sects that exalt Mary

Catholics make up at least half of the Christian population across the world. Add that with the Lutherians, Anglicans and any other Christian denominations that exalt Mary, and you have the majority of the Christian world population as worshippers of Mary

Your second reason is in bad faith, you are saying that foids are unique in salvation, but men are no different in salvation to Christ and access to heaven, we are all forgiven for our sins

No, you misrepresent my second reason. I did not say foids are unique in salvation

I quite clearly said foids are excused for their slutty behavior as they will nonetheless be saved as long as they believe in Jesus Christ. I did not say anything regarding men in salvation through Jesus Christ. I only spoke on foids in my second reason

Excusing foid behavior is a precedent for foid worship, because it pretty much absolves them of accountability for their hypergamous whorish actions, as they will be cleansed of their sins and receive eternal life anyway, provided they believe in Jesus Christ

So you are ignoring that the same rules apply to men. Every Christian (male or foid) is a sinner saved by grace. But you can only be a true Christian if you are genuine and truly repent and have faith in Christ.

Yes I am ignoring that the same rules apply to men because my argument was strictly about foid worship in Christianity

In contemporary times, men are more likely to be held accountable for their actions by justice systems. That's why men have higher incarceration rates and higher conviction rates, whereas women are more likely to remain unconvicted, or get less or zero prison time, even if suspected for the same crimes. So there's at least one kind of system where men are less likely to be excused, but rather punished for their actions

But not only are women more likely to be excused for harmful behavior in man-made systems of governance, they will also be excused under systems of governance by the divine figurehead of the Christian religion as long as they believe in Jesus Christ

Excusing foid behavior only makes it easier for foids to get away with doing whatever they like. Men generally do not share the same privilege

For your third reason you are giving a bad faith hypothetical that doesn't hold up ... The woman in your example is not going to heaven because she is a woman or anything, it's simply because she accepted Jesus as her lord and savior and repented for her sins, now I am going to assume you might be trying portray this as if the woman in your example was not actually genuine about her faith, well then in that case this hypothetical falls apart even more, because then it would be impossible to go to heaven for her

Wrong assumption. I did not say anything about the woman not being genuine about her faith. I said the woman was manipulative, slutty and hypergamous but still had faith in Jesus Christ. The stone-cold blackpilled wizard chud didn't have faith in Jesus Christ

Therefore, the woman went to heaven, chud went to hell. This indirectly justifies the salvation of foid whores over blackpilled wizard chuds, provided the foid whores believe in Jesus Christ and the blackpilled wizard chuds don't

If you believe that foid whores have a secure place in Heaven over blackpilled wizard chuds, just because those foid whores believe in Jesus Christ, and the blackpilled wizard chuds didn't, then you may as well be a foid worshipper

 

[grimlockcel]

Yes I am ignoring that the same rules apply to men because my argument was strictly about foid worship in Christianity

So you concede. If the rules apply equally, there is no gendered foid worship in the doctrine.

Personally I think "Queen of Heaven" is a bit more than just an honorary title

You are just insisting this is the case without any evidence, this is purely subjective.

You are correct in identifying that Protestants did not exalt Mary, mother of Jesus, to the same degree as the other denominations (Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherean etc). So yes it can depend on which type of Christian you are

Okay so why title the thread "[Truth Nuke] All Christians are Simps and Foid Worshippers by Default. Here's Why" If you are basing the first point off of something that isn't agreed upon by all Christians?

In contemporary times, men are more likely to be held accountable for their actions by justice systems. That's why men have higher incarceration rates and higher conviction rates, whereas women are more likely to remain unconvicted, or get less or zero prison time, even if suspected for the same crimes. So there's at least one kind of system where men are less likely to be excused, but rather punished for their actions

This is non-sequitur, you literally just restating Christianity 101 then, yeah if someone has true faith in Christ, and has repented for all sins, then YES they will go to heaven, and the person who didn't will go to hell, the way you attempt to portray this is "The male incel did way less wrong doing than the foid so how come she can go to heaven and I cant?" Well all the incel chud would have to do is what she did... What even is the argument here lol? The same can be said about a male counterpart of the foid, and the foid is instead the one who simply didnt have faith and Christ and didn't repent for her sins, how does this show any kind of unfairness or worship of a foid?

 

[grimlockcel]

Just based off this "Yes I am ignoring that the same rules apply to men because my argument was strictly about foid worship in Christianity"

Cmon dude try better next time

example around a false premise that's impossible to answer like telling you to "prove that 2+2=5 using normal math"

 

[cathuluelitist]

No True Scotsman Fallacy

How do you know what truly defines a Christian? There are various Christian denomoinations in the world with very divergent beliefs

Even then, Anglicans still believe Jesus is the Son of God who was sent by God to die for the sins of Man and resurrected from the dead. This is quite clearly stated in the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Anglican Church. Even if Anglicans diverge from Catholics and Protestants on some beliefs about Christ, the core belief about the divinity and purpose of Jesus Christ is shared by all three Christian denominations

Yeah, I'm pretty confident Jesus Christ wasn't a neomodernist numale transvestite buddy. I can't just say the labooboo believes in the divinity of Christ and then make murder doctrine.

I did not cherrypick anything. I clearly made a coherent line of argument as to why Christians are foid worshippers

My points are backed by the scriptures themselves. Mary, "Queen of Heaven" is widely exalted across the Christian world. By the doctrines of Christianity, foids can be excused for their whorish activities provided they believe in Jesus Christ

This isn't "foid worship". It's pretty obviously Christ worship you're describing here.

Foid whores who believe in Jesus Christ have a place in Heaven over stone-cold blackpilled chuds who dont believe in Jesus Christ. This is all in agreement with the doctrines of Christianity and is directly supported by the scriptures

lolcano at this "argument", clearly their clemency is predicated on their relief from all the antisocial things they did.

Even if medieval Christians were more ruthless to women and lynched or publicly executed women who were suspected of witchcraft or adultery, it doesn't take away from the fact that the core doctrines of Christianity are rooted in foid worship

Today’s progressives are holier than God puritans, who have dumped God for lack of holiness just like how the unitarians dumped Christ for insufficient holiness. Progressive Christians are the modern unitarians. But no, the core doctrine of Christianity is of course genital mutilation logically.

 

[dumbozhina]

the first argument is a poor one. most proselytizers here are protestant, and does not give a damn about mary.
reason 2,3 is correct. jesus and Paul abolished all mosaic laws except some very vague moral principles that can be interpreted anyway they like. martin luther destroyed the universal catholic church that at that time still had some say in ppl's lives.
the result is that ppl can largely do whatever they want and still claim they believe in the religion.
in pauline letters, he criticized the adultery of men, not women.

 

[ResidentHell]

So you concede. If the rules apply equally, there is no gendered foid worship in the doctrine.

I did not concede. You overlooked my point. Men are already heavily scrutinized for their behaviour outside of Christianity

If Christianity scrutinized and punished female behavior to a higher degree than male behavior, it would counterbalance the high scrutiny of male behaviour outside of Christianity. The fact that Christianity excuses whorish foid behavior is a precedent for foid worship

You are just insisting this is the case without any evidence, this is purely subjective.

If Mary is recognized as a saint and the "Queen of Heaven", this is quite clearly a case of foid worship

Being given title such as the "Queen" of a designated spiritual realm of the divine and holy (aka Heaven), is worship

A title of sainthood entails qualities of sanctity and holiness

If a woman is praised to a point that she becomes regarded as a symbol of sanctity, divinity or holiness, that is foid worship

Okay so why title the thread "[Truth Nuke] All Christians are Simps and Foid Worshippers by Default. Here's Why" If you are basing the first point off of something that isn't agreed upon by all Christians?

It was bait. I wanted to see engagement and repiles to the orignal post. Still the majority of Christians are members of the denominations that regard Mary as a saint and Queen of Heaven. A majority of a group is closer to all members of the group than none

This is non-sequitur, you literally just restating Christianity 101 then, yeah if someone has true faith in Christ, and has repented for all sins, then YES they will go to heaven, and the person who didn't will go to hell, the way you attempt to portray this is "The male incel did way less wrong doing than the foid so how come she can go to heaven and I cant?" Well all the incel chud would have to do is what she did... What even is the argument here lol? The same can be said about a male counterpart of the foid, and the foid is instead the one who simply didnt have faith and Christ and didn't repent for her sins, how does this show any kind of unfairness or worship of a foid?

I do not portray the male incel as "less wrong" than the foid whore

The point is that Christianity justifies the salvation of foid whores who believe in Jesus Christ over blackpilled chuds who dont. How you wish to interpret that is up to you. I am talking about a gender disparity in the judgement given to men and women in systems of justice. I'm not talking about whether what they did was "right" or "wrong" in the eyes of God or whether what they did was lawful under the law

Christianity holds women and men to the same standard. This is rooted in the belief that men and women are somehow equal in the eyes of God. It is a bluepilled belief, because it suggests that women have the same capabilities as men when it comes to introspection, rational thought, reasoning, abstraction, intellectual creativity and decision-making

I could go into further detail but I may end up saying demeaning things about foids which are not relevant to this post

Just based off this "Yes I am ignoring that the same rules apply to men because my argument was strictly about foid worship in Christianity"

Cmon dude try better next time

If you were trying to imply that I could be fairer by criticizing male worship as well as foid worship, then yes - I am also critical of male worship. Chad worship in particular, is a normie trait that is heavily associated with redpill and faggot communities

By the same line of reasoning I could have said that Christianity endorses Chad worship as it favours Chads who believe in Jesus Christ over foid whores or blackpilled chuds who don't believe. But my post was not about Chad worship, it was about foid worship

The fact that a Christian so-called blackpiller is ready to justify the place of a foid whore in Heaven over a blackpilled chud wizard, is suggestive of a cucked mentality that is willing to excuse foids for their toxic whorish behavior. It explains why Christians today are cucked

Yeah, I'm pretty confident Jesus Christ wasn't a neomodernist numale transvestite buddy. I can't just say the labooboo believes in the divinity of Christ and then make murder doctrine.

