Each of us can think what we want about whether it's realistic that someone has been making AI-pornos of their partner for over 10 years.
But this thread is not about that, but about the reaction of the normies and what they are considering doing about it.
First, the reaction: a clear and unquestionable stance in favor of the alleged victim. Where have we seen this before, when it came to trusting foids unconditionally with their stories?
Exactly, #MeToo
However, this time it is somewhat different than a few years ago, as now the entire collective is being attacked and not just the individual.
Okay, now for the reaction. Can the Normie imagine that under German law there's no real anonymity because platforms are forced to disclose users' IP addresses if there's suspicion of criminal activity? No? I thought so. But then why is there a outcry for mandatory real names in Germany? Well, it's less about crime. More about the control of information and who can control it.
As explained above, the domain owner must keep the IP address of the users in case of suspicion. But what if a necessity is created that requires one's name in order to access the internet in the first place? This would then no longer follow the normal process because one would then have a history of the German user on a database. All interactions, all website visits, even the smallest movements are visible.
So what is the goal? I would argue a test run to see if it's possible to push something like this through without the person in charge losing their head, and then a Europe-wide test that makes the UK look less like a dictatorial regime.
It's funny how quickly things can escalate when you think about them for just a little while. I wish the Nomrie could do that.
But this thread is not about that, but about the reaction of the normies and what they are considering doing about it.
First, the reaction: a clear and unquestionable stance in favor of the alleged victim. Where have we seen this before, when it came to trusting foids unconditionally with their stories?
Exactly, #MeToo
However, this time it is somewhat different than a few years ago, as now the entire collective is being attacked and not just the individual.
Okay, now for the reaction. Can the Normie imagine that under German law there's no real anonymity because platforms are forced to disclose users' IP addresses if there's suspicion of criminal activity? No? I thought so. But then why is there a outcry for mandatory real names in Germany? Well, it's less about crime. More about the control of information and who can control it.
As explained above, the domain owner must keep the IP address of the users in case of suspicion. But what if a necessity is created that requires one's name in order to access the internet in the first place? This would then no longer follow the normal process because one would then have a history of the German user on a database. All interactions, all website visits, even the smallest movements are visible.
So what is the goal? I would argue a test run to see if it's possible to push something like this through without the person in charge losing their head, and then a Europe-wide test that makes the UK look less like a dictatorial regime.
It's funny how quickly things can escalate when you think about them for just a little while. I wish the Nomrie could do that.
Last edited:
