IQ is fake and gay and gooks are all underachievers in the real world. You haven't had a single original thought in your entire life.
Mathematically illiterate?
Never heard of biovariate normal distribution nor Bayes' Theorem?
1. IQ and creativity are imperfectly correlated
Since most IQ tests do not measure creativity directly, and rely on mass testing of general problems that can meaningfully measure intelligence for a wide swath of the populace, which requires generic problems that have been normed in a representative sample, not novel problems that very few people can solve. Ergo, IQ and creativity are imperfectly correlated
2. High IQ East Asians are relatively less creative than whites possessing similar IQ
Since East Asians load higher and lower on IQ and creativity respectively relative to whites, a 150 IQ East Asian is, statistically speaking, likely less creative than an equally high 150 IQ White
3. 150 IQ isn't exceptionally high
150 IQ is about 1 in 2000 rarity, which is quite common, and not the unicorns that you'll never see IRL like gigachads or 170 IQ supergeniuses that are one-in-a-million in rarity.
As for being a deluded IQ coper, I scored approx. +3.3 standard deviations above the mean on a nonverbal IQ test I took at the age of 10, which Jensen states is the point where IQ stabilizes, AND I scored 99 on the ASVAB with an Army GT score of 144, which has either a standard deviation of 15 or 16. Assuming that the Naglieri and the ASVAB have a correlation of around 0.5 to 0.6, that would imply my composite IQ score is slightly above 150 IQ SD 15
Previous post: https://incels.is/threads/should-i-make-a-post-calculating-my-composite-iq-score-based-on-childhood-iq-afqt-score-and-army-navy-gt-score.690949/ So let's look at the psychometric data first: Childhood IQ: 152 on the Naglieri at age 10 (test ceiling of 160 with an SD of 16)...
incels.is
4. Creativity is overrated
To quote Quentin Tarantino, “I steal from every single movie ever made. I love it—if my work has anything it’s that I’m taking this from this and that from that and mixing them together….I steal from everything. Great artists steal, they don’t do homages.”
To quote Kurt Vonnegut, "I cheerfully ripped off the plot of
Brave New World, whose plot had been cheerfully ripped off from Yevgeny Zamyatin's
We"
The Playboy Interview - July 1973: A candid conversation with the famous writer Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
web.archive.org
As for personal accomplishments, I'm a 20 year old male with little to no motivation, and since the correlation with IQ and academic achievement is merely 0.5 (25% of the variance explained by IQ), with the other 75% explained by academic TIE and work ethic, the average 150 IQ person would regress to the mean on real world measures of success due to the imperfect correlation. Which is perfectly explained by bivariate normal distribution. To quote Pumpkin person, "Everyone knows that a super failure can have a super high IQ, but so many deny that a super achiever can have a super low IQ. But the correlation between IQ and achievement is only meaningful if you believe in the bivariate normal distribution which means that for every high IQ person who is low on achievement, there must be a high achievement person who is low in IQ."
Since my work ethic is virtually non-existent (I am the laziest person I know) AND my intellectual interests are at complete odds with my curriculum, I would drastically underperform relative to even other 150 IQ persons, regressing precipitously towards the mean.
As for critical thinking, insights, perspectives, and intuition, I don't agree with everything I read obviously, and I do have some insights.
For instance, I disagree with Pumpkinperson's conclusion that Oprah's cranial capacity is 6 to 7 standard deviations above the mean of a black female, since the study she cited in support of that was normed to Army enlistees, which is an unrepresentative sample of Americans since the low AND high IQ are likely excluded (low IQ due to Department of Defense Requirements and high IQ due to better opportunities on average), which depresses the variation of IQ, and thus of cranial capacity, which is correlated 0.4 with IQ
While I am an offensive realist who worships Mearsheimer, I also think he overstates the power of nationalism and tends to be overemphasize the fragility of multinational empires like Austria Hungary and the USSR, referring to them as exceptionally weak powers undone by nationalism (only after defeat on the battle field or economic collapse respectively), while neglecting the fact that novel surveillance technologies, political atomization under a ruthless regime, and higher levels of economic modernization help mitigate if not completely suppress popular discontent caused by an occupying regime (if they are ruthless enough)
A few disgruntled college kids, liberals, and antisemites won't be able to enact any meaningful policy change whatsoever due to the collective action problem (only when mass participation in protests hits a certain critical mass will the incentives to participate override individual self interest)
The collective action problem is brilliantly elucidated by Peter Liberman in his magnum opus Does Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies
Since the genocide in Gaza has virtually no effect on the day to day lives of upper middle class college liberals + the risk of arrest outweighs the minute contribution of a single human being to the collective goal (ie, stop the Genocide), nothing will happen
I disagree with Kevin McDonald's main thesis that without Jews, America would have remained a 1950s whiteocracy, as even without the subversive influence of Jewish civil rights activists and academics, the founding ideals of America, when fully realized, would have eventually lead to further political and socioeconomic liberalization sooner or later
Unfortunately, due to the lack of a feudalistic, agrarian past tradition that served as the intellectual cornerstone for a genuine fascist or communist movement in Europe, America's right wing intelligentsia never experienced a Counter Enlightenment, which put emphasis on authority and a return to tradition.