You quoted "Anglicans aren't Christian" but didn't elaborate on this claim

I responded by mentioning the Thirty Nine Articles of the Anglican Church

These articles include core beliefs of Orthodox Christianity. This includes acknowledgement of the divinity of Jesus Christ as the Son of God, the belief in the Sacrifice and the Resurrection of Jesus Christ

These beliefs are fundamental to the Orthodox Christian identity, to the point that it would be considered heretical or blasphemous to disagree with these beliefs about Christ

But there are other non-Orthodox Christians with their own core beliefs. They would probably be regarded as heretics or blasphemers by all the other mainstream Christians like Catholics and Protestants

Maybe you know who the true Christians are. If you do, you can share this information, because I do not know honestly

This isn't "foid worship". It's pretty obviously Christ worship you're describing here.

I've already explained how the sanctification of Mary is a clear case of foid worship. So I've added my definition for the term "foid worship" for all who may be misunderstood or mistaken on what constitutes foid worship:

Foid worship

noun

The act of exalting or praising a woman, to the point that she is regarded to embody or possess qualities of sanctity, divinity, holiness or moral virtue

If Mary is regarded as a saint and was given the title "Queen of Heaven", I cannot see this any other way except foid worship

lolcano at this "argument", clearly their clemency is predicated on their relief from all the antisocial things they did

I do not understand. Perhaps you were trying to suggest that the mercy which foid whores will recieve, is based on them being relieved from all the antisocial things they did?

Today’s progressives are holier than God puritans, who have dumped God for lack of holiness just like how the unitarians dumped Christ for insufficient holiness. Progressive Christians are the modern unitarians. But no, the core doctrine of Christianity is of course genital mutilation logically.

I do not know much about the Puritans or Unitarians. But perhaps you are right. Maybe the core doctrine of Christianity is genital mutilation. Although I'm not sure if Catholics and Protestants would agree. I only know about the core beliefs of Orthodox Church

 

[cathuluelitist]

You quoted "Anglicans aren't Christian" but didn't elaborate on this claim

I did actually. Take a second look.

These beliefs are fundamental to the Orthodox Christian identity, to the point that it would be considered heretical or blasphemous to disagree with these beliefs about Christ

Yes, Jesus Christ and Paul tsarus were staunch feminist and ardent proto-trans activist.

But there are other non-Orthodox Christians with their own core beliefs. They would probably be regarded as heretics or blasphemers by all the other mainstream Christians like Catholics and Protestants

Maybe you know who the true Christians are. If you do, you can share this information, because I do not know honestly


I've already explained how the sanctification of Mary is a clear case of foid worship. So I've added my definition for the term "foid worship" for all who may be misunderstood or mistaken on what constitutes foid worship:

Foid worship

noun

The act of exalting or praising a woman, to the point that she is regarded to embody or possess qualities of sanctity, divinity, holiness or moral virtue

If Mary is regarded as a saint and was given the title "Queen of Heaven", I cannot see this any other way except foid worship

This isn't predicated on her being a woman, women are capable of doing objective good, if something possessed a woman and she did something good like that, you can extol her for her objective good for example. You don't have to be Christian to understand that you just can like not be profusely retarded.

I do not understand. Perhaps you were trying to suggest that the mercy which foid whores will recieve, is based on them being relieved from all the antisocial things they did?

Not at all. Read it over again.

I do not know much about the Puritans or Unitarians. But perhaps you are right. Maybe the core doctrine of Christianity is genital mutilation. Although I'm not sure if Catholics and Protestants would agree. I only know about the core beliefs of Orthodox Church

Bugman level of nievity.

 

[cathuluelitist]

in pauline letters, he criticized the adultery of men, not women.

If you had Paul's letters file by file then posts here, Paul's letters would be indistinguishable from the B file.

 

[ResidentHell]

I did actually. Take a second look.

I looked again. Unless I am blind or crazy, you did not provide any clear explanation as to why the Anglicans are not Christian

This isn't predicated on her being a woman, women are capable of doing objective good, if something possessed a woman and she did something good like that, you can extol her for her objective good for example

Perhaps you can define "objective good" and explain how this version of "good" is somehow impartial and unbiased

Not at all. Read it over again.

I read it again. I don't understand.

Do foids have clemency? If so, is this "clemency" of foid whores "predicated on their relief from all the antisocial things they did"?

 

[cathuluelitist]

I looked again. Unless I am blind or crazy, you did not provide any clear explanation as to why the Anglicans are not Christian

Ah, yes, Paul tsarus and Tuco were big trans activists, yeah yeah.

