J
Just_another_cel
Recruit
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Posts
- 399
Found it on youtube. JFL at normies for not minding their own business.
Gotta be confident broView attachment 61734
Fucking hypocrites I hate them so goddamn much. You just gotta be confident and go out there but when you do you are a creep and a predator. Jocks, chads and whatever are abusing and calling girls hoes left and right and no one bats an eye. When one incel has the courage to ask people out without any threat or blackmail he’s a danger and leech
Gotta be confident bro
Gotta approach bro
Its a numbers game bro
>ok
LMAO THIS FUCKING CREEP ACTUALLY WENT AND DID IT
I hate everything so much
1. Went to a foid. Said hi.
She kept looking at her phone like it is her saviour from a wild butcher.
I added - what's up ? U fighting autism?
She didn't even look at me.
I left
She was a wall hitting roat.
Nice legs.
A typical whore and a typical reaction of her. She is dressed like a whore and you gave her validtion. This is what she likes and to ignore you was the climax for her. Despite all your effort, this has to stop.
yes, she was dressed well - probably going somewhere for friday night
He can barely speak english and doesn't know what he's talking about, he even admits he's not "familiar with incel lingo".Regarding the YT video:
I watched the first 1:15 and had to turn it off. He talked about the 22 approaches is a huge number, he hasn't approached so many girls in his entire life. "but I am not a pick up artist " - curry in denial
@op what will you do when you reach 1000, keep going? Will you change the lifefuel tag?
Keep it up
Reminder chad doesn't have to approach even 1.
High IQ but TL;DRMY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Mondo
High IQ but TL;DR
Brutaloh my bad. The TLDR is he is not improving at all and basically fucked for life.
I can appreciate the effort that went into this post.MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Very high IQ. However I do think that this needs to be trialled again by another incel (I may get round to doing it after the exam period is over) to control for variables (I.e. location). I am a bit more whitepilled about escaping inceldom
oh my bad. The TLDR is he is not improving at all and basically fucked for life.
Just like you said, he doesn't improve. He neither upgrades his appearance nor his mentality. If you just blindly approach a hundred girls the same way, you will get the same results a hundred times.
Quick debunk on moneymaxx and clothingmaxx:
Many incels fail to recognize the dichotomy of the female reproductive strategy. The trifecta referred to as Looks, Money, and Status (LMS) can actually be split into two parts based on female desire: female desire for an attractive, high genetic quality male and a desire to acquire resources (in the modern age: money) necessary for survival. Looks is defined very easily as one's facial symmetry, muscle content, indicators of high testosterone, and the like. I won't be talking about looks today. Money and Status on the other hand represent female drive for resources.
Status is actually a misnomer, in my opinion. I think status is just a means to demonstrate that you have a lot of money to a female. Think about it: when have you ever seen a "high status" man in a profession which doesn't make a lot of money. High status garbage collectors, factory workers, and others? Nah, I don't think so
The problem with acquiring wealth is that women don't love you for you, they love you for your money, and current divorce laws and false rape accusation laws ensure that she will be leaving you and taking half your wealth. This is why divorce rates are so high, this is why cuckoldry is on the rise, and why women are horrible to their husbands and common law husbands (think LTR).
TL;DR moneymaxxing would work but it would probably be even worse than Inceldom (see MGTOW), better incel than cuck.
We have literally no options except to reform marriage laws.
Top tier post, very articulate.MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Status is actually a misnomer, in my opinion. I think status is just a means to demonstrate that you have a lot of money to a female. Think about it: when have you ever seen a "high status" man in a profession which doesn't make a lot of money. High status garbage collectors, factory workers, and others? Nah, I don't think so
I recon I will do baseline (Dietmax as that is what I do normally) for 100 approaches and then do 100 approaches with each variable tested at a time (meditationmaxxing, no fap, different theories). Recording will be done for data analysis.I will likely try this as well in asia. If you are up for it, you might want to consider testing more theories that uninstall didn't test. Such as keeping a clean diet + meditation + nofap + reading and testing pickup theories + combined with mass approach, or something different.
Why should men always be expected to improve with the bar raised higher & higher while foids ain't gotta do shit & can even backpedal 'cos her body her choice. They get fatter & more bitchy with boundless entitlement, screw that. Fuck giving them validation, it just accelerates the cycle, these fucking white knight soyboy cucks are a major factor to this with their orbiting bullshit.Good post, man. Also, improving is an important factor of approaching. It doesn't seem to me that he's applying whatever newly-formed skills he has gotten; such as knowing when to approach, who to approach, et cetera. Trial and error is necessary, as long as there is a balance and an aim of improving one's self. At this rate, uninstall is merely just erroring his way through this experiment.
It's so weird that 105 seems like a small number now. 99% of men have not put in the effort you have @uninstall. "hard work hardly works"105 to go
It would be epic tbh, If someone deserves that, is is our boi uninstallIt's so weird that 105 seems like a small number now. 99% of men have not put in the effort you have @uninstall. "hard work hardly works"
Wouldn't it be funny if girl #1,000 was the only one who agreed to have sex with you? What could we learn from that? Haha...
little did those bitches know they were talking to an incel celebrityI did something really weird
I overheard a ROASTIE making fun if some guy who tried to kiss her.
