I gave extensive explanations on why a hypothetical with no parameters is pointless.
And I again explained to you that is is a simple hypothetical scenario. One does not need to be more specific about that. It is in general.
[As I already said] If I had a 9 inch penis but lived in Siberia I would be at a disadvantage
If I was involved among tropical promiscuity it would be good to have a bigger competitive pump.
I know. You stated something similar before. Ultimately you do at least agree to some extend. But again, this is not what I asked. I asked a simple hypothetical question. There are just 2 answers to it. I will ask again:
If you would have the option to choose, what would you choose. Having 4.5 inch penis or having a 9 inch penis. The answer to it is clear. If you do not want to answer, that is fine. It is just a rhetorical question. I will not make it specific but I will ask in general. If men are able to choose, what would they choose. Having a 4.5 inch penis or having a 9 inch penis?
I want to be clear. I again understand your specifics here and I also do acknowledge it. Now, how about you also engage with this simple hypothetical? Nothing more and nothing less.
At no point have you deviated from your "big dick is magic" premise of that being the most important trait for the pinnacle of life experience of copulation.
Why would I deviate from it?
Just because I am incel does not mean I have to believe a hole's touch is the most important thing to being alive.
But you have to be honest here. It was at least somewhat important or at least important enough that you indulged in escorting. Again, I am not calling you out on it, I am just stating it. So, at the very least, you put some significance on it at least in the past.
That is why I earlier said it sounds like simping. "Please touch me goddess to make me whole." Pathetic.
Nobody said that but you.
Looks are the determining trait that defines inceldom, but that's not what you said.
I do not disagree with that. I never did. All of the sudden you are able to come to the conclusion when it is about looks but not when it is about other traits. Now you just acknowledge looks as it is.
You literally said verbatim that "having a big penis is a prerequisite" to being a sex haver
It is a prerequisite. I am also able to explain how and why that is. I made an IF THEN ELSE logic explaining it. I will briefly go over it. It is a simple IF-ELSE IF:
IF hasGoodLooks == true THEN
outcome = true
ELSE
IF hasBigPenis == true THEN
outcome = true
ELSE
outcome = false
END IF
END IF
Both work perfectly fine as it is.
It has a grounded basis.
@St3v3Cel also went over this.
so sounds exactly like a cuckold saying he could never satisfy any hole.
This is again something you came up with.
I never heard cuckolds say they lost their hotwife to a looksmaxxing model. The fantasy is always about dick.
That is not a fantasy. It is also not about that. And if you talk about the fantasy or you point out to it, then this is would be cucked and it is SPH. But again, this is something you came up with.
The dick insecurity comes from any multiple-male sex competition.
That is not an "insecurity". "Insecurities" do not exist.
It's completely irrelevant to possessing an exclusive hole, which is not possible in modern legal structure.
It does not follow that it is irrelevant.
For something that basically does not matter we are now at page 3. I have a question about that. If it does not matter to you or if this is nothing but a cope as you said and therefore you at least alluded to it that it does not matter, then why are you so engaged in it? What is your incentive here?
@St3v3Cel @deleted dude @MoroccanFarmer