Perhaps you can define "objective good" and explain how this version of "good" is somehow impartial and unbiased

Not even remotely relevant buddy.

I read it again. I don't understand.

Do foids have clemency? If so, is this "clemency" of foid whores "predicated on their relief from all the antisocial things they did"?

No, their pardon is predicated on their character, irregardless of their fauxy sowed archetype.

 

[ResidentHell]

Ah, yes, Paul tsarus and Tuco were big trans activists, yeah yeah.

I'm not sure who Tuco is, but by "Paul tsarus" I assume you were referring to Saint Paul the Apostle aka Paul of Tarsus

If you suggest Saint Paul was a major advocate for transexuality, perhaps you could elaborate further on this claim

It would be a very radical claim about Saint Paul from the perspective of mainstream Christians. I don't believe I have seen anything in the scriptures to support the idea that Saint Paul was pro-trans. But maybe you have rigorously studied the Letters of Saint Paul to the point that you discovered themes of pro-transsexuality in the Letters of Saint Paul that are not immediately obvious to the average reader

I'm interested in learning about how Saint Paul the Apostle was an advocate of transexuality

Not even remotely relevant buddy.

You made the claim that "women are capable of doing objective good"

The burden of proof usually lies with the person who asserts the claim

No, their pardon is predicated on their character, irregardless of their fauxy sowed archetype.

So I guess you're saying that, a woman is pardoned for their character, and not pardoned for their belief (in Jesus Christ)

To be honest I think this is a more reasonable claim, as it's contrary to how most Christians (like Catholics & Protestants), believe that a foid can be pardoned based on their belief instead of their character I suppose God is the one who is doing the pardoning

 

[cathuluelitist]

I'm not sure who Tuco is, but by "Paul tsarus" I assume you were referring to Saint Paul the Apostle aka Paul of Tarsus

If you suggest Saint Paul was a major advocate for transexuality, perhaps you could elaborate further on this claim

It would be a very radical claim about Saint Paul from the perspective of mainstream Christians. I don't believe I have seen anything in the scriptures to support the idea that Saint Paul was pro-trans. But maybe you have rigorously studied the Letters of Saint Paul to the point that you discovered themes of pro-transsexuality in the Letters of Saint Paul that are not immediately obvious to the average reader

I'm clearly being sarcastic, it's honestly sad that you can't come up with any arguments so you deliberately act numbskull.

I'm interested in learning about how Saint Paul the Apostle was an advocate of transexuality


You made the claim that "women are capable of doing objective good"

The burden of proof usually lies with the person who asserts the claim

Since they have pneuma so they can hypothetically operate with good intentions.

So I guess you're saying that, a woman is pardoned for their character, and not pardoned for their belief (in Jesus Christ)

Yeah, try reading that again, retard.

 

[thevineyardworker]

No, the thread is exhibit A of the clinical levels of retardment happening on the internet. Religion in general has a limited power over society, irregardless of its validity, we know a lot of so called Christian and Muslim nations that were Darwinian. The principals are there to make you feel better, how you behave is determent by economic forces affecting your life not by what priests have to say so obviously there will be a bunch of black swans, it's an IQ test, Christianity isn't really universalist in this way, Paul was prohibited from going to Asia and spreading the gospel there. e.g., Anglicans aren't Christian. When religion fails to make people feel better, it loses to a new form of religion that makes people feel better. It’s function is to make you feel superior and justified. Guess which religious expression does this? Satanic egoist forces. And, modern Jews have no connection to David since modern Jews descend from the Northern Kingdom whilst David entire habitus and lineage finds itself in the Southern Kingdom, modern Jews have virtually no ties to David's line. Retards who make threads like these have no idea how anything works, you have to be completely utterly retarded to cherrypick miscs online to try to exculpate a religion that has not only grafted the greatest civilizations that halted the mass lonelyness epidemic by tens of thousands of years but has at least a 1000 year history of burning whores in order to maintain this streak of preventing mass loneliness. The Romans murdered a Sennone diplomat sent by King Brennus. King Brennus sent some more diplomants. The Romans cut out their eyes, every single egoist force would have been mass prime hoarders and would have created loneliness for billions. I mean the thread is just absurd, modern day "strict" Anglicans would be hanged and burned by most churches from at least before 1500ad.

 

[thevineyardworker]

If you add Truth Nuke to your own thread it shows your lack of confidence on the truthfulness of this post.

 

[ResidentHell]

I'm clearly being sarcastic, it's honestly sad that you can't come up with any arguments so you deliberately act numbskull.

A deliberate mispelling of Paul of Tarsus was an act of sarcasm - I see the irony in mispelling Paul of Tarsus as "Paul Tsarus", as the pronounciations of "Tarsus" and "Tsarus" are similar, and both words are spelt using the same letters from English alphabet

However I dont think this discussion was about Emperor Paul of Russia, if that is what you satirically meant by "Tsarus". That's why I said I assume you were referring to Saint Paul the Apostle

I made a proposition. I am not arguing with you. You made a claim that Saint Paul was an early advocate of transexuality. My response was that I am interested in this theory, if you would like to elaborate on this claim. I'm interested in learning how Paul of Tarsus was pro-transexual

Since they have pneuma so they can hypothetically operate with good intentions.

Basically women have a soul / spirit, and because they have a soul or spirit, they are in theory capable of behaving with good intentions

I understand. I'm not saying that I agree with this claim. I'm just acknowledging that I understand this claim

Yeah, try reading that again, retard

I appreciate your unwarranted rudeness . I'm trying to have an honest discussion

This claim about women being pardoned for their character rather than belief, is contrary to what mainstream Christians claim to believe (e.g. Catholics, Protestans). I guess I should try to read that again, since I am a "retard"

You seem to have an unique perspective on what makes a woman redeemable in the eyes of God. Many Christians in the world would call you a "heretic" for having such views. But I'm not labelling you for having unique views, although I don't agree with them

If you add Truth Nuke to your own thread it shows your lack of confidence on the truthfulness of this post.

Members of major Christian sects have beliefs that excuse the toxic behavior of foids, and they worship a foid called Mary who is the supposed virgin mother of Jesus Christ. My "confidence" or lack of it, is irrelevant to these facts. The most popular Christian denominations in the world (Catholicism, Anglicanism, Orthodox, Lutherean, and possibly the Protestants), have dogmas that amount to foid worship

If Christians are truly not foid worshippers: Firstly they need to stop worshiping Mary. Secondly they need to stop excusing foid whoredom on the basis that "she believes in Jesus Christ", so it's OK (even if sinful), for her to carry on doing as she wishes providing she maintains faith in Christ

Thirdly, justifying the place of foid whores over blackpilled chuds in Heaven because the foid believes in Christ and chud doesn't, is inherently cucked no matter how you look at it. Christians believe man and woman are equal in the eyes of God, thus they are held to the same standard of judgement. It is a cucked belief, because it presupposes that women have the same intellectual and abstract capabilities as men

 

[FastBlast]

Great post. Christianity only exists because Mary cheated on her husband but didn’t want to confess it to him, so she claimed the baby was from God and it ended up becoming a 2000 year old lie. This religion was specifically designed for foid worship and to absolve them from any accountability.

It's honestly the funniest thing to happen in history. Who knew that getting cucked and lied to could spawn one of the most significant religions of all time? It's like that domino meme

 

[thevineyardworker]

Members of major Christian sects have beliefs that excuse the toxic behavior of foids, and they worship a foid called Mary who is the supposed virgin mother of Jesus Christ. My "confidence" or lack of it, is irrelevant to these facts. The most popular Christian denominations in the world (Catholicism, Anglicanism, Orthodox, Lutherean, and possibly the Protestants), have dogmas that amount to foid worship

If Christians are truly not foid worshippers: Firstly they need to stop worshiping Mary. Secondly they need to stop excusing foid whoredom on the basis that "she believes in Jesus Christ", so it's OK (even if sinful), for her to carry on doing as she wishes providing she maintains faith in Christ

Thirdly, justifying the place of foid whores over blackpilled chuds in Heaven because the foid believes in Christ and chud doesn't, is inherently cucked no matter how you look at it. Christians believe man and woman are equal in the eyes of God, thus they are held to the same standard of judgement. It is a cucked belief, because it presupposes that women have the same intellectual and abstract capabilities as men

Its so silly because this applies to any group of people, nazis excuse immodesty in white women and atheists allow women to be whores. You are describing a postmodern society. Christianity historically taught women to be modesty and quiet.

 

[nachtlieder]

Christianity historically taught women to be modesty and quiet.

And how well is that going?

 

[thevineyardworker]

And how well is that going?

How well is it going for anyone? This doesn't make any sense; The Anabaptists and many other Christian groups are preserving this tradition.

 

[ResidentHell]

How well is it going for anyone? This doesn't make any sense; The Anabaptists and many other Christian groups are preserving this tradition.

You are coping. White foids and Black foids with Christian backgrounds are among the biggest sluts on Earth in the 21st century

The excusal of harmful and rebellious foid behavior within the Christian movement has led to the cucked state of modern Christianity

It doesn't just apply to "any group of people". Muslims for example, have learned to control and collectively regulate their women

This doesn't necessarily mean all Muslim women are "quiet and modest", as there likely are some foid sluts in the world with Islamic backgrounds. But I'm very confident that you would have a much harder time trying to find an Islamic foid slut, than you would trying to find a Christian foid with a slut history

 

[thevineyardworker]

It doesn't just apply to "any group of people". Muslims for example, have learned to control and collectively regulate their women

This doesn't necessarily mean all Muslim women are "quiet and modest", as there likely are some foid sluts in the world with Islamic backgrounds. But I'm very confident that you would have a much harder time trying to find an Islamic foid slut, than you would trying to find a Christian foid with a slut history

correlation is not causation
Muslim women raised in a moderate environment are also products of modern society...... they are mostly very wanton. The difference between Christianity and Islam is that there are more Moralistic therapeutic deists in Christian countries than in Islamic countries.