As it started out as a frontier state, there was no Ancien Regime, no State Church, no landed aristocracy, and no serfs (not tied down to land by oppressive landowners: can always freely migrate westwards and claim land, unless you're an enslaved niggER lol), which meant America was an overwhelmingly egalitarian state from its conception ie, a liberal state (overemphasis on le property rights and muh individualism) with no strong institutional foundation for the emergence of a genuine conservative movement (f*scism).
soi distant American Conservatives are liberals in all but name, espousing the same rights for everyone with the exception of faggots (for now).
Even pre-civil war Southern Conservatives from slave states advocated for property rights and individualism, just not for niggERs (herein lies the fatal flaw/contradiction of the American "Conservative" tradition, if the basis of your philosophy is equal rights for everyone but certain groups of people, taking it to its rational conclusion would mean giving equal rights to oppressed peoples as well, hence why American "Conservatives" are always merely a generation or two behind American Libs on social issues)
Also, quick side note, a bonafide, fascist mass movement, is also unviable in Europe post WW2 since most of its historical traditions and strong state institutions conducive to revolutionary movements were systematically dismantled by the allies + the demonization of fascism by western elites + lack of any major devastating wars/economic depressions that can serve as a catalyst for revolution due to the presence of the American security umbrella (NATO), which the BRILLIANT
Professor Mearsheimer notes keeps the European nations in line
View attachment 1414934
The face of the greatest social scientist alive
I also disagree with Luis Hartz about the unviability of fascism in America, and, by extension, modern Europe, as while a popular mass movement would be unviable, a coupe similar to the 1930s business plot is feasible under horrific economic conditions plus fascism is not as ideologically rigid as communism
Of course, that is not to say a conspiracy organized by a small coalition of alienated political elites with covert backing from the army and certain financiers can't succeed in enacting a coupe against the ruling regime in America (since Europe is essentially a loose alliance that would collapse without American security guarantees, a fascist coupe will not be viable there)
After all, just because a mass movement with intellectual backing is unviable in today's age, doesn't mean a top down coupe planned by a handful of elites is completely out of the question...
A redux of a certain
Business Plot perhaps
en.m.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot TLDR: Some of the richest businessmen and bankers in the country plotted to overthrow FDR and install retired General Smedley Butler as fascist dictator of the USA, but Smedley, being a cuck, ratted them all out to Congress. But but buh m- muh...
incels.is
We already debated this Darth
If you read the obscure masterpiece Does Conquest Pay? The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies, you'll know that as long as you have a monopoly on violence (complete loyalty of a unified and ruthless army willing to torture and kill domestic dissidents and their associates whether guilty or suspect), there is no possibility of a successful revolt even if the vast majority of the populace resent said ruthless regime
To quote verbatim from the book, Studies of modern authoritarian regimes report that "no transition can be forced purely by opponents against a regime which maintains the cohesion, capacity, and disposition to apply repression"
Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies
After a coupe, one can exploit preexisting racial tensions in Jewmerica to divide and rule through the expeditious creation of a multiracial paramilitary force (racial tensions between violent thugs, whether white, black, hispanic, or asian, will override their cherishment of enshrined rights since most primarily value rights and freedom of speech when only their rights are threatened, but that is a non-issue since their ruthless acts will be rewarded)
Just like Stalin exploited the historical emnity between Jews and Poles during the Great Purge (Deploying ethnically Jewish secret policemen to investigate and purge ethnically Polish party members near the borderlands),
Just like Austria Hungary deployed Slavic, Hungarian, and Romanian troops outside of their respective territorial homelands to the other side of the country to circumvent any possibility of an ethnic revolt
In a hypothetical fascist America, one can deploy freshly recruited, racist white paramilitary troops to brutalize black ghetto communities; black secret policemen recruited from urban shitholes like Detroit to brutalize suburban white communities that are overwhelmingly liberal and Hispanic majority regions since Blacks and Hispanics also have deep racial enmity
This strategy of divide and rule will certainly make it harder for dissidents to overcome the collective action problem and resist the newly established, top down fascist regime
P.S.
Sorry for the late reply, my roommate told me I had to help him clean up our living space with him
I would go more indepth, but I'm too lazy to waste effort on a jealous sub 135 IQ Retardcel + I am overdue on autistic map painting on Azgaar's Fantasy Map
