i will not get closure so i forgive my enemies. you are forgiven and i love you for the sake of God.

[Deleted member 36516]

for my own mental health i must forgive people forgive that my words were taken out of context and just move on. I must realise that i have genuine mental health issues that need to be addressed before i destroy myself anyfurther. i will be mocked by those said people but i must ignore i must move on. i have to

 

[Rhaast]

Take your meds

 

[BrettyBoy]

Mental health is priority which is why I cutted contact with those that I feel are a burden on my mental health.

 

[Rhaast]

cut

Rare footage of native english speaker being corrected by a sandnigger.

 

[Mainländer]

Forgiving breaks a potentially infinite cycle of retaliations. Good job.

 

[Patches]

Take your meds

 

[fukurou]

do you forgive the foids for getting creampied by scum chadrone and breeding out new batches of criminals tho?

 

[Loner94]

Well that's nice of you.

 

[IncelKing]

Take your meds

 

[Richard Coper]

So shall it be

 

[Saint Kaczynski]

Rare footage of native english speaker being corrected by a sandnigger.

No. 'Cutted' is a variation of the word 'cut' in past tense. He's correct.

 

[JestER]

Cuck

 

[Rhaast]

No. 'Cutted' is a variation of the word 'cut' in past tense. He's correct.

To Cut in past tense is cut . Cutted sounds very wrong nd you are just coping

 

[Saint Kaczynski]

To Cut in past tense is cut .

There's also local variations across the Anglosphere. Literature proves this.

For example:
• Its and it's.
• Should have and should of.
• Whose and who's.

And so on.

Cutted sounds very wrong

Sounds wrong by today's standards. Not that it is inherently wrong.

nd you are just coping

Something is either true or not. It's true that 'cutted', although not so common, can be used as a variation of 'cut'. I remain correct.

 

[rcnfive]

never forgive those who have wronged you

 

[Cuckoja]

Who took your words out of context and why do you think youre mentally ill? Thinking this world is wrong doesnt mean youre crazy.

 

[Mainländer]

And assures your enemies you're a harmless cuck to be attacked with impunity.

Really, if people would react appriopriately, the scum of the world would be less brave. It's not even about revenge, but deterrence.

It's one thing to do something in the moment, like punching someone who's coming to stab you for instance.

It's another thing to keep harboring hatred and desire of vengeance for some injustice that happened long ago.

The correct position is doing what you need to do, even if it's killing someone (in the case of a psychopath trying to kill you and more people, for instance), in the moment but without yielding to hatred and let alone letting this hatred take control of you for months and years to come.

 

[Saint Kaczynski]

Uh? ''its'' refers to posession, ''it's'' refers to what something is.

Similar goes for whose and who's

It's called local variation, guys. And some part of our language was lost due to the major alterations which occurred a few centuries ago. Part of it can be found in ancient literature. I remember reading about it in Academia. Though, you are correct. By today's standards, those examples would be wrong. I'm aware, however, that variations existed and are a thing even nowadays, so naturally I oppose this Grammar Nazi behavior.

 

[Deleted member 34301]

Martyrdom is the only way

 

[Rhaast]

There's also local variations across the Anglosphere. Literature proves this.

For example:
• Its and it's.
• Should have and should of.
• Whose and who's.

And so on.


Sounds wrong by today's standards. Not that it is inherently wrong.


Something is either true or not. It's true that 'cutted', although not so common, can be used as a variation of 'cut'. I remain correct.

It literally takes 3 seconds to google it.

 

[trying to ascend]

It's called local variation, guys. And some part of our language was lost due to the major alterations which occurred a few centuries ago. Part of it can be found in ancient literature. I remember reading about it in Academia. Though, you are correct. By today's standards, those examples would be wrong. I'm aware, however, that variations existed and are a thing even nowadays, so naturally I oppose this Grammar Nazi behavior.

Indeed, I was just commenting because I've never saw any place where ''its'' and ''it's'' were used differently from how they are today and it was considered the norm. Though I can't say much about time

 

[Deleted member 36516]

And assures your enemies you're a harmless cuck to be attacked with impunity.

Really, if people would react appriopriately, the scum of the world would be less brave. It's not even about revenge, but deterrence.

yes but im ugly with a severe stutter- uni student and really skinny. im falling into the abyss. besides foids are in control and they hate ugly men so i must stay away