I have a very hard time thinking that you actually believe what you are saying

 

[thevineyardworker]

I'm trying to have an honest discussion

Being intellectually dishonest and not seeing the core cause of the woman issue is not what honest men do.

Attacking the faith that tries very hard to reclaim a traditional society and fighting your fellow incels are not what honest men do.

 

[FEMCELS FANTASY]

Great post. Christianity only exists because Mary cheated on her husband but didn’t want to confess it to him, so she claimed the baby was from God and it ended up becoming a 2000 year old lie. This religion was specifically designed for foid worship and to absolve them from any accountability.

Catholicism is heresy anyway so even Christ cucked incels shouldn’t be supporting the Mary worshipping sect.

 

[ResidentHell]

Muslim women raised in a moderate environment are also products of modern society......

By "moderate environment" you mean the Western environment -- The same Western environment that had previously Christianity as it's primary religion, until those same Christians in that Western environment became cucked and allowed their women to run amok. The modern Western environment is now the most suitable environment for breeding whores in human history

The only reason why a Muslim woman would become a slut is because she was westernized by a "moderate" environment (aka a WESTERN environment). A woman is very unlikely to become a slut as a result of being Islamized within an Islamic environment

If the historically Christian countries of the West were Islamic, they would be less cucked, as it would be more difficult for women to slut themselves out in such places. The West has a massive history of Christian culture. Now women in those historically Christian countries are unapologetic sluts who don't want to marry or have kids until at least age 30 and instead be "career boss girls" and get ran through by Chad

 

[ResidentHell]

Being intellectually dishonest and not seeing the core cause of the woman issue is not what honest men do.

Attacking the faith that tries very hard to reclaim a traditional society and fighting your fellow incels are not what honest men do.

If I am being "intellectually dishonest", then:

(I) Please correct or specify any facts which I misrepresented or ommitted, which would prove that Christians are in fact, not foid worshippers​

​

(II) Explain how I "attacked Christianity" in my original post​

​

I said Christians are foid worshippers and kike worshippers. These are facts, not "attacks". My conclusions were about Christians themselves. My conclusions were not about Christian dogma. I used Christian dogma to support my conclusion about Christians on foid worship

 

[thevineyardworker]

By "moderate environment" you mean the Western environment -- The same Western environment that had previously Christianity as it's primary religion, until those same Christians in that Western environment became cucked and allowed their women to run amok. The modern Western environment is now the most suitable environment for breeding whores in human history

The only reason why a Muslim woman would become a slut is because she was westernized by a "moderate" environment (aka a WESTERN environment). A woman is very unlikely to become a slut as a result of being Islamized within an Islamic environment

If the historically Christian countries of the West were Islamic, they would be less cucked, as it would be more difficult for women to slut themselves out in such places. The West has a massive history of Christian culture. Now women in those historically Christian countries are unapologetic sluts who don't want to marry or have kids until at least age 30 and instead be "career boss girls" and get ran through by Chad

Western just means atheistic, look up the term I used Moralistic therapeutic deism, most "Christians" in America you speak of follow this rather than Jesus Christ. Make a post attacking Moralistic therapeutic deists not Christians

 

[Sir Silentium]

Reason 1: Christians exalt a supposed female virgin called "Mary" who is the human mother of the central divine figurehead (Jesus Christ) of their religion

No. This is just the catholics/orthodox that worship Mary rather than God and partake in that female heresy worship.

Reason 2: Christians believe that the obnoxious, harmful behaviors of women are excusable provided those women believe in Jesus Christ

No, believing in Jesus Christ does nothing. It's the true repentance in the heart that leads to forgiveness. Most people do not truly repent in their heart from these actions. Or are still joyful that they got to partake in such.

Reason 3: Christianity justifies the eternal salvation of hypergamous foids who believe in Jesus Christ, over blackpilled low-SMV males who fail to believe in Jesus Christ

We can all be saved. It's not just the hypergamous females can be whilst we can't - everyone can be saved.
And like mentioned previously you must be born again, it's not just believing in Jesus.

If they say they're Christian but deny being foid worshippers, now you know they're lying

If they say they're Christian but criticize other guys for being simps and foid worshippers, now you know they're a hypocrite

You handpicked the verses and left out the others contradicting yourself.
Such as 1 Timothy 2:12:
"I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

or 1 Corinthians 14:34-35:
"The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church."

or Ephesians 5:22:
"Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord."

or Titus 2:5:
"submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled."

@thevineyardworker

 

[ResidentHell]

You handpicked the verses and left out the others contradicting yourself.
Such as 1 Timothy 2:12:
"I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

or 1 Corinthians 14:34-35:
"The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church."

or Ephesians 5:22:
"Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord."

or Titus 2:5:
"submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled."

My conclusion was about Christians on foid worship. I only used verses from the Bible to support that conclusion

Modern Christians allow women to become pastors and bishops and lead churches. Now women are allowed to not only speak, but teach men in church. This is contrary to Saint Paul's instructions to the Christian movement in 1 Timothy 2:12 and 1 Corinthians 14:34-35

Modern cuckold Christian men with families allow their daughters and wives to run amok and be sluts outside of wedlock. "Marital rape" is now also illegal in most historically Christian countries, and this legally absolves married women from a duty of sexual submissiveness to their husbands. This is contrary to Saint Paul's instructions to the Christian movement in Ephesians 5:22 and Titus 2:5

 

[Lo3e]

No. This is just the catholics/orthodox that worship Mary rather than God and partake in that female heresy worship.


No, believing in Jesus Christ does nothing. It's the true repentance in the heart that leads to forgiveness. Most people do not truly repent in their heart from these actions. Or are still joyful that they got to partake in such.


We can all be saved. It's not just the hypergamous females can be whilst we can't - everyone can be saved.
And like mentioned previously you must be born again, it's not just believing in Jesus.


You handpicked the verses and left out the others contradicting yourself.
Such as 1 Timothy 2:12:
"I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet"

or 1 Corinthians 14:34-35:
"The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church."

or Ephesians 5:22:
"Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord."

or Titus 2:5:
"submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled."

@thevineyardworker

such an odd thread to make

acting like normies aren't like this

 

[Sir Silentium]

such an odd thread to make

acting like normies aren't like this

Yep

 

[Lo3e]

Yep

nga wrote muh trvth nuke just for you to debunk it in 10s

 

[ResidentHell]

acting like normies aren't like this

My point was not strictly about normies. It was about Christians. This doesn't necessarily mean all normies are not Christians. The same way it doesn't mean all Christians are not normies. Foid worship is also a normie trait, but this goes without saying if you're already familiar with

There's nothing I wrote in this post which could reasonably have been interpreted as an attempt to imply that normies aren't foid worshippers. I have made posts before about normies being foid worshippers. Many Christians are normies if you didn't already know

If I was "acting like normies aren't like this" -- Please re-direct me to anything I said in this thread which can be reaasonably interpreted as an "act" of isolating "normies" from Christians, where Christians are made out to be foid worshippers, but not "normies"

nga wrote muh trvth nuke just for you to debunk it in 10s

He didn't debunk anything. My claim is yet to be disproven. Perhaps not all Christians are foid worshippers, but most of them are, for at least one of the reasons stated in OP. I guess you're a kike and foid worshipper as well. So of course you'll be blind to your own BS

None of you have disproven the claim that Christians are foid worshippers by and large

You try to use the Bible to defend against the claim that Christians are foid worshippers. But in reality the most hypergamous countries with the largest simping cultures in the contemporary world are historically Christian countries. Stop hiding in your bubble

 

[Lo3e]

My point was not strictly about normies. It was about Christians. This doesn't necessarily mean all normies are not Christians. The same way it doesn't mean all Christians are not normies. Foid worship is also a normie trait, but this goes without saying if you're already familiar with

There's nothing I wrote in this post which could reasonably have been interpreted as an attempt to imply that normies aren't foid worshippers. I have made posts before about normies being foid worshippers. Many Christians are normies if you didn't already know

If I was "acting like normies aren't like this" -- Please re-direct me to anything I said in this thread which can be reaasonably interpreted as an "act" of isolating "normies" from Christians, where Christians are made out to be foid worshippers, but not "normies"


He didn't debunk anything. My claim is yet to be disproven. Perhaps not all Christians are foid worshippers, but most of them are, for at least one of the reasons stated in OP. I guess you're a kike and foid worshipper as well. So of course you'll be blind to your own BS

None of you have disproven the claim that Christians are foid worshippers by and large

You try to use the Bible to defend against the claim that Christians are foid worshippers. But in reality the most hypergamous countries with the largest simping cultures in the contemporary world are historically Christian countries. Stop hiding in your bubble

shit thread tbh @Sir Silentium alr stated that muh Mary worship is a traditional Christian trait, ie Catholic, Orthodox

Just because you don't want to accept salvation in Christ, but you're condemning promiscuous people because they think it's a way out, but you're still here: essentially coping and mad at God for allowing promiscuous women to get their salvation, rather you sit here whining and crying.

 

[Sir Silentium]

nga wrote muh trvth nuke just for you to debunk it in 10s

Kek, false nuke

shit thread tbh @Sir Silentium alr stated that muh Mary worship is a traditional Christian trait, ie Catholic, Orthodox

Just because you don't want to accept salvation in Christ, but you're condemning promiscuous people because they think it's a way out, but you're still here: essentially coping and mad at God for allowing promiscuous women to get their salvation, rather you sit here whining and crying.

