Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

If Germany won ww2, how would europe/the west look today?

A

Animeincel

Banned
-
Joined
May 17, 2018
Posts
73
They were pretty close to winning, If they had won, how would europe, or well, the entire western world, look now, do think? Better or worse than this?
 
how is this related to inceldom
 
Cope they were never close to winning.

They couldn’t even beat the UK after trying for a whole year kek
 
better

except for slavs, poles and jews hehe
 
Full of Aryans I guess.
 
I wouldn't be living in the chad central that is the netherlands as a so for me personally probably better

But Germany never was truly close to winning WWII
 
You'd have white people hating and distrusting eachothers guts even more.
 
Cope they were never close to winning.

They couldn’t even beat the UK after trying for a whole year kek
Also, they almost literally freezed in Russia kek while trying to conquer it.
 
The world would have been full of aryans and chinks since Japan was on their side. Maybe they would have duked it out so who knows.
 
It definitely wouldn't be a shithole that it is today.
 
They were pretty close to winning,

There is no realistic scenario that can be presented where the Axis wins WWII. To say that they were "close" to winning is just fucking absurd.
 
It definitely wouldn't be a shithole that it is today.
Made it would be worse. Like they literally had laws that their versions of chads and Stacies (blond, blue eyed attractive people) couldn't fuck with people that weren't blond, attractive and blue eyed. I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to kill us all of next.

But on the positive side, there wouldn't be as many whores since they supported traditional values and stuff.
 
There is no realistic scenario that can be presented where the Axis wins WWII. To say that they were "close" to winning is just fucking absurd.

This is what jewish brainwashing does to u :cool:
 
Better, no more ugly guys/girls. Quality of life would improve
 
Full of Aryans I guess.
kek
Goebbels greets incel
 
This is what jewish brainwashing does to u

I know you're just being a cunt, but look at the situation.

At no point in the entire war did Germany have anywhere NEAR the infrastructure/industrial capacity required to produce equipment and train men to win on all the fronts they opened up.

Realistically, they wouldn't have been able to build a navy to carry out/support the operations required to subdue Britain. The plan that they drew up for Operation Lionfish was a pipe dream. The Wehrmacht had never conducted an amphibious operation on that scale (if at all, idk actually) and definitely would've bungled it both logistically and through all levels of the army and navy.

There is no way they could've been successful on the Eastern Front. Even if Hitler left it to the generals. Even if they drove for Moscow. Even if they invaded sooner. Even if they had more time to work out the kinks in Barbarossa. Those are the only "what-ifs" that are in the realm of reality and they would've made no fucking difference at all.

Italy was a weak link, and would've been regardless of weather their military competent or not.

Remember, we're working within the framework of reality. The US couldn't have stayed out of the war. Britain would not have sued for peace. Even with the major tech. advances they desperately needed, the IJN wouldn't have been successful in the Pacific. Germany was not on the verge of unleashing any superweapons powered by the spear of destiny or the holy grail.

I'm not trying to say Germany was totally incompetent. Guderian, Manstein, and Rommel basically wrote the book on modern armored warfare. The U.S. still studies and uses light infantry tactics the Heer developed. The SS pioneered camouflage. The Stalhelm is basically still being worn, it's just Kevlar now. Allied aircraft designers paled in comparison to guys like Kurt Tank. BMW and DB built the best engines of the war. I could go on, but this isn't a dissertation. (may as well be now with this wall of text)

I'm just saying that you Nazicels overlook very important logistical and strategic realities that were in play during the war.
 
They were pretty close to winning, If they had won, how would europe, or well, the entire western world, look now, do think? Better or worse than this?
Eastern Europe would never have been handed over to communist butchers after the war and millions of lives likely would have been spared. The jews wouldn't have a stranglehold on banking, media, and our government like they do today and would instead be confined to the middle east or africa. America likely wouldn't become the bully boys of the jews like they have become today. WW2 was a disaster for europe from so many angles
 
Then my country Denmark will not had been independent and will had lost 1000 year of history. It will also had been an horrific country. Thanks to the Americans for liberating us.
 
I know you're just being a cunt, but look at the situation.

At no point in the entire war did Germany have anywhere NEAR the infrastructure/industrial capacity required to produce equipment and train men to win on all the fronts they opened up.

Realistically, they wouldn't have been able to build a navy to carry out/support the operations required to subdue Britain. The plan that they drew up for Operation Lionfish was a pipe dream. The Wehrmacht had never conducted an amphibious operation on that scale (if at all, idk actually) and definitely would've bungled it both logistically and through all levels of the army and navy.

There is no way they could've been successful on the Eastern Front. Even if Hitler left it to the generals. Even if they drove for Moscow. Even if they invaded sooner. Even if they had more time to work out the kinks in Barbarossa. Those are the only "what-ifs" that are in the realm of reality and they would've made no fucking difference at all.

