I read Schpenhaur's on women for the first time today.

[TruecelVariant]

I dont usually prescribe myself to the dogma of old philosophy unless it pertains to the evolution of scientific (natural sciences) thought or mathematics. A lot of the greek fags and german/french fags are progenators of the modern philosophical bankruptcy. So I usually avoid it and chose schools of philosophical thought that are more modern, i.e. objectivism.
I fucking laughed my ass off, some of it resounds true of modern dilemma though I disdain the belligerency which, by the grace of hindsight, doesnt hold true if such sentiments were to be argued in modern day. What are your guys thoughts on this work and does anyone know of a more modern treatise that covers similar ground but doesnt have crude social darwinism and archaice beliefs that neglect the nuances and complexity of humans/individuals?

 

[Kshatriya]

He was based
Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle's_views_on_women

 

[BenBerger]

I dont usually prescribe myself to the dogma of old philosophy unless it pertains to the evolution of scientific (natural sciences) thought or mathematics. A lot of the greek fags and german/french fags are progenators of the modern philosophical bankruptcy. So I usually avoid it and chose schools of philosophical thought that are more modern, i.e. objectivism.
I fucking laughed my ass off, some of it resounds true of modern dilemma though I disdain the belligerency which, by the grace of hindsight, doesnt hold true if such sentiments were to be argued in modern day. What are your guys thoughts on this work and does anyone know of a more modern treatise that covers similar ground but doesnt have crude social darwinism and archaice beliefs that neglect the nuances and complexity of humans/individuals?

I did not read Schpenhaur's works but i read about his view on women and other ideas. He is based indeed.
I read (and I totally admire) Otto Weininger who was heavily inspired by Schopenhauer. Weininger is basically Schopenhauer+Kant multiplied by inceldom.
I would even say that Weininger's book Sex and Character (1903) basically builds and develops Schopenhauer's ideas.
In Weiniger's view the "Woman" (that is "Womanness" or femininity) is a principle of amorality and sexuality. He also presents interesting ideas on race (jews vs aryans), the genius, morality, etc... but every this in the context of sex.

Plus Weininger was a certified jewish incel who lived among Germanic chads. As a result, he roped aged 23.

What is your view of objectivism?

 

[TruecelVariant]

I did not read Schpenhaur's works but i read about his view on women and other ideas. He is based indeed.
I read (and I totally admire) Otto Weininger who was heavily inspired by Schopenhauer. Weininger is basically Schopenhauer+Kant multiplied by inceldom.
I would even say that Weininger's book Sex and Character (1903) basically builds and develops Schopenhauer's ideas.
In Weiniger's view the "Woman" (that is "Womanness" or femininity) is a principle of amorality and sexuality. He also presents interesting ideas on race (jews vs aryans), the genius, morality, etc... but every this in the context of sex.

Plus Weininger was a certified jewish incel who lived among Germanic chads. As a result, he roped aged 23.

What is your view of objectivism?

Objectivism is the most rational epistemological basis to view the world and man's relation to it. With the mysticism and fallacious views on the operations of the mind and its growth exorcised, its doesn't fall into the fallacies associated with most philosophies, i.e. collective-consciousness, negation of the mind, spirituality etc. The extensions of logic doesn't leave man subordinate to the forces of nature, society, or other environmental factors, but instead continues the thought of man as an individual in all these contexts. The usage of relational logic similar to that found in mathematics makes the logic and philosophy more robust and less subjected to the whims of man's shortcomings. Certainly it's has more knowledge of reality injected into the makeup of the philosophy. What ,akes it greater in my opinion, is when extended to realms of ethics, society, and groups, it allows more accurate assesment and analysis especially given that group's and society's fundamental unit is the individual. An analogue can be trying to model a molecule and its interactions requires understanding how atoms work. Sure it was made by a foid, but that in itself isn't enough to discredit it.

I just notice there has not really been newer treatises on the permeating culture of women that causes them to sacrifice man on the altar of society and step on the subhumans.

 

[Caesercel]

. So I usually avoid it and chose schools of philosophical thought that are more modern, i.e. objectivism.

 

[Pikacel]

View attachment 1652751

I didn’t read (((Rand))) yet still ended up emotionally stunted, socially crippled and obsessed with imaginary individualist chad characters.

What do

 

[Caesercel]

I didn’t read (((Rand))) yet still ended up emotionally stunted, socially crippled and obsessed with imaginary individualist chad characters.

What do

Become a libertarian so I can have something to laugh at

 

[TruecelVariant]

Become a libertarian so I can have something to laugh at

From my reading and the analysis of current libertarian leadership and thought, a more pure form of objectivism would be anti-thetical to libertarians. The had foid jo jorgenson for 2020 who ran on pro-BLM narrative and other moderate bs. In Ayn Rand's "Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology" and in "Capitalism the unknown Ideal" she explicitly rejects those moderates as non-radicals who have done more harm to capitalism and individualism than the statists. Of course most people see Atlas shrugged and think that is the totality of Objecivist philosophy, or listen to statist commie propaganda about its evils. Much like like how the commies slandered fascism and national socialism into on ideology and further slandered it into a capitalist ideology rather than what it is, a variant of socialism.

 

[Caichan]

I read that a while ago, never agreed more with someone

 

[Rapemaxxer]

objectivism is retarded

 

[Rapemaxxer]

View attachment 1652751