 

[ResidentHell]

shit thread tbh @

@Sir Silentium alr stated that muh Mary worship is a traditional Christian trait, ie Catholic, Orthodox

Mary worship is foid worship. The majority of Christians are members of the denominations that partake in "Mary worship"

Thus the majority of Christians are foid worshippers. It doesn't matter whether you agree or not. These are the facts

I'm not "mad" at your god. I said Christians are largely foid worshippers. So anyone who isn't Christian should be mindful of this fact when in communication with Christians. I correctly identified that @Sir Silentium response to my claim wasn't a "debunk"

As none of you have provided any hard evidence to counter the claim that Christians are foid worshippers by and large. The Christian scriptures alone are not sufficient evidence to disprove my claim on Christians being mostly foid worshippers. It's cause the Christian scriptures and the behavior of Christian people are two separate things. If Saint Paul instructed to the Christian movement that a woman should submit to men and remain quiet when participating in Christian congregations, it doesn't necessarily mean all Christians will obey his instruction

So until reasonable counter-evidence is provided, I will maintain my stance on Christians being made up of mostly foid worshippers

You cannot use only scriptures from the Holy Bible to disprove my claim, because my claim was not about the scriptures, but about the behavior of certain people who claim to believe the content of those scriptures. You can use the scriptures as supplementary evidence in your counter-proof. But the standard of proof ultimately comes down to the evidence of Christian behavior, and not the evidence of Christian scriptures

Otherwise feel free to carry on shooting down this post with insults and bigoted assertions, if it makes you feel better

 

[Lo3e]

Mary worship is foid worship. The majority of Christians are members of the denominations that partake in "Mary worship"

Thus the majority of Christians are foid worshippers. It doesn't matter whether you agree or not. These are the facts

I'm not "mad" at your god. I said Christians are largely foid worshippers. So anyone who isn't Christian should be mindful of this fact when in communication with Christians. I correctly identified that @Sir Silentium response to my claim wasn't a "debunk"

As none of you have provided any hard evidence to counter the claim that Christians are foid worshippers by and large. The Christian scriptures alone are not sufficient evidence to disprove my claim on Christians being mostly foid worshippers. It's cause the Christian scriptures and the behavior of Christian people are two separate things. If Saint Paul instructed to the Christian movement that a woman should submit to men and remain quiet when participating in Christian congregations, it doesn't necessarily mean all Christians will obey his instruction

So until reasonable counter-evidence is provided, I will maintain my stance on Christians being made up of mostly foid worshippers

You cannot use only scriptures from the Holy Bible to disprove my claim, because my claim was not about the scriptures, but about the behavior of certain people who claim to believe the content of those scriptures. You can use the scriptures as supplementary evidence in your counter-proof. But the standard of proof ultimately comes down to the evidence of Christian behavior, and not the evidence of Christian scriptures

Otherwise feel free to carry on shooting down this post with insults and bigoted assertions, if it makes you feel better

theoretically speaking it's not by literal definition worship, Do you worship your own mom? You probably don't. It's veneration. That's what they do in the traditional churches

 

[philocel_]

mashallah

 

[ResidentHell]

theoretically speaking it's not by literal definition worship, Do you worship your own mom? You probably don't. It's veneration. That's what they do in the traditional churches

I would never sincerely bestow the title of "Queen of Heaven" onto my mom or any other female, next of kin or otherwise

If I did, it would most definitely be a gesture of foid worship, which goes beyond the limits of just "veneration"


I gave a definition for the term "foid worship" in one of the earlier replies in this thread:

Foid worship

noun

The act of exalting or praising a woman, to the point that she is regarded to embody or possess qualities of sanctity, divinity, holiness or moral virtue

For clarity, I've given two different hypothetical examples of veneration, where one includes foid worship while the other one doesn't:

Chud watches a female boxing contest, and one of the females, Brute Becky, is a seasoned professional with a streak of +10 wins:

Example (A): Chud acknowledges Brute Becky for her accomplishments, and says, "Wow, Brute Becky is an elite-level female boxer. All other aspiring boxers should study her boxing style if they wish to improve their technique and ability as boxers."​

​

Example (B): Chud acknowledges Brute Becky for her accomplishments. But Chud says, "Wow, Brute Becky is so skilled and strong as a female boxer, that she's worthy of bearing the title, 'Heavenly Queen of Boxers'. I feel that Brute Becky has achieved sacred status in boxing history, and I would perceive it as an act of sacrilege if anyone questioned her skill or ability as a female boxer. Plus I would feel offended or angered if I found out that someone laid a finger on Brute Becky, or said something demeaning about her, outside of the boxing ring."​

In Example (A), Chud is showing respect for Brute Becky as a professional female boxer. But Chud is not worshipping Brute Becky

In Example (B), Chud is showing respect for Brute Becky as a professional female boxer. Chud is also worshipping Brute Becky

Thus in Example (A), Chud does not perform an act of foid worship, where as in Example (B), Chud performs an act of foid worship

 

[Peroz Shapur]

I think this only applies to Catholics for the most part