Italy was a weak link, and would've been regardless of weather their military competent or not.

Remember, we're working within the framework of reality. The US couldn't have stayed out of the war. Britain would not have sued for peace. Even with the major tech. advances they desperately needed, the IJN wouldn't have been successful in the Pacific. Germany was not on the verge of unleashing any superweapons powered by the spear of destiny or the holy grail.

I'm not trying to say Germany was totally incompetent. Guderian, Manstein, and Rommel basically wrote the book on modern armored warfare. The U.S. still studies and uses light infantry tactics the Heer developed. The SS pioneered camouflage. The Stalhelm is basically still being worn, it's just Kevlar now. Allied aircraft designers paled in comparison to guys like Kurt Tank. BMW and DB built the best engines of the war. I could go on, but this isn't a dissertation. (may as well be now with this wall of text)

I'm just saying that you Nazicels overlook very important logistical and strategic realities that were in play during the war.

Of course there are scenarios where germany could have won the war. The main problem was the entering of america into the war. Why do you say america could not stay out of the war? They were already in from the beginning, giving money to all parties in the war, the people in america where about 50/50 on the issue. Only after pearl harbour the tides have changed. If japan just wouldnt attack USA and stick to Hitler to attack russia on 2 fronts the ending of the war would probably differ very much.

Germany already took over france and poland and free'd various other countrys from the oppressive communists. That is the reason so many citicens of other countrys where loyal to the german Wehrmacht and supported the germans with food and even manpower. Keep in mind that the stereotype of all germans = evil nazis was not in the mind of most people during the war (except for the countrys currently in war of course)
 
I don't think it would have lasted. There probably would have been massive rebellions throughout the decades
 
Whitesupremecistcels believe the main reason they are incel is because of multiculturism :lul::lul:
It's actually because of Jews who also caused multiculturalism.
There is no realistic scenario that can be presented where the Axis wins WWII. To say that they were "close" to winning is just fucking absurd.
LMAO if Japs didn't attack the US they would've won. Actually to think of it. They should have never allied with the Japs in the first place.
 
Last edited:
It would have collapsed
 
I don't know enough about it to comment, my country is full of eastern Europeans and Portuguese, would they be there if Germany won?
 
It's actually because of Jews who also caused multiculturalism.

LMAO if Japs didn't attack the US they would've won. Actually to think of it. They should have never allied with the Japs in the first place.
Ow great another le evil jooos faggot. Or are you blackpill101 new account? Either way your a fag
 
It would look Nazi.
 
World certainly wouldn't be so cucked as it is today, nearly all right spectrum politics and worldviews was associated with Hitler and nazis after war, and this is pretty much the reason why lefties is winning in the west now. Hintler lost and ruined all hopes for western civilization in future.
 
World peace and really high advanced technology.
 
Why do you say america could not stay out of the war?

Because in around '41-'42, the US would've had to commit regardless of weather Pearl Harbor happened. Ties to Britain and France were too strong to ignore for any longer, especially with how embattled they were at that time. Remember, WW1 ended only 20 years prior and was still fresh in the minds of most people.

giving money to all parties in the war

This is wrong. The U.S. only ever directly supplied allied nations. Ford and GM had plants in Germany that were seized, but that's a different story. At no point did U.S. sympathize with or supply the Axis.

If japan just wouldnt attack USA and stick to Hitler to attack russia on 2 fronts the ending of the war would probably differ very much.

The IJA would've failed against the Red Army on land. Remember, the toughest enemy they fought in conventional warfare (that is, excluding battles on small islands) up to that point was the Chinese. They had no idea what a "real" war was like. Japanese equipment, supply systems, and combined forces tactics were inferior. They would've laughably ill-prepared for the kind of battle they would've faced on the theoretical Russian front. Commies would've murked them, even in '39.
 
Eastern Europe would never have been handed over to communist butchers after the war and millions of lives likely would have been spared. The jews wouldn't have a stranglehold on banking, media, and our government like they do today and would instead be confined to the middle east or africa. America likely wouldn't become the bully boys of the jews like they have become today. WW2 was a disaster for europe from so many angles
 
Here come the poltards. Muh society would be better in a facist dictatorship
 
how is this related to inceldom

Low IQ. This is off topic mate. Anything goes here.

Cope they were never close to winning.

They couldn’t even beat the UK after trying for a whole year kek

There was no possibility that Germany could defeat Britain. Unlike the French even if the Germans had managed to defeat the RAF (impossible seen as a lot of the northern RAF bases were beyond German bombing range) and even if they had crossed the channel. Its likely the Navy and RAF would have cut the Germans off from resupply and the British army would have probably used poison gas on the German expeditionary forces in Southern England. Even if somehow the Germans had gained control of Britain the British government would have relocated to Ottawa and carried on the war. It was only a matter of time until the US and Soviet Union were going to join.

General Thoughts
Germany and Japan would never have brought any kind of order to the world. It would have been chaos even if they somehow did manage to win. Germany had no Navy, Japan did but the Japanese were stupidly fatalistic in their war fighting. Britain and the US did have vast naval power and the stregic ports and bases and supplies of raw materials (including oil) to hold on to it. World order since the days of Napoleon has been enforced by the Royal Navy and after 1945 the US Navy maintaining freedom of navigation on the high seas and keeping the worlds major shipping lanes open. Germany and Japan never could have achieved this. Neither was ever going to have the kind of industrial power the US, Soviet Union or British empire had.

My guess is Germany and Japan would have turned on each other sooner or later and the Germans would have whooped the Japs pretty badly.

Japan also would not have maintained the kind of empire it wanted. I doubt they would ever have been able to invade Australia or New Zealand and may have even lost Malaya and Singapore in the end to coordinated action by the British Indian Army and the Royal Navy.
 
Here come the poltards. Muh society would be better in a facist dictatorship
a fascist dictatorship that keeps women in line is infinitely better than this democratic hellscape we have today
 
Low IQ. This is off topic mate. Anything goes here.
Don't call people low IQ before you don't know the whole context. I requested to move this thread because the original poster posted it into the main forum
 
Low IQ. This is off topic mate. Anything goes here.



There was no possibility that Germany could defeat Britain. Unlike the French even if the Germans had managed to defeat the RAF (impossible seen as a lot of the northern RAF bases were beyond German bombing range) and even if they had crossed the channel. Its likely the Navy and RAF would have cut the Germans off from resupply and the British army would have probably used poison gas on the German expeditionary forces in Southern England. Even if somehow the Germans had gained control of Britain the British government would have relocated to Ottawa and carried on the war. It was only a matter of time until the US and Soviet Union were going to join.

General Thoughts
Germany and Japan would never have brought any kind of order to the world. It would have been chaos even if they somehow did manage to win. Germany had no Navy, Japan did but the Japanese were stupidly fatalistic in their war fighting. Britain and the US did have vast naval power and the stregic ports and bases and supplies of raw materials (including oil) to hold on to it. World order since the days of Napoleon has been enforced by the Royal Navy and after 1945 the US Navy maintaining freedom of navigation on the high seas and keeping the worlds major shipping lanes open. Germany and Japan never could have achieved this. Neither was ever going to have the kind of industrial power the US, Soviet Union or British empire had.

My guess is Germany and Japan would have turned on each other sooner or later and the Germans would have whooped the Japs pretty badly.

Japan also would not have maintained the kind of empire it wanted. I doubt they would ever have been able to invade Australia or New Zealand and may have even lost Malaya and Singapore in the end to coordinated action by the British Indian Army and the Royal Navy.
No they definitely could have won the war, especially after taking control of France and most of Europe.

I meant with the current structure they had no chance of winning, mainly because of stupid decisions of Hitler who thought he was Alexander the Great mk2.
 
They were pretty close to winning, If they had won, how would europe, or well, the entire western world, look now, do think? Better or worse than this?
Europe wouldn't be drowning in Islam right now.
 

Oh my god I really put Lionfish didn't I. What the fuck was I thinking.

:feelsrope::feelsrope:

the toughest enemy they fought in conventional warfare (that is, excluding battles on small islands) up to that point was the Chinese.
theoretical Russian front

Inb4 30's border skirmishes with Soviets. That can't be considered a "front". There wasn't really any substantial fighting besides Khalkhin Gol in 39, and the Soviets won that one lmao.

I actually forgot about this when I was writing my post, so I'm trying to cope with my room temp. IQ.
 
Last edited:
What the fuck was I thinking.
An easy error given that every other word of your post is bang on. Specially when you say the Nazi had no experience of landing. So true, we had Depe (spelling?) And the US had been at work in the Pacific. All nations Germany invaded were land bordered.
 
I wouldn't be living in the chad central that is the netherlands as a so for me personally probably better

But Germany never was truly close to winning WWII
JFL The war was basically won except Hitler decided to attack the USSR. All he needed to do was attack the British empire in the Mediterranean with his fascist allies. USSR was pro German, there was no reason to invade. France was beaten. Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Beligum were beaten. Poland was beaten. Italy and Spain were fascist. Rest of Europe was turning fascist either by wars or politics. Don't even try the kook Russian invasion theories.
 
Full of gigachads and gigastacys, Japan was friendly with Germany right? So it Will be my perfect world Giganoodlewhores and gigaStacys
Full of gigachads and gigastacys, Japan was friendly with Germany right? So it Will be my perfect world Giganoodlewhores and gigaStacys
 

Similar threads

DREAMEROFGREATNESS
Replies
10
Views
280
AgITO37
AgITO37
blackraven
Replies
6
Views
283
AntoCel
A
Based NaziCel
Replies
184
Views
3K
psyop
psyop

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top