She was talking to three guys and another roastie.
I felt like they were mocking him.
I asked them why are they talking behind the back of someone.
Because l felt bad for that dude.
One of the faggots told me that they were making fun of her or some shit.
I said - it felt like you were mocking him and ride away.
This was alpha and beta move at the same time.
MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Link for youtube video?
Nice analysis, but what you are forgetting is mental connectivity and authentic interaction game. I wouldn't count it under PUA.MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Excellent post and a fine analysis befitting of the effort uninstall has put into this.MY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Reading his approach logs, it is not uncommon for him to approach girls below 5/10. He is effectively putting the "lower your standards" theory to the test. The result? Well, clearly the majority of the time they're not receptive.what made u believe i approach super attractive girls
i approach 5/10 who are not fat most of the time
i don't think i have approached a 7 or above more than 1-2 times
Make this the last comment and close thread tbh @Ryo_Hazuki @knajjd @SergeantIncelMY ANALYSIS OF UNINSTALL'S APPROACHES
This thread is the reason I joined, so I take this very seriously.
Uninstall’s approaches are testing the following hypothesis:
Here is a sample of hypothesize that uninstall's approaches are not testing. (in regards to their applicability towards daygame):
- Just be Tall
- Just approach
- Massive amounts of experience and you will auto calibrate (what is taught in RSD and most pickup teachers)
- It’s a numbers game
- Just be confident/low inhibition (This is one of variables uninstall has been optimizing for)
- VoiceMax (This is another stated variable uninstall has been optimizing for)
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
- Looksmax (uninstall eats unhealthy food regularly and lifts weights less than 8 hours week)
- Cultivating loving kindness (Uninstall does NOT do this, possible the opposite)
- Read and test pickup theories and tactics.
- Clothing Max
- Money-Max
- Plowing (uninstall gives up when he encounters resistance)
- Meditate/Nofap(Unsure if he is doing these things)
- Journaling for the purpose of hypothesizing possible strategies to try, and why he failed (he does some of this but not a huge amount)
- Filming and/or audio recording approaches to analyze them frame by frame when in a clearer state of mind
Now, let’s examine the hypothesis that Uninstall’s approaches do test:
We can clearly see that the following in-combination are still insufficient for some, in getting girls: VoiceMax, InhibitionMax, JustBeTall, Mass-Approach.
Now, for the analysis of the red pill belief that I have been most interested in, is his skill with women improving? To do this, we need to come up with a proxy metric for sex/love, since he hasn’t come any where even close to either of those things. Initially, I thought phone-numbers or facebooks would suffice for this, but he hasn’t gotten enough of these to draw any statistically significant conclusions.
For the metric of “improvement” rate I have chosen conversations that last more than five lines. I believed, that if I could measure his rate of improvement, and approximate the future number of hoops he would have to learn/get good at before getting to sex/love, I could approximate how long it would take him to have a chance at getting a girlfriend. I suspected possible, this would take hundreds or thousands of years… but I was wrong…
As you can see from the graph bellow I have plotted the total number of conversations Uninstall has been able to get in, per day of approach over his entire approach period. Do to fuzzy reporting some numbers are estimates but overall it is accurate data.
View attachment 62397
As you can see… there is no upward trend, and no trend at all. That one spike to 7 in one day, is a mixture of luck and uninstall doing 7x more approaches than normal. Uninstall is NOT improving at all. Therefore it is reasonable to assume he will never get a girlfriend, even if he became immortal and approached millions or billions of women over many centuries.
Now, the mass approach theory is a little different than the mass approach and improve theory. The mass approach theory recognizes that there is some variability to women’s emotions and preferences and banks on the idea that you will eventually find one that is attracted to you.
While this is true, it fails to recognize what women are at a fundamental level. Women are carbon based machines which are mass produced by DNA, which has been optimized for it’s own ability to mass produce. As of 2015, the typical difference between the genomes of two individuals was estimated at 20 million base pairs (or 0.6% of the total of 3.2 billion base pairs). In otherwords, these machines have less than one percent variability.
For example, while skin picking is a disorder experienced by 2% of the population, there are no humans that will rip off all of their skin until they die, as that would be too counter towards the goals of DNA. Similarly mating and/or pair-bonding with a sub-chad lite in modern society is a similar death sentence to the females DNA, especially when you add the risk that he may mate guard her and not allow her access to future Chads or she could die in child birth (evolutionary conditions which shaped human female preferences).
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test ever possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
The self-less, self destructive mass approaching committed by Uninstall will likely go down in history as significant scientific experiment, amongst many others that prove inceldom. Or more specifically, that when females of the human species are allowed to choose their mates, they will not choose mates of sub optimal genetic quality (subtle evolutionary mutations, that failed to produce the optimal specimen (aka Chad)). This fact has been heavily researched and proven in all other mammalian species but due to gender politics is generally avoided by scientists studying humans.
Let's destroy the west by asking Kim to nuke us.Why should men always be expected to improve with the bar raised higher & higher while foids ain't gotta do shit & can even backpedal 'cos her body her choice. They get fatter & more bitchy with boundless entitlement, screw that. Fuck giving them validation, it just accelerates the cycle, these fucking white knight soyboy cucks are a major factor to this with their orbiting bullshit.
This will only fix itself with either sex bots, Islamic invasion or removal of women's rights back to pre vote era.
Send him some cupcakes.Let's destroy the west by asking Kim to nuke us.
Excellent post and a fine analysis befitting of the effort uninstall has put into this.
Another factor worth considering is the quality of women being approached. Uninstall gives us an insight into this earlier in the thread:
Reading his approach logs, it is not uncommon for him to approach girls below 5/10. He is effectively putting the "lower your standards" theory to the test. The result? Well, clearly the majority of the time they're not receptive.
My experiences are similar. I've approached stunning girls far above my league who have been receptive and bang average middle-of-the-road girls who have rejected me straight away. I don't have anything close to the volume of approaches uninstall has under his belt, so it's interesting to see his results based on a much larger data set.
It would appear "just lower your standards bro!" is a meme.
Uninstall will not test the above theories because of his highly calicified blackpill beliefs. He does not believe there is even the slightest chance that any of them are true, therefore he will not test them.
What about the hypothesis that are not tested by Uninstall? No one incel can test every possible method for escaping inceldom, there simply is not enough time in a single life time. However, many of these other theories have been tested and debunked by other incels who are still incels. However, to my knowledge not all of these, and not all escaping inceldom theories have been publicly tested. Likely many who have tested inceldom escape theories have commit suicide before posting their results, or escape inceldom and therefore do not post their results.
That's gay.Send him some cupcakes.
Yeah but if you shit in the batter he might get mad enough to launch some nukes.That's gay.
Approaches 12/11/2018
1. Do we know each other...
Lmfao foids are soooo predictable.
The same shit from some wall hitting 5.
2. Ignore from a headphone foid with enough kJ to power a car.
3. Approached a duo of wall hitters.
Once l got closer and opened them they stopped talking and bounced.
4. Approached a make up maxxed 7
Holy shit banging
Guess what she said?
Do we know each other?
Convo:
Hi. What's up?
Do we know each other?
You look kinda sympathetic. (I completely doged the question). Are you?
(She is flattered. She keeps smiling)
But we do not know each other...
Everyone you know today was once a stranger...
I am in a hurry. Try stopping someone else
No you are not...
Bye...
IF I WERE CHAD WOULF YOU BE IN A HURTY HOLE?
Would it.matter that we do not know each other?
5. What's up?
Nothing (hiding her face with her hand)
6. Ignore with a smile
7. My front light got in her face. She hated it.
I approached nevertheless. She didn't even look at me.
8. Ignore with a run at an intersection.
9. Approached a foid on a phone. She smiled-ignored me.
10. Opened some ltalian bitch. She was mega receptive but told me that she has found the love of her life - the son of the ambassador of Brazil in my country and is moving there soon
jfl.
11. Ignore from some bitch with busty tits.
12.long talk with a bitch but right when l was about to ask for number her bus came and she ran
Lmfao
That effort all in vain.
93 to go
Approaches 12/11/2018
1. Do we know each other...
Lmfao foids are soooo predictable.
The same shit from some wall hitting 5.
2. Ignore from a headphone foid with enough kJ to power a car.
3. Approached a duo of wall hitters.
Once l got closer and opened them they stopped talking and bounced.
4. Approached a make up maxxed 7
Holy shit banging
Guess what she said?
Do we know each other?
Convo:
Hi. What's up?
Do we know each other?
You look kinda sympathetic. (I completely doged the question). Are you?
(She is flattered. She keeps smiling)
But we do not know each other...
Everyone you know today was once a stranger...
I am in a hurry. Try stopping someone else
No you are not...
Bye...
IF I WERE CHAD WOULF YOU BE IN A HURTY HOLE?
Would it.matter that we do not know each other?
5. What's up?
Nothing (hiding her face with her hand)
6. Ignore with a smile
7. My front light got in her face. She hated it.
I approached nevertheless. She didn't even look at me.
8. Ignore with a run at an intersection.
9. Approached a foid on a phone. She smiled-ignored me.
10. Opened some ltalian bitch. She was mega receptive but told me that she has found the love of her life - the son of the ambassador of Brazil in my country and is moving there soon
jfl.
11. Ignore from some bitch with busty tits.
12.long talk with a bitch but right when l was about to ask for number her bus came and she ran
Lmfao
That effort all in vain.
93 to go
I like how your inhibition not only lowered, became non existent but is now actually going into the negatives like a cheat engine guru. This can get you far in other areas. Incelman, the hero we received that foids could not deceive.
Use it for some sort of YouTube channel but not on YouTube as that place is cucked or a motivational speaker job?i was actually thinking of ways to put this low inhibition to some other use that will help me
honestly, the only pleasure I am getting out of this is the joy of trolling the fuck out of them
looking them in the eyes - confused
seeing their reaction
seeing those bitches get uncomfortable
while i just stay there like it is another day in the office
maybe because it is